Home Blog Page 616

Ahmadiyya Educational Scheme

2

It was in 1979 that an Ahmadi stalwart, Professor Dr Abdus Salam won the Nobel Prize. This achievement was celebrated not only in the world of science but also in the world of Ahmadiyyat; the first Muslim scientist to be awarded this prestigious prize happened to be an Ahmadi. 

Hazrat Mirza Nasir Ahmad, Khalifatul Masih IIIrh, celebrated this achievement in a very unique way. While there were receptions held in honour of this great scientist, Hazrat Khalifatul Masih IIIrh demonstrated his pleasure in a very pragmatic way.

Divinely inspired, he launched the Ahmadiyya Educational Scheme to encourage and facilitate the pursuit of higher education in Ahmadi youth. This scheme included issuing of grants for youth who couldn’t afford education for financial reasons, loans for those who had excelled in academic examinations but required financial support to pursue further education and measures to ensure that no Ahmadi was left illiterate. Huzoorrh set a standard that every Ahmadi should at least study to the matriculation standard (equivalent to O Levels, now GCSE in the UK).

Huzoor, addressing the 1979 Jalsa Salana Rabwah, included this scheme in the Ahmadiyya Muslim Centenary Celebration Programme (which was ten-years from that point in time). 

Laying out the plan before the Jamaat, Hazrat Khalifatul Masih IIIrh stated:

“One of the glad tidings given to the Promised Messiahas by Allah the Almighty is, ‘People of my sect will excel in knowledge and enlightenment to such a standard that they, with the light of truthfulness, debate and signs, will render everyone speechless.’

“What a great revelation it is … A desire kindled in my heart that in the next century [of the Jamaat] which is only a decade away, we need one thousand scientists and researchers; and a hundred of them in the decade that lies between now and then… Dr Abdus Salam worked in his field, succeeded and was awarded the Nobel Prize.

“This day, I announce that the Jamaat should take responsibility of every child who is intelligent but not financially stable, right from the primary school stage. No intelligent child born in the Jamaat, be they born in the jungles of Africa or in the palaces of New York, in Moscow or in the vicinity of the Ka‘ba, should be wasted. Humanity should save the mind of that child. This is what Islam has taught us and this is what we should try and establish.”

_st003_copy.jpg
Hazrat Mirza Nasir Ahmad, Khalifatul Masih IIIrh

Hazrat Khalifatul Masih IIIrh, in the same address, announced grants and loans for the educational pursuit of children and youth in this address.

During his visit of Europe in 1980, Hazrat Khalifatul Masih IIIrh announced that although this Educational Scheme was launched in Pakistan, but in a few years’ time, it would be extended across the world. Stating the purpose of this scheme, Huzoorrh said:

“I launched this scheme with the objective to propagate the teachings of the Holy Quran.

“The more secular knowledge you attain, the better your understanding of Allah’s attributes will be. Allah the Almighty wants us to attain knowledge of His attributes and the manifestation of these attributes in the Universe, hence progressing in enlightenment and becoming a true servant. Similarly, He wishes for us that we acquire religious knowledge as well as knowledge of secular disciplines.”

Huzoorrh initiated a scheme to award medals to students who excelled in their academic examinations. For this purpose, the first medal-awarding ceremony was held on 13 June 1980 where six students were awarded medals by Hazrat Khalifatul Masih IIIrh. The second ceremony was held on the occasions of the Ijtemas of Majlis Khuddam-ul-Ahmadiyya and Majlis Ansarullah Pakistan in 1980. The third ceremony, again in 1980, was held on the august occasion of Jalsa Salana Rabwah in December. 

This is the background of the degree awarding ceremony that we all witness at the Jalsa Salana UK and also at other Jalsas. Hazrat Khalifatul Masih Vaa, during his address to this year’s Jalsa UK, reiterated the importance of attaining excellence in academic and educational pursuits and also reminded Ahmadi youth of the medals that are awarded every year to qualifying Ahmadi students.

Coming back to the desire of Hazrat Khalifatul Masih IIIrh regarding Ahmadi scientists, we know that there are at least a thousand now who are researching at post-graduate and doctoral levels. We witness such scientists and social-scientists in the meetings that they have with Huzooraa during his tours to various countries. They get a chance to present before Huzooraa the crux of their research. We have witnessed in these classes that whatever their area of research, Huzooraa always has an aspect to add to their vision. Waqf-e-Nau classes have also shown us how resolute Huzooraa is in his desire that Ahmadi men and women should excel in education. 

Academic Excellence

0

Ahmadi men and women have always been known to be well-educated and better qualified than many. The names of members of Lajna Imaillah who received awards at Jalsa Salana UK 2018 from Hazrat Mirza Masroor Ahmad, Khalifatul Masih Vaa are presented below. The level and areas of their qualifications vary from higher secondary school level to masters’ and doctoral levels. 

Natasha Syed, Naaima Arooj Amini, Kainat Arshad, Sufia Eman Ahmed, Hiba Tu Noor, Natasha Sami Carmichael, Kafia Ahmad, Jaziba Ahmed, Fariyah Khalid, Alisha Hafsa Khan, Afia Haider, Safa Noor Ahmad, Marwa Saboor Ahmad, Zunaira Khan, Lubna Latif, Sawaira Waqas, Ghibtah Noreen Ahsan, Amtul Kafi Mubashera, Dania Bushra Chaudhry, Namude Sahar Malik, Madiha Komal Rashid, Sitwat Mirza, Hania Buttar, Zoha Akram, Sophia Saeed, Maaria Qureshi, Khola Aqeel Shah, Sara Ahmed, Serena Yasmin Jade Waters, Shazeen Ahmed Amir, Khulat Aminah Saqi, Tahiya Latif, Maliha Ahmad Khan, Maria Adeel Butt, Amna Farooq, Sumera Ahmed, Aysha Ahmad, Sehrish Ahmad Khawaja, Ghazala Nasir, Rameeza Bushra Khan, Shamaila Naeem, Misbah Batool, Ghazala Abbasi, Malahat Khaula Safeer, Dr Hibbah Araba Saeed Osei Kwasi, Dr Shams-Un-Nisa Naveed, Nasreena Lone, Sadaf Hafeez Soodhary, Rehana Ul Haq, Rida Basharat, Aisha Masood, Atiyatul Ghalib, Anna Javed Suleri, Ghazala Muzafar Arain, Noor-Us-Sehar Mahboob, Salma Ahmad Sharma, Modinat Adekoya, Dr Basirat Olajumoke Dikko, Hibbatul-Haiy Chughtai, Nudrat Anwar, Andleeb Anwar, Uzma Kanwal Dar, Iram Anwar, Syeda Isha Ahmed, Zoya Smamah Shahid, Alia Ali Rida-al-Nahwi c/o Hibba Tul Rehman AlJabi, Kholoud Al Jabi c/o Hibba Tul Rehman Aljabi, Noureen Ahmad, Alina Khan, Shireen Younus, Saadia Nawal, Saira Khawas Bhatti, Aneeqa Farakh, Farwa Jamil, Mnahil Anwar Chaudhry, Mahedah Amjad, Sadia Saeed Awan, Mahnoor Mumtaz, Shamama Tu Shafi, Dania Munawar Chaudhry, Faiza Farooq, Iqra Chaudhry, Rida Mansoor Ranjha, Mahwish Ahmed, Ayesha Zafar, Tahira Malik, Manahil Mahmood Sardar, Ayesha Hamid, Sadaf Salman, Sadia Daud, Naima Madiha Bari, Nomana Ayesha Majeed, Sahir Waseem, Maria Iram, Madiha Hamayat, Ashtti Ali, Basima Tariq, Naila Tariq and Dania Shafiq.

Members of Majlis Khuddam-ul-Ahmadiyya and Majlis Ansarullah who received awards at Jalsa Salana UK 2018 from Hazrat Mirza Masroor Ahmad, Khalifatul Masih Vaa:

Syed Arfin Ahmad Tajammal, Nasir Ahmed Buttar, Amir Saeed Bhatti, Farhan Chughtai, Zeeshan Rahman Bhutta, Mian Daanish Ahmad Ghaffar, Ibsham Ahmad Taufeeque Bhatti, Bilaal Yousaf Dar, Hamza Maghfoor Ahmad, Tauseef Uddin, Fardan Ali, Abdur Raheem Butt, Hashir Ahmad Malik, Akram Hameed Khan Ghauri, Muhammad Aaman Khan, Kashir Ahmed Raza, Jibran Ahmad Raja, Muneeb Ur Rehman Maaz, Rehman Amjad, Farhan Saeed, Agha Rizwan Ullah, Haris Ahmed, Talha Ahmed, Adnan Tahir Gondal, Roshaan Bajwa, Wajahat Atthar Ahmed, Rizwan Kafayit Cheema, Mirza Labeeb Ahmad, Rashid Mubashir Talha, Danyal Ahmad Siddiqui, Syed Abdul Bari Rizvi, Tanzeel Ur Rehman, Bariz Nouman Haider, Khurram Luqman Bhatti, Syed Yousaf Ahmad, Nabeel Ahmad Cheema, Arsam Mahmood, Sameer Ur Rehman Khan, Behram Khan Saeed, Sharjel Amir, Haris Ahmed, Danial Ahmad Zafar Mirza, Nafil Rehman Malik, Salman Nasir Buttar, Raheel Ahmad Karim, Sabahat Ahmed, Asad Malik, Faiq Khan, Osama Mahmood Hamid, Ahmad Kamal Mirza, Hamza Hameed, Sarmad Ihsan Suhail, Anil Ahmed, Khurram Razi Khan, Rizwan Saeed Asif, Basam Uz Zaman, Muhammad Saad Nabeebaccus, Mubarak Ahmad Waseem, Irfan Ahmed Quraishi, Dr Daud Tai Shan Chau, Dr Shakeel Ahmad, Dr Imran Ahmed, Dr Mohammad Azhar Ashraf, Dr Muzzafer Chaudery, Dr Syed Hamid Safeer Ahmad, Kaleem Ahmad, Razi Ul Munim, Hammad Saleem, Basharat Ur Rehman, Ataul Hayy Choudhry, Dr Abdul Haq Compier, Dr Abdul Rauf, Agha Bilal Khan, Jazib Ahmad Shahid, Daramy Vandi Von Kallon, Hamid Tahir, Tahir Hafeez Malik, Ihtisham Ahmad Joya, Adnan Ahmed, Adeel Mirza, Aamir Munif, Nasir Saeed, Aaqib Mahmood, Saqib Mahmood, Zeeshan Zakaria, Dr Aasil Chatha, Dr Mirza Tahir Ahmed, Bushra Kainat, Arslan Ahmet Onder, Hamza Haroon, Muhammad Rizwan, Usama Tanveer, Dr Muhammad Imran Khan, Dr Abdul Qoyum Tjandranegata and Dr Musa Sekikubo.

 

 

We Are Helpless Without God

0
rsz_hazrat_mirza_ghulam_ahmad_qadiani_as.jpg

Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad a.s.

 

 

If you become one with God, rest assured that God too will be yours. God Almighty shall remain awake for you as you sleep. God shall watch over your enemy and frustrate their designs, while you are unmindful of him. You still do not know the extent of God’s powers. Had you known, not a single day would you have grieved over the world. Does he who owns a treasure weep, cry and become sorrowful unto death over the loss of a single coin? Had you been aware of this treasure and knew that at every time of need God is able to fulfil your requirements, why would you look to the world so restlessly? God is a precious treasure; appreciate Him accordingly, for He is your Helper at every step. You are nothing without Him, nor do your resources and your schemes amount to anything. Do not follow other people for they have become wholly reliant on material means.

(Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmadas, Noah’s Ark, p. 37)

Sharia on the Altar of the Federal Shariat Court

0

Tanweer Akhtar Shahid

Thinking of the state of Sharia in the Islamic Republic of Pakistan reminds me of the famous line of the Ancient Mariner where he cries “Water, water, every where, nor any drop to drink”. 

rsz_asdfghjkl.png

One can hear deafening noise of enforcing Sharia in Pakistan by both the leftists and the rightists to secure their worldly interests. However, practically and in essence, the louder the noise became, the national character severed its relationship more intensely with the Sharia. Thus we find the Federal Shariat Court having no relationship with justice based on Sharia which is the primary function of the court, rather it is a perfect embodiment of judicial and moral bankruptcy and completely lacks human decency. The case of a group of Ahmadis, challenging the infamous Ordinance XX of 1984, brought to the Federal Shariat Court, proves the truth of this statement in letter and spirit. 

For the sake of understanding we have divided this into three parts. 

1. The Background 

2. The Discussions 

3. The Conclusion

The Background

Ahmadiyyat is nothing but the true Islam. Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, peace be upon him, claimed on Divine authority to have been appointed as Al-Imam Al-Mahdi and as the Promised Messiah to revive Islam and to re-establish its past glory, fulfilling prophecies found in all major world religions. 

Since the inception of Ahmadiyyat in 1889 until 1974, all efforts by so-called religio-social alliances miserably failed to stop the progress of Ahmadiyyat. In 1974 a bigger religiopolitical alliance was created and the Second Amendment to the 1973 Constitution was passed. 

The false pretext of Ahmadis not believing in Hazrat Muhammad, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, as the last of the prophets was used and Ahmadis were declared not Muslims “for the purposes of the Constitution or Law”. (www.pakistani.org/pakistan/constitution/amendments/2amendment.html) Consequently Ahmadis were left with no option but to sacrifice all their worldly rights, including, but not limited to, the right to vote, enrolling in educational institutions, seeking jobs etc. 

The amendment that was being celebrated as a grand victory against Ahmadiyyat, to the utter surprise of its enemies, proved to be counterproductive. As declared in the Holy Quran, “Allah is the Best of planners”, (Surah Aal-e-Imran: V.55) so He caused Ahmadiyyat to enter a new era of progress. The Khalifa of the time, following the model conduct of the Holy Prophetsa, admonished Ahmadis not to fret over the constitutional amendment as the Holy Prophetsa did not fret over when infidels called him “muzammam”, the condemned one, instead of his holy name “Muhammad”, the most praised. The practical response of Ahmadis to this amendment was, as Shakespeare very aptly put it, was:

“What is in a name? That which we call a rose;

By any other name would smell as sweet.” 

Ahmadi Muslims passed by it with full dignity, as expressed by an Arab poet:

ولقد أمرّ على اللئيم يسبّنی

فمضيت ثمت قلت لا يعنينی

“I passed by a mean person who was swearing at me; I continued to proceed saying he does not mean me.” 

Following the advice of the Khalifa, Ahmadis remained contented that Allah had called them Muslims and continued to practice Islam in letter and spirit. Panicked and frustrated by this situation, using the amendment pretext, several civil suits were filed to take over Ahmadi mosques and to seek injunctions against Ahmadis. 

The plaintiffs alleged that although it was the exclusive right of Muslims but Ahmadi “place of worship is known as a mosque (Masjid) and they perform prayer in it which resembles the prayer in Shariat and includes Azan, Namaz, Qyam, Sajood, Ruku‘, reading of the Quran, saying Darood-o-Salam on the Holy Prophet and invoking benediction (dua).” (Abdur Rehman Mubashir v. Syed Amir Ali Shah, PLD 1978 Lahore 113; at 126)

As these suits reached the appeal stage, “Finally, in November 1977 the Lahore High Court passed a judgment dismissing orders of the subordinate courts granting injunctions against Ahmadis.” (https://appgfreedomofreligionorbelief.org/media/RESEARCH-DOCUMENT-1-discrimination-against-religious-minorities.-Analysis.pdf

Regarding the Sh‘aair (sanctified signs) the Court specifically held “They are as good Sh‘aair  for the Qadianis too since they consider them necessary as a matter of conscience to perform the duty of obedience to Allah.” (Abdur Rehman Mubashir v. Syed Amir Ali Shah, PLD 1978 Lahore 113; at 189-190).

 It was in line with a previous judgment holding “Except for some other minor differences the Qadianis do believe in the mission of Prophet Muhammadsa, and the Holy Quran and the Traditions…” (Agha Abdul Karim Shorish Kashmiri and others Vs Province of West Pakistan PLD 1969 Lahore)

The frustrated enemies sought help from Zia-ul-Haq, the military dictator, who at that point in time, desperately needed political legitimacy to prolong his dictatorial period. This was an unfortunate but happy marriage of a dictator and the clergy. The couple had no hope of any issue so they quickly adopted the bastard baby born to Mr Doultana and the Ahrars in 1953, who was “still alive and waiting for some-one to pick it up.” (Report of the Court of Inquiry Constituted Under Punjab Act II of 1954 to Enquire into the Punjab Disturbances of 1953, p. 286) The baby was used as a simile for illegitimate Ahrari demands against Ahmadis. Zia accepted all these demands through the promulgation of infamous Ordinance XX of 1984. 

The Federal Shariat Court under article 203 D of the Constitution “could strike down any law as being repugnant to Quran and Sunnah”. (Error at the Apex, Mujeeb-ur-Rahman)

Therefore, a few Ahmadis, in their personal capacity, challenged the religious validity of the ordinance “on the ground that it violated Sharia.” (The Nation and Its Heretics: Courts, State Authority and Minority Rights in Pakistan, Sadia Saeed, Indiana University, Bloomington, p. 1)

The proceedings and the judgment both make an interesting but sad story of how “both juridical outcomes and legal reasoning about Ahmadis” were reversed. (ibid., p. 3) The Federal Shariat Court was a creation of an absolute dictator who employed it as a “strategic tool… to exert control over the judiciary”. (ibid., p. 38)

The Discussions

Mr Mujeeb-ur-Rahman, one of the petitioners who also argued the case before the Court, writes that in order to support the petition, more than one hundred and fifty references were attached. For every prohibition, specific references were given from the Holy Quran and the Sunnah, explaining through the commentaries from all phases of Islamic history to the present time. The debate continued for about fourteen days, discussing every point in its fullest details. (Ordinance XX of 1984 Before the Federal Shariat Court [Urdu], Mujeeb-ur-Rahman, pp. 7-8)

One cannot help but to appreciate the intelligence of Mujeeb-ur-Rahman Sahib who declared his faith as Islam in the Court and started his opening speech by reciting the Shahada (“I believe that there is none worthy of worship except Allah and that Muhammad is His messenger”) and the Khutba Masnoona, the invocation used by the Prophetsa of Islam.

Mujeeb-ur-Rahman Sahib writes that he established three principal stands to argue the case. The first of them had been that as the Court had no power to strike down the Constitutional Amendment even if proved it had no justification, therefore, notwithstanding the Constitutional Amendment, the prohibitions in the Ordinance were to be considered on the anvil of Holy Quran and the Sunnah. 

screen_shot_2018-08-15_at_19.20.30.png

Title of the infamous Ordinance XX

The second of them had been that as per the intent of Article 203 D of the Constitution, although other Islamic sources would be consulted for the sake of proper understanding of any injunction of the Holy Quran and the Sunnah, but in order to test the justification of the laws the only yardstick on which the decisions should be based should be the Holy Quran and the Sunnah, even excluding all shades of Islamic jurisprudence. 

The third and the last of them had been that as the decision should be based on the Holy Quran and the Sunnah, it should also be decided what principles be applied to understand the injunctions of the Holy Quran and the Sunnah. The following five principles for the interpretation of the Holy Quran, as agreed by classical and modern Muslim scholars, were presented before the Court by the petitioners: 

1. The Holy Quran 

2. The Holy Prophet’ssa sayings and established conduct 

3. Sayings of the Companionsra of the Holy Prophetsa  

4. The Arabic language

5. The contextual requirements of the statements. (ibid. pp. 15-17) 

Mujeeb-ur-Rahman Sahib writes that it was contended that: 

a. “The Ordinance violated the letter and spirit of Quranic injunctions about freedom of conscience and religious liberty.” 

b. “The Quran and Sunnah do not justify any compulsion in the matter of faith.” 

c. “What has been declared to be lawful by the Quran and the Sunnah cannot be declared unlawful by State authorities and that the acts declared laudable and commendable by Quran and Sunnah cannot be made criminal offences punishable under law.” 

d. “There is nothing in the Quran and Sunnah to stop a non-Muslim from believing in and declaring the unity of Allah or to acknowledge the Holy Prophetsa of Islam to be truthful in his claim or to adopt the teachings of Quran as a code of life or to act upon the injunctions of Islam if he voluntarily so chooses.” 

“There were lengthy arguments on both sides.” (Error at the Apex, Mujeeb-ur-Rahman, www.thepersecution.org/archive/erratapex/04.html) Under the special instructions of Hazrat Mirza Tahir Ahmad, Khalifatul Masih IVrh, the petitioners placed before the Court the following questions:  

1. “Does Islam entitle and allow a non-Muslim to declare the unity of Allah?”

2. “Does Islam entitle a non-Muslim to acknowledge the Holy Prophetsa as truthful in his claim?” 

3. “Does Islam entitle a non-Muslim to acknowledge the Quran as furnishing a good Nizam-e-Hayat i.e. way of life and to treat it as worthy of obedience?” 

4. “Is [it] permissible or not for a non-Muslim to act upon the Injunctions of the Holy Quran if he so likes?”

5. “If the answer be in the negative, where is the injunction in the Quran and the Sunnah in support of this negation?” 

6. “What course of action does the Quran propose or provide for a person who is not considered Muslim nor has any right to be so considered by believers, in the truthfulness of Quran, in the prophethood of Muhammad Rasulullahsa and the Oneness of Allah.” (PLD 1985 FSC, p. 89) 

rsz_screen_shot_2018-08-15_at_192020.png

Ordinance XX of 1984 Before the Federal Shariat Court (Urdu) | Mujeeb-ur-Rahman

The Court dealt with these questions saying:

“The first four questions posed by Mr Mujeeb-ur-Rahman have to be answered in the affirmative. There is no bar – Constitutional, legal or [Shar‘i] against the right of a non-Muslim to declare the unity of Allah, to acknowledge the Holy Prophet, peace and blessings of Allah be on him, as truthful in his claim, to acknowledge the Quran as furnishing a good way of life and to act upon its injunctions. The fifth question does not arise in view of the affirmative answer of the fourth question. A clear answer to the sixth question is that such a non-Muslim is to be dealt with like other minorities, subject to the conditions imposed by the Quran and the Sunnah which shall be considered at the appropriate place.” (PLD 1985 FSC, p. 93)

The court categorically stated:

“The Muslim Sharia affords full protection to the practice of religion by the non-Muslims as well as to its profession.” (ibid.)

