Home Blog Page 622

MKA UK organises Waqf-e-Nau trip to Palestine

0

Musharaf Ahmed

Muavin Sadr, MKA UK

photo5807511004077207923

After a successful trip to Spain in October 2018, Hazrat Khalifatul Masih Vaa guided the department of Waqf-e-Nau in Majlis Khuddam-ul-Ahmadiyya UK to organise a trip for Waqifeen-e-Nau to Kababir.

The main purpose of this trip is to further build a strong relationship amongst the Waqifeen-e-Nau and make them realise the importance of the Waqf-e-Nau scheme. Furthermore, we wish for the Waqifeen-e-Nau to acquire knowledge by visiting historical and archaeological places in Palestine such as the birthplace of Prophet Jesusas, the Tomb of Prophet Abrahamas and Prophet Isaacas, Baitul Maqdas, Masjid Aqsa etc.

Our stay will be at the Mahmood Mosque, Kababir which is the headquarters of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community in the Middle East.

With the approval of Huzooraa this trip is being organised from 8-14 June and 40 Waqf-e-Nau Khuddam from various parts of the UK will partake in this historic and memorable trip.

Insha-Allah, a detailed report will be presented after the trip. Readers of Al Hakam are requested to pray for the success of this trip.

AMJ New Zealand hosts Iftari Experience

0

Mubarak Khan

New Zealand Correspondent

Presentation by Murabi Mustansar

The Ahmadiyya Muslim Jamaat in New Zealand hosted its annual Iftari Experience on Saturday, 18 May at the Baitul Muqeet complex in Auckland, during the holy month of Ramadan. The event saw over 90 guests from all walks of life attend.

The formal session began with the recitation of the Holy Quran followed by the welcome address from the National President, Bashir Ahmad Khan Sahib. Visitors then had the opportunity to learn more about the Islamic institution of fasting through a presentation delivered by Mustenser Qamar Sahib. As part of the presentation, Imam Qamar explained that the primary objective of fasting was “to leave physical nourishment and focus on spiritual nourishment and developing a stronger relationship with our Creator.” He further explained that during this month Muslims increase their acts of charity and endeavour to help those less well off.

The Chief Executive of the Auckland City Mission and friend of the community, Chris Farrelly was among the notable guests in attendance and shared some thoughts with guests. He said that he was highly moved with the charity work the Jamaat does in and outside New Zealand. He was pleased to see a large group of people from all walks of the society gattered in the hall for the Iftari Experience.

rsz iftari experience guests

After the breaking of the fast with dates, fruit and refreshments, visitors were welcomed into the prayer halls where they observed members offering Maghrib prayer. Following this, Imam Qamar gave a brief introduction to the features of the mosque and the philosophy behind the Islamic prayer and the reasons for different postures. Thereafter, members of the public asked questions on different aspects of the Islamic teachings before proceeding to the Monir hall for dinner.

Several guests took away free books and literature including the Kuranu Tapu (the Te Reo Maori translation of the Holy Quran) to help them better understand the religion of Islam.

Many guest had chats with the Jamaat members to learn about the Jamaat and its Islamic beliefs. One of the lady guests had a very interesting discussion with me. She was interested to know why Jesusas had to travel to India if he had survived from the cross. I told her about the Promised Messiahas and his book, Jesus in India. She said that she was a history graduate and would love to read this book.

Another guest was explained about the obligatory prayers and how working Muslims managed to pray.

Many of the guests had their first experience of attending any Muslim function and especially visiting a mosque.

Guests were very grateful for the invitation to the event and praised the efforts of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community for not only opening their doors to the public but also in being at the forefront of clarifying commonly held misunderstandings about Islam and for helping build bridges of love and lasting friendship. Some even expressed interest in attempting the fast in the future.

The Big Iftar 2019

0

Hosted by the UK Tabligh Department UK on 15 and 25 May 2019

Muhammad Ibrahim Ikhlaf

UK Tabligh Secretary

WhatsApp Image 2019 05 26 at 12.57.16

By the grace of Allah, two Big Iftars for Ramadan 2019 were organised by the National Tabligh Department. The first one got off to a great start on Wednesday, 15 May, while the second one was attended by a huge number of guests on Saturday, 25 May. 

Alhamdolillah, both events were enormously successful and guests attended in record breaking numbers. Over 205 guests attended the first iftar (despite it being a mid-week event) while over 400 guests attended the second one. In total, over 605 guests attended this year’s events compared to 385 for last year. This represents an increase of 57%. This substantial and dramatic increase reflects a more systematic approach to attracting guests.

Based on the feedback received from guests, the overwhelming reaction was that they learnt a great deal about Islam, Ahmadiyyat and Ramadan, and very much enjoyed the event. As in previous years, the purpose of the event was to provide an opportunity for the guests, coming from all walks of life, to experience at first hand an Islamic religious event and thereby to increase their understanding of Islam and what it actually stands for.

Planning

An organising committee under the chairmanship of Ibrahim Ikhlaf Sahib, the National Secretary Tabligh UK and assisted by Nadim Vanderman Sahib and Danayal Zia Sahib was formed. A number of team heads were appointed and each was given responsibilities for the event. The committee met weekly to organise the event. At the Jamaat level, meetings with local presidents and local tabligh secretaries were held and they were requested to spread the word among their members, and to invite tabligh contacts, neighbours, friends, work colleagues, teachers, etc. A flyer for the event was produced and was widely circulated to all Jamaats. A separate team was formed to invite guests such as religious and community leaders, academics, charity workers, teachers etc.

Media

A promotional video was made and distributed widely. Good use of social media was made on various platforms such as Facebook, Twitter, Instagram and NextDoor with success. A press release was produced and issued to local newspapers. Surrey Comet published this before the event. After the first iftar, a further press release was issued and as a result of this, prominent articles with photos were published by Surrey Comet and Wimbledon Times. As a result of this and other efforts mentioned above, there was significant increase in attendance.  Alhamdolillah!

Programme

The format for both events were similar and followed the established pattern of registration, guided tours of the mosque, visits to the exhibition areas and light refreshments.

Big Iftar 25 May 17

The second Big Iftar on 25 May 2019 commenced under the chairmanship of Mansoor Shah Sahib, Naib Amir UK. Alongside him was Muhammad Ibrahim Ikhlaf Sahib, National Secretary Tabligh UK. In addition, at the head table were the Mayor of Merton Councillor Janice Howard, MP for Mitcham and Merton Siobhain McDonagh and Leader of Merton Council Stephen Alambritis and members of the UK amila.  

Tilawat was recited by Bilal Mahmood Sahib and its English translation was read by Danesh Sheikh Sahib. The welcome address and introductory remarks were given by Nadim Vanderman Sahib. This was followed by an Introduction to the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community by Naseem Bajwa Sahib, Imam of the Baitul Futuh Mosque. He said that the Jamaat was founded in a small town in India and has now spread to most countries of the world.

Tahir Nasser Sahib spoke eloquently on Ramadan. He explained its purpose and removed many misconceptions. Siobhain McDonald spoke briefly on the warm and inclusive nature of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community. Many guests asked questions during the question  and answer session and these were responded to by the panel.

Big Iftar 25 May 4

The vote of thanks was given by the mayor of Merton. Mansoor Shah Sahib gave the concluding remarks and ended the formal session with a silent prayer. Maghrib Azan was given by Bilal Mahmood Sahib. The guests joined in with the breaking of the fast and many went to observe the Maghrib prayer. Many lively discussions took place over dinner which was served afterwards.

Pakistani TV channels Geo and Aaj and the Arabic TV channel Al Hurra were present and recorded the event for later transmission.

Big Iftar 25 May 2

Guests were greatly interested in the literature and many took the following books: The Holy Quran, The Philosophy of the Teachings of Islam, Life of Muhammad, World Crisis and the Pathway to Peace, Islam’s Response to Contemporary Issues, Invitation to Ahmadiyyat etc. 

After the event, Ibrahim Ikhlaf Sahib said, ‘The Big Iftar helps us to challenge misconceptions about Islam. The feedback from the event was overwhelmingly positive and it was successful in clarifying aspects of Islamic belief which are often misunderstood.

Comments were received in answer to questions, such as:

What did you like about the events?

  • “The tour was fantastic and I really enjoyed learning more about the Muslim religion”
  • “I got to know more about Islam and meet people from the Muslim community”
  • “Great people and I met interesting people”
  • “The speech and explanation about Ramadan was quite informative”
  • “I really enjoyed sharing a special occasion with members of the local community and being welcomed in so well (also the delicious food)”

How has the event helped in understanding Islam in a new light?

  • “Yes, I have a clearer and more comprehensive understanding of the different sects of Islam”
  • “Greatly. I had some understanding, but I learnt a lot today”
  • “Yes, I found out more about Islam, principles, rules and laws, how prayers in the mosque look like and questions and answers were very informative”

Any final thoughts?

  • “Thank you so much for inviting us”
  • “Looking forward to more community events”
  • “A great event for broadening cultural relationships”
  • “It would be great to see more women up on stage on the panel”

Huzoor’s exclusive words about Mubarak Mosque and the institution of Khilafat

Hazrat Khalifatul Masih V’s exclusive words about the Mubarak Mosque and the institution of Khilafat

Asif M Basit

5

God’s chosen Khalifa has a unique relationship with God Almighty. While this reality is manifested in Huzoor’saa speeches, lectures and sermons, it is also manifested through other means.

It was around two weeks after Huzooraa had shifted to Islamabad. Although the Mubarak Mosque had not yet been formally inaugurated, the mosque had already been inhabited following the shift. Huzooraa arrived in Islamabad on 15 April at around 7pm, and about an hour later, Huzooraa led Maghrib prayer in which hundreds of men, women and children were present. After that day, it was never felt as though this small village was yet to be populated, but rather as if it had always been populated in all its glory. This is during those very days when final touches were still being given inside and outside the mosque.

I had the opportunity to meet with Huzooraa. I had not yet uttered anything when Huzooraa said, “In your view, the mosque doesn’t look congested due to the calligraphy, does it?”

