Home Blog Page 614

Men of Excellence

0

Friday Sermon

16 August 2019

Men of Excellence

Screenshot 2019 07 02 at 23.39.12

After reciting Tashahud, Ta‘awuz and Surah al-Fatihah, Hazrat Khalifatul Masih Vaa stated: 

Today I will continue to narrate the accounts of the Badri companions [i.e. those companions who took part in the Battle of Badr], which have been ongoing for some time. 

The first companion to be mentioned is Hazrat Qatadahra bin Numan Ansari. Hazrat Qatadahra belonged to the Banu Zafar clan of the Khazraj tribe of the Ansar. His father was Numan bin Zaid and his mother was Unaisah bint Qais.

Hazrat Qatadah’sra title is reported as Abu Umar as well as Abu Amr and Abu Abdillah. Hazrat Qatadahra was the half-brother of Hazrat Abu Saeed Khudrira; they were both born to the same mother.

Hazrat Qatadahra had the opportunity to participate in the Bai‘at-e-Aqabah along with 70 Ansari companions. However, according to another narration by Allamah Ibn Ishaaq, he was not part of those Ansari companions who participated in the Bai‘at-e-Aqabah or perhaps he has simply not mentioned him.

Hazrat Qatadahra was one of the archers appointed by the Holy Prophetsa. He participated in the Battles of Badr, Uhud, Khandaq and all the subsequent battles along with the Holy Prophetsa. Hazrat Qatadah’sra eye was struck by an arrow during the Battle of Uhud due to which his eye came out of its socket.

He came to the Holy Prophetsa and said, “O Messengersa of Allah! I have been struck by an arrow and my eye has come out. I love my wife very much, however if she were to see me like this, I fear that she may start to resent me.” The Holy Prophetsa placed the eye back in the socket with his hand and it was set in its place again and he regained his sight in that eye.

This eye was sharper and stronger than his other eye even during old age. According to another narration, the Holy Prophetsa had applied his saliva on that eye as a result of which it became even better than the other eye. (Al-Tabaqaat-ul-Kubra li ibn Saad, Vol. 3, p. 239, Wa min Bani Zafar…, Dar Ihyaa Al-Turath Al-Arabi, Beirut, 1996) (Usdul Ghaba, Vol. 4, pp. 370-371, Qatadahra, Dar-ul-Kutub al-Ilmiyyah, Beirut, 2008)

Hazrat Qatadahra himself has also mentioned this incident and states, “The Messengersa of Allah was given a bow as a gift. The Holy Prophetsa gave it to me on the occasion of Uhud. I shot arrows with it in front of the Holy Prophetsa until its string broke. Despite this, I remained in front of the blessed face of the Messengersa of Allah.”

Usually we mention Hazrat Talhara in this regard but his name is also mentioned. He further states:

“I continued to stand in front of the Holy Prophetsa. Whenever, an arrow came in the direction of the Messengersa of Allah, I would move my head in front of it so that I would serve as a shield for the blessed countenance of the Messengersa of Allah. I did not have any more arrows left at that point which I could shoot. At that moment, an arrow struck one of my eyes, due to which my eye came out of its socket and onto my cheek. Thereafter, the attacking army dispersed and I held my eye in my own hand and went to the Holy Prophetsa. I was not far from him when the Messengersa of Allah saw it in my hand, and tears started to flow from the Holy Prophetsa eyes and prayed, ‘O Allah! Qatadahra has saved the face of Your Prophet with his own face. Pray, make this eye of his, the more beautiful and observant of the two.’ Thus, that eye was more beautiful and the visually more perceptive of the two.” (Al-Mu‘jam Al-Kabir Li Al-Tabarani, Vol. 19, p. 8, Umar bin Qatadah bin Al-Numan, Dar Ihyaa Al-Turath Al-Arabi, 2002)

In the tradition which he has narrated himself, there is no mention of the fact that his wife will not love him because of this and will begin to resent him. The earlier account which I related was what the historians have written in order to perhaps arouse more interest, or perhaps just for the sake of it.  However, in his own narration of the account, there is no mention of his wife.

Nevertheless, his eye fell out of the socket during the battle. The Holy Prophetsa placed it back in its socket and his eyesight was immediately restored. As a matter of fact, it improved greatly and for this very reason, Hazrat Qatadahra later became known by the title of Dhul-Ain, that is, the possessor of the eye. (Al-Isaba Fi Tamyeez Al-Sahaba, Vol. 2, p. 345, Dar-ul-Kutub al-Ilmiyyah, Beirut, Lebanon, 2005)

Hazrat Qatadahra participated alongside the Holy Prophetsa in all the battles, including the Battle of Khandaq [the Ditch].

On the occasion of the Conquest of Mecca, the flag of the tribe of Banu Zafar was in the hands of Hazrat Qatadahra. He passed away at the age of 65, in 23 AH. Hazrat Umarra led his funeral prayer in Medina. His half-brother, Hazrat Abu Saeed Khudrira, Muhammadra bin Maslama and Harithra bin Khuzma came down into his grave and according to one narration, Hazrat Umarra was also among those who came down into the grave [during his burial]. The name of one of the grandsons of Hazrat Qatadahra was Asim bin Umar, who was an expert in the field of genealogy – that is the knowledge of families, ancestries and tribes – and Allama Ibn Ishaaq has related many of his narrations. (Al-Tabaqaat-ul-Kubra li ibn Saad, Vol. 3, p. 239, Wa min Bani Zafar,…, Dar Ihyaa Al-Turath Al-Arabi, Beirut, 1996) (Usdul Ghaba, Vol. 4, p. 372, Qatadahra, Dar-ul-Kutub al-Ilmiyyah, Beirut, 2008) (Siyar Al-Sahabah Az Saeed Ansari, Vol. 3, p. 474, Darul Ishaat, Karachi, 2004)

In one of the narrations it states that the Holy Prophetsa had a bow that was called Qutoom. This was made from Naba, a tree from which arrows are made. This was the bow that broke during the Battle of Uhud by Hazrat Qatadahra due to its excessive use. (Tarikh Dimashq Li Ibn Akir, Vol. 4, p. 148, Bab Dhikr Silahah Wa Markubah, Dar Ihyaa Al-Turath Al-Arabi, 2001) (Lughaat Al-Hadith, Vol. 4, p. 293, Ali Asif Printers, Lahore, 2005)

Hazrat Qatadahra bin Numan states that there was a family from among the Ansar, which were known as Banu Ubairak. There were three brothers, Bishr, Bashir and Mubashir. Bashir was a hypocrite and a poet and used to ridicule the companions of the Holy Prophetsa through his poetry. He made out to be a Muslim, but some of his actions were contradictory to this. He would attribute his statements to some Arabs and say that such and such a person has said this. When the companions of the Holy Prophetsa heard the couplets he used to recite, the Companions stated, “By God! This is the couplet of this very wretched person and these couplets are those of Ibn Ubairak.” These were needy and impoverished people during the age of ignorance as well as during the era of Islam and they did not change their state. They did not do any work nor make any effort. As a result of this, they were extremely poor.

Furthermore, he states that dates and barley were the food for the people of Medina. Once a person became wealthy and a grain merchant would bring some white, finely grounded flour from the region of Levant, this wealthy individual would purchase some of it and include it in his food. However, his wife and children would still eat dates and barley.

He says that once, it so happened that when a grain merchant came from the region of Levant, his paternal uncle, Rifa‘ah bin Zaid purchased a sack of white flour and placed it in his storeroom. He had also placed his weapons, armour and sword in that storeroom. He says that a wrongdoing was committed against him in that this storeroom was looted. Thieves broke in by breaking the wall and the ration, including the weapons were stolen. In the morning, his paternal uncle, Rifa‘ah, came to him and said:

“My dear nephew! I was greatly wronged last night. Our storeroom was broken into and all of our rations and weapons were stolen. We have tried to receive some information in the area and have also asked people. In response we were told that they saw Banu Ubairak this evening. They had lit a fire and they believe that they were probably celebrating with our food. That is, they were probably cooking and eating the items they had stolen.”

Hazrat Qatadahra further states that while they were conducting an investigation in the neighbourhood, the Banu Ubairak claimed, “By God! We think that the person who stole from you is Labeed bin Sahal.” In other words, they blamed someone else. He states that Labeed was a Muslim and virtuous man from among them. When he heard that the Banu Ubairak were accusing him of theft, he drew his sword and stated, “Am I a thief? By God, my sword shall remain between us unless you find out who committed this theft.”

He became extremely impassioned and sought to settle the matter at once. The people around him said, “You are not a thief, put your sword away for we believe you”, and that “you are a very virtuous man.” However, upon further investigation, there was no doubt that it was the Banu Ubairak who had committed the theft. He further states that his paternal uncle stated, “My dear nephew! Perhaps we could have recovered my belongings had you gone to the Holy Prophetsa and informed him of this incident.”

Hazrat Qatadahra bin Numan states that upon hearing this, he went to the Holy Prophetsa and presented himself before him and informed him by stating: “Someone from among our own people has carried out this unjust and cruel act. They went to my paternal uncle, Rifa‘ah bin Zaid’s house and stole his weapons and ration by secretly breaking into his store. We request that our weapons be returned to us. As far as the ration and the grain is concerned, we do not need it as such.”

The Holy Prophetsa stated, “I will decide on this matter after having sought consultation.” When this news reached Banu Ubairak, they met with someone from their tribe known as Aseer bin Urwah. They discussed the matter with him, and a few other men from the local area also joined together with them and went to the Holy Prophetsa and stated, “O Messengersa of Allah! Qatadah bin Numan and his paternal uncle are accusing someone from among us of committing theft without providing any witnesses or evidence. We are Muslims and good people.”

Qatadah states, “I visited the Holy Prophetsa and discussed this matter with him. The Holy Prophetsa said, ‘You have accused a people of theft who have been described as Muslims and good people, without providing any witnesses and evidence.’”

Qatadahra was a person of virtuous disposition. He states that after meeting the Holy Prophetsa and having heard what he said, he returned home and felt that it would have been better to lose some of his wealth instead of bringing this matter to the Holy Prophetsa and to have caused the Holy Prophetsa such discomfort. It would have been better to lose his wealth than to have ever mentioned this to the Holy Prophetsa. He then states that his paternal uncle visited him and stated, “My dear nephew! What have you done thus far regarding this matter?” In response, Hazrat Qatadahra informed him about what the Holy Prophetsa had said to him. His uncle stated, “Allah is our Helper.”