The Court goes on to say that:

“Islam teaches absolute tolerance in matters of religion and leaves it to the conscience of a man to accept the religion of Islam. No compulsion in this respect is allowed in Islam.”

Mujeeb-ur-Rahman Sahib challenged the ban on Azan – Islamic call to prayer – by Ahmadis. He writes that he “mainly relied upon verses 5:2 and 41:33 of the Holy Quran. In the verse 5:2 ‘best of utterance’ refers to Azan, which cannot be made punishable. It was further argued that if a religious practice is common between Muslim and non-Muslim it cannot be denied to non-Muslim and that according to Quranic mandate Muslims are required to cooperate with non-Muslims in such matters. It was also argued on the authority of Quranic text that sacred rites are not to be desecrated or denied just because non-Muslims wish to carry them out. Azan was such a sacred rite. It was also argued, again on the authority of Quranic text, that Muslims should cooperate with non-Muslims on the basis of a common denominator.

“Confronted with the thrust of the argument based on the unimpeachable Quranic text, at one stage the Counsel for the Federation found no escape but to argue that the particular portion of the verse of the Quran stood repealed.” (Error at the Apex, Mujeeb-ur-Rahman)

It is interesting to note that regarding the Sh‘aair the Court mentions arguments presented by both sides. Then, it states, “The opinion of Pir Muhammad Karam Shah, now a Judge of the Supreme Court Shariat Bench, in his well-known commentary Ziaul Quran favours the opinion of Mr Mujeeb-ur-Rahman.” (PLD 1985 FSC, p. 111)

rsz_asdfghjkl.png

On this situation, Mr Mujeeb-ur-Rahman comments in his book by saying:

“The court did not record any finding as to which of the two contending views prevailed with the court. Nor did it record any reason either for accepting or for rejecting one view or the other and felt content merely with the recording of the two views. The inference is obvious.” (Error at the Apex, Mujeeb-ur-Rahman, www.thepersecution.org/archive/erratapex/04.html)

This was not a case of seeking validity and correctness of the Ahmadiyya version of Islam from a court that comprised of judges who, in order to secure these jobs for themselves, had demonstrated their partiality and bias by taking oath and rejecting the claim of the holy founder of Ahmadiyyat. It was a case asking the Court to strike down a law that was categorically repugnant to Quran and Sunnah. But the Court permitted the respondents to enter into irrelevant discussions about doctrinal issues during the proceedings. These issues were Khatm-e-Nubuwat (finality of prophethood), jihad, prophecies of the Promised Messiahas, “insult” to Jesus Christas, praise of British Empire, etc. The petitioner accepted this challenge and chased them in that haven as well. The petitioners explained to the Court that for the sake of argument, even if it was proved that Ahmadiyya interpretations were incorrect, did that justify the prohibitions in the Ordinance XX according to Holy Quran and Sunnah? Did it justify that religious freedoms of a community be taken away on the basis that the religious doctrines of that community could not be approved and accepted by the majority of a country? What actually happened in the Court during these proceedings can precisely be known from the following:

Mr Mujeeb-ur-Rahman expresses his deepest sense of gratitude to Almighty God for His miraculous help and support that he received while he was arguing this case. In his book (Ordinance XX of 1984 Before the Federal Shariat Court [Urdu]) he devotes a full chapter (p. 20) on his recollection of Divine favours that he received and witnessed during those proceedings. He also mentions the level of panic in the respondents’ camp. 

The manner in which the Sharia was being interpreted by the respondents in the Court to oppose the petition was not different from the one in which it is being interpreted from the pulpits of the mosques even today. Realising the revulsion of human nature against such a version of Islam and expected criticism from the international community, Justice Fakhar Alam could not help but comment, “In such a situation would we be able to show our faces to the present world?” (Ordinance XX of 1984 Before the Federal Shariat Court [Urdu], Mujeeb-ur-Rahman, p. 32) Qazi Mujeeb-ul-Rehman, showing utter disregard to human nature and prospective censure from international community, sticking to his version of Sharia retorted, “I am talking of Sharia and I don’t care about anything else”. (ibid., p. 34)

Mr Tahir ul Qadri also appeared before the Court as a jurist consult. Summing up why he was called by the Court and what was happening in the Court, all this he tells about in an inside story. Mr Qadri describes the situation of respondents in the Court who appeared to oppose the petition. He says:

“Scholars from around the country appeared before the Court – the foremost scholars. When they appeared and the hearing came to a complete end, I swear by Allah as my witness and proclaim that there is none worthy of worship except Allah and that Muhammad is His messenger, all of them were defeated. This is the inside story and I am telling you today the thing that happened inside. They could not secure the dismissal of the appeal made by Qadianis. And they made themselves an object of laughter. Included among them were scholars from Tahaffuz Namoos-e-Resalat, Tahaffuz Khatam-e-Nubuwat, Ulama Deoband, Ahl-e-Hadith, Ahl-e-Sunnat; all of them appeared. They could not answer any one of the questions that was put to them by the Court, which were raised by Qadianis. Whosoever from the scholars appeared before the Court would start discussing the issue of his [Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmadas]  prophethood, that he made a claim to prophethood [in light of the Hadith] ‘There shall be no prophet after me’ and [the status of] ‘Khatam-un-Nabiyyin’ and that a person who claimed to be a prophet would naturally become an infidel and apostate. Therefore, they said, they [Ahmadis] are not Muslims. The Court said that this was not an issue before the Court. This had been settled in the 1973 Constitution in the time of Mr Bhutto through the parliament. They [Ahmadis] had been declared a non-Muslim minority. So his [Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmadas] claim to be a prophet, being an infidel and apostate was not a matter under the consideration of the Court. They would come and present arguments that he was one-eyed, that he used to ask women to press his legs, that he was not a believer and that he used to say that he received revelations [which made no sense to them]. They were citing this sort of references just to cause laughter. This very act of those scholars rendered the sanctity of religion to a laughing stock. The scholars spoke about such things while the Court laughed at them. The Court told them that in doing so, they would lose the case! None of these matters was under consideration. They [Ahmadis] had asked a simple thing – why did the Constitution declare them non-Muslims? They demanded their freedom of religion being a non-Muslim minority. They said, ‘This is what our religion requires from us and we should have the right to it. Why interfere in it? Present your arguments on this issue from the Sharia whether we can or cannot use such and such words as a matter of our freedom of religion.’ When all of the scholars had appeared before the Court and the Court became extremely upset, I was on a tour in Norway. I received a telephone call. None of them argued about the matter before the Court. This is their problem even today. They make the non-issue an issue, thereby confusing matters. This is the reality. They present their arguments about his [Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmadas] being an apostate and that is not an issue before the Court. The issue is what freedoms they have as non-Muslim minority.”

Mr Qadri takes credit and claims that it was exclusively due to his representations before the Court that the petition was dismissed.

I conclude this part on what Mr Mujeeb-ur-Rahman writes in his book:

“The discussion was very lengthy and many issues came under discussion. The complete discussion that continued for fourteen days cannot be reduced to writing.” (Ordinance XX of 1984 Before the Federal Shariat Court [Urdu], Mujeeb-ur-Rahman, p. 48)

Conclusion

Through a short order, pending the detailed judgment by the consensus of all the five judges, the petition was dismissed. (PLD 1984 FSC 136) As Faiz Ahmad Faiz once said, “Par terey ehad sey agey to ye dastoor na tha” [This was not the law before your time]. (Quoted by Hazrat Mirza Tahir AhmadrhKhutbat-e-Tahir, Vol. 3, p. 399) The judgment presented a textbook example of “a historical reversal, of earlier court commitments to safeguarding rights and religious freedoms of minorities”. (The Nation and Its Heretics: Courts, State Authority and Minority Rights in Pakistan, Sadia Saeed, Indiana University, Bloomington, pp. 1-2)

The reasons that could not be accepted by the independent judiciary since 1953 to 1978 became acceptable by it under a dictator’s rule. The judges in 1953, exposing the unreasonable nature of the demands against Ahmadis said that the Prime Minister “could not have accepted the demands as it would certainly have exposed Pakistan to ridicule and disillusioned the international world of her claims as an advancing, progressive and democratic State.” (Report of the Court of Inquiry Constituted Under Punjab Act II of 1954 to Enquire into the Punjab Disturbances of 1953, p. 264) But in 1984 the judges, by giving this judgment that justified the acceptance of these demands by a dictator, practically declared: Who cares about Pakistan? 

The Court, showing its utter disregard to human decency, incorporated in its detailed judgment irrelevant material and presented in judicial garments what was already available in the public domain as malicious content and hate speech against Ahmadis and was being propagated by the clergy. (Ordinance XX of 1984 Before the Federal Shariat Court [Urdu], Mujeeb-ur-Rahman, p. 203) The petitioners protested against this illegal, illogical and indecent attitude of the Court in their appeal. (ibid., p. 213)

To the utter astonishment of the international legal fraternity, the detailed judgment was signed by the four judges while the fifth judge’s opinion, who was the Chief Justice of that Court, was not mentioned anywhere. (Gustaf Patern, (1987) Pakistan: Human Rights after Martial Law. Geneva: International Commission of Jurists. p. 62) Though the petition was dismissed, the Court accepted almost all the arguments of the petitioners. (Ordinance XX of 1984 Before the Federal Shariat Court [Urdu], Mujeeb-ur-Rahman, p. 201) As a matter of faith, all five judges were not only themselves a party to the petition, rather they also lacked the moral courage to declare “I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.” 

As a conclusion of the conclusion, we would like to quote here the verse of Mirza Ghalib as cited by Hazrat Mirza Tahir Ahmadrh when he commented on the expected outcome of the petition. Hazrat Mirza Tahir Ahmad, Khalifatul Masih IVrh says, “I had written to the petitioners at the very beginning of the proceedings:

Qaasid ke atey atey khat ik aur likh rakhun; mein janta hoon jo vo likheingey javab mein’

[Better I write another letter before the messenger returns; I know what they will be writing in reply to my letter already sent.] (Hazrat Mirza Tahir Ahmadrh, Khutbat-e-Tahir, Vol. 3, p. 447)

The petitioners made an appeal before the Shariat Appellate Bench of the Supreme Court, but on the hearing date they found that two of the judges to hear the appeal had already publically approved the legality of the infamous Ordinance XX of 1984. These judges insisted to continue to sit on the bench. There was no wisdom to argue an appeal before judges sitting with such closed minds so the petitioners sagaciously withdrew their appeal. 

17-23 August

0

17 August 1895: The Promised Messiah, Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmadas says that one day, when he was reading the Holy Quran and pondering over it with deep concentration, his eyes stopped at a certain verse regarding Mecca. This verse appeared before his eyes extraordinarily and Huzooras felt that it was a treasure of knowledge and of spiritual secrets. Hazrat Ahmadas became very glad and exclaimed, “Alhamdolillah!” Huzooras says that it was made clear to him that that verse pointed towards the excellence of the Arabic language and also to the fact that Arabic is the mother of all languages. It is this theme that he has expounded on and explained in his book Minan-ur-Rahman. Hazrat Ahmadas intended this book to be published in December 1895, but for some reason it could not be published in his lifetime. It eventually got published in 1915. Later, Hazrat Sheikh Muhammad Ahmad Mazhar produced a series of books on this topic, on the origin of languages in light of this above-mentioned book of the Promised Messiahas.

17 August 1899: The Promised Messiahas received a letter from Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh, in which the sender asked him to write on oath that he was that Messiah who was prophesied in the Holy Quran and books of Hadith. The Promised Messiahas took paper and pen and wrote down the demanded wording.