I remained silent – this was due to the low value and worthlessness of my opinion. With the fear that my view could potentially conflict with Huzoor’saa view, I attempted to be cautious, when Huzooraa asked again, “Tell me. What does your aesthetic sense say?”

At first, I thought, Who am I and what value does my artistic taste have? But then I realised that this instruction surpassed the invitation of expressing my point of view. Therefore, I immediately answered, “When I saw it without the calligraphy, it seemed more spacious.”

Huzooraa understood his servant’s dilemma and responded by saying, “Yes, when I turned around to leave the mosque having led prayer one day, I felt as though the mosque had become somewhat crowded due to the calligraphy. But then the thought occurred to me, what could be better than the attributes of Allah surrounding the worshippers. As worshippers wait for prayer, they can reflect as they are reminded of the attributes of Allah. Then I thought that it was fine as it was.”

With a bit of courage, I said, “To the right of the mihrab, the attributes of Allah begin with Al-Muntaqim [the Avenger] and similar attributes…”

Huzooraa replied, “More names are yet to be included; in the mihrab is to come the word ‘Allah’. And the mosque is circular, so you can start from anywhere. In any case, it is important that we are reminded of such attributes of Allah, otherwise one tends to be complacent. If God’s glory and majesty remains in one’s mind, one treads very carefully.”

We – who consider this mere adornment and decoration of the mosque, mere calligraphy, and who walk out of the mosque unaware of our surroundings, with only the thought of where we placed our shoes, leave the mosque saying Salaam and chatting away with others – never reflect on how particular Huzooraa is about each minute detail to do with mosques; how he gives specific guidance; how detailed and precise his instructions to organisers and workers are; how his attention is always drawn to the fact that a mosque is Allah’s house and how all worshippers can give their full attention to Allah.

How great is the solution that Huzooraa has provided to the instruction of remembering Allah while waiting for Salat. The words of Allah have been written in beautiful calligraphy and are a means of enhancing the beauty of the mosque. Whilst waiting, when our attention is drawn to these names, it will act as a way of keeping us occupied in the remembrance of the Divine.

I believe it was in the same mulaqat in which I said, “Huzoor, the world has rarely witnessed a mosque being inhabited so quickly.”

Huzooraa replied, “Yes, from the day I arrived here, local residents have been coming for prayer. Many people travel from London, and since my arrival, delegations have arrived to meet me. The mosque remains filled with their presence. On the weekends, people come with their children. I have arranged for a screen behind which women can also offer prayers in the mosque. Women are very happy as before, they were not able to pray directly behind the imam in this manner. Now this too is possible due to this mosque.”

Huzoor’saa faith-inspiring thoughts and reflections on the Mubarak Mosque were heard by all in the 17 May Friday Sermon when Huzooraa inaugurated this mosque. Every Ahmadi takes back a wealth of spiritual sustenance from Huzoor’saa every sermon. As I deem it to be the property of members of the Jamaat, one lesson that I took home with me from the Mubarak Mosque’s inaugural sermon is as follows:

The day after Huzooraa shifted to Islamabad, I wrote to Huzooraa, “If Huzoor permits, we would like to prepare a special programme on the new Markaz.”

The reply came, saying, “Enquire after the work has been completed.”

In complying with the instruction, I put aside this thought for when the work would be completed. Even though I readily accepted the instruction, the true wisdom behind it would become clear to me later on.

Then in a mulaqat, Huzooraa said, “The name of the mosque is to be written outside; the Kalima is to be written outside. Everyday a board is placed with different styles of inscription on the path I use to go to the mosque. But I am yet to make a decision.”

From the very first day, MTA’s camera operators began filming the site from different angles. Every angle was captivating. When seeking approval for using only one shot in a promo for MTA, Huzooraa instructed, “Not yet. When it is inaugurated, then you may.”

Now, when the mosque had been inaugurated and prayers had been said that this mosque may serve as a perfect reflection of Masjid Mubarak in Qadian and that this mosque may continue the extraordinary task that had started in Masjid Mubarak in Qadian, I realised that there was something special in Huzoor’s heart for this mosque. Regarding its name, Huzooraa said that his attention was drawn to the very revelation that the Promised Messiahas had received regarding Masjid Mubarak that the mosque would be a source of blessings, would itself be blessed and every blessed deed would be performed in it.

Huzooraa inaugurated the mosque on 17 May. The very next day, I had the blessed opportunity to meet Huzooraa. As I entered, I congratulated Huzooraa. With great love and affection, Huzooraa spoke with this humble servant about this blessed mosque. Where I felt that my heart permitted, I said, “Huzoor, yesterday when you inaugurated the mosque and didn’t lead dua afterwards, everyone was surprised. Some thought that perhaps Huzoor had forgotten to.”

Huzooraa replied, “Yes, those present there too thought the same and tried to remind me. I told them, ‘First, come inside.’ Then, when I went inside and said a few words before sajda-e-shukr, people realised why I had not performed dua. As soon as we went into prostration, it was as if people were given a medium to express their emotions. It was also good in this respect that people have been writing to me from all over the world saying that they too were a part of this sajda.”

I then said, “The prayer that Huzoor said for this mosque to be a perfect reflection of Masjid Mubarak in Qadian, that too moved many people.”

Huzooraa added, “But I also expressed the desire that may this mosque pave ways for us to travel to Masjid Mubarak in Qadian, to Mecca and Medina; may it create the means for us to travel to all of Islam’s actual Marakiz [plural of Markaz]. The actual desire is this.”

On the same topic, Huzooraa said, “I have said to have:

لَا رَادَّ لِفَضْلِہ

[No one can repel His bounty] written in green, just as these words have been inscribed at the entrance of Masjid Mubarak Qadian. The Promised Messiahas was shown in a vision that angels were writing something at the entrance of Masjid Mubarak in green ink in rehani [Arabic font-style] text. Those words were:

لَا رَادَّ لِفَضْلِہ

They first wrote it in black ink, but I asked for it to be written in dark green.”

Masjid Mubarak Qadian 001 1
Masjid Mubarak Qadian

My attention was drawn to the instruction which was conditional to the work being completed in the mosque. Allah had put great attention for this mosque in Huzoor’s heart; the realisation of the connection with Masjid Mubarak, Qadian; the desire to spread Islam from here. It was perhaps as if the work for this mosque should be completed and the similarity with Masjid Mubarak should be made manifest at the entrance of the mosque first.

Whatever it was, every worshipper in the mosque will have felt that offering Salat has a completely new experience after the sermon. The sajda was an extraordinary sajda. Every Ahmadi who was a part of it, either present or viewing it live on MTA, was very fortunate.

In the same mulaqat, I said that in a recent mulaqat with Huzooraa, a young Ahmadi, who had travelled as part of a delegation from another country, asked Huzooraa how he felt after coming to Islamabad. In response to the question, Huzooraa said, “You have never asked how I felt after leaving Pakistan and living where I had lived until now.”

I said to Huzooraa that I had a similar question: “The life Huzoor lived in Pakistan was completely different to the life Huzoor now lives after being bestowed the responsibility of Khilafat…”

SCAN 011 1

Huzooraa answered, “How many years did I live in Rabwah – how many years from 1984 to 2003? 19 years? The 19 years of service to the Jamaat that I spent in Rabwah was a time of freedom. I would sometimes walk, sometimes cycle and sometimes drive wherever I desired; from my home to the office and then back; if time permitted, I would go to the bazaar. Even after being appointed nazir-e-ala, I would freely go wherever I pleased. It was the persistence of Majlis Khuddam-ul-Ahmadiyya that under the circumstances, a Khadim should remain with me for security. I had told him too that if he was to perform his duty, then he should do so at a distance. When I came here, the days of my freedom vanished.”

I then said, “Huzoor, where you were living prior to this was not even a proper flat. There was a lack of space also…”

Huzooraa immediately responded, “I never felt any discomfort there, rather I liked the office there because everything was in arm’s reach. Whatever I needed was always nearby. Thus, I never felt any discomfort there.”

Whilst talking about Huzooraa being bestowed the mantle of Khilafat, I said, “Huzoor, I have a question: When Allah informs many pious people around the world about who the Khalifa will be, then how is it that the person who Allah has selected for this purpose is left unaware of it?”

Huzooraa replied, “It is only he who is left unaware. Or perhaps Allah deliberately does not inform him. If Allah was to inform him beforehand, then only God knows how he would bear that burden. Allah bestows this responsibility solely to him who never desired the responsibility and so, even if God was to give that person a sign, his mind would not even be able to grasp the true meaning. If someone ever narrated such a dream to me in which they received an indication of this, I always interpreted it another way because I could never have imagined that I could be given this responsibility. For this reason, if that person receives a direct indication or is told through others, then he can never understand it to mean this.”

It was a very special moment. I said, “Huzoor, people immediately performed Bai‘at at your hand. At some point, you must also have been bestowed conviction in being the Khalifa?”

Huzooraa replied, “When my name was proposed, my state was indescribable. I was certain that it could not be me. But when the election was completed, Allah’s decree manifested itself. Then, it became a question of obedience to Allah; and in obedience to Him, He quickly granted me the ability to accept this decision. The belief was also put in my heart that where God Almighty had Himself placed this responsibility on my shoulders, He too would grant me the strength to carry and fulfil it. And He continues to do so.”

I must admit here that whenever I have had the opportunity to meet Huzooraa, I always feel as though I am in the midst of a chosen one of God. This creates an awe in one’s heart. But when Huzooraa narrated this, my heart felt something that is not possible to describe.

Let us, with special emphasis, pray on Khilafat Day: O Allah! The individual You selected as our leader and guide is very dear to You and You are very dear to him; we are dear to him and he is dear to us. By means of this connection of love between us all, enable us to tread those ways that this beloved servant of Yours calls us on for they are the paths that lead to You. O God! Always keep this beloved of Yours and ours in security and peace because today, the flag of Islam rests in the hands of this man. You made him the leader of faith in this day and age and it is his love that attracts our hearts towards him. Keep him forever smiling in this age of hard-heartedness so that the world may be attracted towards him and Islam’s name may hail victorious.

