Home Blog Page 3

Answers to Everyday Issues – Part 98: Story of Musa and Khidr, attributing mistakes to Satan, faith vs knowledge of God and car financing

Guidance regarding basic Islamic issues that Hazrat Amirul Momineen, Khalifatul Masih Vaa, has given on various occasions in his written correspondence and during MTA programmes is being published officially below for everyone’s benefit.

Click here for Part 97

What is the Ahmadiyya interpretation of the story of Musa and Khidr?

Answers to Everyday Issues – Part 98
Image: inanilmuaz/Unsplash

Someone wrote to Hazrat Amirul Momineen, Khalifatul Masih Vaa, enquiring about the reality of the narrative concerning Prophet Mosesas and Khidr. He asked whether this event actually occurred physically or if it recounts a spiritual journey, noting that a divergence exists within the Jamaat’s literature regarding whether the event was apparent [zahiri] or visionary [kashfi]. He sought the actual position.

Huzoor-e-Anwaraa, in his letter dated 16 September 2023, provided the following guidance regarding this matter:

“The first point is that the Holy Quran is God Almighty’s final law-bearing Book; its knowledge and insights extend until the Day of Resurrection. Allah the Almighty continues to grant the gnosis of Quranic sciences to His Prophets, saints [awliya] and chosen ones according to the needs of every age, in accordance with the following Quranic teaching:

وَإِنْ مِنْ شَيْءٍ إِلَّا عِنْدَنَا خَزَائِنُهُ وَمَا نُنَزِّلُهُ إِلَّا بِقَدَرٍ مَعْلُومٍ

“‘And there is not a thing but with Us are the treasures thereof and We send it not down except in a known measure.’ (Surah al-Hijr, Ch.15: V.22)

“Interpreting this verse, the Promised Messiahas states:

“‘It is clearly proved from this verse that everything found in the world has descended from heaven alone. This is in the sense that the causative factors [‘ilal-e-mujibah] of these things are from that very True Creator and also in the sense that every craft manifests through His revelation [ilham], inspiration [ilqa], instruction and the bestowing of reason and understanding. However, it does not manifest beyond the need of the time and the breadth of knowledge granted to every Divinely Commissioned one [Mamur min Allah] is also bestowed in accordance with the need of the time. By this same deduction, the subtleties, deep insights and truths of the Holy Quran are also unveiled strictly in accordance with the need of the time.’ (Izala-e-Auham, Part II, Ruhani Khazain, Vol. 3, pp. 450-451)

“The second point is that the Holy Prophetsa, upon whose perfectly pure heart this Sharia was revealed, mentioned the vastness of the Holy Quran’s knowledge and spiritual insights and its limitless meanings, by stating:

أُنْزِلَ الْقُرْآنُ عَلَى سَبْعَةِ أَحْرُفٍ، لِكُلِّ آيَةٍ مِنْهَا ظَهْرٌ وَبَطْنٌ، وَلِكُلِّ حَدٍّ مُطَّلَعٌ

“‘The Quran has been revealed in seven modes [ahruf]; for every verse within it, there is an apparent aspect [zahr] and a hidden aspect [batn].’ (Mishkat al-Masabih, Kitab al-‘ilm, al-fasl ath-thani, Hadith 238)

“Thus, based on these truths expounded by the Holy Quran and Holy Prophetsa, when the Promised Messiahas narrated the incident of Prophet Mosesas and the righteous servant of Allah mentioned in the Quran, he described the apparent [zahiri] meaning of this verse, as this was the interpretation prevalent among the general Muslims of that era. Furthermore, the need of the time dictated that by explaining the apparent meanings of these verses, the erroneous concept held by people – that Allah the Almighty cannot send revelation to anyone other than a Prophet – should be refuted with arguments and this error be rectified.

“Accordingly, the Promised Messiahas clarified to the general public and specifically to the scholars of the Ummah, by inferring from the apparent meanings of these verses, that Allah the Almighty can send revelation and inspiration to a non-prophet as well. To support this, he presented four examples from the Holy Quran – referencing the disciples of Jesusas, Mary the mother of Jesusas, the mother of Mosesas and the aforementioned man of God in the incidents of Mosesas – thereby providing proof from the Holy Quran of the descent of revelation upon all these individuals.

“Moreover, the Promised Messiahas deduced from the incidents of the mother of Mosesas and the man of God with Prophet Mosesas that, in addition to a Prophet, the revelation of a wali is also definitive. It was for this reason that the mother of Mosesas, considering her revelation to be true and certain, cast her newborn child into the river, pushing him to the brink of possible destruction. Similarly, that righteous servant, deeming his revelation true and certain, killed a child. Had these individuals not considered their revelation to be true and certain, they would never have done so.