17 August 1903: The Promised Messiahas embarked on his journey towards Gurdaspur, after saying Zuhr and Asr prayers in congregation. The purpose behind this was to attend the hearing of a lawsuit filed by Karam Din. Hazrat Mirza Bashiruddin Mahmud Ahmadra was also part of the entourage. Hazrat Ahmadas made a night-stay in Batala in an inn situated near the railway station. Dusk and night prayers were offered there in congregation.

18 August 1902: Mirza Ahsan Baig formally requested to be part of the Ahmadiyya Jamaat. He was the grandson of Mirza Ahmad Baig, son-in-law of Mirza Ahmad Baig and brother-in-law of Muhammadi Begum. 

19 August 1948: Ahmadi Army Officer, Major Mahmood Ahmad came under a mob attack in Quetta and embraced martyrdom in the newly born state and Islamic Republic of Pakistan. 

20 August 1903: The Promised Messiahas arrived back in Qadian from Gurdaspur from the aforementioned journey.

20 August 1904: The Promised Messiahas departed on his journey of Lahore, during the course of which, he delivered the historic lecture now famously known as Lecture Lahore.

20 August 1941: Hazrat Munshi Zafar Ahmadra of Kapurthala passed away. This esteemed companion was amongst the very early, devoted and close companions of Hazrat Ahmadas

21 August 1992: Hazrat Mirza Tahir Ahmad, Khalifatul Masih IVrh established Muslim Television Ahmadiyya International (MTA). This satellite-based channel broadcast its first show on 21 August 1992 from London. It started with a weekly one-hour programme, transmitting the Friday Sermon.

22 August 1901: During litigation in the famous “wall case”, on this day, under court orders, the cousins tore down the wall that they had previously erected with their own hands.

22 August 1945: During the Second World War, Ahmadi Missionaries appointed in Indonesia bravely faced the troublesome times and saw the mercy of Allah descending from the heavens. As Japanese forces made dramatic advancements and took over the country, they captured the Ahmadis too. These men of God were subjected to savage torture. 

It was finally decided and conveyed by the jail authorities to execute the missionary Maulvi Muhammad Sadique Sahib. The precise date and time of hanging was fixed for the night of 23 August. On the other hand, Ahmadis as always, turned to their Lord and offered humble and sincere supplications. God Almighty foretold the good news and showed a magnificent sign as the Japanese surrendered to the allied forces in Indonesia. This extraordinary development led to the survival of the Ahmadis there. 

23 August 1897: The court of Captain Douglas, after completing its proceedings, declared the Promised Messiahas not guilty. The Judge dismissed the charges of attempted murder as levelled by a prominent Christian missionary, Henry Martyn Clarke. Hazrat Ahmadas was present in court when the verdict was announced.

Work Hard, Play Hard Summer Camp 2018 – Mahdi Mosque, Jamaica

0

Umair Khan

rsz_screen_shot_2018-08-15_at_192116.png

Students from the Summer Camp with Primary School Teachers who Volunteered for the Camp | AMJ Jamaica

Ahmadiyya Muslim Jamaat Jamaica launched its first Summer Youth camp, called “Work Hard, Play Hard Summer Camp” on 9 July 2018. 

The purpose of this summer camp was to give children and youth of the nearby communities of Mahdi Mosque, Jamaica an opportunity for further learning during the summer break. It was also a way for nearby communities, mainly of Christian backgrounds, to become more familiar with the Mahdi Mosque and introduce them to the Ahmadiyya Muslim Jamaat. 

Some communities near the Mahdi Mosque were hesitant to visit because of negative perceptions of Islam in many Christian households. The summer camp opened an opportunity for children and families to become more familiar with the Jamaat along with children getting education in reading and writing skills, English, Maths and various other subjects. 

Two fully certified and trained primary school teachers and one guidance counsellor also volunteered to teach in this program. This became an excellent opportunity to also introduce the Jamaat to these teachers. 

Another aspect of the camp was that it was followed by organised sports. Volunteers from the Jamaat helped organise the youth and children in sports training. 

Over 50 registered students participated (mostly of non-Muslim background) with over 15 Jamaat volunteers (including 3 non-Muslim teachers) helping in organising the camp. Approximately 50-70 youth and children regularly visited the Mosque for summer camp and sports. 

Classes were split up according to age group, and Jamaat volunteers and teachers were responsible to teach classes according to age groups. 

Many parents of the children showed great appreciation when missionaries went to visit the communities surrounding Mahdi Mosque to promote the summer camp. 

While most summer camps in Jamaica charge fees, but as this summer camp was free, many of the parents who come from financially difficult backgrounds showed high appreciation of Jama’at to keeping it free. Fully certified school teachers volunteered to teach and thus, the standard of the camp was very high due to their teaching experience. 

One of the volunteer teachers said he wished he could have a community such as the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community, as he was so impressed at the organisation and volunteer efforts. Some of the parents of the students later said that the children waited all day for the camp to start because they enjoyed it so much. 

As the Mahdi Mosque property has facility for sports grounds, this was one of the only youth summer camps which offered education and physical activity for students. 

Many of the Jamaat volunteers stayed on Mahdi Mosque property which helped in tarbiyat [moral training] as they regularly attended congregational Salat and also gave Jamaat members an opportunity to get to know each other better, creating better brotherhood and sisterhood amongst the Jama’at members. 

100 Years Ago… – Travelogue of Nayyar

0

Al Hakam, 14 August 1918

rsz_screen_shot_2018-08-09_at_185002.png

Hazrat Maulvi Abdur Rahim Nayyarra

My revered brother, Master Abdur Rahim Nayyar Sahib (who is carrying out the invaluable task of correspondence of Hazrat Khalifatul Masih – a very honourable cause) had travelled from Qadian to Bombay in order to perform his duty of Huzoor’s correspondence. Prior to his arrival in Bombay, Huzoor had departed from there. Thereafter, he had to stay behind in Bombay for preaching purposes. From there he arrived at Qadian via Sikandrabad and from Qadian, he reached Dalhousie. By the time this newspaper reaches the hands of readers, it is expected that he will have arrived in Qadian. He desired to write his travelogue for Al Hakam. Why? He himself has answered this, and this is given below. The details of the travelogue will come at a later stage, Insha-Allah. I am certain that the readers of Al Hakam will, God willing, derive benefit from it. (Editor [Hazrat Sheikh Yaqub Ali Irfanira])

What I shall write and why?

In the 28 July issue of Al Hakam, the article which was referred to and which I was unable to write due to travelling and an overwhelming workload relates to my travels to Bombay and Hyderabad. If God enables, Dalhousie will also be included alongside it. How will it fare; will it be interesting or otherwise? I cannot answer this. My written accounts of the journey in Urdu will speak for themselves. I will only say this much that, Insha-Allah, the traveller shall obtain information, the missionary shall find assistance and the reader of these articles shall find a source of pleasure from it. 

Why am I writing it for Al Hakam? The answer to this is simply for my own dignity and to take pride in it. This is because I know, and my ears have heard God’s Messiah (may millions of blessings be on him) say, “Al Hakam is an arm of ours”. In my opinion, to assist Al Hakam is to strengthen the Arm of God. For me, there is pride and honour in this. Readers will observe Nayyar shining in the columns of Al Hakam for a period of time. Insha-Allah. 

Wa ma tawfiqi illa billahil-‘Aliyil ‘Azim [I have no power but through Allah, the High, the Great].

100 Years Ago… – Ahmadiyya Mission in London: In the eyes of a respectable non-Ahmadi

0

Al Fazl, 10 August 1918

An article taken from the newspaper Mashriq, written by a revered non-Ahmadi Muslim in Gorakhpur, is hereby included in this section. The article elucidates on the Ahmadiyya Mission and the circumstances of our missionaries. This person was residing in London in order to pass the bar [law examination]. Now, having passed, he has arrived in India in good health. We hope that for all honest non-Ahmadis, his views will be reliable. (Editor [Al Hakam Urdu])

Dear editor of Mashriq, Gorakhpur. Peace be unto you. 

As an eye witness, I deem it necessary to narrate to the Muslims, [the passion of] two venerable Ahmadis of Qadian, District Gurdaspur who are serving the faith of Islam with utmost sincerity and zeal in England. Last winter, when Hazrat Mufti Muhammad Sadiq Sahib was touring the suburbs of England and Qazi Abdullah Sahib was working alone in London, I incidentally would have the chance to visit their residence, mostly on Fridays, but on other days also. I felt overjoyed to observe a community of respectable ladies and gentlemen gather, among whom some had accepted Islam at the hands of these venerable persons while some were still researching the faith. Qazi Sahib delivers the sermon very eloquently in the English language and congregational prayers take place. I also travelled to London when Hazrat Mufti Sahibra returned to London. Only yesterday, our honourable friend Mr Ahmad Din, who is a merchant, and I arrived at Star Street, London in the evening. As a Muslim, when you enter this street, you feel great joy observing the word “Al-Masjid” written in bold Arabic letters in the middle of a market, the declaration of faith and the blessed verse, “Innaddina ‘indallahil-Islam” in the corner of a heart-warming atmosphere, in a central location of a city such as London. 

In the whole of London, which extends many miles and wherein thousands of Muslims reside, this is the sole residence upon which these words can be seen. Further, it is only the dweller of this household, i.e. Hazrat Mufti Sahib, who travels throughout London performing tabligh without any hesitation in his Islamic turban and attire. 

Thus, we arrived there in the evening. There were other people gathered as well. It had grown into a considerable gathering of respectable people. At 6 o’clock, Hazrat Mufti Sahib’s lecture commenced regarding those prophecies which [Hazrat] Mirza Sahib had delivered in his age in support of Islam. Their fulfilment in the European continent is a powerful argument for Europeans in relation to the truthfulness of Islam. Proving [Hazrat] Mirza Sahib’s claims of being the Messiah and Mahdi with remarkable eloquence and robust and logical arguments, Mufti Sahib claimed with great confidence that this is the one true religion which [Hazrat] Mirza Sahib presented to the world in this age, with a divinely revealed revival, something no one can contest. Further, he mentioned the command which [Hazrat] Mirza Sahib had issued in support and in relation to obedience and loyalty to the British Government. When the lecture had concluded, an elderly man, Mr McDonald, a renowned scholar who has served as the editor of an English newspaper, stood up and raised a philosophical question regarding prophecies, that scientists can also make prophecies. However, Mufti Sahib and Qazi Sahib convinced him [otherwise] afterwards by demonstrating a plain and manifest distinction between the prophecies of scientists and prophets with great logic and reason, for which all the listeners were grateful. 

It is my hope and expectation that this mission will progress rapidly in this country and become a large tree. Hazrat Mufti Sahib possesses such a vast degree of knowledge regarding Christianity that no priest can stand before him. On many occasions, people observe the reality of this. 

Wassalam

Syed Hasan Dehlvi, Barrister-at-law 

9 Pall Mall Street, London

Is Jalsa Over?

0

Jalsa Salana UK 2018 is now over. It is over for those who attended it as guests and for those who watched it on their television screens at home, but those who built the tent city are now busy taking it down to bring it back to the same farm that Hadiqatul Mahdi shall remain for the coming year, as it waits to bloom again for the next Jalsa. But before going to these teams that remain busy even after Jalsa, let us share an interesting aspect of this convention.