Long live Syedna Hazrat Khalifatul Masih V.

The true successorship of the Promised Messiah a.s. – How did the Promised Messiah a.s. see it?

Every Khilafat Day – year in year out – our thoughts automatically flow to a sad but very important episode of the Jamaat’s history: the split of the Ahmadiyya Jamaat into two sections. A vast majority of the Jamaat, including very close companions of the Promised Messiahas, believed that his succession should continue in the form of Khilafat. This opinion was inferred from the Promised Messiah’sas book Al Wasiyyat.

But there was a small section that thought that the Sadr Anjuman Ahmadiyya (administrative body) was the only true successor of the Promised Messiahas, and they too claimed to infer this from the same book, Al Wasiyyat.

rsz_hazrat_mirza_ghulam_ahmad_qadiani_as.jpg

This conflict led to the split with one group following the system of Khilafat and the other taking only the Anjuman to be the rightful heir and successor of the Promised Messiahas. The latter, who later took on the name of Ahmadiyya Anjuman-e-Ishaat-e-Islam Lahore (AAIIL), were adamant that the Promised Messiahas had on no occasion mentioned in Al Wasiyyat, or anywhere else for that matter, that a Khalifa or Khilafat would be his successor.

Jamaat-e-Ahmadiyya (Qadian) continued to point to passages where the Promised Messiahas had cited the example of Hazrat Abu Bakrra, claiming that this was sufficient to prove that he wanted the system of Khilafat to succeed him. However, the AAIIL insisted that had this been the case, the Promised Messiahas should have categorically mentioned the concept of Khilafat as his successor in clear cut terms.

By the grace of Allah, the Ahmadiyya Archive & Research Centre has discovered a document, handwritten by the Promised Messiahas which sheds light on the issue of Khilafat.

This handwritten note of the Promised Messiahas is a reply to a letter written to him by a Mustafa Hussain Tirmizi (of Lucknow, India). The writer, referring to the Sunni-Shia dispute over the Khilafat of Hazrat Abu Bakrra and Hazrat Alira, asked why the Holy Prophetsa had not clearly stated that he was to be succeeded by Khilafat and the procedure of election thereof. The six questions posed to the Promised Messiahas by the writer are as follows:

1. Was there a need for Khilafat after the Holy Prophet Muhammadsa?

2. If there was, then why did God or the Prophetsa himself not appoint someone as his Khalifa?

3. If there wasn’t the need, then why was Khilafat established?

4. If his companions felt that there would be the need of Khilafat, why did they not request the Holy Prophetsa to appoint a Khalifa?

5. Why did they not enquire that if the Holy Prophetsa was not appointing someone, should they choose a Khalifa?

6. Has the Holy Prophet Muhammadsa clearly stated anywhere that his successor was to be elected through ijma [consensus]?

To this, the Promised Messiahas replied:

مولوی صاحب [حضرت مولوی نورالدین صاحبؓ] سے جواب دریافت کرلیں۔ اور میرے نزدیک تو اب یہ بحث ہی فضول ہے۔ اسوقت نہ حضرت ابوبکر زندہ ہیں نہ حضرت علی۔ وہ دور گذر گیا۔ اب تو یہ تحقیقات چاہئیں کہ اب خلافت کا کون مستحق ہے۔ قرآن شریف میں خلافت کے بارے میں صریح پیشگوئی تھی، اس کے موافق ہونا ضروری تھا، اورپیش گوئیوں کے امر میں رسول کو دخل دینے کی کیا ضرورت تھی؟ خدا اس کا متکفل تھا، جیسا کہ سورۃ نور سے سمجھا جاتا ہے۔

Screenshot 2019 05 23 at 03.03.47
A recently found handwritten note of the Promised Messiahas about Khilafat being a matter directly in the hands of Allah

“You can get a reply from Maulvi Sahib [Hazrat Maulvi Hakim Nuruddinra]. According to my understanding, this debate is now futile. Neither is Hazrat Abu Bakr Siddiq present, nor is Hazrat Ali. The research now required is as to who is worthy of Khilafat now. Since the Holy Quran clearly prophesied about Khilafat, it was destined to happen accordingly and there was no need for the Holy Prophet to intervene in matters of divine prophecy. God had the matter in His own hand, as is understood from Surah al-Nur.”

This blessed note by the Promised Messiahas clearly explains that although he had given indication in Al Wasiyyat about Khilafat, yet he had firm belief that Khilafat should follow. Also, keeping in line with the practice of his holy master, the Holy Prophet Muhammadsa, he had left it to Allah to establish Khilafat as He had done after the Holy Prophetsa.

Although the dispute erupted in 1914 when the election of the Hazrat Khalifatul Masih IIra took place, it had its roots right from the very inception of Khilafat-e-Ahmadiyya in 1908.

The 111 years that have gone by are a clear proof of Khilafat being the true succession of the Promised Messiahas. The Promised Messiahas had prophesied that his Jamaat would spread to the corners of the Earth; the world has seen this happen only with the Jamaat that was led by Khalifatul Masih. He had prophesied that millions of people from around the world would come under the banner of his Jamaat; the world has witnessed this happen to the Jamaat that sided with Khilafat-e-Ahmadiyya. The Promised Messiahas had prophesied that his Jamaat would face fierce persecution and tests at the hands of its opponents but would continue to progress in its great mission of propagating Islam; we all know that all this opposition was faced by the Jamaat that gave their hand in the hand of Khilafat and this guiding hand led the Jamaat to great heights despite the bitter opposition.

The Jamaat was blessed with the first Khalifa, then the second, the third, the fourth and, in April 2003, with the fifth Khilafat. Every phase had its own unique features. We are fortunate to be living in the time of Hazrat Khalifatul Masih Vaa and to be witnessing the great bounties of Allah that have been bestowed on the Jamaat in this blessed era.

How true are the words of the Promised Messiahas in the note given above! Allah is the guardian of Khilafat. Allah took it into His own hands. Allah was to sow it, Allah was to take it to the heights of progress. The words of the Promised Messiahas have proven that Khilafat was, is and always will be the only true successor of the Promised Messiahas.

Hazrat Khalifatul Masih V – A loving father, a unique role model

At the request of Al Hakam, Respected Mirza Waqas Ahmad Sahib penned impressions and sentiments related to his father, Hazrat Mirza Masroor Ahmad, Khalifatul Masih Vaa. May Allah reward him abundantly for this.

Mirza Waqas Ahmad Sahib

20170917 165649 FABF9AC0

Huzoor’saa personal life at home is a practical reflection of the guidance Huzooraa gives in his sermons, classes and addresses to auxiliary organisations. This is not from today or since he was chosen as Khalifatul Masih, but rather, as far as my memory goes, it has always been his way to live his life according to the commandments of Allah. The same is the case today. However, ever since the responsibility of Khilafat was given to him, this has acquired a new demeanour.

One thing that I have always noted is that Huzooraa always pays special focus on worship; to strictly adhere to the timings of Salat himself and to inculcate this in his family. This is such an aspect of Huzoor’s life that has always remained etched on my mind.

There were many challenges during our time in Africa, but beyond the challenges of the time, what remains a strong memory is Huzoor’s adherence to the five daily prayers. If there is anything that Huzooraa has constantly asked us about since childhood, it is about performing Salat. His immersion in Salat and his weeping is exemplary. To completely cut off from the affairs surrounding him and to devotedly stand before God is a special characteristic of Huzooraa.

Patience is considered to mean remaining quiet in times of difficulty. However, the true definition of patience can be seen in the person of Huzooraa.

When we were in Ghana, the house that was given to Huzooraa was not exactly one of comforts. Many problems were faced whilst living there. There was an old generator for use at night that could only be used for three hours at any one time, and so the three hours would be spread over a longer period of time, turning it off frequently and switching it back on. It would only be used when necessary. Otherwise, we would try to make do without it.

No matter the circumstances, we always saw that not only did he never complain, but he always found ways of praising Allah and showing gratitude to Him. This true definition of patience was one we learnt from Huzooraa.

However, it should be clear that it was not as if Huzooraa would not make any plan in times of difficulty. It is another key characteristic of Huzooraa that he plans to the best and highest of standards.

2rwt8ar copy

He always relied solely on Allah for favourable outcomes in difficult circumstances, and along with this trust in Allah was his habit of hard work. Whilst living in Africa, whenever there were difficult situations, for instance when the roof started to leak or when there was a shortage of water, he never complained, nor did he ever speak out about the unfavourable circumstances and nor did he feel shame in practically doing work with his own hands. Whatever the circumstances, he bore hardships wholeheartedly. Neither did he fear any challenge, nor did he allow us to be fearful. We never saw him fearful and this was something he expected of us as well, to never be afraid of anything. Huzooraa is extremely courageous and brave and he has never wanted for us to have any form of cowardice in us. If ever we saw fear in him, then it was the fear of Allah.

Our house in Ghana was pretty much in a jungle. Scorpions and snakes were frequently seen. However, he never permitted us to be afraid of such things. If seen, Huzooraa would kill a small snake or scorpion himself. Once, he killed a considerably large snake. Thus, neither did he fear anything, nor has he permitted us, since childhood, to be afraid.

I have noticed that it is for this reason that Huzooraa is able to commit all his matters to God. To plan to the best of his ability and to rely on Allah for good results is a teaching that Huzooraa not only taught us verbally, but also practically through his example.

I recall that once, on the second day of Jalsa Salana, Huzooraa received the news that our grandmother [Hazrat Sahibzadi Nasira Begum Sahiba] had fallen severely ill. Huzooraa was told that perhaps it was her last few moments. Obviously, Huzooraa was somewhat perturbed by hearing this news, but he did not allow this to affect his routine during the Jalsa days, nor did we feel that it had distracted him from his routine. The Jamaat did not have the slightest clue that alongside the concerns for the entire world, in those moments, Huzooraa was worried for the health of his mother. He continuously remained informed about her illness and continued to pray for her.