Only a short while had passed since this conversation took place that the following verses of the Holy Quran were revealed:

اِنَّاۤ اَنۡزَلۡنَاۤ اِلَیۡکَ الۡکِتٰبَ بِالۡحَقِّ لِتَحۡکُمَ بَیۡنَ النَّاسِ بِمَاۤ اَرٰٮکَ اللّٰہُ ؕ وَ لَا تَکُنۡ لِّلۡخَآئِنِیۡنَ خَصِیۡمًا

Meaning, “We have surely sent down to thee the Book comprising the truth, that thou mayest judge between men by that which Allah has taught thee. And be not thou a disputer for the faithless.” (Surah al-Nisa, Ch.4: V.106)

The word لِّلۡخَآئِنِیۡنَ [the faithless] was used here for the Banu Ubairak. It then further stated وَّاسۡتَغۡفِرِاللّٰہَ “And ask forgiveness of Allah.”  اِنَّ اللّٰہَ کَانَ غَفُوۡرًا رَّحِیۡمًا “Surely, Allah is Most Forgiving, Merciful.” (Surah al-Nisa, Ch.4: V.107)

Then, Allah the Almighty stated:

وَ لَا تُجَادِلۡ عَنِ الَّذِیۡنَ یَخۡتَانُوۡنَ اَنۡفُسَہُمۡ ؕ اِنَّ اللّٰہَ لَا یُحِبُّ مَنۡ کَانَ خَوَّانًا اَثِیۡمًا۔ یَّسۡتَخۡفُوۡنَ مِنَ النَّاسِ وَ لَا یَسۡتَخۡفُوۡنَ مِنَ اللّٰہِ وَ ہُوَ مَعَہُمۡ اِذۡ یُبَیِّتُوۡنَ مَا لَا یَرۡضٰی مِنَ الۡقَوۡلِ ؕ وَ کَانَ اللّٰہُ بِمَا یَعۡمَلُوۡنَ مُحِیۡطًا۔ ہٰۤاَنۡتُمۡ ہٰۤؤُلَآءِ جٰدَلۡتُمۡ عَنۡہُمۡ فِی الۡحَیٰوۃِ الدُّنۡیَا ۟ فَمَنۡ یُّجَادِلُ اللّٰہَ عَنۡہُمۡ یَوۡمَ الۡقِیٰمَۃِ اَمۡ مَّنۡ یَّکُوۡنُ عَلَیۡہِمۡ وَکِیۡلًا۔ وَ مَنۡ یَّعۡمَلۡ سُوۡٓءًا اَوۡ یَظۡلِمۡ نَفۡسَہٗ ثُمَّ یَسۡتَغۡفِرِ اللّٰہَ یَجِدِ اللّٰہَ غَفُوۡرًا رَّحِیۡمًا

“And plead not on behalf of those who are dishonest to themselves. Surely, Allah loves not one who is perfidious and a great sinner. They seek to hide from men, but they cannot hide from Allah; and He is with them when they spend the night plotting about matters of which He does not approve. And Allah encompasses what they do. Behold! you are they who pleaded for them in the present life. But who will plead with Allah for them on the Day of Resurrection, or who will be a guardian over them? And whoso does evil or wrongs his soul, and then asks forgiveness of Allah, will surely find Allah Most Forgiving, Merciful.” (Surah al-Nisa, Ch.4: V.108-111)

God Almighty then states:

وَ مَنۡ یَّکۡسِبۡ اِثۡمًا فَاِنَّمَا یَکۡسِبُہٗ عَلٰی نَفۡسِہٖ ؕ وَ کَانَ اللّٰہُ عَلِیۡمًا حَکِیۡمًا۔ وَ مَنۡ یَّکۡسِبۡ خَطِیۡٓٮـَٔۃً اَوۡ اِثۡمًا ثُمَّ یَرۡمِ بِہٖ بَرِیۡٓــًٔا فَقَدِ احۡتَمَلَ بُہۡتَانًا وَّ اِثۡمًا مُّبِیۡنًا

“And whoso commits a sin commits it only against his own soul. And Allah is All-Knowing, Wise. And whoso commits a fault or a sin, then imputes it to an innocent person, certainly bears the burden of a calumny and a manifest sin.” (Surah al-Nisa, Ch.4: V.112-113)

Hazrat Qatadahra then says that this points towards the Banu Ubairak, who said that according to them, Labeed bin Sahal committed the theft. God Almighty then further states:

وَ لَوۡ لَا فَضۡلُ اللّٰہِ عَلَیۡکَ وَ رَحۡمَتُہٗ لَہَمَّتۡ طَّآئِفَۃٌ مِّنۡہُمۡ اَنۡ یُّضِلُّوۡکَ ؕ وَ مَا یُضِلُّوۡنَ اِلَّاۤ اَنۡفُسَہُمۡ وَ مَا یَضُرُّوۡنَکَ مِنۡ شَیۡءٍ ؕ وَ اَنۡزَلَ اللّٰہُ عَلَیۡکَ الۡکِتٰبَ وَ الۡحِکۡمَۃَ وَ عَلَّمَکَ مَا لَمۡ تَکُنۡ تَعۡلَمُ ؕ وَ کَانَ فَضۡلُ اللّٰہِ عَلَیۡکَ عَظِیۡمًا۔ لَا خَیۡرَ فِیۡ کَثِیۡرٍ مِّنۡ نَّجۡوٰٮہُمۡ اِلَّا مَنۡ اَمَرَ بِصَدَقَۃٍ اَوۡ مَعۡرُوۡفٍ اَوۡ اِصۡلَاحٍۭ بَیۡنَ النَّاسِ ؕ وَ مَنۡ یَّفۡعَلۡ ذٰلِکَ ابۡتِغَآءَ مَرۡضَاتِ اللّٰہِ فَسَوۡفَ نُؤۡتِیۡـہِ اَجۡرًا عَظِیۡمًا

“And but for the grace of Allah upon thee and His mercy, a party of them had resolved to bring about thy ruin. And they ruin none but themselves and they cannot harm thee at all. Allah has sent down to thee the Book and Wisdom and has taught thee what thou knewest not, and great is Allah’s grace on thee. There is no good in many of their conferences except the conferences of such as enjoin charity, or goodness, or the making of peace among men. And whoso does that, seeking the pleasure of Allah, We shall soon bestow on him a great reward.” (Surah al-Nisa, Ch.4: V.114-115)

Nonetheless, these verses could have various other meanings as well, however they thought that these verses were revealed about their situation. However, God Almighty disclosed the reality of the matter to the Holy Prophetsa. The outcome of this was that when these verses were revealed, the people of Banu Ubairak about whom there was suspicion of the theft, also thought that these verses were revealed about them and admitted to their theft. They brought the weapons back to the Holy Prophetsa, who then returned it to Rifa‘ah, who was the rightful owner.

Hazrat Qatadahra states:

“My uncle was an elderly man and his eye sight was weak even prior to his acceptance of Islam during the age of ignorance [jahiliyyah period]. Owing to this, I thought that perhaps my uncle was weak in his faith.” He thought that although he had accepted Islam and became a Muslim, he was not firm in his faith. “But when I took the weapons that had been returned from the thieves, he said to me, ‘O my nephew! I give these away as Sadaqah [charity] in the way of God Almighty.’ At that time, I realised and I was convinced that my uncle was firm in his faith, and all the while I was wrong to doubt his level of faith.”

When these verses of the Holy Quran were revealed, Bashir, one of the brothers about whom there was doubt that he was a hypocrite, went to join the idolaters and stayed with Sulafah bint Saad. At that time, God Almighty revealed the following verses:

وَ مَنۡ یُّشَاقِقِ الرَّسُوۡلَ مِنۡۢ بَعۡدِ مَا تَبَیَّنَ لَہُ الۡہُدٰی وَ یَتَّبِعۡ غَیۡرَ سَبِیۡلِ الۡمُؤۡمِنِیۡنَ نُوَلِّہٖ مَا تَوَلّٰی وَ نُصۡلِہٖ جَہَنَّمَ ؕ وَ سَآءَتۡ مَصِیۡرًا۔ اِنَّ اللّٰہَ لَا یَغۡفِرُ اَنۡ یُّشۡرَکَ بِہٖ وَ یَغۡفِرُ مَا دُوۡنَ ذٰلِکَ لِمَنۡ یَّشَآءُ ؕ وَ مَنۡ یُّشۡرِکۡ بِاللّٰہِ فَقَدۡ ضَلَّ ضَلٰلًۢا بَعِیۡدًا

“And as to him who opposes the Messenger after guidance has become clear to him, and follows a way other than that of the believers, We shall let him pursue the way he is pursuing and shall cast him into Hell; and an evil destination it is. Allah will not forgive that anything be associated with Him as partner, but He will forgive what is short of that to whomsoever He pleases. And whoso associates anything as partner with Allah has indeed strayed far away.” (Surah al-Nisa, Ch. 4: V.116-117)

When Bashir left Islam and went to stay with Sulafah, who was an idolater, Hazrat Hassanra bin Thabit criticised him in one of his couplets. When Sulafah bint Saad heard these couplets, she took his possessions and placing them on her head, threw them out of the house in an open plain. She then said it was owing to him that they received the gift of Hassan bin Thabit’s couplets, i.e. due to him they also became the target of his couplets. She then said, “I will not receive any benefit from you.”

(Sunan Al-Tirmidhi, Abwab Tafsir Al-Qur’an, Bab Wa Min Surah Al-Nisa, Hadith 3036)

Hence, she stated that she would not keep his possessions in her house any longer. Thus, this was the ultimate fate of a hypocrite or idolater.

Hazrat Abu Saeed Khudrira relates that once Hazrat Qatadahra bin Numan spent the entire night reciting Surah al-Ikhlas. When the Holy Prophetsa was informed about this, the Holy Prophetsa said, “I swear by Him in Whose hands is my life, Surah Al Ikhlas is equal to a half or one third of the Quran.”

(Musnad Ahmad bin Hanbal, Vol. 4, p. 42, Musnad Abu Saeed Khudri, Hadith 11131, Alamul Kutub, Beirut, 1998)

I.e. it refers to the Unity of God, which in reality is the teachings that are found in the Holy Quran.

Abu Salmah says that Hazrat Abu Hurairahra would narrate to us a hadith from the Holy Prophetsa that once, he said, “On Friday, there comes a time whereby if a Muslim is engaged in prayer and seeks the favours of Allah the Almighty, then Allah will grant all that to him.” Hazrat Abu Hurairahra then signalled with his hands indicating that the aforementioned time is very short.

Abu Salmah says, “When Hazrat Abu Hurairahra passed away, I thought to myself, ‘By God! When I meet Abu Saeed Khudrira, I will certainly ask about that [special] hour, perhaps he will know.’ Thus, on one occasion I met him and saw that he was straightening a few canes. I asked him, ‘O Abu Saeed! What are these sticks that you are straightening?’” There were some sticks that he was arranging. “He replied, ‘These sticks are such that God Almighty had placed blessings therein for us. The Holy Prophetsa liked these sticks and would use them whilst walking. We would straighten them and bring them to the Holy Prophetsa.’ He then stated that on one occasion, the Holy Prophetsa saw spittle on the floor of the mosque, in the direction of the Qibla. At that time the Holy Prophetsa was holding one of these sticks and he used it to clean the spittle, then said, ‘Whenever anyone from among you is in prayer, they should not spit in front of them, as their Lord is before them.’”

This means that as a person is standing before God Almighty, therefore they should not spit in front of them. I believe that perhaps not all the commandments had been revealed. That is why in this narration, which is found in Bukhari, it is mentioned that one ought to spit to one’s left or under one’s foot.

At the time, the area they would pray in was not fully constructed and therefore they would put earth over it to clean it. That is why the Holy Prophetsa advised to spit under one’s feet. However, later on when the commandments were revealed and they received moral training, the directive of the Holy Prophetsa was that one should use the corner of their robe or cloth if they need to wipe their nose or if they have to spit.

But nowadays we have tissues and handkerchiefs, and also our mosques are carpeted, therefore it does not mean that spitting on the floor is permissible, rather in those days there was a temporary permission granted due to the situation at the time. Moreover, later on, the Holy Prophetsa clarified that if someone has to clean their nose or has to spit, they ought to use one corner of their robe, then cover it and clean it once they go outside.

The narrator of the incident then says:

“On the same night it rained heavily. When the Holy Prophetsa came out to lead the Isha prayer, there was a sudden flash of lightening. The Holy Prophetsa saw Hazrat Qatadahra and said, ‘O Qatadah! What are you doing at this hour?’ He replied, ‘O Messengersa of Allah, I knew that very few people would come for prayers’, due to the heavy rain and lightning, ‘therefore I thought that I ought to attend and so I came early. The Holy Prophetsa said, ‘When you finish your prayers, wait here until I pass by.’ Thus, when the prayer finished, the Holy Prophetsa gave a stick to Hazrat Qatadahra and said, ‘This stick will enable you to see ten steps ahead of you and ten steps behind you. Then when you enter your house, you will see the shadow of a human; before he speaks, kill him with this stick, for that will be Satan.’ Therefore, he did as he was instructed. Abu Saeedra then further says, ‘We have love for these sticks because the Holy Prophetsa granted them to us. We would give them to the Holy Prophetsa after preparing it specially for him. The Holy Prophetsa would then use them and also return them to us or give them to people as gifts. Therefore, there are many blessings attached with them. That is why I am arranging them.’”