“Then, from the incident of Mosesas and this righteous servant, Huzooras drew a third inference: that we should not object to such Friends of Allah [awliyaullah] who are stationed at a high rank of wilayah and whose being recipients of divine revelation is proven with certainty through other arguments and heavenly signs, even if their words and actions are beyond our understanding, for we cannot comprehend their reality.

“All these arguments presented by the Promised Messiahas could only be made by explaining the apparent meaning of these verses, not by explaining their hidden [batini] meanings. Therefore, he was content with the apparent meaning of these verses.

“Subsequently, during the blessed era of Khilafat-e-Ahmadiyya, when the time came to explain the hidden meanings of these Quranic verses, in exact accordance with the prophecies of the Holy Prophetsa, the manifestations of Khilafat-e-Haqqah Islamiyyah Ahmadiyyah established through the Promised Messiahas – by means of Divinely bestowed knowledge [‘ilm-e-ladunni] granted by Allah the Almighty – explained the inner meanings of these verses in their respective times, presenting deeply insightful commentaries.

“Thus, Hazrat Khalifatul Masih Ira declared this incident to be a vision [kashf] and termed it the spiritual ascension [mi‘raj] of Prophet Mosesas. He interpreted the person whom Prophet Mosesas set out to meet on this spiritual journey as an angel, stating that the fact that this incident was a spiritual ascension is supported by an ancient book still found among the Jews called Mi‘raj-e-Musa. In it, the angel described as the guide of Mosesas is named Khidr. The purpose of mentioning this spiritual journey in the Holy Quran was to inform the Holy Prophetsa of future events. Regarding the matter of the wall, Hazrat Khalifatul Masih Ira interpreted it to mean that when people corrupted the religion of Abrahamas, that wall was about to fall; to protect it, Allah the Almighty sent Mosesas and our Holy Prophetsa. They raised this crumbling wall again and thus the treasure of pure teachings remained preserved. (Summarised from Haqaiq-ul-Furqan, Vol. 3, pp. 26-32)

“Similarly, in his commentary on Surah al-Kahf, Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra presented a detailed exegesis of this event, declaring it to be the mi‘raj of Prophet Mosesas. Through various internal and external pieces of evidence and arguments, he proved it to be a visionary [kashfi] event and interpreted the righteous servant mentioned therein as the personification of our master and lord, the Holy Prophet Muhammad al-Mustafa, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him. He further explained that this spiritual journey contained news regarding the future conditions of the Muslim Ummah, which were revealed to Prophet Mosesas in a visionary form; within this event, a comparison was drawn between the circumstances of the Muslim Ummah and the Mosaic Dispensation. Additionally, Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra provided highly insightful and reasoned interpretations of the various objects and matters mentioned in this narrative. (Tafsir-e-Kabir, Vol. 4, Qadian, 2004, pp. 465-490)

“Thus, both interpretations and commentaries – those presented by the Promised Messiahas and those by his Khulafa – are entirely correct in their respective places in the light of the Holy Quran and the sayings of the Holy Prophetsa and are exactly in accordance with the needs of the time. There is no contradiction of any kind between them.

“As for the questions you have raised regarding this narrative, the answers to all of them are also present in detail in the commentary by Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra. As I wrote to you previously, you have only had the opportunity to read the Five-Volume Commentary. This is a concise commentary prepared in English by the Ahmadiyya Muslim Jamaat according to its resources for those who understand English, based on the summary of Hazrat Musleh-e-Maud’sra masterpiece Tafsir-e-Kabir and the notes he prepared for it, so that members who read English may understand the subjects of the Holy Quran to some extent. Since it is in the form of a summary, details could not be included. Therefore, if you wish to broaden your knowledge and read a detailed commentary of the Holy Quran, you should also study Tafsir-e-Kabir.”

Why does the Quran attribute human mistakes to Satan?

Answers to Everyday Issues – Part 98
Image: Hamid Mohammad Hossein Zadeh Ha/Pexels

Someone wrote to Hazrat Amirul Momineen, Khalifatul Masih Vaa, noting that in many places in the Holy Quran, the cause and responsibility for errors committed by people are attributed to Satan instead of the people themselves. For instance, when the fish slipped from the hands of the companion of Mosesas, it was attributed to Satan; similarly, the action of the prison companion of Josephas in failing to mention Josephas to the king was also attributed to Satan. What is the reason for this?

Huzoor-e-Anwaraa, in his letter dated 26 September 2023, provided the following guidance regarding this question:

“The essence of the matter is that at the time of Adam’s creation, Satan declared to Allah the Almighty that he would make every possible effort to mislead the children of Adam and turn them away from the right path until the Day of Judgement. Accepting this challenge, Allah the Almighty declared, ‘You shall have no power over My servants.’ (Surah al-Hijr, Ch.15: V.40-43)

“Therefore, since the source of every error and evil is Satan or the satanic thoughts spread by him, when an error is committed by a human being, it is attributed to Satan. This is because it is Satan and his tribe who are constantly on the lookout to lead man astray from the right path and do not let any opportunity slip by without trying to turn humans away from the path of God Almighty.