We witnessed Friday, 28 May 2010. Huzooraa was occupied in preparation for his Friday Sermon. He still had to get ready for going to the mosque when he received the news of the attacks on our mosques in Lahore. Huzooraa constantly remained informed about the news of the attacks. He would enquire about updates and would pray too. In his office, he continuously received phone calls and faxes from all around the world. At home too, we received phone calls from relatives. This all continued, however, we saw that despite all his concerns and worries, he did not let it affect his preparation for Jumuah. And the world saw that the Jumuah prayers happened as usual.

Huzooraa went to the Baitul Futuh Mosque, delivered the Friday Sermon, returned and enquired about the latest news. He issued instructions to the Jamaat in Pakistan in a detailed manner. He gave guidance to them at every moment. However, Huzooraa did not let all this anxiety wear him out as it does a normal human being.

It is a fact that the pain the loss of lives caused Huzooraa, it did not cause anyone else. But as the leader of this Jamaat, his sight was set on Allah. The Jamaat is Allah’s, the sacrifice was made for Allah, then only Allah could get us out of the storm of difficulties. Progress was in His hands and the reward for martyrdom was in His hands.

This is only an example of how Huzooraa never stopped in his efforts and always relied solely on Allah for His help and succour. I have always seen Huzooraa pass through turbulent trials and tribulations while completely depending on Allah. The results of such moments, by the grace of Allah, are before everyone.

It is also worth mentioning that the wellbeing and security of members of the Jamaat are of paramount importance for Huzooraa. Huzooraa was in India, when such circumstances arose that were not favourable for him travel further to Qadian. A state official from Delhi said to Huzooraa that if he desired, security arrangements could be made for Huzoor to travel to Qadian. Huzooraa replied:

“Only Allah can provide security. There are always hundreds of Ahmadis around me, and during Jalsa, they will be in their thousands. I care for each one of them. I cannot afford to compromise the security of any one of them.”

From this, we can assess the concern Huzooraa has for every Ahmadi. Even though every Ahmadi is ready to sacrifice their life for the sake of Khilafat, but the life of every Ahmadi is very dear to Huzooraa. So when fate manifests itself and the Jamaat has to offer the sacrifice of lives, his patience is exemplary. And in normal circumstances, Huzooraa does his best through prayer and effort for their welfare.

The strongest of men are sometimes helpless when it comes to controlling emotions, but an individual who has complete trust in Allah and has entrusted everything to Him, his emotions are then subservient to His command and will. In such circumstances, at home we always witness, and the Jamaat too witnesses it now, that in trying times, Huzooraa never complains and does not permit fear to be caused, rather he prostrates before his Lord and urges the Jamaat to do the same. Even at home, we have always been taught this and his actions have always practically taught us to do so.

K5292
Hazrat Mirza Masroor Ahmadaa, with his daughter, greets Hazrat Khalifatul Masih IIIrh (Ghana)

My mother [Hazrat Sahibzadi Amatul-Sabooh Begum Sahiba] once told me that when they heard the news of Hazrat Khalifatul Masih III’srh demise, they were in Ghana. They received the news at night. In one hand, Huzooraa held the telegram while in the other, Huzooraa held the torch through which he was able to read the message. Huzooraa continued to read the telegram, and pain and grief began to overcome their hearts. The hand with which Huzooraa was holding the torch began to tremble severely. And that was it. After that, all his emotions, all his pain was expressed before God.

My mother told me that Huzooraa spent the entire night praying in grief and expressed his heart’s content in his prostrations. The next day, we had to go to Ghana’s city of Accra and the entire journey was spent in supplications. Whenever Huzooraa spoke to us children, he told us about the importance of Khilafat and its establishment. Even then, the routine works were not affected, which gave further strength in our belief in Huzooraa being a realist. It was impossible for him to do anything living so far away; all he told us to do was pray, which he did a lot, and that the work of the Jamaat continues, which he practically showed.

In our childhood, Huzooraa would narrate stories to us, but such stories that carried morals. One story that I recall frequently listening to was about Hazrat Bilalra and his patience and perseverance, especially the chapter to do with when Hazrat Bilalra would repeatedly respond to the opponents with “Ahad! Ahad!” [God is One! God is One!]. This is something I recall Huzooraa frequently narrating. Huzooraa would explain how Hazrat Bilalra was tormented in so many ways, yet despite that, he bore all hardships for his faith and remained resolute in his faith. The other stories resembled this and were all true and had morals in them.

From these incidents, the level of his faith in Allah’s unity becomes clear. He never made any worldly means parallel to Allah; he never let any trying time come in between him and his Lord.

Another extraordinary trait of Huzooraa that has always had a great impact on me since childhood is his love and relationship with Khilafat. I always noticed since childhood that he would write to Hazrat Khalifatul Masih regularly and constantly.

I was very young when I once said, “Why don’t you photocopy one letter and change the date each time before sending it?” I realised that Huzooraa did not like what I said. He expressed his dislike, but also explained, “I write this out of my own love; I am not compelled to do so. Photocopies can be sent when one is compelled to. One should say istighfar [repent] for such a thought.” In this manner, Huzooraa established love and respect for Khilafat in our hearts from a very young age.

Huzooraa kept a close eye on our tarbiyat and would not ignore even the smallest aspect of tarbiyat. Whenever possible, he would take us on trips. On such trips, according to the available means, he would openhandedly and wholeheartedly arrange for our entertainment so that we would fully enjoy the trip; it was not as though he would be tight-fisted in spending on us, however at the same time, he never misspent his money either. In entertaining us, he ensured that we, his children, enjoyed ourselves.

Whatever time he had when not performing his official Jamaat duties, he would spend it with us at home. Huzooraa always detested unnecessarily eating meals and sitting in pointless social gatherings in the name of Jamaat-related work. He never stayed out unnecessarily with the excuse of Jamaat duties, rather he would give that time to us, his family.

When going on trips, children sometimes pull tantrums and get irritable, and the father, who is responsible for the family, sometimes loses his temper. But even in such cases, I always noticed that Huzooraa would remain cheerful and would talk to us calmly and lovingly. This way, we would understand, and the joy of the trip would not be compromised.

There was always an awe-inspiring presence of Huzooraa. The awe was not such that hindered us from talking openly with him, but at the same time, it was not as if we could do or say whatever we liked in front of him.

The overriding aspect of Huzoor’saa personality, when remembering him at home, is of Salat. No matter what we were doing, no matter what we were talking to him about, if it was time for Salat, then Salat would take precedence.

Once, we went to Karachi and we reached our destination quite late at night. It took us even longer to finally get some rest. In the morning, we woke up with a little delay in Fajr prayer – there was still some time, but very little. The concern and distress with which Huzooraa woke us up was something that made a lasting impression on me, something that I remember even today. Huzoor’s entire being was shaken because the time for prayer was nearly over. He hurriedly woke us all up and got ready for Salat.

This was when we were very young, and in that naïve age, I said, “There is still time; what is all the fuss about?” This sentence was uttered by a child out of ignorance, but that day, I realised that Huzooraa does not tolerate even the slightest remark when it comes to worship. Huzooraa was displeased at my comment. Huzooraa has always had a “no nonsense policy” when it comes to Allah’s worship.

From a very young age, Huzooraa has always urged us to focus on our Salat. This is the same even today.

When I came to the UK in 2003 for education, the foremost thing that Huzooraa paid stress on was the regular offering of Salat. He has always said, and on that occasion, he repeated, “If you continue to offer your Salat, Allah will continue to protect you.”

When speaking to Huzooraa on the telephone, Huzooraa would enquire about my prayers. As we got older, Huzoor’s manner in explaining things to us changed, yet the things he would stress even in childhood, he continued to draw our attention to even as we got older, and this remains to date. 

The 16 years that we spent in the Fazl Mosque, even there Huzooraa would call me daily on the telephone to wake me up for Salat.

After coming to Islamabad, one day Huzooraa thought that perhaps I had not turned up for Salat. Huzooraa called me on the phone and enquired whether I had gone for prayer. Then there are our children; Huzooraa emphasises the same things for their tarbiyat, especially Salat.

One can assess from Huzoor’s state whilst waking us up in Karachi that Huzoor’s every good deed is solely for the sake of Allah and not for displaying to others. Not just Salat, but every pious deed performed by Huzooraa is in following the instructions of Allah and seeking His pleasure. He has never performed any good deed for mere display.

After Khilafat, there has been a drastic change in Huzoor’s routine. Huzoor’s entire schedule has now been sacrificed for the sake of the Jamaat. But at home, he keeps a close watch over our tarbiyat and edification.

One noteworthy fact is that after being bestowed the mantle of Khilafat, the advice that Huzooraa has given to the Jamaat was always expected of us too. Salat has always remained the foremost priority in Huzoor’s life and after Khilafat, he has urged the Jamaat to pay attention to the importance of Salat, while also drawing our attention especially to this. Despite his schedule becoming even more intense, he continues to pay attention to Holy Prophet’ssa example of showing an excellent conduct to his family.

Out of his busy schedule, though relatively less than before, yet he still takes time out for his family. At breakfast, he enquires about members of the household, the needs of the house, and whatever is needed at home, he arranges for that to be done. Huzooraa remains occupied in his office all day, but in the evenings, he takes out time for his family and has tea with us – our children also get the chance to spend a few moments with Huzooraa. In this short period of time, Huzooraa listens to what the children have to say and affectionately talks to them. If anyone is unwell at home, Huzooraa attends to them. We all, including our children, understand how busy Huzoor’s schedule is, and so when Huzooraa takes time out to visit us, even for a few moments, it comforts us and brings great joy to us. Huzooraa asks us how we are and listens carefully; he asks us about our regularity in taking medication. If we have not yet informed the doctor, Huzooraa arranges for the doctor to see us.

He is very particular about personal hygiene. Regular bathing, clean clothes, cleanliness of socks etc. are all things that he is particular in himself and has taught us about and inculcated in us. He has never felt any shame in doing manual labour and his own work himself, something he has taught us also. He has always taught us to do our own work ourselves.