One could think that Jalsa for Huzooraa means five addresses that punctuate the course of the three-day event. But the fact of the matter is that these five addresses, magnificent as they are, is what we get to see and hear. What goes on behind the scenes makes Jalsa an extremely busy period for Hazrat Khalifatul Masih Vaa

With guests flocking from all over the world, a huge number of Ahmadis are seen huddling in the waiting rooms of Huzoor’s secretariat, waiting to see their revered Imam. These meetings, or mulaqats as they have traditionally come to be known, can see a total of over 60 different mulaqats and can even go up to the 70-mark in busier periods. This means that at least 60-70 families meet Huzooraa daily. Families who go in last are also heard saying that they felt as if they were the first family Huzoor was seeing; welcoming, loving, affectionate, understanding and sympathetic is the feeling everyone gets from this divinely appointed Man of God.

Then there is, of course, the preparations of the addresses that we get to hear from Hazrat Khalifatul Masihaa during Jalsa sessions. From the content of the addresses, it is not hard to guess the amount of time, research, thoughtfulness and insight these addresses must have taken as Huzooraa prepared them for the benefit of the Jamaat.

After the Jalsa, while most of us head home tired and longing for a sound sleep in the night ahead, Huzooraa heads straight back to his office in Hadiqatul Mahdi where foreign delegations await an audience with him. These audiences are not merely meetings with light-hearted conversations but regarding issues of serious nature; from geo-political to social and from religious to non-religious trends of respective regions. Hazrat Khalifatul Masihaa, as these delegates express after their audience, is always better informed about these issues than most of them, and the benefit derived is all theirs.

The next morning, as many struggle to get out of bed, Huzoor’s day starts with the routine Tahajjud prayer and Fajr prayer that he leads in the Fazl Mosque in London. A busy day lies ahead of him where dozens of delegations from almost all parts of the world are scheduled to have an audience with him. They seek guidance on particular issues pertaining to their regions and this goes on up to mid-afternoon. Late-afternoon, once again, sees families arriving to see Huzooraa and these sessions span over the rest of the afternoon and evening. This dawn-to-dusk-to-late-night routine continues for several weeks even after the Jalsa. This is the example set by our beloved Imam; the factor behind the motivation that keeps the whole Jamaat aspiring to achieve this standard untiringly, relentlessly and uncompromisingly.

Around 150 Khuddam from Majlis Khuddam-ul-Ahmadiyya Canada travelled this year to assist with the winding up of Jalsa facilities at Hadiqatul Mahdi. MTA cameras have shown the magnitude and the scale of the Jalsa arrangements: gigantic marquees, water-supply, portable toilets and showers, mass-scale kitchens, storage, hired equipment; all this has to be removed from the site to bring out the farm that had hibernated under this tent-city for the Jalsa period.

Seeing all facilities being set up for Jalsa is a very pleasant sight; seeing all of it being dismantled is quite the opposite. But the 127 years of Jalsa Salana have proved that there is no moment in the calendar of the Jamaat where one can stop and spare time to be sad and go into melancholy. There is always something happening; Jalsa Salana Germany is less than a month away already, but before Jalsa Germany is Eid-ul-Azha, and later in the year Jalsa Qadian and then many more events that continue to happen all throughout the year in the blessed cause of Islam.

So let’s put it this way: the wind-up teams are harbingers of the next Jalsa, clearing Hadiqatul Mahdi for the guests of the Promised Messiahas who will come for the next Jalsa Salana.

Men of Excellence

0

Friday Sermon

13 July 2018

Men of Excellence

rsz_friday2.jpg

After reciting the Tashahud, Ta‘awuz, and Surah Al-Fatihah, Hazrat Khalifatul Masih Vaa stated:

Today, I will speak about two further companions of the Holy Prophetsa. [The first is] Hazrat Abu Usaid Maalik bin Rabia Saidi. Hazrat Maalik bin Rabia is better known as Abu Usaid. Some have said his name was Bilal bin Rabia. He belonged to the Banu Sa‘da branch of the Khazraj tribe. (Usdul Ghaba, Vol. 5, p. 13, Abu Usaid Al-Asa’idira, Printed in Darul Fikr, Beirut 2003)(Al-Isabatu Fi Tamyiz Al-Sahaba, Vol. 5, p. 535, Printed in Darul Kutub Al-Ilmiyya, Beirut)

Hazrat Abu Usaid Maalik bin Rabia was of a short stature. His hair and his beard had turned grey, but had a full set of hair. In his old age he lost his eyesight and died in 60 Hijri, during the time of Muawiyah at the age of 75. He was the last person among the Ansar to pass away who had participated in the Battle of Badr. (Al-Isabatu fi Tamyiz Al-Sahabah, Vol. 5, p. 536, Printed in Darul Kutub Al’Ilmiyyah, Beirut) (Usdul Ghabah, Vol. 5, p. 22, Maalik bin Rabiara, Printed in Darul Fikr, Beirut 2003)

Hazrat Abu Usaid accompanied the Holy Prophetsa in the Battles of Badr; Uhud; Khandaq [The Battle of the Trench] and later battles. He carried the standard of Banu Sa‘da at the time of the conquest of Mecca. (Al-Tabaqat Al-Kubra, Vol. 3, p. 286, Abu Usaid Al-Sa‘idi, Dar Ihyaa Al-Turath Al-Arabi, Beirut, 1996)

According to Hazrat Sahl bin Sa‘d, Hazrat Abu Usaid invited the Holy Prophetsa to attend his wedding. On the day of the wedding, his wife-to-be was serving in the house of the Holy Prophetsa and was later to become bride for that wedding. It was a simple occasion and the bride was cooking and serving the guests herself. Hazrat Sahl says: “Do you know what he offered the Holy Prophetsa to drink?” (It was his style to ask the question and then answer it himself.) She put some dates in water in a cup the night before and offered this juice to the Holy Prophetsa when he finished eating. (Sahih Muslim, Kitabul Ashribah, Chapter “Ibahatul Nabidh alladhi lam yashtaddu wa lam yasir muskiran”)

Once some prisoners were brought to the Holy Prophetsa. He found a woman among them who was crying. The Holy Prophetsa asked her why she was crying. She said that [her captor] had taken her son and sold him to the Banu Ubbais. The Holy Prophetsa summoned her captor and discovered that it was Hazrat Abu Usaid Sa‘di. When the Holy Prophetsa asked him if had separated the mother from her son, he said the child was unable to walk and the woman could not carry him, that was why he had sold him to Banu Abbas. The Holy Prophetsa ordered him to bring back the child. Thus, Abu Usaid himself brought the child back and returned him to his mother. (Sharful Mustafa, Vol. 4, p. 400, Jamia Abwab Sifat Akhlaqihi wa Aadaabihi, Hadith 1649, Printed in Darul Bashair Al-Islamiyyah Mecca, 2003)

The Holy Prophetsa said that a mother, no matter if she is a free woman or a slave, cannot be separated from her child even if she is incapable [of looking after him]. The Holy Prophetsa once held a camel and horse race. His own camel, which was ridden by Hazrat Bilalra won the race. Similarly, during a horse race, the Holy Prophet’s horse, which was ridden by Abu Usaid Sa‘idi left all others behind. (Imta‘ul Asma‘, Vol. 1, p. 212, Himayat Al-Naqi‘ li Khail Al-Muslimeen, Darul Kutub Al-‘Ilmiyyah, Beirut, 1999)

Hazrat Sahl says that Abu Usaid brought his new born son – Munzir bin Usaid – to the Holy Prophetsa who sat the baby down on his thigh. Abu Usaid also sat down in the gathering. A short while later, the Holy Prophetsa became occupied in something else and left. (He did not leave, in fact he became preoccupied with other work whilst seated in the same gathering). People picked up the baby from him. When the Holy Prophetsa had finished his work, he enquired as to the whereabouts of the baby. Hazrat Abu Usaid said that they had sent him away. The Holy Prophetsa asked what he had named the baby. Hazrat Usaid told him such and such name, the Holy Prophetsa said, “No, he is to be given the name Munzir”. Thus, the Holy Prophetsa named him Munzir. (Sahih Bukhari, Kitabul Adab, Chapter “Tahweel Al-Ism ila Ism Ahsan minhu”, Hadith 6191)

Commentators of the Ahadith have said that Abu Usaid had a cousin by the name of Munzir bin Amr who was martyred in Bi‘r-e-Ma‘unah. The reason for naming the baby Munzir was in the hope that he may prove to be a good successor for his namesake. (Fathul Bari Sharh Sahih Al-Bukhari, Kitabul Maghazi, Vol. 7, p. 497, Hadith 4094, Old Print from Kutub Khana Aram Bagh, Karachi) 

Hazrat Sulaiman bin Yassar narrates that prior to the martyrdom of Hazrat Uthman, Hazrat Abu Usaid Sa‘di lost his vision and his eyes were permanently damaged. Hence, upon this he used to say “I thank Allah for granting me the faculty of sight during the lifetime of the Holy Prophetsa and for enabling me to witness all of these blessings. Furthermore, when Allah the Exalted desired to put people through trials, he took my sight from me and I lost my vision so that I will not have to witness these terrible circumstances.” (Al-Mustadrak ‘ala Al-Sahihain, Vol. 3, p. 591, Book “Ma‘rifat Al-Sahabah”, Hadith 6198, Printed in Darul Kutub Al-Ilmiyyah, Bierut, 2002)

Hazrat Uthman bin Ubaidillah, who was the freed slave of Hazrat Sa‘d bin Abi Waqas, narrates “I have seen Hazrat Ibn Umar, Hazrat Abu Huraira, Hazrat Abu Qatada and Hazrat Abu Usaid Sa‘di. These people would pass by us while we were in school [receiving education] and we could smell the fragrance of Abeer emanate from them.” This fragrance is created from a mixture of saffron and various other things. (Author Ibn Abi Shaibah, Vol. 6, p. 216, Kitabul Adab, Chapter “Ma yustahabbu lirrijaal an yujada rihuhu minhu”, Dar Al-Tafkir, Beirut)

Marwan bin Al-Hakam used to appoint Hazrat Abu Usaid Sa‘di for the collection and distribution of charity. When Hazrat Abu Usaid Sa‘di would come to his door, he would make his camel sit down and give him everything for the distribution. The last item he would give was the whip and whilst doing so, he would say that this is from your share. Once, Hazrat Abu Usaid came in order to distribute the Zakat [alms]. He left after having distributed everything. He went home, fell asleep and saw in a dream that a snake had wrapped itself around his neck. He woke up perturbed by the dream and asked a female servant or his wife if there was anything left behind from the sum that he was given in order to distribute? She said no. Hazrat Abu Usaid replied that why then did the snake wrap itself around my neck? Go and take a look. Perhaps something is left behind. When she went to take a look, she said that indeed, there is a rope to tie the camel with, which was also used to tie a small bag [for distribution]. Hence, Hazrat Abu Usaid went and returned this rope as well. (Sha‘bul Iman lil Bayhaqi, Vol. 5, p. 167, Hadith 3247, Maktabatul Rushd, Nashirun Riyadh, 2003)

Allah the Exalted desired to enable these companions to tread on the subtlest paths of righteousness and uphold and fulfil the highest standards of returning the trusts that they were entrusted with. This is the reason they received guidance even in their dreams.