Abu Salmara then father states that he asked:

“O Abu Saeedra! Hazrat Abu Hurairahra once narrated a hadith to us about a special time on Fridays.” Abu Salma initially went to ask Abu Saeed this very question, but when he saw him arranging the sticks, he first enquired about the sticks. That is why I mentioned the incident regarding the sticks. He then returned to his actual question and asked, “According to a narration of Abu Hurairahra, on Fridays, a particular moment comes in which prayers are accepted and if he knew about this. Abu Saeed Khudri replied that he asked the Holy Prophetsa concerning that particular moment to which he replied, ‘At first I was informed about that particular moment, but then, just like the Night of Decree, I was made to forget it.’ Abu Salmah said that he then left and went to Hazrat Abdullah bin Salaam.” (Musnad Ahmad bin Hanbal, Vol. 4, p. 42, Musnad Abu Sa eed Khudri, Hadith 11131, Alamul Kutub, Beirut, 1998) (Sahih al-Bukhari, Kitab as-Salat, Bab Hukkul Mukhaat Bil Hisaa Min al-Masjid, Hadith 408-409)

The narration from Musnad Ahmad bin Hanbal, which has just been quoted, mentions that there is a particular moment on a Friday for the acceptance of prayer. In this regard, there are various other narrations from which three particular times can be ascertained. One of them is reported to appear during the Friday Sermon, the second is towards the latter part of the day and the third is that it appears after the Asr prayer. I shall relate all of these various narrations:

Hazrat Abu Hurairahra relates that the Holy Prophetsa spoke about the Friday prayer and stated that there is a particular moment in the day, which, if a Muslim experiences while he is stood in a state of prayer, he shall be granted whatever he supplicates from God Almighty. Through the gesture of his hand, the Holy Prophetsa indicated that the duration of this particular moment was extremely limited. (Sahih al-Bukhari, Kitabul Jumuah, Bab al-Sa‘ah Fi Yaumil Jumuah, Hadith 935)

Then, there is a narration from Sahih Muslim in which Abu Burdah bin Abu Musa Ash‘ari relates that Hazrat Abdullah bin Umarra said to him, “Have you heard your father narrate the Hadith from the Holy Prophetsa with regard to the description of the particular moment that appears on Friday?” He replied, “Indeed, I have heard him.” He then said that his father stated, “I heard the Holy Prophetsa say that the particular moment appears from the time the imam sits down till he concludes the prayer.” (Sahih Muslim, Kitab-ul-Jumuah, Bab Fi Al-Sa‘atillati Fi Yaumil Jumuah, Hadith 835)

In another narration related by Hazrat Abdullahra bin Salam, in which he states that once the Holy Prophetsa was seated and he asked, “We read in the book of God that there is a particular moment on Friday in which if a person seeks anything from Allah, whilst in the state offering prayer, his prayer is surely answered.” Hazrat Abdullahra states that the Holy Prophetsa then pointed towards him and said, “Or some part of an hour” i.e. a very short time. Hazrat Abdullah stated, “Indeed, or some part of an hour.” Hazrat Abdullahra then stated, “When exactly is that hour?” The Holy Prophetsa stated, “It is in the last hours of the day (i.e. when the day is approaching its end).” Hazrat Abdullahra then asked, “Does it not appear during the prayer?” The Holy Prophetsa stated, “Indeed, when a believer completes his prayer but remains seated thereafter and it is merely owing to that prayer he remains seated, then that also constitutes as part of the prayer itself.”

(Sunan Ibn Majah, Kitab Iqaamat As-Salat Wa Al-Sunnati Fiha, Bab Ma Ja’a Fi Al-Sa‘ah Turjaa Fi Al-Jumuah, Hadith 1139)

In other words, if after prayer one remains occupied in the remembrance of God Almighty, one will still be considered to be in the state of prayer and this creates a condition for one to continue offering supplications.

In another narration, Hazrat Abu Hurairahra states that the Holy Prophetsa stated, “A particular moment appears on a Friday in which if a believer is seeking good from Allah the Almighty, He surely grants him whatever good he was supplicating for. This particular moment appears after the Asr prayer.”

(Musnad Ahmad bin Hanbal, Vol. 13, p. 117, Musnad Abu Hurairah, Hadith 7688, Maktabah Muassisah Al-Risalah, Beirut, 2008)

Here, the narration of Musnad Ahmad bin Hanbal states that this particular time appears after Asr on a Friday. In another narration it states that Hazrat Abu Salmahra enquired from the Holy Prophetsa regarding this particular time and the Holy Prophetsa stated:

آخِرُساعاتِ النھار

Meaning, that it appears in the in final hours of the day.

(Musnad Ahmad bin Hanbal, Vol. 7, pp. 847-848, Musnad Abdullah bin Salaam, Hadith 24189, Alamul Kutub, Beirut, 1998)

Expounding upon this, Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra states in his Tafsir [exegesis of the Holy Quran]:

“Friday and Ramadan are similar in one respect. That is because Friday is a day for the acceptance of prayer as is the month of Ramadan. With regard to the Friday prayer, the Holy Prophetsa states that if a person arrives at the mosque for prayer and quietly remains occupied in the remembrance of God Almighty whilst waiting for the imam, and thereafter attentively listens to the Friday Sermon and offers the prayer in congregation, God Almighty shall bestow His special blessings upon him. Moreover, there is a particular moment which appears on Friday in which whatever one supplicates for is answered.”Hazrat Abu Hurairahra relates that the Holy Prophetsa spoke about the Friday prayer and said that there was a particular moment in the day which if a Muslim experienced while he was stood in a state of prayer, he would be granted whatever he supplicated from God Almighty. The Holy Prophetsa indicated with the gesture of his hand that the duration of this particular moment was extremely limited.

This is a narration from Bukhari which has been previously mentioned and has been narrated by Abu Hurairahra. Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra further states:“One of the explanations of this hadith which certainly needs to be given is that only such prayers will be accepted which are in accordance to the established practise of God Almighty and the Divine law. However, prayers of an ill nature will certainly not be accepted. Those supplications which are lawful, in accordance to the established practise of God Almighty and the Divine law will only be accepted. And while this is a great bounty, however it is not easily achieved. The duration of the Friday prayer starts approximately a short while before the second Azan [call to prayer] and ends with the Salaam [i.e. the completion] of prayer. Even in the instance where the sermon is short, the total duration of the Friday prayer is almost 30 minutes and if the sermon is a little longer, the total duration can be around 1-1.5 hours. During this 1-1.5-hour period, there comes a particular moment in which whatever one supplicates is answered. However, one cannot determine whether the acceptance of prayer is in the very first, second or third minute of the sermon. In fact, one cannot even determine a single minute from the entire 90 minutes of the sermon as to which of them was the one for the acceptance of prayer.”

Thus, one will have to search for the entire 90 minutes, in other words, one will have to continuously pray for the entire 90 minutes of the sermon in order to succeed in achieving this moment in which all of one’s supplications are answered. However, to continuously pray for 90 minutes and remain focused is a very arduous task indeed.”

Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra further writes,

“Certain people cannot keep their attention focused for even five minutes. For instance, I have come here for prayer, and naturally as one takes a glance around, I happened to notice that before the sermon some people were offering their Sunnah prayer and their eyes would begin to wander here and there. The Sunnah prayer only lasts for a few minutes but even in this short duration of time, their eyes roam about everywhere, at times looking to their right or left or at the floor or then up in the heavens. Thus, if one cannot even focus their attention for 2-2.5 minutes, to maintain one’s concentration for an entire 90 minutes and remain occupied in prayer and the remembrance of God Almighty is no easy task.”

(Khutbat-e-Mahmud, Vol. 33, pp. 161-162, Khutbah Farmudah 30 May 1952) (Sahih al-Bukhari, Kitabul Jumuah, Bab al-Sa‘ah Fi Yaumil Jumuah, Hadith 935)

Therefore, if there is mention of a particular moment [for the acceptance of prayer], however it requires a continuous and concerted effort. One has to greatly strive in order to achieve this. It is not that simple that one prays and within that very minute it is instantly accepted. In fact, one has no knowledge as to when this moment appears. Therefore, it is necessary for one to continuously remain engaged in prayer during this time, without diverting their attention. Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra has also mentioned that this is no easy task. In order to attain the blessings of the Friday prayer, one needs to make great effort.

The next companion to be mentioned is Abdullahra bin Maz‘un. Hazrat Abdullahra bin Maz‘un belonged to the Banu Jumaah tribe of the Quraish. His mother was Sukhaila bint Anbas. He was the brother of Hazrat Uthmanra bin Maz‘un, Hazrat Qudamahra bin Maz‘un and Hazrat Sa‘ibra bin Maz‘un. They were all maternal uncles of Hazrat Abdullah bin Umarra because Hazrat Umarra married their sister, Zainab bint Maz‘un. 

Yazid bin Roman narrates that Hazrat Abdullahra bin Maz‘un and Hazrat Qudamahra bin Maz‘un accepted Islam prior to the Holy Prophetsa going to Dar-e-Arqam and preaching the message of Islam from there. (Al-Sirat al-Nabawiyyah li Ibn Hisham, p. 463, Min Bani Jumah wa Hulafa’ihim, Dar-ul-Kutub al-Ilmiyyah, Beirut, 2001) (Al-Tabaqaat-ul-Kubra li ibn Saad, Vol. 3, p. 214, Abdullah bin Maz‘un bin Jumah, Dar Ihyaa Al-Turath Al-Arabi, Beirut, 1996) (Al-Tabaqaat-ul-Kubra li ibn Saad, Vol. 3, p. 201, Umar bin Al-Khattab, Dar-ul-Kutub al-Ilmiyyah, Beirut, 1996) (Usdul Ghaba, Vol. 3, p. 391, Abdullah bin Maz‘un, Dar-ul-Kutub al-Ilmiyyah, Beirut, 2008) (Usdul Ghaba, Vol. 2, p. 399, Sa‘ib bin Maz‘un, Dar-ul-Kutub al-Ilmiyyah, Beirut, 1996)

Hazrat Abdullahra bin Maz‘un and all three of his brothers, Hazrat Qudamahra bin Maz‘un, Hazrat Uthmanra bin Maz‘un and Hazrat Sa‘ibra bin Maz‘un, were all part of the delegation which migrated to Abyssinia. When they learnt of the news that the Quraish had accepted Islam, they all returned. (Al-Sirat al-Nabawiyyah li Ibn Hisham, pp. 241, 267, Man Hajara Ila al-Habshah min Bani Jumah, Man Aada Min Bani Jumah, Dar-ul-Kutub al-Ilmiyyah, Beirut, 2001) (Usdul Ghaba, Vol. 2, p. 399, Sa‘ib bin Maz‘un, Dar-ul-Kutub al-Ilmiyyah, Beirut, 1996)

In relation to the accounts of previously mentioned companions, I spoke about the migration towards Abyssinia. It was mentioned that when the persecution against the Muslims exceeded all limits, the Holy Prophetsa instructed the Muslims to migrate to Abyssinia and stated that its king was a just and fair man, and no one is treated unjustly under his rule.

In those days, there was a very strong Christian government in Abyssinia and Najashi [Negus] was the king. In any case, in Rajab 5 Nabawi, upon the instruction of the Holy Prophetsa, eleven men and four women migrated towards Abyssinia. It was their great fortune that as they left Mecca and headed south, they arrived at Shuaiba, which was a huge port of Arabia at the time and God Almighty blessed them in that there was a trade ship ready to depart for Abyssinia. Subsequently, they peacefully boarded the ship and it departed from there.