Once, in Rabwah, when I was very young, my bicycle’s tyre had punctured. I asked one of the workers in our house to have the tyre changed. When Huzooraa found out, he was not pleased and explained to me, “By doing this, a person never gets into the habit of doing their work themselves. According to one’s capacity, one should do their work themselves.”

After Khilafat, the pace of Huzoor’s life has increased manifold; everything moves at a greater speed. We had to adjust to this change also. We also had to come to the realisation that Huzoor’s life has taken a completely fast-paced path. For this reason, whatever time Huzooraa takes out of this fast-paced, extremely busy lifestyle for our sake, we consider it a blessing.

Sometimes we are stunned when Huzooraa takes time out to attend to us and our children. Everything is running simultaneously – taking care of the smallest things, making arrangements for our entertainment, ensuring the children are happy, talking to the children and concentrating on their tarbiyat.

Along with our children, we are aware that the focus of Huzoor’s life is the success and progress of the Jamaat; his days and nights have been sacrificed for this cause. Therefore, the few moments that we have to spend with Huzooraa at home, we consider it to be a lot of time. Even a little of Huzoor’s attention is deemed a lot.

Huzooraa always took great care of us before Khilafat and continues to do so now after Khilafat. Prior to Khilafat, we saw this love and affection from a father. However, after becoming Khalifatul Masih, with the responsibility of the smooth functioning of the Jamaat and all the duties associated with it, he takes time out to take care of the welfare of members of his family, talks to us, gives us advice, looks after our needs and fulfils them. This love from Huzooraa is such that has left a great impact on all of us in our house.

May Allah enable us to properly appreciate the attention and love Huzooraa gives to us. May He enable us to pay gratitude. May the importance of this blessing always be in our minds and the minds of our children. May Allah always keep Huzooraa healthy and secure.

Expansion of the Muslim dominion during Khilafat-e-Rashida

1

Fazal Malik, Canada

The Treaty of Hudaybiyyah is of paramount importance in the history of Islam. It set the stage for the expansion of Islam in the Arabian Peninsula and set the precedence for the expanding boundaries of the Muslim dominion in North Africa and Asia Minor during the time of Khilafat-e-Rashida. Although many Muslims initially viewed it with bitterness, the result was a great triumph.

Capture 3

The treaty allowed some of the greatest Arab warriors and enemies of Islam to witness its peaceful nature and embrace it. These included the Holy Prophet’s uncle, Hazrat Abbasra bin Abdul Muttalib; Hazrat Khalidra bin Waleed – the Sword of Islam; and Hazrat Amrra bin al-Aas – later to be conqueror of Egypt. As a result of the treaty, the Meccan leadership, which had banned Muslims from entering the city, welcomed Hazrat Muhammad Mustafasa as their head in less than two years.

Shortly after the victory of Mecca, the Holy Prophetsa passed away. His demise was monumental on many fronts. The Muslims were now without their Prophet, and the Arabian Peninsula without a king. Allah guided the Muslims towards an able leader and Hazrat Abu Bakrra was elected as the Khalifa. It was a historic moment as never before in their history had the Arabs pledged allegiance to one person in unity for a reason other than faith. Every clan, every tribe had remained independent before the advent of Islam, and here they stood as brethren, one to another.

Ridda Wars

With the news of the demise of the Holy Prophetsa, the political situation of Arabia began to change. Four claimants of prophethood had started instigating the Arabs who were geographically removed from Medina to revolt. Most powerful of them was Musaylima who had raised an army of 40,000. Siding with a false prophetess – Sajah bint al-Harith – he was planning a hostile takeover of Medina.

When the news of unrest and rebellion caused by the false prophets reached Medina, Hazrat Abu Bakrra had already dispatched the army to the Syrian frontier.  A short background is needed to understand why this occurred at such a sensitive time.

The enmity between the Byzantine and Persian Empire is old, with the attacks on the Arabian soil dating back to early 5th century, about 100 years before Islam came into being. With the advent of Islam, the attacks became more focused and intense.

Upon return from Hajj in 629 AD, the Holy Prophetsa learnt about the possibility of an attack on Medina from the Syrian front. He dispatched a party of 15 people to enquire about the situation, all of whom were martyred. Upon learning of this, the Holy Prophetsa dispatched a messenger to the Roman Emperor enquiring what provoked this atrocity. Unfortunately, this messenger – Al Harasra – was intercepted at the point of Mu‘tah, captured and killed by the local governor. In response, the Holy Prophetsa dispatched an army of 3,000 men, who, by the sheer grace of Allah, forced the opposing army of over 150,000 soldiers to retreat; however, the Muslims suffered a great  loss.

Three years later in 632 AD, the Holy Prophetsa was informed by credible sources that the Romans were gathering for a battle with the Muslims. Under the command of Usamara, the Holy Prophetsa dispatched an army to confront the Byzantines at the point of gathering. The army had not completely cleared the border of Medina when the Holy Prophetsa passed away and the advancing troops halted.

Once Hazrat Abu Bakrra was elected as the Khalifa, he immediately carried out the last command of the Holy Prophetsa.  While the army was on its mission, the news of rebellion reached Medina. Suppression of the rebellion and safety of the Muslim state was of utmost importance. Musaylima had started killing Muslims in far off lands, such as Yemen and Bahrain. In addition to the rebellion by the four false prophets, some Bedouin tribes had formed a small army to attack Medina. All these rebellions had to be dealt with decisively and quickly. With his faith in God and expert military planning, the first Khalifa of Islam, Hazrat Abu Bakrra struck and quashed all evil forces, pardoning the ones who sought forgiveness and punishing those who committed treason.  It would be worth the mention that not all tribes had rebelled; among the rebellious were many who remained loyal to the government at Medina and refused to fight.

During the insurgency, the Persian and Roman Empires openly sent troops to fight alongside the rebels, especially in Yemen and Bahrain. Once peace was established in Arabia, Muslim troops were deployed on the borders with the Persian and the Roman Empire, in order to reduce the chance of further attacks. This did not deter the two empires and they continued their hostilities, constantly disturbing the internal peace of Arabia. These occasional territorial aggravations were about to escalate into a war.

By the summer of 634 AD, the forces of Byzantium had gathered in a place known as Ajnadain with a mission to attack and destroy Muslims. The exact location of Ajnadain is unknown, but it appears to have been west of Jordan, not far from Jerusalem. The Byzantine army outnumbered the Muslim army by a ratio of 3:1, but when the Sword of Allah, Hazrat Khalidra bin Waleed  began executing his orders from the Khalifa to protect the Muslims and Islam from an onslaught of the Byzantine army, Allah granted a decisive victory to Muslims, expanding the Muslim governed lands further North, deeper in the Middle East. The war was far from over as Heraclius could not accept the loss and planned to attack the Arabian Peninsula in the very near future.

Before the news of victory could reach Hazrat Abu Bakrra, he departed from this world to rest at the feet of his Master, the Holy Prophet of Islam, Hazrat Muhammad Mustafasa

A background note on territorial expansion of Islam

Regarding the expansion of Islam during the period of Khilafat-e-Rashida, William Muir, a critic of Islam and a Christian historian, admits that “obligation to enforce Islam by a universal crusade had not yet dawned upon the Muslim mind.”  This is a strong observation that has eluded the modern historian, who conflates the current day situation with the pristine conduct of Khulafa-e-Rashideenra.

This situation is further exasperated by some Muslim historians who find glorification of Islam in battles rather than the true teaching of the Holy Prophetsa, which is to win the hearts of the people. They ignore one of the most basic injunctions of the Holy Quran (Ch.2: V.256); turning a blind eye to the pain when Hazrat Umarra remarked, “I desire that between Mesopotamia and the countries beyond, the hills shall be a barrier so that the Persians shall not be able to get at us, nor we at them … I would prefer the safety of my people to thousands of spoils and further conquest.” (William Muir, The Caliphate, p. 120).

A person expecting a sharp rise in conversions to Islam during the 7th century will be awarded with disappointment, as less than 10% of the population was Muslim in Syria, Palestine and Egypt, well into the 10th century (Albert Hourani, A History of the Arab Peoples, pp. 46-47 [1991]). The reasons for conversion are various and will be discussed towards the end of the article.

Two wings of a bird

The two superpowers that remained a constant threat to Islam and Muslims in Arabia, Byzantine (Romans) and the Sasanian (Persians), were not about to back down. After having lost at the hands of the Muslim army, while meddling with Arabian state affairs at Bahrain, the Persians were gathering the armies to strike a decisive blow to Muslims once and for all. 

The call for help from the Byzantine front was received by Hazrat Abu Bakrra on his death bed who commanded Hazrat Umarra to send reinforcements immediately.  The Emperor Heraclius had left Constantinople (Istanbul) and was heading to Damascus in a bid to crush the Muslims. Having been offered an olive branch several times, he had always chosen the sword, hence forcing the Muslims to defend themselves. 

Over a period of several months, lasting most of 636 AD, the Muslims forces fought the enemy in Damascus and Jordan, with the decisive victory being delivered at the Battle of Yarmuk, the river that marks the border between modern day Syria and Jordan. It was a tough battle which proved victorious for Muslims who, in addition to winning Syria and Damascus, successfully pushed the Byzantine army out of the heart of their Empire. 

The Patriach (pope) of Jerusalem surrendered the city to Hazrat Umarra himself.  Hazrat Alira was in-charge of negotiating a peace treaty with the Christians, who were guaranteed freedom of faith, among other civil liberties that did not exist before. Some time after taking Jerusalem, Hazrat Umarra invited the Jewish families expelled from the city by the Byzantines to live in Jerusalem once again. He himself took the initiative of restoring the Temple of Solomon, which was destroyed by the Romans.