“However, alongside this, it is also a reality that while Satan tries to mislead man, Allah the Almighty also guides His righteous servants through His angels and the impulses of virtue created by them. Therefore, if a mistake is ever committed by righteous servants, Allah the Almighty does not let those righteous servants persist in that error but reforms them.

“Nevertheless, it must be remembered that in both matters – whether it is a case of being led astray or being guided – no human is compelled. Rather, after clarifying the paths of guidance and error, Allah the Almighty has given man the freedom to choose between them. Thus, expounding upon this subject, Hazrat Khalifatul Masih Ira states:

“‘The Holy, Blessed, and Pure Being of God Most Exalted has spread guidance throughout the world by endowing man with capacity, the ability to discern good from evil, reason and an innate disposition; and by sending thousands upon thousands of Prophets and Messengers, and scriptures, and by indicating the means of attaining His pleasure. He has always granted help and support to the Prophets and to their true followers and obedient servants. Indeed, He has not coerced a capable person – seizing him by the neck, as it were – in order to make him perform righteous deeds. The benefit of the existence of Satan and his progeny is that He may bestow upon the obedient among mankind the robe and honour of obedience; yet even so, He has not granted Satan the authority to mislead people by force.’ (Nuruddin Ba Jawab Tark-e-Islam, p. 107)”

Can humans truly know God or only believe in Him?

Answers to Everyday Issues – Part 98
Image: “Cosmic Cliffs” in the Carina Nebula/NASA

Someone from Germany wrote to Hazrat Amirul Momineen, Khalifatul Masih Vaa, stating that an atheist friend had asked, “It is said that we believe in God, but it is not said that we have knowledge of God.” What is the answer to this?

Huzoor-e-Anwaraa, in his letter dated 27 September 2023, gave the following reply to this question:

“The Being of God Almighty is Eternal, Everlasting and Infinite; human intellect can never encompass it, for man can intellectually comprehend only limited things. That is why Allah the Almighty states in the Holy Quran:

لَا تُدْرِكُهُ الْأَبْصَارُ وَهُوَ يُدْرِكُ الْأَبْصَارَ وَهُوَ اللَّطِيفُ الْخَبِيرُ

“‘Eyes cannot reach Him, but He manifests Himself before the eyes. He is the Imperceptible, the All-Aware.’ (Surah al-An’am, Ch.6: V.104)

“The meaning of this verse is that man cannot see Allah the Almighty through the power of his own knowledge. However, God Almighty, by His grace, comes to him and manifests His glory and in this way, man attains His vision [ru‘yat]. Accordingly, we observe that in past ages, thousands and hundreds of thousands of such people have passed and even now such people exist in the world, to whom Allah the Almighty gave news of His existence in such a way that He heard their prayers, manifested supernatural miracles through them to the world, gave them prior information regarding future events and then caused those events to occur in the world exactly in accordance with those prophecies. Furthermore, for these loved ones, He displayed such supernatural wonders through His power that were impossible to be manifested by human hands. Expressing this theme, the Promised Messiahas says in an Urdu couplet:

قدرت سے اپنی ذات کا دیتا ہے حق ثبوت

اُس بے نشاں کی چہرہ نمائی یہی تو ہے

“‘By His own power, the True One furnishes proof of His very Being; this, indeed, is how the One beyond all outward signs discloses Himself.’ [Majmu‘ah-e-Ishtiharat, Vol. 1, India, 2019, p. 161]

“Similarly, at another place, Huzooras states:

“‘The meaning of لَا تُدۡرِکُہُ الۡاَبۡصَارُ is that He cannot be recognised solely through intellects; rather, He causes His Being to be recognised only through the means He Himself has appointed.’ (Malfuzat, Vol. 3, Rabwah, 2003, p. 590)

“Thus, man cannot attain knowledge of this Infinite Being on his own; however, to the extent and when He deems necessary, He provides proof of His Being to His loved ones and grants them knowledge regarding Himself.”

Is buying a car on finance halal in Islam?

Answers to Everyday Issues – Part 98
Image: hyundaimotorgroup/Unsplash

A lady from Palestine wrote to Hazrat Amirul Momineen, Khalifatul Masih Vaa, stating that many Ahmadi sisters have the question: Is it permissible to buy a car by taking a loan from a bank?