After arriving in Abyssinia, the Muslims enjoyed a life of peace and security and were given respite from the torment at the hands of the Quraish. However, as mentioned by various historians – which I have also previously mentioned in reference to them – they soon returned upon hearing the news [of the Quraish]. They had not spent too long in Abyssinia when a rumour was propagated which also reached them stating that all of the Quraish had accepted Islam and there is complete peace for Muslims in Mecca.

Subsequently, many of those who migrated to Abyssinia immediately returned. When they were close to Mecca, they learnt that this news was false and was in fact a ploy hatched by the disbelievers in order to bring back the Muslims from Abyssinia. They now faced a very difficult situation; some of them returned to Abyssinia and others sought protection from some of the influential men of Mecca.  However, this protection did not last long and the persecution of the Quraish relentlessly continued and there was no place of peace or security for the Muslims in Mecca.

The Holy Prophetsa once again instructed his companions to migrate and discreetly they began preparing and migrated from Mecca. Eventually, the total number of Muslims who had migrated to Abyssinia was 100, among whom 18 were women and the rest were men. Thus, this was the manner in which the second migration took place.

In any case, it is stated that Hazrat Abdullahra bin Maz‘un returned after the very first migration, but it is not known whether he took part in the second migration to Abyssinia, but nonetheless he took part in the migration to Medina.

(Sirat Khatamun-Nabiyyin, Hazrat Mirza Bashir Ahmadra, pp. 146-149)

Upon his migration to Medina, the Holy Prophetsa established a brotherhood bond between Hazrat Abdullahra bin Maz‘un and Hazrat Sahl bin Ubaidillah Ansarira. (Al-Tabaqaat-ul-Kubra li ibn Sa‘d, Vol. 3, p. 214, Abdullah bin Maz‘un bin Jumah, Dar Ihyaa Al-Turath Al-Arabi, Beirut, 1996)

According to one narration, the Holy Prophetsa established a brotherhood bond between Hazrat Abdullahra bin Maz‘un and Hazrat Qutbahra bin Amir. (Uyoon Al-Athar, Vol. 1, p. 232, Dhikrul Muwakhaat, Darul Qalam, Beirut, 1993)

Along with all three of his brothers, Hazrat Uthmanra bin Maz‘un, Hazrat Qudamara bin Maz‘un and Hazrat Saibra bin Maz‘un, Hazrat Abdullahra bin Maz‘un took part in the Battle of Badr alongside the Holy Prophetsa. Hazrat Abdullahra bin Maz‘un took part in all the battles of the Holy Prophetsa, including the Battle of Badr, Uhud and Khandaq. Hazrat Abdullahra bin Maz‘un passed away in 30AH during the Khilafat of Hazrat Uthmanra at the age of 60. (Usdul Ghaba, Vol. 2, p. 399, Sa‘ib bin Maz‘un, Dar-ul-Kutub al-Ilmiyyah, Beirut, 1996) (Al-Tabaqaat-ul-Kubra li ibn Saad, Vol. 3, pp. 212-214, Abdullah bin Maz‘un bin Jumah, Dar Ihyaa Al-Turath Al-Arabi, Beirut, 1996)

May God Almighty continue to elevate the station of these Companionsra.

(Originally published in Al Fazl International on 6 September 2019, pp. 5-9. Translated by The Review of Religions)

Health and leisure

0

Hazrat Ibn Abbas, Allah be pleased with him, narrates that the Holy Prophet, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, said:

“There are two blessings which many people squander: (They are) health and free time for doing good.”

(Sahih al-Bukhari, Kitab-ur-Riqaq)

Religious Founders Day ceremony in Myanmar

0

Muhammad Salik, Myanmar Correspondent

013

The Ahmadiyya Muslim Jamaat Myamnar held the fifth Religious Founders Day ceremony in Mandalay on 1 September 2019. The Jamaat has been holding this ceremony since 2017.

T Muhammad, who is also known as U Khin Maung Nyunt, National Jamaat President Myanmar relayed to the press that the goal of the ceremony was gaining a better understanding of religions and the importance of honouring the dignity of prophets and religious founders. He also highlighted that the ceremony aimed to highlight morals, including mutual love and respect among the believers of different religions. 

The event commenced with the recitation of the Holy Quran followed by the opening speech by Thura U Aung Ko, Minister of Myanmar’s Religious and Cultural Affairs. During the speech, he called for the followers of various faiths to promote peace and shun hate speech. The minister particularly praised the well-known identity of the worldwide Ahmadiyya Jamaat for religious tolerance shown by its community members and their efforts towards charitable works.

Minister Thura U Aung Ko also spoke of an event at Mandalay National School that was also attended by a former delegate from the Myanmar Jamaat, Hazrat Abdul Rahim Nayyarra (companion of the Promised Messiahas).

The school was founded by Abdul Razak, one of the nine martyrs of Myanmar and a cabinet minister in General Aung San’s pre-independence government. It is a prominent and highly regarded institution where interfaith and racial harmonies are inculcated to the young students.

Thura U Aung Ko also said that Nayyar Sahibra gave three interfaith speeches at the Mandalay National School in which he specifically highlighted the similarity between Islam and Buddhism.

018

U Aung Kyi, Minister of Immigration and Human Resources of Mandalay Division also attended the event, representing the chief minister and read out a message on his behalf.

The event was then followed by various speeches of religious leaders. Firstly, Ashin Ramachandra spoke about the importance of religious harmony from the Hindu perspective.

The famous venerable Buddhist monk, Dr Ashin Nanda Sara (lecturer and master of Abhidama) addressed the audience on the topic of the importance of religious harmony from the perspective of Buddhism.

Following that was a speech from Archbishop Marco Tin Win, who highlighted the religious tolerance in the age of Jesusas.

Khalil Ahmad Sahib, Missionary of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Jamaat Myamnar then articulated about the importance of religious tolerance exemplified by the founder of Islam, the Holy Prophet Muhammadsa. He quoted passages from the Holy Quran and various incidents from the life of the Holy Prophetsa that showed his great religious tolerance while also quoting the Promised Messiahas.

019

The message from Hazrat Khalifatul Masih V, may Allah be his Helper, was conveyed by T Muhammad, National President of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Jamaat Myanmar. In the message, Huzooraa stated:

“We must also appreciate that God desires a compassionate and caring society for everyone. It is for this reason that God has continually sent His prophets and righteous representatives to every part of the world to guide humanity towards fulfilling the rights of God Almighty and discharging the rights due to one another.

“God assigned them for the purpose of reforming mankind and to develop a spirit of love, compassion and brotherhood amongst all people. Indeed, this constitutes the core message of all religions and therefore, we should utilise all of our resources and capabilities to serve God’s creation by fostering a better society and spreading the message of love, affection and peace at every level.”

During the closing speech, the national president of Jamaat-e-Ahmadiyya Myanmar expressed gratitude to the attendees for participating, who included all the respected monks, Dr Ashin Nanda Sara, Myawadi Min Gyi Sayadaw, Hindu and Christian religious leaders, the Consulate General of India HE Mr Nandan Singh Bhaisora, dignitaries and all the other honourable guests.

7th Khuddam Ijtema of Albania and Kosovo

0

Sali Beja, MKA Albania

Capture 6

The Ahmadiyya Muslim Jamaats of Kosovo and Albania held their 7th annual Ijtema of Khuddam-ul-Ahmadiyya on 7 and 8 September in Tirana, Albania.

This has become an annual practice which aims to encourage Khuddam to compete in good deeds. With about 60 participants in total, nearly 40 Khuddam took part in the academic and sports competitions.

By the grace of Allah, this year, a good number of tabligh contacts also took part from both Kosovo and Albania.

The Ijtema began with the flag hoisting ceremony of Liwa-e-Khuddam-ul-Ahmadiyya and the Albanian flag. Immediately after, the opening session started which was chaired by Jinahuddin Saif Sahib, Missionary & Sadr Jamaat Kosovo.

Recitation of the Holy Quran with Albanian translation was done by Sali Beja Sahib. This was followed by a speech by Samad Ahmed Ghori Sahib, missionary & Sadr Jamaat Albania, who spoke about the aims of Khuddam-ul-Ahmadiyya, the institution of Khilafat and obedience. In his speech, he explained the difference between worldly leadership and Khilafat. He further explained the importance of obedience from the writings of the Promised Messiahas.

After the inaugural session, academic competitions started, which consisted of recitation of the Holy Quran, Azan, Salat, speeches, mushahida wa mu‘ainah (observation test), and paigham rasani (Chinese whispers).

After the Zuhr and Asr prayers, sports were held that included volleyball, tug of war and table tennis. After Maghrib and Isha, dinner was served.

The first day concluded with the quiz competition. It challenged Khuddam on their religious knowledge and also the key events that took place in 2018.

222

The second day of activities began with Fajr prayer. Later, at around 7:30am, members had breakfast and set off for the sports fields where the football championship match was held.

After the final, the Khuddam returned to Baitul Awwal mosque to offer Zuhr and Asr prayers, after which they were served lunch.

The prize distribution ceremony was held thereafter, in which prizes were given to the best performances for all competitions held.

11 1

The event closed with the speech of Bujar Ramaj Sahib, Vice President of Albania Jamaat. Referring to the system of the universe which Allah has created without any flaw, he explained how Allah has also established the spiritual system without any flaw and today, we are fortunate enough to have Khilafat.

He also said that youth in today’s world have very little direction and it is a sheer blessing of God on us that under the guidance of Khilafat, Majlis Khuddam-ul-Ahmadiyya has enabled us to develop our spiritual and physical abilities. From the writings of the Promised Messiahas, he also elaborated the profound meaning of the Quranic verse:

“And everyone has a goal which dominates him; vie, then, with one another in good works.” (Surah al-Baqarah, Ch.2: V.149)

Before the silent prayer led by Bujar Ramaj Sahib, Samad Ahmed Ghori Sahib, President Jamaat Albania thanked all the guests who attended from Kosovo and different parts of Albania and also the volunteers for their selfless and remarkable efforts making the Ijtema successful.

He also thanked Sadr Lajna Imaillah Albania and her team who prepared food for the three days with great effort.

The Ijtema ended at 4pm, leaving lots of good impressions and emotions, Alhamdolillah.

The effect of company

0
rsz_hazrat_mirza_ghulam_ahmad_qadiani_as.jpg

تخم تاثیر صحبت را اثر

“The seed bears influence and one’s company carries effect.”

The first part of this proverb may be debatable, but the second portion which states that one’s company possesses an effect is such an established fact that we need not engage in a lengthy discourse on this matter. You have witnessed the children of many noble families falling into the snare of the Christians, as well as Muslims – even the children of saints, holy men and descendants of the Holy Prophet – dishonour the Noble Messenger, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him. I have seen the progeny of Syeds whose lineage cannot be doubted and who link their ancestry to Imam Hussain, may Allah be pleased with him, embracing Christianity and God-forbid, raising all sorts of allegations against the Founder of Islam, peace and blessings be upon him. If even in such circumstances, a Muslim does not possess honour and jealousy for their religion and their Prophet, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, then who could be more wicked?

If you do not safeguard your children from the company of the Christians, Aryas and others, or if you have no desire to protect them, then remember that you do not gravely wrong your own souls alone, rather you wrong your nation and Islam. This can only mean that you are not the least jealous for Islam and your hearts are devoid of respect for the Noble Prophet, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him.

(Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmadas, Malfuzat, Vol. 1, pp 69 – 70)

13-19 September

1

13 September 1924: Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra delivered two lectures in Portsmouth, England. He shed light on the second advent of Jesusas and elaborated on the heavenly call of God for this age.

13 September 1947: Dealing with the aftermath of the partition, Sadr Anjuman Ahmadiyya Pakistan commenced its daily bulletin service with the aim to convey the everyday business of Jamaat offices and the well-being of dispersed Jamaat members in the newly formed country, Pakistan. Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra instructed that the mission in England must remain updated with the ongoing situation, hence the latest updates were sent to the England mission through air mail.