The Byzantine Empire did not look favourably upon any non-Orthodox Christians.  Theirs was the only way to salvation. Those with other faiths were regarded as criminals and termed as the “children of Satan” (Alexander A Vasiliev, History of the Byzantine Empire, p. 148 [1952]). The era of Muslim rule was gratifying for the inhabitants of Emesa (Homs) and Damascus, Palestine and Syria.  The recognition of Monophysite Christians, Nestorian Christians, Orthodox Christians, Samaritans and Judeans as having a legitimate religion and equal civil and religious rights was a matter of great joy for them.  This resulted in the Quranic injunction that teaches many paths to salvation (Ch.2: V.213-214) and does not permit religious persecution.

The threat, however, was far from over. Shortly after Byzantine forces were driven out of Syria, the Muslims learnt of massive military activity in Egypt, one of the provinces of the Byzantine Empire.  After the demise of Heraclius, his son and his widow – Empress Martina – had started a military buildup with the intent of attacking Palestine and Syria. Amrra bin al-Aas was granted permission to attack the troops and stop them in Egypt. This was neither an easy task nor an opportune time as a plague had broken out in Syria (Plague of Amwas) and had thinned the Muslim forces by about 25,000.

With a small army of about 4,000 people, Muslims embarked on a daring expedition. In a peaceful takeover of eastern Egypt, they found two major allies – the Coptics and the Jews in their battle against the oppressors. In a little over a year, Egypt was won and the last of the Byzantine forces that threatened to annihilate the Muslims was overpowered.

While the Byzantine war was raging on the Northern front, the Persian Empire was busy reinforcing its troops. The Muslims had entered a peace agreement with the Persians twice, but that did not stop them from causing constant agitation in the Muslim State. The Persian king – Yazdegerd III – continued inciting people in the surrounding territories to revolt against Medina. Observing the situation, Hazrat Umarra sent a delegation to meet the king at Midian. The king received the delegation but humiliated them in the court. After repeated violations of the peace treaty, Hazrat Umarra decided to fight them. The first battle that ensued was that at Tustar, which Muslims won. The decisive battle took place at the point of Nihawand where the Muslim army of 30,000 faced a Persian army of 150,000!  The Persians were fortified in a castle; the Muslim commander, Hazrat Numanra, tactically drew them out of their fortified position towards a narrow passage between two mountains. This proved to be fatal for the Persians. With no army to resist and the king in hiding, Persia came under Muslim control in a matter of days. 

Within a decade, during the Khilafat of Hazrat Umarra, the forces that threatened Medina were neutralised; for the time being, an attack on the Arabian soil would prove difficult. The people under the Muslim dominion found themselves content with freedoms that did not exist before. Jews and Christians could worship in public, maintain their own religious buildings and have their own religious organisations. In return for being excused from military service, which was expected of all Muslims, they had to pay a tax, the jizya, as their contribution towards the defense of the state. Such communities became known as the dhimma (protected people) who enjoyed unconditional legal and military protection by the Muslim Government. For any Muslim government to violate the protected status of such dhimma was a serious crime. The Holy Prophet Muhammadsa was recorded as saying: “He who wrongs a Jew or a Christian will have myself as his accuser on the Day of Judgment.”

In 644 AD, Hazrat Umarra was martyred by a Persian slave with a personal grudge. The electoral council chose Hazrat Usmanra as his successor.

Hardly half a year had passed since the election of the new Khalifa, Hazrat Usmanra that the revolt began in the Persian lands. The exiled Persian king Yazdegerd III deployed spies who travelled through Persia, inciting the population to revolt. Hazrat Usmanra took a decisive step, clearing the territory of all insurgent influences and as a matter of strategic necessity to prevent further attacks, he posted the Muslim forces on the borders of Afghanistan, Turkistan and Khurasan, which were now annexed to the Muslim domain. 

Arab tribes in 6th Century

The Persian Empire had been subdued; they would impose a threat no more. Not the ones to be outdone, the Byzantine Empire now struck.

Roman Emperor Constantine I chose Byzantium as the site for the new “Rome” with Constantinople (Istanbul) as its capital. This was in 330 AD, five years after the Council of Nicaea where Constantine had established Christianity as Rome’s official religion.

In 364 AD, Emperor Valentinian I divided the empire into western and eastern sections, putting himself in power in the west and his brother Valens in the east. It was the Eastern Roman Empire, known as the Byzantine Empire, that clashed with the Muslims in the seventh century. Before the war with the Arab Muslims, an impressive geographical area boasted their pride; the pride which now demanded that the nomads from Arabia should be thrown back to oblivion. The war with Arabia had proven costly for the Roman Empire. Despite losses of massive proportions, they had not accepted defeat and waited for an opportune moment to strike back.

The demise of Hazrat Umarra provided them with such an opportunity. Or so they thought.

Encouraged by the outlaying communities of the former Byzantine Empire, they launched a massive military operation against the Muslims. Overwhelmed and taken by surprise, the Governor of Syria Hazrat Muawiyara asked the Khalifa Usmanra for help and received thousands of troops in response. 

The first victory was the battle of the Masts off the Lycian coast in 655 AD, where the Muslims won a decisive naval victory over the Byzantines. It was a victory on two major fronts. It drove the elite Roman forces out of their stronghold and it initiated the formation of the first Muslim navy to protect the nation against further Byzantine attacks. 

On the North African front, the last of the Roman strongholds that revolted had to be eliminated, and places as far as Tripoli fell to the rule of the Muslims. Finally, the Byzantium dreams to eliminate the Muslim dominion were crushed. The Byzantines were pushed back to Costantipole and, suffering from internal warfare, would not face the Muslims for another century and that too for very different reasons.

With Muslim ruled land ranging from the Atlantic to the Indian Ocean, the Arabian tribes migrating en masse to far flung lands and non-Arabs coming into ever increasing contact with the Muslims, there were massive administrative challenges. Hazrat Usmanra, an excellent administrator, kept abreast of issues and needs of his constituents, Muslims and non-Muslims alike, by establishing a system of inspection throughout the Muslim dominion and initiated systems to protect the public from market fluctuations in response to supply and demand of the economy. In addition to investing in infrastructure such as roads, buildings and rest stops, he formalised the civil and military service pay codes.

The Middle East in the Sixth Century

With the expansion of the dominion, the Arabic language was evolving and the issue of the standardisation of the Holy Quran came to being. The Holy Quran was written down in script and arranged in order during the life of the Holy Prophetsa; and the collection of all the sources into one standard book was completed during the life of the first Khalifa, Hazrat Abu Bakrra, who was helped by Hazrat Umarra.  Alarmed by the reports of mispronounced recitation of the Holy Quran, Hazrat Usmanra tasked a former scribe, Hazrat Zaidra bin Thabit and some other prominent members of the Quraish to produce a standard copy of the text, as spoken in the dialect of the Quraish. Multiple copies of the original were made and sent to major cities in the Islamic domain, such as Damascus, Basra and Kufa.

All the while the progression of Islam continued an impressive climb, the opposing forces worked to undermine the success of Khilafat. In the year 656 AD, Hazrat Usmanra was martyred and Hazrat Alira was elected as the Khalifa. As foretold by the Holy Prophetsa almost three decades ago, the Khilafat of Hazrat Alira ibn abi Talib would be the last for another thousand years!

The war clouds could be seen over the deserts of Arabia, but Hazrat Alira did not take pride in the vast resources of Arabia under his command or the ample weaponry or army that it had built over the past decades. He turned his attention towards Allah and sought refuge in Him. His reign was short but one hallmarked with traits of previous khulafa. During his lifetime, the centre of Khilafat was moved from Medina to Kufa.

The martyrdom of Hazrat Usmanra had left a deep wound in the hearts of Muslims and the safety of citizens, from Tripoli to Damascus to Medina, was of paramount importance. Hazrat Alira promptly established a police force and continued to invest in the infrastructure throughout the dominion. The expanded dominion, new Muslims with foreign dialects and languages, and social issues of new kinds awaited the new Khalifa. 

Although the standardised calligraphy of the Holy Quran was compiled during the time of Hazrat Usmanra, the standard pronunciation of the Holy Quran, without any doubt to the meaning of the words, was of paramount importance. The Holy Quran was revealed in a poetic form in a culture that valued language and particularly poetry. It was during the time of Hazrat Alira that the codification of the Holy Quran with rules of qirat [recitation] was standardised. Rules of recitation were firmed up and Arabic grammar, as a subject, was first taught.

Growing up in the house of the Prophetsa, Hazrat Alira had a unique understanding of the Holy Quran and the Sunnah. His knowledge and wisdom was such that the Holy Prophetsa declared him to be the “Seal of all Knowledge”, or a person whose wisdom could not be surpassed. The depth of his religious knowledge was so profound that all three Khulafa-e-Rashideen called upon his aid in various legal problems.

Hazrat Alira was an exceptional jurist who evolved ijtihad to new heights. Ijtihad refers to exercising independent juristic reasoning to provide answers where the Holy Quran and Sunnah are silent. This would apply mostly to social conditions and not religious issues. The concept of ijtihad can be traced to the sixth century Hijrah when the Holy Prophetsa appointed Hazrat Muazra bin Jabal as the jurist to Yemen. 

His eloquent speech and sermons form an integral part of general Islamic culture.  A large number of his sermons, letters, commentary and narrations are contained in a book titled Nahj al-Balaghah (The Peak of Eloquence). A major portion of the book contains a lengthy discussion on the balance between rights and duties. 

The period of Khilafat-e-Rashida came to a sudden end one fateful day during Ramadan of 661 AD when Hazrat Alira was martyred while praying in the mosque in Kufa. This was a turning point in history of Islam and the beginning of a new chapter with Hazrat Muawiyyara as the first Umayyad Khalifa. During the period of Khilafat-e-Rashida, the khalifa was chosen for his piety and virtue; however, from the Umayyad period onward, it became a dynasty with khilafat being passed down based on blood relations.

Under the Umayyads, the migration of Arab tribes continued throughout the dominion as it had for the past twenty years. Individual Christians and Jews, depending on their own experience with Muslims, their interests and prejudices, portrayed Islam in very different ways. Few wrote about their interactions. None of the writers used the words Islam or Muslim; instead they spoke of Saracens, Arabs, Turks, Pagans, Moors, or simply those who followed the law of Muhammadsa.