Ammarah bin Radhiya narrates this statement of his father that some youths asked Hazrat Abu Usaid about the excellences the Holy Prophetsa had mentioned about the Ansar [Muslims native to Medina]. Upon this, he said that he heard the Holy Prophetsa say that from among the tribes of the Ansar, the best households were those of Banu Najjar, then Banu Abdul Ash‘al, then Banu Harith bin Khazraj and then Banu Sa‘da. Furthermore, every household of the Ansar is filled with virtue. Upon this, Hazrat Abu Usaid used to say that if he was to accept anything but the truth, he would have started with a household from among the Banu Sa‘da. (Al-Mustadrak ‘ala Al-Sahihain, Vol. 3, p. 592, Kitab Ma‘rifat Al-Sahabah, Hadith 6194, Printed in Darul Kutub Al-Ilmiyyah, Bierut, 2002)

With reference to an incident in history, Hazrat Musleh Maudra has stated on one occasion that when Arabia was conquered and Islam began to spread, there was a lady from the tribe of Qinda, who whose name was Asma or Umaima, who was also called Junia or Bint-ul-Jaun. Her brother, Luqman, came to the Holy Prophetsa as a representative of his tribe. On that occasion he also expressed his desire for his sister’s hand to be given in marriage to the Holy Prophetsa. He made the request directly to the Holy Prophetsa saying “My sister, who was previously married to a relative, is now widowed. She is very beautiful and intelligent. Please accept her proposal of marriage.” As the Holy Prophetsa desired to unite the tribes of Arabia, he accepted this request of his and said that the nikah [marriage ceremony] should be announced on the basis of twelve and a half ounces of silver [as her dowry]. He said “O Prophet of Allahsa! We are counted amongst the honourable families and chiefs of my people. This dowry is too low.” The Holy Prophetsa replied “I have not set a higher dowry for any of my wives, nor any of my daughters.” Once he expressed his satisfaction, the nikah [marriage ceremony] was announced. Furthermore, he requested the Holy Prophetsa to send a person in order to pick her up. The Holy Prophetsa appointed Abu Usaid for this task. He went there. Jauniya invited him to her home upon which Hazrat Usaid said that the wives of the Holy Prophetsa have been instructed to observe the veil. Upon this, she inquired about further guidance, which he imparted to her. He brought her to Medina on a camel and settled her in a house, which was surrounded by date palms. The relatives of this lady sent her wet-nurse along with her. 

Hazrat Musleh Maudra writes “In our countries, affluent and people of a higher status used to send female maids along with them. This is no longer the custom nowadays. However, it used to be like this in the older days so that she [the bride] would not feel any form of discomfort or problem. As this lady, who was married to the Holy Prophetsa, or whose brother proposed and desired for her to get married and was eventually married [to the Holy Prophetsa], was known for her beauty and as is customary that the women of the local area wish to meet a new bride in the area, the women of Medina also went to see her. This lady was known for her beauty and according to her own testimony, another lady had taught her to impose her authority and dignity from the very first day. She was told that when the Holy Prophetsa approaches, she should say ‘I seek Allah’s protection from you.’ In this manner, he will become more fond of you.” 

Hazrat Musleh Maudra writes that if this was not a fabrication of this lady, it is very possible that a hypocrite schemed this mischief through his wife or another relative. Nevertheless, when the Holy Prophetsa received the news of her arrival, he went to the house which was designated for her. In the Ahadith [sayings of the Holy Prophetsa] it is written that when the Holy Prophetsa approached her he said to her, “Offer yourself to me [in marriage].’ Upon this she replied, “Does a queen offer herself to ordinary men?” Abu Usaid says that as the Holy Prophetsa thought that she was nervous due to not being familiar with him, he placed his hand on her in order to comfort her. As soon as he placed his hand on her, she uttered these utmost abhorrent and irrational words that “I seek Allah’s protection from you.” 

Hazrat Musleh Maudra states “As a prophet becomes humbled when he hears the name of God the Exalted and is awestruck by His magnificence, the Holy Prophetsa immediately said upon hearing her words ‘You have sought refuge and protection of the Highest Being, Who grants protection in great abundance. Therefore, I accept your request.’ Hence, the Holy Prophetsa immediately came out of the house and said ‘O Abu Usaid! Give her two pieces of cloth and send her to her family.’ Hence, following that, apart from her dowry, the Holy Prophetsa instructed to give her two sheets as a gesture of kindness. In accordance with the commandment of the Holy Quran of [Arabic] (Surah Al-Baqarah: V. 238) ‘Do not forget to do good to one another,’ the Holy Prophetsa gave more and expressed his kindness.” 

Hazrat Musleh Maudra then says: “This [verse] is in relation to women, who are divorced without having consummated the marriage. The Holy Prophetsa sent her away and Abu Usaid brought her to her home. This matter was very burdensome for the people of her tribe and they scolded her. However, she continued to reply that it was her ill fortune. At times, she even said that she was deceived and told that when the Holy Prophetsa approached her, she should step aside and express a sense of dislike. In this manner she would impose her rank and dignity on him. Whether this was the reason or something else, she expressed a sense of dislike and the Holy Prophetsa separated himself from her and sent her away.” (Tafsir-e-Kabir, Vol. 2, P533-535, Tafsir Surah Al-Baqarah, V. 228)

This entire incident is sufficient as a reply to the allegations that are raised against the Holy Prophetsa in relation to his wives and that, God forbid, he was keen of beautiful women. Hazrat Abu Usaid used to say that whenever something was requested from the Holy Prophetsa, he never rejected or declined. (Majma‘ Al-Zaw‘id, Vol. 8, p. 409, Kitab Alamat Al-Nubuwwah, Chapter “Fi Judihi”, Hadith 14179, Darul Kutub Al-Ilmiyyah, Bierut, 2001) 

The other companion is Hazrat Abdullah bin Abdil Asad. His name was Abdullah and known as Abu Salamah. His mother was Barrah bint Abdil Muttalib. He was the cousin of the Holy Prophetsa and the foster-brother of the Holy Prophetsa and also Hazrat Hamzara. He had been suckled by Sobiah, the servant of Abu Lahab. He first married Umme Salamah. (Usdul Ghabah, Vol. 3, p. 295, Abdullah bin Abdil Asad, Darul Kutub Al-Ilmiyyah, Bierut, Lebanon)  

With reference to this Hazrat Mirza Bashir Ahmadra also writes in Seerat Khatamun Nabiyyin that Abu Salamah bin Abdil Asad was the foster-brother of the Holy Prophetsa and belonged to Banu Makhzoom. After his demise, his wife Umme Salamah married the Holy Prophetsa. (Seerat Khatamun Nabiyyin byMirza Bashir Ahmad Sahib M.A., p. 124)

Hazrat Abdullah bin Abdil Asad was among the first people to accept Islam. According to Ibn Ishaaq, after the first ten people, he accepted Islam, so he was among the first Muslims. (Al-Isti‘ab fi Ma‘rifat Al-Sahabah, Vol. 3, p. 71, Abdullah bin Abi Abdil Asad, Darul Kutub Al-Ilmiyyah, Bierut, 2002)

In one narration Hazrat Abu Ubaidah bin Harith, Hazrat Abu Salamah, Hazrat Arqam bin Abu Arqam and Hazrat Uthman bin Maz‘un went to the Holy Prophetsa. He preached to them the message of Islam and recited the Holy Quran to them after which they accepted Islam and bore witness that the Holy Prophetsa is rightly guided. Hazrat Abdullah bin Abdil Asad and his wife Umme Salamah were among those in the first migration to Abyssinia. After returning from Abyssinia to Mecca they migrated to Medina. (Usdul Ghabah fi Ma‘rifat Al-Sahabah, Vol. 5, p. 153, Abu Salamah, Maktabah Darul Fikr, Beirut, Lebanon, 2003)

Their migration to Abyssinia is mentioned in Seerat Khatamun Nabiyyin: “When the suffering of the Muslims had reached its limit and the Quraish continued to aggravate the affliction of the Muslims, the Holy Prophetsa instructed Muslims to migrate to Abyssinia, and said, ‘The king of Abyssinia is just and equitable. None are subjected to oppression under his rule.’

“The country of Habshah, which is known as Ethiopia or Abyssinia in the English language, is situated to the north-east in the continent of Africa. It is exactly opposite to southern-Arabia and with the exception of the Red Sea, no country intercedes it. During that era, a strong Christian sovereignty was established in Abyssinia and the king was referred to as the Negus. As a matter of fact, the ruler there is still called upon by the same name. Arabia had business relations with Abyssinia, and in the era that we are currently mentioning, the capital of Abyssinia was Axsum, which is located near the present-day city of Adowa, and until now is considered a sacred city. In those days, Axsum was the centre of a very powerful sovereignty. During that time, the personal name of the Negus was Ashamah, who was a just, intelligent and powerful king. In any case, when the pains of the Muslims reached their limits, the Holy Prophetsa instructed that those who could afford should migrate to Abyssinia. 

“Therefore, upon the instruction of the Holy Prophetsa, in the month of Rajab,5 Nabawi, eleven men and four women migrated to Abyssinia. The well-known names among them were as follows: Hazrat Uthman bin Affanra and his wife Ruqayyahra, daughter of the Holy Prophetsa, Abdur-Rahman bin Aufra, Zubair bin Al-Awwamra, Abu Hudhaifah bin Utbahra, Uthman bin Maz‘unra, Mus‘ab bin Umairra, Abu Salamah bin Abdul-Asadra and his wife Umme Salamahra. It is very strange that a majority of these pioneer immigrants were those who belonged to powerful tribes of the Quraish, and the weaker were few and far between. This illustrates two things: firstly, even those who belonged to the powerful tribes of the Quriash were not safe from the cruelties of the Quraish. Secondly, weak people such as slaves, etc., at that time, were in such a grave state of weakness and misery that they were not even able to migrate. Travelling south, when the immigrants reached Sha‘ibah, which was a sea-port in Arabia at that time, by the Grace of Allah they found a trade ship which was just ready to leave for Abyssinia and thus, all of them boarded in security. When the Quraish were informed of this, they were deeply enraged that this ‘prey’ had slipped their hands. Hence, they pursued these immigrants, but when their men reached the coast, the ship had already departed, and for this reason they returned disappointed. Upon reaching Abyssinia the Muslims found a life of great peace and protection from the cruelties of the Quraish after much difficulty and prayers.” (Seerat Khatamun Nabiyyin, by Hazrat Mirza Bashir Ahmad Sahib M.A., p. 146-147)

Ibn Ishaaq states that when Abu Salamah returned from Abyssinia and sought the protection of Hazrat Abu Talib, few people of Banu Makhzoom visited Abu Talib and enquired, “You have given protection to your nephew Muhammad, but why have you given protection to our brother Abu Salamah?” Abu Talib replied, “He sought my protection and he also is my nephew (sister’s son). If I had not given protection to my nephew (the Holy Prophet) then I would not have given protection to my other nephew.” Abu Lahab addressed the people from Banu Makhzum and said, “You constantly irritate Abu Talib; a noble man amongst us, and talk in vain. By God, refrain from this or else we are with him in every matter till he fulfils what he desires.” Upon hearing this, the people addressing Abu Lahab said, “O Abu Utbah we refrain from that which you dislike.” As Abu Lahab was a friend and supporter of Banu Makhzum in the opposition of the Holy Prophetsa, they refrained from insisting or urging regarding Abu Salamah. Upon hearing the words of accord from Abu Lahab, “He is speaking in favour of me and has stopped the other party; therefore, he will agree to support us”, Abu Talib recited some stanzas in which he praised Abu Lahab and tried to persuade him to support the Holy Prophet. (Al-Seerat Al-Nabawiyyat li Ibn Hisham, pp. 269-270, Qissat Abi Salamah fi Jawarihi, Darul Kutub Al-‘Ilmiyyah, Beirut, Lebanon, 2001) 

Nevertheless, this had no effect on him and he increased in opposition. 