13 September 1947: Fateh Garh Choryan, a village near Qadian, came under attack and remained cut off for some days. Sadr Anjuman Ahmadiyya, with the aid of their aeroplane, assisted these besieged villagers by dropping supplies of food and messages of reassurance into the village.

14 September 1931: The Kashmir Committee held its public meeting in Sialkot, which was also addressed by Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra.

14 September 1936: A writing forum was formed in Qadian, titled Majlis Ansar Sultan-ul-Qalam. Maulana Abul Ata Sahib was its supervisor.

14 September 1947: At the time of the partition, Ahmadis were a ray of light for the refugees who were the prime target of rioters. Being furious at the humanitarian efforts of the Ahmadis, the then government arrested Hazrat Syed Zainul Aabidin Waliullah Shahra, Nazir Umur-e-Ama (Director of General Affairs) of Sadr Anjuman Ahmadiyya in Qadian. The day before, Hazrat Chaudhry Fateh Muhammad Siyalra, Nazir Tabligh (Director Outreach) was also apprehended.

15 September 1924: A group of youngsters who had travelled from the Indian subcontinent to study in England had an audience with Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra.

15 September 1947: Al Fazl was re-launched from Lahore. The editor was Roshan Din Tanvir Sahib, while the paper was managed by Chaudhry Abdul Wahid Sahib. The first issue published an article by Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra titled, “Are You a Devout Ahmadi?” Al Fazl from Qadian remained functional until 17 October.

16 September 1914: Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra sent a letter to the Begum of Bhopal with the aim of propagating the message of Ahmadiyyat. Hajjah Nawab Begum Dame, Sultan Jahan GCSI (9 July 1858-12 May 1930) was a notable and progressive ruler of Bhopal who ruled from 1901 to 1926.

16 September 1924: Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra prepared a condensed version of his article for the Wembley Conference.

16 September 1927: Amatul Hayy Library was inaugurated in Qadian.

16 September 1948: Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra presided over the joint session of Sadr Anjuman and Tahrik-e-Jadid held in Lahore. An agenda item discussed during this sitting was the new Markaz, its name and inaugural date. The name “Rabwah” was accepted unanimously for the new markaz and the date for the inaugural ceremony of this new town was set as 20 September.

17 September 1924: Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra participated in a session held in London to protest the barbaric killing of Maulvi Nematullah in Kabul.

17 September 1936: Hazrat Musleh-e-Maud’sra car was attacked by unknown assailants in Qadian. Huzoorra remained unhurt.

17 September 1947: Hazrat Mirza Bashir Ahmadra went to the tomb of the Promised Messiahas in Bahishti Maqbara and led a silent prayer for its protection with some companions of the Promised Messiahas. After the partition, there was very little security and the situation in the surrounding areas was intensifying by the day. During the prayer, this blessed group humbly and fervently prayed for the security of this sacred place.

18 September 1913: Qadian’s public buildings and general services were re-developed by Hazrat Mir Nasir Nawabra in the early years of the Jamaat’s history. On this date, he raised the need for an authentic Urdu translation of the Holy Quran, Sahih al-Bukhari and other basic books, along with the building of a hospital, care home and Masjid Noor. Hazrat Khalifatul Masih Ira endorsed his appeal.

18 September 1961: Hazrat Nawab Muhammad Abdullah Khanra passed away after suffering from a long illness. He was the son-in-law of the Promised Messiahas.

18 September 1962: Hazrat Sir Chaudhry Zafarulla Khanra was elected as President of the General Assembly at the United Nations.

19 September 1912: The Jamaat newspaper, Badr started publishing the words of Khalifatul Masih Ira under the title “Kalam-e-Amir”.

19 September 1923: The Shuddhi cause was a sociopolitical movement for reverting those that had converted from Hinduism to Islam. The Jamaat’s efforts to counter this movement were so effective that the Arya Samajists announced abandoning this movement. On this date, Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra made it loud and clear that the Jamaat would continue to strive and would not stop countering this movement.

19 September 1924: Sir Edward Dennison Ross, President of the Wembley Conference had an audience with Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra. That same evening, Huzoorra addressed a gathering at St Luke Hall, London on the topic of life after death.

19 September 1924: Hazrat Mir Nasir Nawabra passed away. He was the father-in-law of the Promised Messiahas.

19 September 1932: On this date, Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra stressed to safeguard the rights of the “Achhut” (Untouchables) in India.

“Where an individual weakens, it weakens the collective.” Hazrat Amirul Momineen addresses 2019 Khuddam-ul-Ahmadiyya UK Ijtema

0

4 6028206798614300333
Courtesy of MKA UK

Bordon, Hampshire: On 8 September 2019, the concluding session of the UK Majlis Khuddam-ul-Ahmadiyya Ijtema was graced with the presence of Hazrat Mirza Masroor Ahmad, Amirul Momineenaa

Huzoor’s entourage arrived at 15:15 BST, after which Hazrat Amirul Momineenaa hoisted the Majlis Khuddam-ul-Ahmadiyya flag and led all attendees in dua. 

Following silent prayer, Khuddam-ul-Ahmadiyya UK amila members, Atfal-ul-Ahmadiyya UK amila members, qaideen and various departments who helped organise the Ijtema were fortunate to have group photos with Huzooraa

Hazrat Khalifatul Masih Vaa then led the congregation in Zuhr and Asr prayers in the main Ijtema marquee. 

At around 15:50 BST, the concluding session of the 2019 Majlis Khuddam-ul-Ahmadiyya UK Ijtema commenced with the recitation of the Holy Quran, chapter 59, verses 23-25 by Sadiq Ayub Sahib, followed by its translation read out by Tawqeer Mirza Sahib. 

Hazrat Amirul Momineenaa then instructed all Khuddam, Atfal and guests to stand up to take the Khuddam pledge, which Huzooraa read out and the gathering repeated behind their Imamaa

After the pledge, Hafeez Ahmad Sahib recited an Urdu poem written by the Promised Messiahas, the translation of which was read out by Athar Ahmad Sahib. 

thumbnail image3

Sadr Majlis Khuddam-ul-Ahmadiyya UK, Abdul Quddus Arif Sahib then read out a short report of the Ijtema. He said that the theme of the Ijtema was “The Existence of Allah the Almighty”. Some of the highlights included Jumuah behind Huzoor in Masjid Mubarak, various exhibitions by the tabligh department, Al Fazl International, The Review of Religions and Al Hakam, Atfal masterchef competition and many other competitions and features. 6,192 was the total attendance of this year’s Ijtema. 

A short video presentation was then played for Huzooraa, summarising the three-day event. 

Huzooraa then graciously distributed awards to the regions and qiadats that had performed extraordinarily in the past year, both to Atfal and Khuddam. 

Thereafter, Huzooraa addressed the congregation. After Tashahud, Ta‘awuz and the recitation of Surah al-Fatihah, Hazrat Amirul Momineenaa said that with the grace of Allah, this year’s Ijtema was drawing to a close. 

Huzooraa said that he was confident that the attendees would have tried to enhance their spiritual and moral standards, rather than just spending all of their time in sports and games. 

Taking part in sports, Huzooraa said, is important as physical fitness enables a person to perform their responsibilities to Allah and their fellow creation. At every Ijtema, however, one’s primary purpose should be to enhance their spiritual standards. 

Huzooraa said that the majority of Ahmadi youth study very hard, but the same effort is not being put into attaining religious knowledge. The main purpose of events such as Jalsas and Ijtemas is to evaluate oneself and increase religious knowledge and enhance spiritual conditions.

While attending the Ijtema, one should focus on the foremost requirement of strengthening our bond with Allah the Almighty. 

Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra famously said, “Nations cannot be reformed without the reformation of the youth.”

With regard to this, Hazrat Khalifatul Masih Vaa said:

“These enlightened words have not only become the main slogan of Majlis Khuddam-ul-Ahmadiyya, but have also become the basis of its activities and schemes.”

It is not enough, Huzooraa said, to just have these printed on clothing or badges; we should try to understand the depth of wisdom behind these profound words. The reason Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra assigned these words to Majlis Khuddam-ul-Ahmadiyya was to remind the youth that secular education is not enough, rather they should focus on enhancing their spirituality too. 

Every moment of prayer should be cherished and enjoyed as we get to open our hearts before our Lord, as opposed to considering prayer a necessity and thus superficially fulfilling the requirement of faith. 

4 6028109461770470691
Courtesy of MKA UK

Having knowledge of Islam’s teachings will draw us nearer to Allah the Almighty and through this, we can fulfil our actual purpose. 

The success of our Jamaat and Islam is paired with the success of our youth.

Huzooraa said that as the world drifts away from religion, our role and responsibility of conveying the truth should not be underestimated. Ahmadi youth should wholeheartedly accept this challenge. Through this, we will be fulfilling our purpose and the purpose for which Allah created this world. If we are successful, we will be the recipients of Allah’s rewards and will reap the benefits in our worldly endeavours. Materially and spiritually, we will be blessed by Allah as we desired to act according to the teachings of Islam. 

Huzooraa went on to give the noble example of the Holy Prophet’ssa Companionsra to Khuddam and Atfal:

“For quite some time, I have been mentioning the blessed companions of the Holy Prophetsa in my Friday Sermons. They were the esteemed group of people for whom history bears witness that they not only pledged to give precedence to faith over all worldly matters, but more importantly, they fulfilled that pledge in the most astonishing fashion. They spared no effort to discharge their oath and gave every possible sacrifice for the sake of their faith. As a result, Allah the Almighty enabled them to excel in spiritual and moral terms and to play an outstanding role in the spread of Islam. 

“At the same time, he also blessed them in worldly terms, so that those who worshipped Him day and night and were truly obedient to the Holy Prophetsa of Islam saw their trade and businesses thrive to the extent that some even became millionaires in today’s terminology. However, such wealth never took them away from their faith or corrupted them in any way, rather it led them towards even greater sacrifices for the cause of Islam.”

Giving guidance to Khuddam and Atfal, Huzooraa said:

“Hence, you should always keep in view to prioritise your faith and you should continually evaluate your efforts to spiritually and morally better yourselves. This is imperative, not only for your own benefit, but also for the benefit of your nation. 

“Each Khadim should serve as a means of pride for their country and be amongnst those who take their people toward peace and prosperity.”

Huzooraa said that the tragic reality of today is that the majority of the world has forgotten their Creator. Every Khadim should attempt to bring their nation back towards God Almighty and for this, Khuddam must set the highest standards of piety and righteousness. Khuddam must lead by example. 

When seeking forgiveness for previous mistakes, Khuddam must be remorseful over their sins before they seek forgiveness. 

Huzooraa said that many people would ask him how they can know if each of our sins have been forgiven, however, Huzooraa said that if a person piously seeks forgiveness and shows remorse, their sins are forgiven. 

Conversely, if a person offers Istighfar but repeatedly commits that sin, it cannot be said that they are sincere in seeking forgiveness. Apart from Istighfar, Huzooraa said that we should offer the prayer:

اِھْدِنَا الصِّرَاطَ الْمُسْتَقِیْم

“Guide us on the right path.”

Having accepted the Promised Messiahas, everyone – man, woman and child – should offer this prayer repeatedly to stay rightly guided. 

There are so many distractions and temptations in the world that can take us away from our actual purpose, for example, immoral and indecent television programmes and films. These serve to weaken the moral fabric of society. 

thumbnail image1

The same is the case of social media and many videos and posts promote immorality. Then there are video games that also serve this purpose; to take us away from spirituality and morality. If Khuddam are falling prey to this, they should realise that they are succumbing to Satan and helping him in his cause of working against Allah the Almighty. 

It is not an exaggeration to suggest that in this era, more than ever before, society is engulfed by satanic influences. Today, pornography, drugs, online gaming, gambling, immoral and inappropriate programmes, nightclubbing and many other things are among those that are entirely harmful and taking youth away from God Almighty. Regrettably, some of our youth are being drawn towards such worldly allures. 