As Arabic became the dominant language of the new Muslim Empire and as conversion to Islam facilitated entry into government service, growing numbers of Christians started converting to Islam. Towards the middle of the eighth century, leaders of the Christian communities started looking on with alarm and sought ways to stem the conversions. They felt an urgent need to convince Christians not to convert. Islam had to be explained to an average Christian as evil. This led to defamatory biographies of the Holy Prophetsa, something that soon becomes a staple of anti-Muslim polemics.

Various apocalyptic traditions had long predicted mass conversions to a “false” religion. Just as Jews had used these traditions to explain the successes of Christianity, now both Christians and Jews employed them to explain those of Islam. Islam became a manifestation of the Antichrist and there was a surge of apocalyptic activity among the Jews and Christians living in the Muslim Empire.

Among the Jews, for example, Abu Isa of Isfahan in the early eighth century claimed to be a prophet and the Messiah, his movement thriving for almost a century. The Apocalypse of Pseudo-Methodius, an extremely popular work originally written in Syria around 692, was translated into many languages to deter Christians from leaving their faith. The central theme of the book (and most, if not all apocalyptic literature) was that the Muslims were made to rule over the Christians not because God loved the Muslims, but because the Christians had sinned exceedingly. The idea was to convince the average Christian that the Muslim presence was permanent, at least until the apocalyptic end was ushered in and the Messiah revived the glory of Rome.

However, the expansion of the Muslim dominion into an empire and the freedom of faith in the early part of the rule up until around the 11th century, meant that the apocalyptic efforts of the Christians were mostly in vain and Islam, as a religion, spread at a much greater speed with people entering its domain on their own free will.

As time moved forward and the Umayyad rule fell to the Abassid and eventually to the Ottoman, the teaching of love for many turned towards the sword and the words of the Holy Quran, for many more, were lost in the dust of greed. It was not until the 19th Century that the prophetic words of the Holy Prophetsa came to being and the Messiah was raised so that the people of the world would see their God once again. 

This Messiah was to break the sword and win the hearts of each man, woman and child on this planet. Today, the Ahmadiyya institution of Khilafat is a manifestation of the teachings of the Holy Quran, a guidance for anyone who wishes for peace to reside in their heart. 

Primary sources used for this article:

Akbar Shah Najeebabadi, History of Islam. Darussalam, 2000.

Ahmad ibn Yahya Al-Baladhuri, Origins of Islamic State (Kitab futuh al-Buldan). Columbia, 1916.

David Nicolle, The Great Islamic Conquests AD 632-750. Osprey, 2009.

William Muir, The Caliphate – Its Rise, Decline and Fall. Edinburgh, 1924.

N Saifi, An Outline of Early Islamic History. Tabshir, Rabwah.

Shibli Naumani, Al-Farook. Dar-ul-Ishaat (Urdu Translation).

Al-Tabari, History of al-Tabari (Tarikh al-rusul wal-muluk).Suny, 1993.

Encyclopedia of Islam. Brill Publishing

100 Years Ago… – The Ahmadiyya and Woking missions: A glance at the results of their efforts

0

Al Fazl, 27 May 1919

Khawaja Kamaluddin Sahib went to the UK in order to convey the message of Islam which he had acquired from the Promised Messiahas. At least that is what he revealed to Ahmadis, but God knows what he disclosed to the people over there and what they perceived from his discourse.

Nonetheless, Khawaja Sahib reached the UK and began his efforts. Ahmadis were committed and ready to do as Khawaja Sahib directed. However, once he got there, he perceived that Ahmadiyyat was a narrow passage and the Ahmadiyya Jamaat was an insignificant group. Therefore, he declared that the tabligh of Ahmadiyyat and mentioning the name of the Promised Messiahas in the UK was a hurdle in the promulgation of Islam and it acted as a deadly poison.

Screenshot 2019 05 23 at 03.04.16

Hence, he carried on with the mission of converting Christians into Muslims, abandoning the way of God, about Whom he admitted that He had saved him from converting to Christianity and in fact rescued him from the pit of Christianity. Abiding by a wrong and erroneous way of preaching, he had not only imagined, but in fact believed that he would be able to attract countless people into the pale of Islam. However, regardless of his cunningness, the outcome of his efforts turned out to be futile as was destined. It became evident like daylight that it was the corruption of Khawaja Sahib’s heart and faith which led him to declare that mentioning the name of the Promised Messiahas in the UK acted as a deadly poison in the way of propagating Islam.

If it has really been the matter, then our mission which was solely based to present before the European nation that very Islam which was taught by the Promised Messiahas and to spread his name across the globe, would never have gained a strong foothold over there, resulting in the unsuccessful return of our missionaries. Moreover, the people of that region would not have considered them worthy of having any discussion or listening to their discourse, but instead they would have avoided them as one keeps away from a deadly poison.

Screenshot 2019 05 23 at 03.04.24

On the contrary, nobody can claim that our missionaries were unsuccessful in the task of conveying that same message of Ahmadiyyat, the true Islam, which was declared a deadly poison by Khawaja Sahib. [Can anybody prove] that Khawaja Sahib turned out to be successful by avoiding this poison as a result of which he abandoned the message of Ahmadiyyat? We would like to present a detailed description of this matter:

There was a very short span of time between the second visit of Khawaja Sahib and Mufti Sahib’s first visit to London. The former was well aware of the UK’s conditions because he had previously resided there and believed that mentioning the name of Ahmadiyyat was extremely detrimental in that place and it acted as a hurdle in the tabligh of Islam. The second person under discussion is the one who was totally unaware of the conditions of that region and was instructed by his imam, whom he considered worthy to be obeyed, in the following manner:

“Convey the truth [Ahmadiyyat]. This is your mission. It is not your responsibility to make them accept or embrace it.”

These were the words of Hazrat Khalifatul Masih II addressed to Mufti Sahib while delivering a lecture in a general gathering. In other words, the only responsibility of Mufti Sahib was to present before the European nation that Ahmadiyyat, which, according to Khawaja Sahib, acted as a deadly poison for the promulgation of Islam.

When we compare the outcome of Khawaja Sahib’s efforts with our missionaries, our hearts are filled with praise and gratitude to Allah the Almighty that He, through His benevolence, granted success to our missionaries, which was never achieved by the other party, in spite of possessing every kind of apparent means of success. In the span of two years, the total number of people who have accepted Islam, according to Khawaja Sahib, amounts to just 20.

No matter what sort of people Khawaja Sahib claims to have accepted Islam; whether they seek to develop the true teachings of Islam in themselves or not, whether they consider the drinking of wine as lawful, whether they seek to distort the very beliefs of Islam rather than adopting them after entering the pale of Islam or whether their moral conditions appear to be in the weakest possible state after declaring themselves to be a Muslim; no matter what Islamic beliefs these Muslims possess, the number Khawaja Sahib claims to have accepted Islam in the period of two years does not exceed the figure of 20. Perhaps, Khawaja Sahib is only “compelling them to accept God” and does not obligate those who become Muslims to abide by the doctrines of Islam. Competing with him on the other side are Mufti Muhammad Sadiq Sahib and his associate Qazi Muhammad Abdullah Sahib who have never extended their hand before any non-Ahmadi and never desired to receive stipends from any government, but rather their expenses are managed from the pockets of a handful of poverty-stricken Ahmadis.

Considering these Ahmadis as insignificant, Khawaja Sahib trustingly looked towards other governments and non-Ahmadis and ended up rusting his own hands. Owing to the efforts of our missionaries, with the blessings and benevolence of Allah the Almighty, in the same two-year period, around 70 individuals embraced Islam and each one of them is an Ahmadi who considers the Promised Messiahas to be a true prophet of God.

Nobody could ever have imagined the magnificence of this success and it becomes all the more significant when we compare the approach of our missionaries with those of the Woking mission. As mentioned earlier, the difference between the two separate ways of conveying the message of Islam is poles apart. The Woking mission is limited to compel (the people) to accept God and does not make any effort to obligate its Muslim converts to abide by the doctrines of the Shariah (divine law). More shockingly, the whereabouts of several of these converts are not revealed.

On the other hand, it is mandatory upon our missionaries that immediately after they have persuaded someone to accept God, they must commit him to believe in prophethood and do not consider him a Muslim on a verbal admission unless he makes an effort to practically abide by the doctrines of Islam. Hence, these people who become considerably close to Islam are called musaddiq (one who attests to the truth).

The Woking mission, however, defines Islam as merely verbally accepting God and the Prophetsa. If someone verbally admits that God is one and Muhammadsa was a prophet, it is put to paper by the Woking mission and an announcement is made that a lady or a gentleman has converted to Islam. Even by adding such kind of Muslims, the number of their new Muslim converts in two years does not exceed the figure of 15 or 20. However, four times more persons have converted to Islam by the efforts of Mufti Sahib and Qazi Sahib and there is not a single individual among them who has been considered (a Muslim) on verbal admission. Each one of them has faith in God and firmly believes in the true prophethood of Muhammadsa, moreover they accept the prophethood and messengership of Hazrat Ahmadas, the prophet of the age.

It is a matter of great happiness that several persons whom Khawaja Sahib has left after converting them to his lot of Muslims drank of this “deadly poison” [Ahmadiyyat] which was avoided by Khawaja Sahib as he considered it harmful, and they attained that renewed life which was once attained by Khawaja Sahib.

Has it not been proved that the assumption of Khawaja Sahib about the message of Ahmadiyyat that it acts as a deadly poison in the UK turned out to be an erroneous and futile perception? If this notion had been true, it would have certainly resulted in the failure of our missionaries. In fact, it appears that Khawaja Sahib’s idea was right in a certain way because if he had mentioned the name of that Messiah who is being mentioned in the Heavens with love by God Almighty and about whom He desired that his acceptance should spread across the globe, then this mention would have acted as a deadly poison for his [Khawaja Sahib’s] earnings which he used to receive from the non-Ahmadis.