Ibn Ishaq says that Ummul Momineen [the mother of the believers], Hazrat Umme Salamahra relates that when her husband Hazrat Abu Salamahra decided to go to Medina, he prepared his camel. He mounted her and their son Salamah on it, who was in her lap and then they set off. A short distance forward, some people from Banu Makhzoom surrounded them and said that Umme Salamahra was their woman, thus they would not allow her to go with them journeying from town to town. Hazrat Umme Salamahra says that in the end they took her husband away from her. Upon hearing this news the people of Banu Abdil Asad became frightened and said that that man was of Abu Salamah and they would not leave him with them. Therefore, he took her son away (the tribe kept the woman and the son was taken away by the tribe of the father). She says that she was completely alone and remained in this wretched state for a whole year, that every day she would go to a place called Atbah and cry. One of her uncle’s sons saw her crying there one day and felt pity. He went to her tribe Banu Mugheerah asking them as to why they tormented that poor woman? He said that they had separated her from her husband and son. Thus, they should let her go. Thereafter they told her that she could go and see her husband. Hazrat Umme Salamahra says that after this, the Banu Abdil Asad tribe returned her son. She then prepared her camel and took her son with her. When she departed for Medina, she had no helper with her. When she reached a place named Tan‘eem, she met Hazrat Uthman bin Abi Talha (who had not yet accepted Islam at the time and did so later in 6AH). He said “O Umme Salamah, where are you headed?” She replied that she was going to her husband in Medina. Hazrat Uthman asked if there was someone accompanying her to which she said that by God, there was no one and only her son and God Almighty accompanied her. Hazrat Uthman then said “By God, I will not allow you to travel all by yourself like this. I will accompany you.” He then took hold of her camel’s bridle. Hazrat Umme Salamah relates, “By Allah I had never seen any Arab more honourable than this man. Upon reaching a destination, we sat the camel down and dismounted (in different areas they would camp up and leave the camel). Whenever I would dismount my camel, he would remove the saddle off its back, tie the camel to a tree and fall asleep under the shade of another tree. When it was time to continue the journey, he would prepare the camel once again and I would mount it whilst he would walk holding the nose-halter until we reached Medina. When Hazrat Uthman bin Talha saw the village of Banu Amr bin Auf in Qaba he said ‘O Umme Salamah, this is where your husband Abu Salamah is staying. Enter this house with the blessings of God Almighty upon you.’ Hazrat Uthman then returned to Mecca.” (Al-Seerat Al-Nabawiyyatu li ibni Hisham, p. 333, Dhikril Muhajireen ila Al-Medina, Darul Kutub Al-‘Ilmiyyah, Beirut, Lebanon, 2001)

In the second year after Hijra when the Holy Prophetsa left for the Battle of Ushairah, he appointed Abu Salamah as the governor in Medina. (Al-Isti’ab fi Ma‘rifat Al-Ashab, Vol. 3, p. 71, Abdullah bin Abdil Asad, Darul Kutub Al-Ilmiyyah, Beirut, Lebanon, 2002)

Hazrat Mirza Bashir Ahmadra writes regarding the Battle of Ushairah, “After this, in Jamadi I, upon receiving news of the Quraish of Mecca once again, the Holy Prophetsa set out from Medina with a company of the Companions and appointed his foster-brother, Abu Salamah bin ‘Abdil Asadra as the Amir in his absence. In this ghazwah [battle], after making numerous rounds, the Holy Prophetsa finally reached ‘Ushairah, which was situated close to the coast and the region of Yanbu‘. Although a battle with the Quraish did not take place, nevertheless the Holy Prophetsa settled a treaty with the Banu Mudlij on terms as were agreed upon with the Banu Damrah, and subsequently returned.” (Seerat Khatamun Nabiyyin by Hazrat Mirza Bashir Ahmad M.A., p. 329)

The following conditions were agreed upon with Banu Damrah that they would hold cordial relations with the Muslims and will not aid any opposition against the Muslims. Furthermore, when the Holy Prophetsa calls upon them to help the Muslims they would come forward immediately. On the other hand the Holy Prophetsa took an oath with the Muslims that they would have cordial relation with Banu Damrah and help them in the time of need. This pact was written down and both parties signed it. (Al-Seerat Al-Nabawiyyatu li ibni Hisham, pp. 269-270, Qissatu Abi Salamahra fi Jawarihi, Darul Kutub Al-‘Ilmiyyah, Beirut, Lebanon, 2001)

Then, in Seerat Khataman Nabiyyin it is written: “The defeat suffered in the battle of Uhud by the Muslims made the tribes of Arabia even bolder than before in raising their heads in opposition to the Muslims. As such, much time had not passed since the Battle of Uhud, and the Companions had not even become fully discharged from tending to their wounds, when in Muharram,4 AH, the Holy Prophetsa suddenly received news in Medina that Tulaihah bin Khuwailid, chief of the Asad tribe and his brother Salamah bin Khuwailid were inciting the people of their region to wage war against the Holy Prophetsa. As soon as this news was received, the Holy Prophetsa, who under the circumstances of his own region, understood the dangers of such news, immediately assembled a fast riding detachment of 150 Companions and appointed Abu Salamah bin Abdil Asadra as their Amir. The Holy Prophetsa emphatically instructed that they should march towards the enemy and cause them to disperse before Banu Asad were able to practically execute their hostile motives. As such, Abu Salamahra advanced swiftly but silently and caught the Banu Asad at a place called Qutn, situated in central Arabia, but no fighting took place. As a matter of fact, the people of Banu Asad dispersed as soon as they caught sight of the Muslims. After an absence of a few days, Abu Salamahra returned to Medina. Due to the strenuous labour of this journey, the injury sustained by Abu Salamahra at Uhud, which had apparently healed until then, began to deteriorate again. Despite medical treatment, the wound continued to worsen, and ultimately in this very illness, a faithful and pioneer Companion of the Holy Prophetsa, who was also the foster-brother of the Holy Prophetsa passed away.” (Seerat Khatamun Nabiyyin, by Mirza Bashir Ahmad Sahib M.A., p. 511)

His body was washed with the water of the well Al-Yaseerah, which was the property of Banu Ummayyiya Bin Zaid at the station of Aliya. During the days of ignorance, this well was named Al-Abeer and the Holy Prophetsa changed the name to Al-Yaseera. Hazrat Abu Salamahra was buried in Medina. (Al-Tabaqat Al-Kubra, Vol. 3, p. 128, Abu Usaid Al-Sa’idi, Dar Ihyaa Al-Turath Al-Arabi, Beirut, 1996)

When Hazrat Abu Salamahra passed away, the Holy Prophetsa closed his eyes and prayed after his demise, saying, “O Allah, treat Abu Salamah with forgiveness and elevate his status amongst the guided people; become the Guardian of the heirs he left behind. O Lord of all the worlds! Forgive him and us too.” In another narration it states that in the final moments of his life, Hazrat Abu Salamahra prayed, “O Allah! Find the most excellent person to replace me who shall look after my family.” 

Thus, this prayer was accepted and the Holy Prophetsa married Umme Salamahra. (Usdul Ghabah fi Ma’rifat Al-Sahabah, Vol. 3, p. 296, Abdullah bin Abi Abdil Asad, Darul Kutub Al-‘Ilmiyyah, Beirut, Lebanon)

Hazrat Umme Salamah’s son narrates, “Hazrat Abu Salamahra went to Hazrat Salamahra and said that I heard the Holy Prophetsa mention a Hadith [tradition] which is even more dearer to me than such and such thing. The Holy Prophetsa said, ‘Whomsoever is faced with an affliction and prays, “Surely to Allah we belong and to Him shall we return” and then says, “O Allah! I seek reward from You in exchange of this affliction.” God Almighty shall then grant one its reward.’” 

Hazrat Umme Salamahra states, “When Abu Salamahra was martyred, I prayed – even though my heart did not truly desire to say this prayer – ‘O Allah! grant me someone in place of Abu Salamahra.’ I then said to myself that who could be better than Abu Salamahra; he possessed such and such qualities. In other words, he had many qualities and attributes, but still I offered this supplication.” When Hazrat Umme Salamah’s iddat [a fixed time period appointed by the Islamic Sharia, which must elapse before a widow or divorced woman can marry again] was completed, she received a message from the Holy Prophetsa asking for her hand in marriage and the Holy Prophetsa then married her. (Al-Isabatu fi Tamyiz Al-Sahabah, Vol. 4, p. 132, Maktabah Darul Kutub Al-‘Ilmiyyah, Beirut, Lebanon, 2005)

With regards to this marriage, Sahibzada Mirza Bashir Ahmad Sahibra writes in Seerat Khataman Nabiyyin: “The very same year, in the month of Shawwal, the Holy Prophetsa married Umme Salamahra. Umme Salamahra belonged to a noble family of the Quraish and prior to this, was married to Abu Salamah bin Abdil Asadra, who was a very faithful and pioneer Companion and had passed away this year. When the iddat had passed, since Umme Salamah was a very wise, well-mannered and able lady, Hazrat Abu Bakrra desired to marry her, but she did not accept. Finally, the Holy Prophetsa thought to marry her, because in addition to her personal qualities, due to which she was worthy of becoming the wife of a law-giving Prophet, she was the widow of a very eminent and pioneer companion. Then she also had children, due to which it was necessary to make special arrangements for her. In addition to all this, Abu Salamah bin Abdullahra was also the foster brother of the Holy Prophetsa, and for this reason, the Holy Prophetsa was especially concerned for his bereaved family. In any case, the Holy Prophetsa sent a proposal of marriage to Umme Salamahra. At first, she was somewhat reluctant on account of various difficulties and excused herself saying, “I have grown old and am no longer able to bear children.” However, since the purpose of the Holy Prophetsa was different, she ultimately accepted. Her son acted as the guardian of his mother and married her to the Holy Prophetsa. As it has already been mentioned, Umme Salamahra was a lady of distinct stature and in addition to being extremely intelligent and sharp, she possessed a lofty rank in sincerity and faith. She was among those people who had migrated to Abyssinia on the instruction of the Holy Prophetsa in the early days. Even in migrating to Medina, she was the very first among the ladies. Hazrat Umme Salamahra knew how to read as well, and played a significant role in educating and training the Muslim women. Many narrations and Ahadithare related by her in the books of Hadith, and in this respect she stands second among the wives of the Holy Prophetsa, and twelfth among all the Companions in total (including both men and women). (Seerat Khatamun Nabiyyin, by Mirza Bashir Ahmad Sahib M.A., pp. 530-531)

Thus, this the description of the Companionsra. May God Almighty continue to further elevate their lofty status and also enable us to adopt their virtuous practices. 

I shall now mention some details of a few people who have recently passed away and also offer their funeral prayers [in absentia]. 