Huzoor-e-Anwaraa, in his letter dated 27 September 2023, provided the following guidance regarding this issue:

“Any sale, purchase, or financial transaction that is mixed with interest is, categorically, forbidden. However, several methods for the sale and purchase of goods on instalments are prevalent in the world under names such as Hire Purchase (HP) and Personal Contract Purchase (PCP), in which goods can be bought by paying a somewhat higher amount in instalments compared to a lump-sum payment. This method does not fall into the category of interest. Accordingly, a question of this nature was presented to the Promised Messiahas and its answer was published in the Badr newspaper of Qadian in the following words:

“‘The smooth running of the newspaper would be facilitated if the subscription price were received in advance. Among those who do not pay in advance and make promises of later payment, some simply delay on the basis of promises alone, while for others, the recovery of payments involves such difficulty – through repeated correspondence and the keeping of records to collect the payments from them – that in order to mitigate this additional labour and loss to some extent and also to receive compensation for it, the price of the Badr newspaper for post-payment has been increased by one rupee; that is, from those who pay afterwards, the price of the newspaper would be collected as four rupees instead of three.

“‘Upon this, a friend from Lyallpur enquired whether this arrangement constituted interest. As this was a matter pertaining to Islamic law, it was presented to the Promised Messiahas with the aforementioned reasons. The reply that he wrote is reproduced below:

“‘‘As-salamu ‘alaykum. In my view, this has no connection to interest. The owner has the right to ask for whatever price he wishes, especially as there is also an inconvenience involved in collecting payment later. If a person wishes to receive the newspaper, they can also pay beforehand. This matter lies within his own choice. Wassalam. Mirza Ghulam Ahmad.’’ (Badr, Qadian, No. 7, Vol. 6, 14 February 1907, p. 4)

“Therefore, if you wish to buy a car on instalments through this method, in which you would have to pay a somewhat higher amount than the lump-sum price, this is not considered interest and it is permissible. The exception is if the one receiving the payment has named it interest; in such a case, this type of interest-bearing transaction is not permitted.”

(Compiled by Zaheer Ahmad Khan, Head of Records Department, Private Secretariat, London and translated by Al Hakam)

Spiritual remedies for a fast-paced world: Members of MKA Italy blessed with mulaqat with Huzoor

Spiritual remedies for a fast-paced world: Members of MKA Italy blessed with mulaqat with Huzoor

Islamabad, Tilford, UK, 14 December 2025: A delegation from Majlis Khuddam-ul-Ahmadiyya Italy was graced with the opportunity to meet Hazrat Mirza Masroor Ahmad, Khalifatul Masih Vaa, in a mulaqat. Upon his arrival, Huzooraa extended his salaam to all those present before taking his seat. The session commenced with an individual introduction for each khadim. Following these introductions, the members were granted the opportunity to seek guidance on a vast array of issues.

The purpose of biological diversity and the station of humanity

The session opened with an enquiry regarding the rationale behind the creation of a vast array of biological life forms when humanity was intended to be the primary inhabitant of the earth. 

Huzooraa explained that Allah the Almighty is the Sovereign Master of the Universe and His creative power is manifested through the diversity of life. It was explained that according to the Holy Quran, nothing has been created without an underlying purpose or reason; every living entity plays a specific role. (Surah Aal-e-‘Imran, Ch.3: V.192)

Huzooraa detailed that while humans are designated as Ashraf-ul-Makhluqat, the most noble of all created beings, this status is predicated on their superior intellect and spiritual potential. He referred to the sociological perspective of man being a “social animal,” yet distinguished by education and moral capacity. The khuddam were reminded that all other elements of creation, including animals, flora and even inanimate objects like mountains and stones, have been essentially placed in the service of humanity.

Elaborating on this point, Huzooraa pointed out that the Holy Quran mentions how animals are provided for transport and sustenance. (Surah al-Mu’min, Ch.40: V.80) Furthermore, many creatures serve a medicinal purpose; for instance, the periodic shedding of a snake’s skin is utilised in treatments for ocular health. Similarly, various homoeopathic and conventional medicines are derived from substances like snake venom, proving that even things that appear harmful possess qualities that benefit human health. Huzooraa exhorted the youth to be grateful, noting that Allah has effectively made the entire world a ‘servant’ to mankind and it is the duty of humans to utilise these resources for the betterment of life.

Attaining Allah’s nearness and becoming the ‘delight of the eyes’ for the Khalifa

A khadim enquired about the practical steps required to attain the nearness of Allah the Almighty and how an Ahmadi can truly become a source of comfort and joy or the “delight of the eyes” for the Khalifa of the Time. 

Huzooraa responded by stating that the path to Allah’s nearness is through absolute obedience to the commandments of Allah. He explained that since Allah is our Creator, it is incumbent upon us to be grateful servants.

The primary expression of this gratitude, Huzooraa stipulated, is through the formal acts of worship. He remarked that Allah has made the path to His nearness remarkably accessible; He commands us that we present ourselves before Him at least five times a day in prayer to express our thanks for the blessing of being human. Huzooraa admonished the youth to reflect on the fact that they were created as humans with the potential for spiritual excellence rather than as lesser animals.