Such youth neglect to offer Istighfar, forget that they have accepted the Imam of the age and that they have accepted the Holy Prophetsa.

Addressing the youth drifting away from religion and members of the Jamaat in general, Huzooraa said: 

“It is a source of deep regret for me that there are members of our Jamaat who have more interest in keeping updated with the latest films and social media posts than they have in studying the Holy Quran, offering Salat and seeking to perform righteous deeds. Though our Jamaat makes a lot of effort towards fulfilling the needs of others through khidmat-e-khalq – service to humanity, charities – the truth remains that the majority of the work is being done by a minority of our members. 

“There are many who remain idle and fail to sacrifice their time and wealth for the benefit of mankind. Similarly, we cannot claim that a majority of Ahmadis are offering their prayers with the devotion and spirit that is required, nor are they studying the Holy Quran deeply or seeking to act upon its instructions. Ultimately, we cannot claim that the majority of our youth are those who are truly giving precedence to their faith over all worldly matters. 

“How then can we hope to reform our nations if we are failing to reform ourselves? This is the stark truth and so, until each and every one of us reflects upon our actions and seeks the help of Allah and repents before Him, we can never be truly successful or fulfil the real objectives of our lives.”

Huzooraa then went on to say that, in this regard, some people say that if Allah desires us to be better, then He should better us Himself. However, this is wrong and ignorant. Human beings have free will and they should learn to make their choices wisely.  

Some people question the involvement of the Jamaat in their personal lives and issues. Huzooraa responded to this by saying:

“Some things are indeed personal in nature, however, where a personal matter interferes with our religious duties, it becomes an issue for the Jamaat because as Ahmadis, we have all pledged to give precedence to faith over all worldly matters. If an Ahmadi violates the demands of his faith, they are breaking their pledge and so it becomes the duty of the Jamaat, whether at a Jamaat level or through the auxiliaries, to take action by trying to guide him back towards the right path. 

“Therefore, always remembers, if you weaken in your faith or become embroiled in immoral or vain acts, the Jamaat’s nizam [system] will seek to guide you and to explain the importance of reformation. 

“Without a doubt, Majlis Khuddam-ul-Ahmadiyya will and should constantly remind the Khuddam and Atfal about the importance of offering Salat and coming to the mosque. It is their duty to make it clear to every Khadim that failure to offer these basic duties will take them away from their faith. 

“Such matters do not remain personal but are a matter of concern to the Jamaat because if Ahmadis are not fulfilling the rights of Allah and are not prioritising their faith over worldly matters, then they are not only hurting themselves, but also the Jamaat and the wider society. 

“Where an individual weakens, it weakens the collective and this is the core point underpinning the slogan that ‘Nations cannot be reformed without the reformation of the youth.’” 

Huzooraa said that if we succumb to temptations of the world, the slogans of Khuddam will be hollow slogans. 

4 6028109461770470696
Courtesy of MKA UK

Some things may remain personal, however, there are some aspects that the Jamaat will have to intervene in. Everyone has the freedom to work in their respective fields and earn money, so long that it is in keeping with the law and the Islamic values. Consuming or selling alcohol is prohibited. No person can be forced to marry without their consent. Man should not marry to fulfil his sexual desires. In these areas, the Jamaat provides constant guidance. 

In chapter 12, verse 54 of the Holy Quran, it is said that Prophet Josephas said:

وَ مَا اُبَرِّئُ نَفْسِیْ ۔ اِنَّ النَّفْسَ لَاَمَّارَةٌ بِالسُّوْءِ اِلَّا مَا رَحِمَ رَبِّیْ۔ اِنَّ رَبِّیْ غَفُوْرٌ رَّحِیْمٌ

“And I do not absolve myself of weakness; for, the soul is surely prone to enjoin evil, save that whereon my Lord has mercy. Surely, my Lord is Most-Forgiving, Merciful.”

From this, one can understand that even a person who was destined to be a prophet affirmed that without the help of Allah, it was not possible to be saved from satanic temptations. 

If even prophets require Allah’s help to be saved, then what about ordinary people? It is the foremost duty of those who accept the Promised Messiahas that they should adhere to all this. 

Speaking about those who break their pledges, Huzooraa said:

“Do not be under the illusion that failing to fulfil one’s pledge is a small matter; rather in the Holy Quran, Allah the Almighty has said that each person will be held accountable for their pledges. At the very minimum, every person should be honest and courageous and free from hypocrisy. 

“Thus, if a person does not want to follow the teachings of Islam or does not want the Jamaat to guide him, then openly declare that he is not a member of the Jamaat. 

“On the other hand, once you have taken Bai‘at and pledged to give precedence to your faith over all worldly matters, you must seek to fulfil its demands to the best of your abilities. You must offer Istighfar as much as possible so that you can be saved from the so-called freedom of the modern world, which are actually shackles that serve only to pull mankind away from the path of true prosperity.

“Each of you should pray that you are served from modern-day vices and that you remain pure of mind and all immoral thoughts and desires. Be ever determined to fulfil your pledge, most especially the fundamental pledge to give precedence to your religion over all other things. 

“Be amongst those Khuddam who truly understand that they have been given the duty to reform their nations and for this, they must first reform themselves. Be amongst those Khuddam who are determined to unite the whole world in a firm belief in the unity and oneness of God Almighty and those who play their role in bringing mankind together under the glorious of the Holy Prophet Muhammadsa. These are the values that must be instilled within us and it is to embed these values that we hold Jalsas and Itemas. 

rsz img 20190908 170332

“It is my ardent and heartfelt prayer that the members of Majlis Khuddam-ul-Ahmadiyya and Majlis Atfal-ul-Ahmadiyya are those who cherish and protect their Islamic values and realise that their every success will be based upon staying true to their core identities as Ahmadi Muslims. Otherwise your pledge and claim will be rendered hollow and will be grounded in hypocrisy and hypocrisy is a vice that is not only hated by religious people, but also by other worldly people.”

Towards the end, Huzooraa prayed for all participants to attain the highest moral and spiritual standards. 

Thereafter, Huzooraa led the congregation in dua, after which some Khuddam sang choral poems before Huzoor’saa departure. 

Paradise lost or paradise found?

Success story of the Ahmadiyya Jamaat 45 years on

Capture 1
Parliament House, Islamabad

Pakistan had only just celebrated the silver jubilee of its formation that its rulers decided to give in to extremist clerics. The dawn of the year 1974 brought with it the darkness that was to prevail the skies of the very young state of Pakistan for many decades to follow. A democratic government felt its throne shaking vigorously by the pushing and pulling of bigoted extreme-right wing political powers. The so-called democratic leader decided to join hands with these pressure groups with the aim of saving his political power.

ZA Bhutto, the then prime minister of Pakistan, finally accepted the demand of the extremist circles to declare the Ahmadiyya Jamaat non-Muslim. These circles had been trying their best to achieve this goal since the formation of Pakistan in 1947; finally, their demands saw acceptance, ironically, at the hands of a leader with a secular outlook.

We know that the Ahmadiyya Jamaat was constitutionally declared a non-Muslim minority on 7 September 1974. We all know that Hazrat Mirza Nasir Ahmad, Khalifatul Masih IIIrh, presented the Ahmadiyya case before the Pakistani parliament which fell on deaf ears and the parliament decided to go ahead with a decision that they were carrying in their pocket even before the hearings of the committee had started. 

Today, 45 years on, we look back to see what the special committee (consisting of the whole house of the Pakistani parliament) sought to determine and what they actually determined. The primary objective of the full-house special committee was set out as,
“To determine the position of a person who does not believe in the finality of the Holy Prophet Muhammad, may peace and blessings of Allah be upon him.”

The objectives went on to detail how the Ahmadiyya Muslim Jamaat should constitutionally be declared non-Muslim. The parliament, endorsing the demands, established a special committee and made it obligatory for the then head of the Ahmadiyya Jamaat to appear before the committee to prove why they deserved to constitutionally remain Muslims.

In several sessions, the parliament heard the arguments of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Jamaat and finally declared that they did not deserve to be classed a Muslim by definition. What definition of Muslim? Whose definition of Muslim? No one cared to make that clear. Actually, no one could dare to make that clear! How could they?

During the days of those hearings in the assembly, all members would have breaks for Salat. No two members were ready to say Salat behind the other as all belonged to seperate denominations and sects of Islam. There were Barelvis, Deobandis, Ahl-e-Hadith and Shiites in the committee and none thought the other to be “Muslim enough” to lead the congregational prayer. Thus, small groups said their own congregational prayers. This was suffi cient to prove that everyone had their own definition of Islam.

Hence, when declaring Ahmadis non-Muslim, no one had any touchstone to present.  This wasn’t a new situation. When the anti-Ahmadiyya agitation of 1953 turned violent and looting and damaging crossed limits, the judicial committee headed by Justice Munir convened scholars from all Islamic sects and denominations. They were asked to define the term “Muslim” so that their demand to declare Ahmadis as “non-Muslim” could judicially be examined.

Justice Munir, in his report, stated that no one denomination agreed with the other in the definition of a Muslim. One ground that the committee presented in support of their decision was that Ahmadis believe in a prophet after the Holy Prophetsa of Islam. All members of the house claimed to be Muslims. All believed in the re-advent of Isa ibn Maryam (Jesusas) in the latter days. Despite this, they used the very belief against Ahmadis. 

One wonders why the special committee has never met again. There are so many reasons for the committee to meet regularly and throw every Pakistani out of the circle of Islam. For instance, the committee should convene again to consider whether Pakistani citizens, who sell counterfeit medicine that result in the deaths of thousands of innocent patients, are Muslims or not according to the constitution. Th e Holy Prophetsa of Islam said that the killing of a single individual equates to the genocide of the whole of humanity. Why then does the committee not convene?

There are millions who kill innocent citizens in the name of Islam. All these goons claim to be Pakistani citizens. Their leaders shamelessly accept responsibility for such heinous crimes. Should the committee not convene to see whether such acts are Islamic or not? These bloodthirsty groups still enjoy the status of being Muslims in the “Islamic Republic of Pakistan”.

Violence, terrorism, obscenity, profanity, vulgarity, drug abuse, sexual abuse, human trafficking and all other social vices have eaten into the bricks and mortar of Pakistani society. Why? Because religious clergy were allowed to mould and twist and turn and bend and break the constitution of Pakistan. Is it too late? Perhaps not!

The one community that the Pakistani government declared non-Muslim is now seen globally as the representative of the true Islam. The Pakistani assembly once summoned their Khalifa and refused to listen to his arguments. Today, their Khalifa is heard as the sole spokesperson of Islam in great parliaments of the world. Their Khalifa was called to stand in the dock and give evidence in his favour, but their Khalifa is now invited to major world parliaments to deliver keynote addresses from their most respectable platform. 

So here we are, 45 years on: The pro-mullah government of Pakistan versus the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community. Can they look us in the eye and go through the story of gain and loss over this half-a-century? We are sure they cannot! Those who wanted to crush us gained notoriety. We, their target, have flourished, prospered and succeeded in the entire world. Who lost and who won? We let the readers decide.

(Mahzarnama was the document presented by the Ahmadiyya Muslim Jamaat to the special committee. It serves as a textbook on the Ahmadiyya Muslim beliefs and can be accessed at www.alislam.org/library/ books/Mahzarnama.pdf)

1953-1974: A story of a state turning against its citizens

7 September 1974 was a day celebrated by the clerics and the right-wing politicians of Pakistan as a victory of “Islam” against Ahmadiyyat; the day when the infamous declaration of Pakistan’s national assembly came out declaring Ahmadis as a non-Muslim minority.

This did not just happen overnight. This declaration of heresy took two decades of jealousy. Ahmadiyya literature is full of explanations of what went on and what it took for the Pakistani legislative body to intervene in purely theological differences; what it was that united the extremely disunited clergy against the Ahmadiyya Muslim Jamaat. Today, we would like to present the viewpoint of a neutral, fair-minded historian and political analyst to see how they trace the roots of this infamous, inhumane declaration of the Pakistani government.