The first is Raja Naseer Ahmad Nasir, who served as a life-devotee and a missionary of the Jamaat. He has also formerly served as Nazir Islaah-o-Irshaad Markaziyya. He passed away on 6 July 2018 at the age of 80 in the Tahir Heart Institute [Rabwah] – Surely to Allah we belong and to Him shall we return. He was suffering from illness for many years, and since 2012 his health was slowly deteriorating. For the last three months he was completely bedridden due to suffering from a brain haemorrhage. 

He was born on 7 May 1938 in Bhera, in the district of Sargodha. He acquired his basic primary education from there and also completed his matriculation exams and then worked as an office clerk in the department for irrigation in Lahore. He devoted his life for the cause of faith in 1958 and entered Jamia Ahmadiyya and attained his Shahid Degree in 1965. Ahmadiyyat entered his family through his father, Raja Ghulam Haider Sahib, who did the Bai‘at at the hand of Hazrat Khalifatul Masih IIra and later got his parents and siblings to also take the Bai‘at. It was the desire of Raja Naseer Ahmad Sahib’s father that one of his sons should become a life-devotee and it was in order to fulfil this desire that Raja Naseer Ahmad Sahib completed the life-devotee form and took the form to his elder brother, Raja Nazeer Ahmad Zafar Sahib, to sign. His elder brother said that he should ponder very carefully over this as this was a very arduous and challenging task which demanded great responsibility. However, he said to his brother that he had given plenty of thought to it and requested him to sign – his father had passed away then. Thereafter, as I mentioned, he devoted his life and entered Jamia Ahmadiyya and after graduating from there, he then entered the practical field. After graduating from Jamia Ahmadiyya, he had the opportunity to serve the Community for 47 years. He served in various parts of Pakistan as a missionary and prior to the partition when Pakistan and Bangladesh were one, he served in East Pakistan – Bangladesh. He also served in Uganda, Zaire and Indonesia. He also served for two years as a teacher in Jamia Ahmadiyya and thereafter he served as a Naib Nazir in Sadr Anjuman Ahmadiyya and as Nazir Islaah-o-Irshaad Markaziyya for ten years. He also served for two years as Additional Nazir Rishta Nata and for two years as Additional Nazir Isha‘at. In 2012 he took his retirement. His wife, who was also his cousin, passed away during his lifetime. He had three sons; Raja Muhammad Ahmad Sahib, who lives here in London, Raja Ataul Manan, who is a missionary and currently serving in Wakalat-e-Tasneef Rabwah and Raja Muhammad Akbar who is also here in the UK. 

He had great trust in God Almighty and was devoted to his prayers and supplications. His son writes that when they lived in Bangladesh, a fire once broke out and was almost approaching the homes of the Ahmadis. At the time he prayed, “O Allah! Your Messiah has stated, ‘[Threaten me not with fire,] for fire is my servant and indeed the servant of my servants’, thus save us from the fire.” He relates that the fire approached the houses and the flames were even touching the corner of one of the houses but it stopped there and did not spread any further and the houses of the Ahmadis were saved. 

While serving in Uganda, the conditions became very dangerous due to the outbreak of a war, however he would still go out and do tabligh [preaching]. He would go early in the morning and return home in the evening as there was no place to stay, so he would only go to the nearby areas. One day, a member of Jamaat-e-Islami came to him believing him to be a Maulvi of a Tablighi Jamaat and said he had a car and he could buy it from him for 1400 dollars. Eventually, they negotiated and settled the deal for 1150 dollars. At the time, neither did the Jamaat have the funds to purchase a car, nor did Raja Sahib. However, he prayed to God Almighty to make the arrangements for the funds so that he could purchase the car and this would assist him in his tabligh as he could take a small grill and bedding and go out for tabligh. He was extremely worried as the deal was done and he had been given a few days in which he had to pay the amount. He says that one day he opened his mailbox and saw that he had received a letter from one of his brothers-in-law in Canada. In the letter he wrote that he saw in a dream last night that he was in need of 1150 dollars. He wrote that he did not know the reason why he needed this amount but nevertheless he was sending him money and with it was a cheque of 1150 dollars. There are many other accounts similar to this of his acceptance of prayers. 

He had great passion for the recitation of the Holy Quran. His son writes that his father desired to complete the reading of the Quran in the air and on water. He had finished the Quran many times on land. Thus, he had the opportunity to complete the reading of the Holy Quran whilst travelling on sea. The travel by air was never long enough, but however much time he spent whilst travelling in the aeroplane, he would recite the Holy Quran. 

His son, who is a life-devotee and is currently serving in Wakalat-e-Tasneef, Raja Ataul Manan, says that their father always advised them about two things; never to do shirk [associate partners with God] and to always remain attached to the institution of Khilafat-e-Ahmadiyyat in all circumstances. He himself also always adhered to these two principals. 

He would show great respect to his mother. His sister writes: “He would show such obedience to our mother that if she would repeatedly ask him to carry out a certain task, he would listen to her each time as if this was the first time she had requested. He would never say ‘You have already asked me this before.’” His daughter-in-law, who is also the wife of a missionary, writes: “In these eighteen years, I have only ever felt love and honour from my mother and father (i.e. referring to her mother-in-law and father-in-law). Raja Sahib would say to my late mother that he would ensure that her daughter forgets the memories of her parents’ house. My mother would say that girls can never forget the house of their parents. But he would say that if the in-laws treat the daughter-in-law like their own, they can easily forget their parents’ home.” Nonetheless, he always maintained a bond of love and respect with his daughters-in-law. She continues by saying: “My father-in-law had the utmost love and obedience for God Almighty, the Holy Prophetsa, the Promised Messiahas, Khulafa, the Holy Quran and Khilafat. He had a good understanding of different matters and would impart valuable advice, whilst at the same time he would always show kindness.” She further writes: “Another one of his attributes was that he would finish a complete reading of the Holy Quran every month.” His relatives have also written that they are a witness to how God Almighty fulfilled all of his needs and would accept his prayers.

Nonetheless, he was a successful missionary and had administrative abilities as well. His relationship with Khilafat was exemplary and it can be said for him that he worked alongside Khilafat in the same manner that a pulse works in accord with one’s heart. In Pakistan when Hazrat Khalifatul Masih IVrh appointed me as Nazir-e-Ala [Executive Director of Sadr Anjuman Ahmadiyya] I saw a distinct form of obedience in him that he would obey the office-bearer simply because he was appointed by Khalifatul Masih. His obedience was exemplary, the likes of which is seldom seen in the world today. May God Almighty shower His mercy on him and enable his children to continue his virtuous deeds. He possessed many qualities. He would always care for the poor and destitute. Furthermore, whichever missionary he would work alongside he would look after them and would care for their needs. Many of the missionaries that have written to me have mentioned this point.

Aside from this there is a funeral prayer of two martyrs, who although were not martyred for the sake of the Jamaat, however a robbery took place at their shop and the thieves shot them as a result of which they were martyred. One of them is Mubeen Ahmad Sahib, son of Mehboob Ahmad Sahib, and the other is Muhammad Zafrullah Sahib, son of Liaqat Ali Sahib. On 7 July 2018 at approximately 3pm, in the Korangi Industrial area of Karachi, armed robbers fired at three Khuddam; namely Mubeen Ahmad Sahib, son of Mehboob Ahmad Sahib, Zafrullah Sahib and Muhammad Nasrullah Sahib. As a result of this, Mubeen Ahmad Sahib and Zafrullah Sahib were killed. Surely, to Allah we belong and to Him shall we return. The armed robbers wanted to loot their electronics shop. Since they resisted, they opened fire and killed them.

Ahmadiyyat entered the family of Mubeen Ahmad Sahib, son of Mehboob Ahmad Sahib, through his great paternal grandfather, Mr Chaudhry Alladad Sahib. He performed the Bai‘at in 1940 through his elder brother Abdul Aziz Patvari Sahib. After performing the Bai‘at, his sons began to reproach him. They made a separate area in the house for him to stay and separated his bed and cutlery. However, he endured all of this with great patience. The deceased’s grandfather, Ali Muhammad Sahib was a staunch opponent of the Jamaat and a follower of Ataullah Shah Bukhari, who was a fierce opponent of Ahmadiyyat. During the partition when Ataullah Shah Bukhari used abusive language against Qaid-e-Azam [Muhammad Ali Jinnah], calling him Kafir-e-Azam [the great disbeliever] and also used profanities against the Muslim League, that was when his grandfather distanced himself from him. Subsequently, after the partition of India when the Jamaat [headquarters] was shifted [temporarily] to Lahore, he saw the fulfilment of the prophecy of the Promised Messiahas regarding migration. Consequently, he began to incline towards the Jamaat. After the partition he moved to Nawabshah with his family. When Hazrat Musleh Maudra visited Sindh [Pakistan], the deceased’s grandfather saw him at a railway station. When he saw the countenance of Hazrat Khalifatul Masih IIra, he said that it could not be the face of a liar, and subsequently performed the Bai‘at and entered into the Jamaat.

Mubeen Ahmad Sahib was studying for his BA and at the age of his martyrdom he was 20 years old. Mubeen Ahmad Sahib had many qualities; he was very tolerant, had a balanced temperament and a strong build. He regularly observed the five daily prayers and treated everyone in his home with love and respect. The deceased would fully partake in Jamaat activities and was an active Khadim. If he had to sacrifice his work for the sake of the Jamaat, he would do so without hesitation. The deceased had submitted his Wasiyyat and had been assigned a case number. His Wasiyyat will be accepted, God Willing. He had a good relation with all of his neighbours. Everyone has commented on this fact irrespective of whether they are old or young. Mubeen Ahmad Sahib was related to the second person martyred in this incident, Muhammad Zafrullah Sahib, through his aunt. Aside from his father, Mr Mehboob Ahmad Sahib and his mother Amatul Hafeez Begum Sahiba, he leaves behind two sisters, Mubeena Mehboob aged 23 years and Kinzah Mehboob aged 16 years, and one brother, Ameen Ahmad aged 13 years.

The second martyr whose funeral prayers will also be lead is Muhammad Zafrullah Sahib, son of Liaqat Ali Sahib. During this incident he was hit by three bullets which fatally injured both his kidneys. His operation was successful, however his health deteriorated again. The doctors decided to take him for another operation, however, he passed away last night. Surely, to Allah we belong and to Him shall we return. Ahmadiyyat also entered his family through his great paternal grandfather Ghulam Deen Sahib, who was from the district of Gurdaspur and worked on the land belonging to a companion of the Promised Messiahas, Hazrat Abdul Aziz Patvari. One day, he went with him to Qadian and after meeting with the Promised Messiahas, he performed the Bai‘at.

The deceased Muhammad Zafrullah Sahib was born on October 1993 in Karachi. He was a cheerful and well-mannered Khadim, who always had a smile on his face. The deceased would partake in Jamaat activities and was activly involved in various departments in Khuddamul Ahmadiyya. By the grace of Allah he was a musi [part of the Institution of Al-Wasiyyat] and was 25 years old when he was martyred. He is survived by his father, Liaqat Ali Sahib, his mother Naseera Begum Sahiba and five brothers; Wajahat Ahmad who is 33 years old, Mansoor Ahmad, 31 years old, Mustenser Ahmad, 28 years old, Shuja Ahmad, 27 years old and Hafiz Muhammad Nasrullah who is 24 years old. The third person injured in this incident was his brother Hafiz Nasrullah, who is currently in hospital having undergone surgery. May Allah grant him a swift recovery and restore him to full health. May he elevate the status of the deceased and grant steadfastness to their families.

(Translated by The Review of Religions)