Huzooraa further expounded that the mission of the Promised Messiahas was to bring about a spiritual revolution, mirroring the transformation the Holy Prophetsa effected in his Companions. Huzooraa explained that if Ahmadis today become true Muslims, adhere to the Holy Quran and follow the mission of the Promised Messiahas and the system of Khilafat, they will naturally become the “delight of the eyes” for the Khalifa. True joy for the Khalifa lies solely in seeing the members of the Jamaat become exemplary Ahmadi Muslims.

The innate nature of belief and the vicissitudes of doubt

A question was raised regarding why, if the existence of God is ingrained in human nature, some individuals experience contrary thoughts or doubts. 

Huzooraa explained that such thoughts often arise because people do not put in the necessary effort to search for God. He observed that in moments of extreme crisis or helplessness, even those who claim to be atheists instinctively cry out to a higher power, often using phrases like “Oh God.” This, Huzooraa noted, indicates that a latent recognition of a Creator exists within the subconscious of every human being.

Huzooraa referred to the Quranic depiction of people caught in a storm at sea; in their desperation, they remember Allah, yet once they are safely returned to shore, they return to their ways of neglect or even speak against God. (Surah al-‘Ankabut, Ch.29: V.65) He compared this to human relationships, asking whether it would be considered moral to forget the favours of a friend once a need has been met. Huzooraa elucidated that a truly noble person is one who remains grateful even in times of ease. He instructed that if one remains steadfast in the remembrance of Allah and maintains regularity in prayer, these fleeting doubts and contrary thoughts will be replaced by conviction and gratitude.

Navigating overthinking and the preservation of mental well-being

The khuddam sought guidance on how to manage the tendency to overthink, particularly before sleep, concerning future anxieties and worldly entanglements, which can lead to significant mental stress. 

Huzooraa advised that Allah the Almighty has provided spiritual remedies for such distress. He specifically recommended the recitation of Ayat-ul-Kursi and the three quls (Surah al-Ikhlas, al-Falaq and an-Nas) before sleeping.

Huzooraa explained that one should reflect deeply on the attributes of Allah mentioned in these Surahs: His power, His protection from evil and His role as the Sovereign. By falling asleep while meditating on the majesty of God and seeking His protection from the mischief of the envious and the whisperings of the soul, a person’s mental entanglements begin to dissolve. Furthermore, Huzooraa highlighted the importance of the Isha prayer as a means to offload the day’s burdens. He encouraged the youth to pray for ease in their affairs and to adopt a routine of sleeping early and rising for Tahajjud. He reminded them of the Quranic assurance that it is in the remembrance of Allah that hearts find true comfort and satisfaction. (Surah ar-Ra‘d, Ch.13: V.29)

Outward appearance vs inward obedience

A khadim expressed that out of love for the Khalifa, many youth desire to emulate his dress and manner of speech, yet they are sometimes mocked by others for “trying to become the Khalifa.” 

Huzooraa responded with great kindness, stating that as long as the intention is rooted in sincere love, such imitation is commendable. He referred to a historical precedent where a person asked the Promised Messiahas about followers who adopt his appearance. The Promised Messiahas had replied that a person’s level of love determines the degree to which they try to imitate the beloved and there is no inherent evil in this.

Huzooraa shared the example of Mirza Abdul Haq Sahib, a long-serving Amir from Sargodha, who was born at the turn of the century. After performing the bai‘at of Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra, he resolved to adopt Huzoor’sra appearance, including his specific style of turban and coat and maintained this practice throughout his life.

However, Huzooraa provided a vital caveat: outward imitation must be accompanied by inward obedience. He explained that it is wrong to adopt the physical appearance or speaking style of the Khalifa while ignoring his core instructions, such as the requirement to be regular in the five daily prayers. True imitation, Huzooraa concluded, involves striving to achieve the spiritual objectives for which the system of Khilafat was established and responding wholeheartedly to the Khalifa’s call for moral reformation.

Why haste in salat hinders spiritual evolution

The discussion then focused on the fast-paced nature of modern life and the common tendency among youth to rush through their daily prayers. A khadim enquired how one might compensate for the resulting lack of spirituality.

Huzooraa began by observing the irony in human behaviour: while a person will dedicate ample time to sitting and enjoying a meal, ensuring they are fully satiated, they often treat the five daily prayers as a burdensome task to be completed as quickly as possible. He admonished that if a person recognises that rushing their prayer is a mistake, they must take conscious steps to rectify it by slowing down and performing the prayer with due diligence. He noted that even those with the busiest of schedules must find the time to pray properly and thus there is no excuse for the average person to rush.