The following are extracts from Husain Haqqani’s book Reimagining Pakistan.

Al Hakam is thankful to Mr Husain Haqqani for granting permission to include these extracts:

Husain Haqqani, USA

A major manifestation of the pitfalls of religion-based politics came in January 1953, when clerics of various Muslim denominations demanded that the Ahmadi sect be declared non-Muslim for legal purposes. Widespread riots soon followed, resulting in dozens of deaths and considerable loss to property. Reflecting what has been a consistent pattern in Pakistan’s history, the religious demand also had a worldly purpose. Punjabi politicians had instigated the clerics in the hope of dislodging the government of Bengali prime minister, Khawaja Nazimuddin, who had taken office after Liaquat’s assassination two years earlier.

Capture 2
Khawaja Nazimuddin

Nazimuddin turned down an ultimatum from the ulema to declare members of the Ahmadi sect as a non-Muslim minority and to dismiss Foreign Minister Chaudhri Zafrullah Khan, who was an Ahmadi. The ulema also demanded that other Ahmadis occupying key posts in the state must also be removed from their offices. Punjab chief minister Mumtaz Daultana had activated the protestors in the hope of bringing down the federal government and becoming prime minister …

Nazimuddin’s decision to refuse the ulema’s demands had wide support at the time across the government and Pakistani society. The Ahmadi issue was limited to Punjab as that is where the sect had its principal following. Non-Punjabi polilticians did not associate themselves with the clerics or the Punjabi politicians supporting them. Pakistan’s secular leadership succeeded in pushing back a religious demand and the army enforced order, putting the Islamists and their rioting followers in their place …

At that time, the government set up a commission of inquiry, headed by the chief justice of the Lahore High Court, Muhammad Munir (who went on to become chief justice of Pakistan), to look into the causes of the anti-Ahmadi disturbances. In 117 sittings, the commission examined 3,600 pages of written statements and 2,700 pages of evidence. It went through 399 documents …

Its conclusion was that heeding the demands of the theologians in matters of state was a slippery slope and that Pakistan would do well to avoid it.

The 387-page report of the Munir Commission reflects the thinking of Pakistan’s ruling elite in the country’s early years. The report scrutinized “with the assistance of the ulema” their “conception of an Islamic State and its implications” and declared, “No one who has given serious thought to the introduction of a religious State in Pakistan has failed to notice the tremendous difficulties with which any such scheme must be confronted.”

Commonwealth Representatives Visiting France November 1939 O219
Commonwealth representatives visiting France, November 1939. Foreign Minister Chaudhry Zafrulla Khan Sahibra standing third from right.

“The Quaid-i-Azam said that the new State would be a modern democratic State,” it continued, adding that Jinnah’s concept of Pakistan required that sovereignty must be vested in the people and “the members of the new nation” should have “equal rights of citizenship regardless of their religion, caste or creed” …

The most important statement of the Commission, however, related to the differences among the clerics, which would divide Pakistanis more that religion could unite them. “The ulema were divided in their opinions when they were asked to cite some precedent of an Islamic State in Muslim history,” Justice Munir reported, pointing out that “no two learned divines are agreed” even on the fundamental definition of who is a Muslim.

In Justice Munir’s words, the anti-Ahmadi riots demonstrated that if “you can persuade the masses to believe that something they are asked to do is religiously right or enjoined by religion, you can set them to any course of action regardless of all considerations of discipline, loyalty, decency, morality or civic sense”. Munir warned that Pakistan was “being taken by the common man” as an Islamic State. In his view, this belief had been encouraged “by the ceaseless clamour for Islam and Islamic State that is being heard from all quarters since the establishment of Pakistan”. In words that were not heeded, the chief justice cautioned against letting the “phantom of an Islamic State” haunt the new country.

Notwithstanding Munir’s warnings … religious exhortations continued to consume the nation’s energies.

Under Bhutto, Pakistan still juggled between the needs of a modern state and pressure from clerics to recreate a bygone era … Bhutto portrayed himself, in the words of political scientist Anwar Syed, as “a Socialist Servant of Islam”. To rebut the argument of his Islamist opponents that socialism was “antithetical to God and religion”, Bhutto “advertised his personal dedication to Islam” and “insisted that he was a good Muslim”. He said, “he was proud of being a Muslim; indeed, he was first a Muslim and then a Pakistani” …

The first major manifestation of that inclination in constitutional and legal terms occurred when Islamist groups rioted against the Ahmadi sect. The riots began after a clash in May between Islamist and Ahmadi students at the Railway station of Rabwah, the town where the Ahmadi sect has its headquarters.

Islamist demands against the Ahmadis were no different this time around than they had been almost two decades earlier. But in 1953, Prime Minister Nazimuddin had been willing to call in the army to stop the rioters and Justice Munir had written his report pointing out the problem with the state accepting demands to define which sect was or was not Islamic. Now, Bhutto was unwilling to follow in Nazimuddin’s footsteps and there was no one of Munir’s stature to remind the government that it should not allow clerics to dictate legislation.

Even though the Ahmadis had, as a community, backed Bhutto in the 1970 election, Bhutto decided to join the religious parties he had defeated at the polls in amending Pakistan’s constitution (framed only a year earlier) to define ‘Muslim’ in a way that specifically excluded Ahmadis from the fold of Islam. The Islamists got their biggest legislative victory since the Objectives Resolution and that too after losing a general election …

In 1974, the political leadership sought political advantage by appeasing clerics making anti-Ahmadi demands. Prime Minister Zulfikar Ali Bhutto declared it an “achievement” that he secured support of all major political parties in amending the constitution to declare Ahmadis non-Muslim under law. A few years later, military ruler Zia legislated restrictions on Ahmadi professions of faith, making it a punishable offence for an Ahmadi to act in a manner that made him or her seem to be a Muslim. The judiciary upheld Zia’s laws on grounds that by acting like a Muslim or using nomenclature used by Muslims, an Ahmadi offended Muslims and, therefore, deserved the punishment prescribed by Zia.

Had Bhutto, Zia and the judges acted like Pakistan’s leaders did in 1953, Pakistan could have avoided being saddled with a constitutional amendment and laws that are deemed by the rest of the world as violating the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

The 1974 ouster of the “Heretics”: What really happened?

Nadeem F Paracha, Columnist, Pakistan

Zulfiqar ali bhutto

The legacy of Pakistan’s former Prime Minister, Zulfikar Ali Bhutto, is a mixed bag of praise, platitudes and panning.

Where, on the one hand, he is hailed as being perhaps the sharpest and most dazzling politicians ever to grace the country’s political landscape, he is also panned for being a megalomaniac and a demagogue, readily willing to sideline his democratic principles in pursuit to retain political power.

Applauded for successfully regenerating a demoralised and fractured country’s pride (after the 1971 East Pakistan debacle), and igniting within the working classes a sudden sense of political consciousness, Bhutto is also remembered as the man who (to remain in power) continued to play footsie with reactionary political outfits and (thus) ultimately betraying his own party’s largely secular, democratic and socialist credentials.

Not only did he attract fierce opposition from the right-wing Islamic parties, over the decades, the left and liberal sections of the Pakistani intelligentsia have also come down hard on him for capitulating to the demands of right-wing parties on certain theological and legislative issues that eventually (and ironically) set the tenor and the tone of a reactionary General (Ziaul Haq) who toppled his regime.

With the ever-increasing problem of religious bigotry and violence that Pakistan has been facing ever since the 1980s, many intellectuals, authors and political historians in the country have blamed the Bhutto government’s 1974 act of constitutionally redefining the status of the Ahmadiyya, formerly recognised as a Muslim sect, as the starting point of what began to mutate into a sectarian and religious monstrosity in the next three decades.

The Ahmadiyya community was (almost overnight) turned into a non-Muslim minority in Pakistan.

Many observers correctly point out that by surrendering to the demands of the religious parties in this context (especially after they had resorted to violence), Bhutto unwittingly restored their confidence and status that was badly battered during the 1970 election.

But I believe panning Bhutto for introducing legislative and constitutional expressions of bigotry has become too much of a cliché. It’s become a somewhat knee-jerk reaction, and an exercise in which the details of the 1974 event have gotten lost and ignored in the excitement of repeatedly pointing out the starling irony of a left-liberal government passing a controversial theological edict.

I will not get into the theological aspects of what was then called ‘the Ahmadiyya question,’ because I’m not academically qualified to do so.

Nevertheless, it is important that one attempts to objectively piece together the events that led to the final act. Events that seem to have gotten buried underneath the thick layers of polemical theological diatribes exchanged between orthodox Muslim scholars and those associated with the Ahmadiyya community; and also due to the somewhat intellectual laziness of the secular intelligentsia that has exhibited a rather myopic understanding and judgment of and on Bhutto’s role in the episode.

This article is by no means an attempt to judge the theological merits or political demerits of the bill that constitutionally relegated the Ahmadiyya community as a non-Muslim minority.

It is just an attempt to bring to light certain events that culminated in the relegation of the Ahmadiyya community.

To do so I did go through some literature produced by orthodox Sunni and Shia ulema and those associated with the Ahmadiyya community during the commotion, but that literature is largely theological.

So I have ignored it because I lack the theological training to comment on it, and anyway, it is hardly helpful in understanding the day-to-day on-ground happenings that led the Bhutto government to turn a demand of his Islamic opponents into a law.

Instead, my findings in this respect are squarely based on, and culled from the writings of historians and authors who, I believe, have transcribed the history of the event in the most objective and informed manner.

I have also used a plethora of information available in the day-to-day reporting of the commotion by certain Urdu and English newspapers of the time (especially between May 1974 and July 1974).

The schism

A series of modern, as well as puritanical reformist Muslim movements emerged after the complete fall of the Muslim Empire in India in the mid-1800s.

The Ahmadiyya movement was one of them. The Ahmadiyya community was founded in 1889 by Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, who claimed he was under divine instruction to fulfil the major prophecies contained in Islamic and other sacred texts regarding a world reformer who would unite humanity.

He announced to Christians awaiting the second coming of Jesus, Muslims anticipating the Mahdi, Hindus expecting Krishna, and Buddhists searching for Buddha, that he was the promised messiah for them all, commissioned by God to rejuvenate true faith …

As the 19th century reformist movements competed among themselves to gather and organise the Muslim community in India, they often clashed with each other and in their polemical publications and literature denounced their counterparts as either being ‘bad Muslims’ (fakir) or outright heretics/infidels (kafir).

For example, the Sunni Muslim reformists emerging from seminaries in the Indian city of Deoband (the ‘Deobandis’) denounced another Sunni Muslim sub-sect, the ‘Barelvis,’ of introducing questionable innovations in the practice and rituals of Islam. The Barelvis, a less puritanical Sunni sub-sect, responded in kind.

Both, however, were on the same page when it came to Shia Islam and accused the Shias of heresy.

Interestingly, the more conservative sections of all three sects in the region vehemently criticised the modernist/rationalist reformist Muslim movements of the time led by scholars such as Sir Syed Ahmed Khan and Syed Ameer Ali.

Till about 1913, the Ahmadiyya movement was seen as a spiritual and evangelical branch of the modernist reformist Muslim initiatives triggered by the likes of Sir Syed and Syed Ameer Ali.

In fact, for a while, a number of Indian Muslim intellectuals were closely associated with the Ahmadiyya movement and considered Mirza Ghulam Ahmad as a modern redeemer of faith in India.

Brilliant poet and philosopher, Muhammad Iqbal, too was once a great admirer of the movement.

Contrary to popular belief, agitation against the Ahmadiyya movement (by the orthodox Muslim sects and sub-sects in India) was not an immediate happening that emerged right after the formation of the community in 1889 …

The accusations began piling up in earnest from 1915 onward and by the 1940s the orthodox ulema began to pressurise Muslim leadership in India to address the ‘Ahmadiyya question.’