It seems that Khawaja Sahib is in a state of shock for the reason that his efforts were not productive enough, regardless of having a great deal of money. Above all, he is grief stricken at the sight of what he considered to be a deadly poison for the people of the UK acting as an antidote for him.

Those conveying the message of Ahmadiyyat are successfully performing their tasks. The sum of the Woking mission’s lectures is very low in comparison to the lectures of our missionaries. Perhaps, this type of circumstances had an impact on his health. He has returned to India because he is unable to perform any work. We are sympathetic towards him over his failing health. However, we cannot stop ourselves from asking, will he still not learn a lesson from the kind of circumstances that have affected his health? And will he still retain his views that the message of Ahmadiyyat acts as a deadly poison for Europe, even after observing his failure and the success of those conveying the message of Ahmadiyyat?

Mufti Muhammad Sadiq Sahib, during his stay in London, repeatedly invited Khawaja Sahib for a discussion regarding the issues of mutual dispute. Mufti Sahib went so far as to give him a challenge of mubahalla (prayer duel) but he did not dare to come before him. Now it is unclear as to which battlefield he suggests for himself or, acting upon his old approach, whether he prefers to take part in politics or not. However, if he stimulates the issues of mutual dispute, he would realise that the age has passed when people are deceived by him.

(Translated by Al Hakam)

Original Urdu – Huzoor’s exclusive words about Mubarak Mosque and the institution of Khilafat

Hazrat Khalifatul Masih V’s exclusive words about the Mubarak Mosque and the institution of Khilafat

Caliphate: Validity in Question

This is an extract from the final chapter of the book Islamic Caliphate: The Missing Chapters. This recently launched book is a comparative study of three models of caliphate: The Ahmadiyya, the Ottoman and the ISIS. This study reveals that while the Ottoman and the ISIS caliphates both claimed to be successors of the Holy Prophetsa of Islam, both failed to deliver the claim when it came to practice. However, the Ahmadiyya caliphate – with its very humble resources – ran parallel to both (1908-1924 and then 2014-2017) and served the cause of the Islam in the best possible way by taking forward the mission of the Holy Prophetsa of Islam.

In the opening chapters, we have seen that caliphate, as a term, is taken to mean the successorship of the Holy Prophet Muhammadsa. We have also seen that after the first four Rashidun, hundreds of caliphs from a number of dynasties claimed the office. We have also seen that all of them – the Ummayads, the Abbasids and the Ottomans – practiced the rule of inheritance in passing down the title.

rsz minara at night

Before delving further into the question of who can be justly called the successor of the Prophetsa, we stop here and observe that dynastical rule could and can in no way be a valid formula of successorship of the Prophet Muhammadsa. The office is a spiritual one and hereditary succession can in no way guarantee the successor to be spiritually capable of taking on the position.

We see that the Ahmadiyya caliphate has practiced the method of Shura for succession of caliphs by ensuring that the person elected is fully capable in terms of religious understanding, spiritual leadership and administrative decision-making. This makes the Ahmadiyya caliphate the only one that followed the method of succession advised by the Prophetsa himself and practiced by his first four Rashidun caliphs.

Then there is the issue of defining successful leadership; success being inherent in the concept of caliphate as discussed in light of Islamic canonical sources and their classical, medieval interpretations. History bears witness that the Ummayads, the Abbasids and the Ottomans spent most of their time, energy, resources and human resources in warfare and territorial occupation.

Blue Mosque 2017

Their contribution towards secular learning cannot be undermined as it was during the rule of the Ummayad and the Abbasid dynasties that Muslim scholars prospered in the fields of philosophy, mathematics and sciences. But to align any success of any caliphate, the spiritual decline and constantly emerging sectarian cleavages at the hands of the clergy cannot be just put aside. Caliphs are meant to lead the nation just as the Holy Prophetsa did – morally, spiritually and religiously. The caliphs from the three main dynasties failed to do so. What was witnessed instead was a spiritual decline in Muslims who subsequently became weary of Islamic Shariah and resorted to innovations in the name of tariqa (mystic practices).

We have seen in the preceding chapters that the Ahmadiyya caliphate, on the other hand, always called Muslims to the fundamental teachings of Islam. One has to pledge that they will practice all tenets and pillars of faith to be accepted in the allegiance of the caliph (Hazrat Mirza Masroor Ahmadaa, Conditions of Bai‘at and Responsibilities of an Ahmadi). The migration of the Ahmadiyya caliphate from their headquarters in Pakistan to London was for the reason that the anti-Ahmadiyya laws did not allow the caliph to practice as a Muslim – breaching the law meant imprisonment and hence the termination of his caliphal role (https://www.hrw.org/news/2007/05/06/pakistan-pandering-extremists-fuels-persecution-ahmadis). Most of the millions of pages of literature produced by the Ahmadiyya caliphate calls its adherents to have a living relationship with God, to pray to Him, to practice every command of God and to live their lives according the Quran (www.ahmadiyya-islam.org/khalifa).

What services a caliph renders for the cause of propagation of Islam is another decisive factor in terms of validity of the claim to the office of the caliphate of the Holy Prophetsa of Islam. Thousands of mosques (built in every continent of the world), thousands of missions, hundreds of health  and educational facilities for the underprivileged parts of the world, humanitarian projects like providing water to the underdeveloped areas (www.amjinternational.org/activities/humanitarian-projects), translations of the Quran in hundreds of languages spoken across the globe, printing and publishing literature to educate the world about Islam (www.amjinternational.org/wp-content/uploads/A4_Report_2014_03_Web.pdf), and the lectures and addresses delivered by the caliph himself to various parliaments and congregations around the world, are all witness to the fact that no other claimant to Islamic caliphate has ever been able to render services for Islam at such a scale (www.ahmadiyya-islam.org/khalifa).

The moral character of a person is another touchstone to determine how much they qualify for a position sacred enough to be the successorship of the Holy Prophetsa. Books of history testify that many caliphs from the Ummayad, Abbasid and Ottoman dynasties were immersed in the habits of drinking and womanising. As “Amirul Momineen” – leader of the faithful – they would feel free to point to a “believing” girl and have her in their harems; women of the disbelieving subjects were taken to be more of an object and any of them could be summoned to satisfy the desires of the so-called caliphs. Some Ottoman caliphs are said to have had up to five hundred women as concubines in their harems – all waiting to be called for a lucky night. Sultan Abdel Hemid II (1842-1918) is said to be born to a Russian concubine of his father, Sultan Abdul Mejid, who, when informed of the child’s birth, did not even know which woman had given birth to his child – the heir to the throne as next “caliph”. Illegitimate conjugal relations, leading to illegitimate birth of future caliphs, is something that no Muslim would want to associate to the successor of the Holy Prophetsa of Islam (Shahab ud-Din an-Nuwayri, Niahayat al-Arab fi Funoon al-Adab [commonly known as Nihaya], Vol. 4).

The characters of the Ahmadiyya caliphs, on the other hand, have always been seen with great respect by their followers and non-followers alike. This one factor should, again, be helpful in understanding the true nature of caliphate.

The list of decisive factors is long. (Contemporary Muslim writers like Haroon Mughal have discussed how the caliphates that followed the Rashidun were not representative of the Islamic definition of caliphate and that a true caliph is required to lead the ummah [www.qz.com/546973/only-a-real-islamic-caliphate-can-stand-up-to-the-sham-of-isil].)

rsz can1610171

I conclude this work with one last factor. At a time when the Prophetsa of Islam and the religion of Islam come under attack by a vast population of the world; when Islam becomes a symbol of terror and the Prophetsa of Islam is branded as the founder of religious fanaticism, who is it that comes forward as a defender of Islam? As seen in preceding chapters, it has always been the Ahmadiyya caliph. The British Parliament, the Parliament of New Zealand, the Canadian Parliament, Capitol Hill in the USA, the Irish Parliament, African heads of states, all invite Hazrat Mirza Masroor Ahmadaa, the Ahmadiyya caliph to speak to them about the Islamic viewpoint on various contemporary world issues.

2mpgre9

We find no other example from the Muslim leadership – if there does exist one – to have approached all influential heads of states and faith leaders in as systematic a manner to invite them to understand the true teachings of Islam and to play their role in eradicating religious differences for a better, pluralistic world; the only Islamic leader to have done so has been Hazrat Mirza Masroor Ahmadaa, the Ahmadiyya caliph, who not only did so but also publicised the correspondence to set an example (World Crisis and the Pathway to Peace – Included are letters written by Hazrat Mirza Masroor Ahmadaa to the Pope, the Queen of England and the heads of states of Israel, Iran, USA, France, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Germany and Canada).

The intention is not to end this work by giving a judgmental answer. It is rather to invite members of the academia and those interested in the subject to come up with an analysis of their own. The motive is to open an avenue for academics to research and fill a gap in the scholarly study of Islamic caliphate.

Book cover 25 page 001

Another intention of this work has been to draw attention to the astounding and bitter fact that the international media all along seemed more interested in the work of a caliphate that stood for hate, violence, terrorism and brutality. Why the work of the caliphate that stood for love, peace, harmony and interfaith collaboration never got the same level of media interest is a question we would want to, at the least, be raised if not answered.

If the circles of both the academia and the media reply by way of judging the status of Ahmadiyya as a “heretic” movement, or a sect that is declared “out of the pale of Islam” by the orthodox Muslims, I would advise that the theological debate be left aside as almost all Islamic sects have declared each other the same.

After a VBIED Iraq War 2007 2008

The Ahmadiyya caliphate was around and fully functional in the later years of the Ottoman caliphate; it was around and globally functional when the ISIS caliphate rose and fell. However, it never got to be studied in a systematic, academic and scholarly manner as it deserves.

No claims have been made in this work. It is not being presented as a complete work on the topic of Islamic caliphate in the modern day. This work is just a means to provide a steppingstone for those who wish to carry out research in this field.

(The book Islamic Caliphate: The Missing Chapters is available at www.amazon.co.uk and other regional Amazon outlets)