To illustrate the severity of this issue, Huzooraa narrated a well-known account from the life of the Holy Prophetsa. While sitting in a gathering in the mosque, the Holy Prophetsa observed a man arrive and perform his prayer hastily. When the man came to greet him, the Holy Prophetsa instructed him to go back and pray again, stating that he had not truly prayed. This occurred three or four times until the man confessed that he did not know how to pray any better. The Holy Prophetsa then taught him that prayer must be performed with composure, involving the praise of Allah, the invocation of blessings on the Prophetsa (i.e., durud) and deep reflection. Huzooraa remarked that without these elements, the physical movements of prayer are merely hollow rhythmic motions, rather than true worship. (Sahih al-Bukhari, Kitab al-ist‘zan, Hadith 6251)

Huzooraa also referred to the writings of the Promised Messiahas, who compared the hasty prostrations of some worshippers to the pecking of a hen as it eats grain. (Malfuzat, Vol. 3, p. 258) He elucidated that Allah is not in need of such mechanical prostrations. When we rush our prayers, we are essentially demonstrating that we give more importance to our worldly work than to our Creator. Huzooraa warned that such an attitude prevents the descent of Allah’s blessings. He clarified that true prayer is not merely something to be done in times of crisis, but a consistent discipline where the work of the faith is given precedence over the work of the world.

The khuddam were presented with the example of Hazrat Chaudhry Zafrulla Khanra. While present in the royal court of the Queen, he became restless as the time for prayer approached. Despite the strict protocols of the court, he informed the authorities that he had to leave for his prayers. His firm adherence to his faith was such that the royal administration eventually established a protocol for him, ensuring he was never hindered from his prayers. Huzooraa noted that when a person shows such resolve, even the worldly powers are forced to respect them.

Huzooraa concluded by reminding the youth that the purpose of going to the “Divine Court” is to ask from Allah. He asked them to consider how they would behave when meeting a worldly president or minister; they would wait patiently and present their case with great care and detail until they were satisfied. It is, therefore, a sign of extreme spiritual blindness to approach the King of Kings with haste, expecting Him to be pleased with a few hurried movements.

Death of Jesusas

The discussion moved toward the Jamaat’s belief regarding the death of Jesusas and whether non-Ahmadi Muslims and Christians would be held accountable for their belief in his physical survival in heaven. 

Huzooraa stated that the concept of shirk – associating partners with Allah – is a grave transgression. He pointed out that the Holy Quran explicitly denies that Jesusas is the son of God and emphasises the absolute Oneness of Allah. To suggest that a human being could survive for thousands of years, Huzooraa noted, is a dangerous idea that could shake the very foundations of the earth and the heavens.

Huzooraa explained that the Promised Messiahas proved the death of Jesusas using 30 distinct verses of the Holy Quran. Huzooraa observed that the belief held by many non-Ahmadi Muslims – that Jesusas is alive – actually serves to support the Christian claim of his divinity.

Interestingly, Huzooraa mentioned that a segment of modern Muslim scholars is beginning to concede that Jesusas has indeed passed away and will not return physically. However, he lamented their stubbornness, as they refuse to accept Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmadas as the Promised Messiah despite the prophecy of the Holy Prophetsa regarding a Messiah appearing from among the Muslims. Huzooraa stated that by denying the advent of the Messiah while admitting Jesusas is dead, they are effectively betraying both the Quran and the Hadith. 

As for their accountability in the Hereafter, Huzooraa remarked that while Allah will certainly question them, the exact nature of His judgement remains with Him alone.

Religious experience vs psychological influence

A khadim enquired how to respond to members of other faiths who claim to have experienced a connection with their religion, such as Christians seeing Jesusas in dreams.

Huzooraa clarified that Ahmadi Muslims believe in the truth of all Prophets, including Jesusas and Mosesas. According to Islamic theology, Prophets were sent to every nation on earth.

Huzooraa explained that if a person sees Jesusas in a dream, it does not necessarily validate their current religious framework as the final truth. He elucidated the psychological aspect of dreams, noting that if a person is constantly immersed in a particular thought or fear, such as the fear of drowning, they may eventually see it in their dreams. Thus, many such experiences are the result of deep-seated psychological influence rather than a revelation.

Furthermore, Huzooraa encouraged the youth to point out to Christians that their own scriptures contain prophecies about the coming of a final Prophet. He noted that Jesusas himself stated he was sent only for the “lost sheep of Israel,” (Matthew, 15:24) whereas the Holy Prophet Muhammadsa was sent as a mercy for the whole of mankind. (Surah al-Anbiya, Ch.21: V.108) Huzooraa instructed that instead of confronting them by denying the truth of their prophets, khuddam should argue that while Jesusas was a true prophet, his own teachings require followers to accept the Universal Prophetsa who was to follow him in the Latter Days.

Jihad of the sword vs the message of peace

When asked how to respond to those who challenge the peaceful message of Islam, Huzooraa directed the youth to the context of the Holy Quran. He explained that the Quranic permission to fight was granted only in circumstances where Muslims were being persecuted, their rights were being denied and they were being killed for their faith. It was a permission for defensive retaliation, not an injunction for unprovoked aggression. (Surah al-Hajj, Ch.22: V.40)

Huzooraa emphasised that the fundamental teaching of the Holy Quran is one of love, peace and harmony. He urged the khuddam to increase their own knowledge before engaging in such debates. He specifically recommended the study of World Crisis and the Pathway to Peace, a compilation of his addresses that provides comprehensive arguments from the Holy Quran regarding global peace. He noted that this book is available in many languages, including English and German.