Interestingly, the Ahmadiyya movement allied itself with Jinnah’s All India Muslim League (AIML).

For example, during the crucial 1946 election in the Punjab, the main opposition to the Ahmadiyya came from Islamic groups allied to the Indian National Congress or from Islamic scholars who did not recognise the League to be the sole representative of Indian Muslims.

The League at the time was a mixture of modernist Muslims, secular democrats, pro-Jinnah ulema and even Marxists.

In fact, the League’s manifesto for the 1946 election was largely authored by socialists and Marxists, whereas much of the campaigning was done by the pro-League Islamic lobbies.

The latter in fact advised Jinnah to dissociate himself from the party’s Ahmadiyya members because Islamic outfits that were being backed by the Congress were using the issue to question the party’s Muslim credentials.

Jinnah ignored the suggestion.

In 1951, three years after the creation of Pakistan, due to a failed ‘communist coup’ attempt by some left-wing military men in league with the Communist Party of Pakistan (CPP) and a group of progressive intellectuals, the government initiated an intense crackdown and bans against left-leaning officers in the military, the CPP and affiliated trade, student and labour unions.

This created just enough of a void for some radical rightist forces to seep in.

This opportunity was further widened by the disintegration of the ruling Muslim League (ML) that was by then plagued with infighting, corruption and exhaustive power struggles among its top leadership.

In 1953 after smelling an opportunity to reinstate their political credentials, the Jamaat-i-Islami (JI) and the Majlis-i-Ahrar gladly played into the hands of the then Chief Minister of Punjab and veteran Muslim Leaguer, Mian Mumtaz Daultana, who was plotting the downfall of his own party’s prime minster, Khuwaja Nazimuddin.

With a burning ambition to become the Prime Minister after former Prime Minister Liaqat Ali Khan’s enigmatic assassination in 1951, Daultana was bypassed when the ML government chose the Bengali Nazimuddin as PM whom Daultana considered to be incompetent.

As Chief Minister of Punjab, Daultana was being criticised for the rising rate of unemployment and food shortages in the province.

Anticipating protests against his provincial government’s failure to rectify the economic crises in Punjab, Daultana began to allude that economic crises in the province were mainly the doing of the Ahmadiyya community.

The Ahmadiyya had played a leading role in the creation of Pakistan and were placed in important positions in the military, the bureaucracy, the government and within the country’s still nascent industrial classes.

Daultana did not accuse the Ahmadiyya directly. Instead, he purposefully ignored and even gave tactical support to JI and the Ahrar who decided to use the crises in the Punjab by beginning a campaign against the community and demand their excommunication from the fold of Islam.

As JI and Ahrar members went on a rampage destroying Ahmadiyya property in Lahore, Daultana was able to shift the media’s and the nation’s attention away from his provincial government’s economic failures.

But his ‘victory’ was short-lived. The Nazimuddin government with the help of the military crushed the movement and rounded up JI and Ahrar leaders.

It then went on to dismiss Daultana. The demand to throw the Ahmadiyya out of the fold of Islam was rejected.

The brutal crackdown against the protesters and the arrest of the movement’s main leaders (on charges of instigating violence against the state) seemed to had buried the Ahmadiyya question once and for all.

No significant move to reignite the issue was made for the next 20 years. But when the move did come, it took everyone by surprise.

The ouster

Along with the working classes and the petty-bourgeoisie of the Punjab, the Ahmadiyya had overwhelmingly voted for the Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) in the province during the 1970 election.

The community’s members were well entrenched in the country’s economy and had not faced any major acts of persecution from the orthodox Islamic parties and the ulema ever since 1954.

On May 22, 1974, some 160 members of the Islami Jamiat-i-Talaba (IJT — the student of the Jamaat-i-Islami), boarded a train headed for Peshawar in the former NWFP.

On its way to Peshawar, the train stopped for a while at the Rabwa railway station. The city of Rabwa was predominantly an Ahmadiyya town and also housed the community’s spiritual headquarters.

As the train stopped at Rabwa, IJT students got out and began to raise slogans against the Ahmadiyya and cursed the community’s spiritual figurehead, Mirza Ghulam Ahmad.

The train then left the station taking the charged students to Peshawar. No untoward incident was reported apart from the slogan-chanting and cursing.

However, when the incident was related to some Ahmadiyya leaders in Rabwa, they ordered Ahmadiyya youth to reach the station … when the train stops again at Rabwa on its way back from Peshawar.

After finding out that the students would be returning to Multan from Peshawar on the 29th of May, dozens of young Ahmadiyya men gathered at the Rabwa station.

As the train came to a halt … a fight ensued …

Interestingly, whereas the first incident had only been briefly reported by the newspapers, the news of the attack on IJT was prominently displayed in the country’s conservative Urdu press.

JI demanded that the culprits of the attack be apprehended or the party would hold countrywide protest rallies.

Police arrested 71 Ahmadiyya men in Rabwa and the Punjab government headed by the PPP’s Chief Minister, Hanif Ramay, appointed K M Samadani, a High Court judge, to hold an inquiry into the incident.

But this did not stop the JI from launching a protest movement. It was soon joined by other opposition parties which included the centre-right Muslim League, the right-wing Majlis-i-Ahrar and even the centrist Tehrik-i-Istiqlal headed by Asghar Khan.

Joining the protests were also various bar associations of the Punjab, orthodox ulema and clerics and the student wing of JI, the IJT.

They demanded that Ahmadiyya members be removed from the bureaucracy and the government; Ahmadiyya youth outfits be disarmed; and that Rabwa be declared an open city because it had become ‘a state within a state.’

The protests turned violent and spread across various cities of the Punjab. Mobs attacked houses and businesses owned by the Ahmadiyya and also attacked Ahmadiyya men and women. Dozens of members of the Ahmadiyya community lost their lives, most of them dying in Gujranwala and Sargodah.

The leaders of the protest movement then demanded that the Ahmadiyya be excommunicated from the fold of Islam.

On June 4, while speaking on the floor of the National Assembly, Prime Minister Bhutto refused to allow opposition members to speak on the Ahmadiyya issue. He accused the opposition of being ‘hell-bent on destroying the country.’

His party had an overwhelming majority in the assembly and protests from the members on the opposition benches were briskly subdued.

Then, when the riots escalated, Bhutto gave the Punjab CM the green signal to use force to quell the riots. The police came down hard on the rioters and managed to reduce the intensity of the turmoil after a week.

On June 14, opposition parties called for a wheel-jam strike. It was successful in the Punjab and in some cities of the NWFP, but was largely ignored in Sindh and Balochistan.

On June 19, newspapers quoted Bhutto as saying that the government was committed to protecting the lives and property of all Pakistanis and that his government was even willing to use the army for this purpose.

He was reminding the opposition how the army had brutally cracked down against anti-Ahmadiyya rioters in 1954.

Bhutto then appealed to the opposition that the ‘Ahmadiyya question’ can be settled in a more civilised manner without resorting to violence and bigotry. He said now was not the right time.

He appeared on TV and radio and insisted that he will not allow ‘savagery and cannibalism’. He said the Ahmadiyya issue had been around for 90 years and could not be solved in a day. He suggested that the issue be referred to the Advisory Council of Islamic Ideology (ACII) — a non-legislative advisory body that was formed by the Ayub Khan dictatorship in the early 1960s and was mostly headed by liberal Islamic scholars.

After the June 14 strike, Bhutto allowed the issue to be discussed in the assembly and told the press that his party members in the House were free to vote on the issue according to their individual conscience.

Jamiat Ulema-i-Islam (JUI) chief, Maulana Mufti Mehmood, who was heading the opposition’s stand on the issue, responded by accusing Bhutto of trying to put the ‘Ahmadiyya question’ in cold storage.

‘A mere resolution in the assembly will be an eyewash,’ he told reporters. ‘Bhutto is trying to sweep the issue underneath the carpet.’

Religious parties, the fundamentalist JI, the Deobandi Jamiat Ulema-i-Islam (JUI) and the Barelvi Jamiat Ulema-i-Pakistan (JUP) had formed an ‘Action Committee’ with the centre-right Pakistan Democratic Party (of Nawabzada Nasarullah) and Pagara’s Muslim League. They called it Qadiyani Muhasbah Committee (Committee for the Exposition of Qadyanism).

Opposition parties such as the left-wing National Awami Party (NAP) remained silent.

Mufti Mehmood demanded that a bill be passed in the assembly that would once and for all declare the Ahmadiyya community as a non-Muslim minority.

Jamaat-i-Islami’s Mian Tufail demanded the same and warned Bhutto that ‘his double-talk on the Ahmadiyya issue would trigger his downfall.’

The centre-right PDP also joined the chorus and demanded that a bill be introduced in the Parliament declaring the Ahmadiyya as non-Muslim.

Opposition parties and clerics again threatened to take to the streets to force the government to introduce the suggested bill.

Bhutto maintained that declaring the Ahmadiyya a minority and pushing them out from state and government institutions would be detrimental to the economy and political stability of the country. He also protested that the issue was a religious one and hence the National Assembly should not be used to resolve it.

The religious parties disagreed. They reminded him of the constitution all the political parties had approved only a year ago (1973). They told him that the constitution had declared Pakistan as an Islamic Republic so how could he claim that a religious issue had no place in the National Assembly?

It was about this time that some advisors of Bhutto warned him that if the crises was allowed to simmer or be sidelined, the party might lose some members in the Punjab and National Assembly who were sympathetic towards the demands of the opposition.

On Bhutto’s orders, one of his ministers, Kausar Niazi, led a government delegation that held a series of meetings with the ulema belonging to Sunni (both Deobandi and Barelvi) sub-sects, and the Shia sect.

They agreed to form a parliamentary committee to look into the demands of the parties that were leading the anti-Ahmadiyya movement.

The government convinced the opposition members of the committee that the spiritual leader of the Ahmadiyya community also be given the opportunity to present his thoughts and opinion on the issue.

After weeks of intense dialogues among the parliamentary committee, the ulema and the head of the Ahmadiyya community, the committee decided to finally introduce the bill in the assembly.

Sections of the press reported that a majority of PPP legislators were unwilling to vote for the bill. But even though the report that was prepared by the committee was never made public, parts of it were leaked to the legislators and the report allegedly recorded the head of the Ahmadiyya community telling the committee that he only considered those who were Ahmadiyya as Muslims.

On Sept 7, 1974, the bill was passed and the Ahmadiyya became a non-Muslim minority.

Though the violence stopped after the passage of the bill, a large number of Ahmadiyya who were actively involved in the fields of business, science, teaching and the civil service began to move out of Pakistan, leaving behind the less well-to-do members of the community who till this day face regular bouts of violence and harassment.

In another series of ironies, in 1977, the parties that had rejoiced the excommunication of the Ahmadiyya in 1974 were out on the streets again — this time agitating against the very government and the man who had agreed to accept their most assertive demand.

In the final act of this irony, in April 1979, the same man was sent to the gallows (through a sham trial) by the military dictatorship of Ziaul Haq, who decided to stay on to ‘turn Pakistan into a true Islamic republic’, and would go on to explain how Bhutto had become ‘a danger to both Islam and Pakistan’.

In 1984, the Zia dictatorship further consolidated the state of Pakistan’s stand against the Ahmadiyya by issuing an ordinance (Ordinance XX) which prohibited the Ahmadiyya from preaching or professing their beliefs.

The ordinance that was enacted to suppress ‘anti-Islamic activities’ forbids Ahmadiyya to call themselves Muslim or to pose as Muslims.

Their places of worships cannot be called mosques and they are barred from performing the Muslim call to prayer, using the traditional Islamic greeting in public, publicly quoting from the Quran, preaching in public, seeking converts, or producing, publishing, and disseminating their religious materials.

(Taken from Nadeem Paracha’s article with his special permission. Courtesy of Dawn, 21 November 2013)