The necessity of literature in local languages

During a brief interaction with the Jamaat’s missionary, Huzooraa enquired about the Italian translation of World Crisis and the Pathway to Peace. Upon being informed that it was not yet available, Huzooraa emphasised the urgency of this task. He remarked that such literature is an essential tool for reaching the public and conveying the true message of Islam. He noted that in countries like Germany, people are actively reading the book in German and appreciating it and the same should be facilitated for the people of Italy to ensure the message of the Jamaat is disseminated effectively.

The nature of miracles among non-Muslims

The final question addressed the authenticity of miracles, such as the survival of Pope John Paul II during an assassination attempt and whether everything happens for a predetermined reason. 

Huzooraa affirmed that miracles can and do happen and they are not limited to Muslims; even atheists can experience extraordinary events.

Huzooraa explained that Allah sometimes manifests such signs to demonstrate His existence to humanity. When a person witnesses something extraordinary after seeking help or praying, it serves as a sign to strengthen their conviction in a Higher Power. However, Huzooraa clarified that the occurrence of a miracle in a particular religious context does not mean that the religion itself is the final truth. Allah shows signs to people across all nations – even to pagans in remote parts of Africa – to simply say, “I do exist.”

Huzooraa also reiterated the distinction between a true sign from God and a psychological effect. He used the example of someone who is afraid of water, seeing dreams of drowning; such dreams are reflections of the mind’s anxieties rather than Divine intervention. He concluded that while many incidents are real manifestations of God’s power, others are merely the mind’s reaction to its environment.

The mulaqat concluded with the khuddam being blessed with the honour of a group photograph with Huzooraa. Huzooraa then took his leave.

(Summary prepared by Al Hakam)

‘Reconciliation in real time and inspiring dialogue’ event held in Canada

0
Syed Mukarram Nazeer, Canada Correspondent
‘Reconciliation in real time and inspiring dialogue’ event held in Canada

Jamaat-e-Ahmadiyya Canada has been working to promote awareness, reflection and solidarity with Canadian Indigenous communities. Recently, Jamaat Regina participated in the “Reconciliation in real time and inspiring dialogue event at Luther College, University of Regina.  The event sought to create a space for intercommunity dialogue and practical understanding of reconciliation efforts in real time.

Co-ordinator of Humanity First Jamaat-e-Ahmadiyya Regina, Madeeh ur Rehman Sahib, delivered a brief presentation outlining the Jamaat’s consistent engagement in Indigenous outreach and friendship programmes.  He shared examples of cooperative initiatives and service projects reflecting Jamaat’s slogan “Love for All, Hatred for None.”

The event included the screening of Reconciliation in Real Time, followed by an open dialogue. The discussions emphasised that reconciliation is not a one-time gesture but a continuous commitment to mutual respect and education. Participants were visibly moved by Jamaat-e-Ahmadiyya’s sincerity and willingness to listen and learn.

Amir Jamaat Prairie Region, Dr Habib ur Rehman Sahib, noted that Islam teaches the equality of all human beings and that reconciliation efforts must continue until lasting bonds of understanding are established.

11 Ahmadis and over 45 non-Ahmadi participants attended, including Elder Lorna Standing Ready of the First Nations University of Canada, Professor Brenda Anderson of Luther College, and several representatives from local churches.

Many attendees expressed their appreciation for the Jamaat Canada’s humble yet determined efforts toward reconciliation and expressed interest in visiting the Mahmood Mosque in Regina in the near future.

National Flag Day observed by Ahmadis in Kosovo

0
Jinahuddin Saif, Missionary, Kosovo
National Flag Day observed by Ahmadis in Kosovo

On 30 November 2025, Jamaat-e-Ahmadiyya Kosovo marked National Flag Day with a special programme held at the Jamaat Center in Prishtina.

Members and guests from several regions participated in the gathering, which focused on Islamic teachings regarding patriotism, loyalty and service to one’s homeland. Among the attendees was Lt Mr Imer Zeqiri from the Kosovo Police, whose presence added further significance to the occasion.

The programme was conducted by Besmir Yvejsi Sahib, Secretary Ishaat, Jamaat Kosovo. It commenced with a recitation from the Holy Quran, followed by an address by Rexhep Hasani Sahib, Secretary Maal Jamaat Kosovo, on “The Holy Prophetsa: A perfect example of loyalty to one’s homeland.” Rexhep Sahib is a veteran of the Kosovo War, having sustained injuries in 1999 due to a grenade explosion.

The formal programme concluded with silent prayer, after which Maghrib and Isha prayers were offered. A meal was then served, followed by an engaging question-and-answer session. Participants asked questions related to the Holy Prophetsa, the Promised Messiahas, Khilafat, the importance of Jumuah, loyalty in Islam and the power of prayer. The discussion created a valuable opportunity for tabligh and spiritual reflection.

Approximately 35 members and guests attended the event, including participants from Mitrovica, Fushë Kosova, Podujeva, Prishtina and several nearby villages.

This Week in History: 19-25 December

A glimpse into the rich history of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Jamaat

This Week in History: 25 December 1907

19 December 1965: On this day, the first Jalsa Salana of the Khilafat of Hazrat Khalifatul Masih IIIrh commenced in Rabwah, continuing until 21 December. Despite some really challenging circumstances, the total attendance at the Jalsa reached 80,000. The event was prominently reported in the national news bulletin of Radio Pakistan. During his address, Huzoorrh gave the following motto to khuddam

تیرى‭ ‬عاجزانہ‭ ‬راہیں‭ ‬اس‭ ‬كو‭ ‬پسند‭ ‬آئیں۔

“He is pleased with your humble ways.” (Tadhkirah, Qadian, India, 2019, p. 961)

In the women’s session of Jalsa, speeches by Hazrat Syeda Maryam Siddiqua (Choti Apa) and Sayyida Mehr Apa were played via tape recordings. During this Jalsa, with Huzoor’srh permission, Hazrat Chaudhry Muhammad Zafarulla Khanra presented the proposal for the Fazl-e-Umar Foundation to the Jamaat members. He called for a reserve fund of 2.5 million rupees, and within a single day, pledges amounting to 1.5 million rupees were made. (Tarikh-e-Ahmadiyyat, Vol. 23, p. 326)

19 December 1991: On this day, during his tour of India, Hazrat Khalifatul Masih IVrh reached Amritsar from Delhi by a train named the Shan-e-Punjab Express. In Amritsar, Huzoorrh boarded a local train and reached Qadian at 7 pm. Thus, for the first time after the partition of India in 1947, the blessed presence of Khalifatul Masih was witnessed again in Qadian. (Silsila Ahmadiyya, Vol. 4, p. 868)

20 December 1895: On this day, the Promised Messiah’sas book, Nur-ul-Quran Part II, was published by Zia-ul-Islam Press, Qadian. Fateh Masih, a Christian missionary stationed at Fatehgarh, Gurdaspur, India, had written two letters to the Promised Messiahas, in which he resorted to offensive language regarding the Holy Prophet Muhammadsa. He spoke scurrilously about the Prophet’ssa marriages, character, and the Islamic concept of paradise. In response, the Promised Messiahas authored the second part of Nur-ul-Quran. The book comprised approximately 80 pages. (Maktubat-e-Ahmad, Vol. 1, p. 179)

21 December 1921: Tazkirat-ul-Mahdi, authored by Hazrat Pir Siraj-ul-Haq Sahibra, is a very fine and beneficial treatise, which contains the accounts and sayings of the Promised Messiahas. On this day, the second part of this book was presented to Hazrat Khalifatul Masihra. Examining it, Huzoorra said, “[Having good memory] is also an innate ability. Pir Sahib has a natural gift of committing events to memory. He remembers [the details] to such an extent that it seems as if he even remembers the actual words.” (Al Fazl, 20 February 1922, p. 7)

21 December 1944: On this day, based on one of his visions, Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra directed the Jamaat to thoroughly study the emerging Communist movement and formulate counterarguments against it. 

Huzoorra instructed the Jamaat’s scholars, jurists, teachers, professors, life devotees, and students of Madrasa-e-Ahmadiyya and Jamia Ahmadiyya to study the Communist movement critically and comprehensively. (Tarikh-e-Ahmadiyyat, Vol. 8, p. 573)

22 December 1936: King Edward VIII announced his abdication. On this day, Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra said that this abdication was a manifestation of the prophecy about the rise and fall of Christianity.

For more details, see “The abdication of Edward VIII: An Islamic take on the crisis that shook the Crown” at www.alhakam.org (4 December 2020, issue no. 142, pp. 8-11).

23 December 1959: In December 1959, Dag Hammarskjöld, Secretary-General of the United Nations, visited Monrovia, the capital of Liberia, during his official tour of African countries. On this day, Maulana Muhammad Siddiq Amritsari Sahib, the Missionary-in-Charge of the Ahmadiyya Mission in Liberia, had the opportunity to meet him and present him with a copy of the English translation of the Holy Quran and other Jamaat literature. (Ruh Parwer Yadain, p. 534)

To read more about his missionary activities, see: “Pioneer Missionaries: Part 4 – Taking Ahmadiyyat’s message to the highest echelons of society” at alhakam.org (11 November 2022, pp. 10-11).

23 December 2005: On this day, Hazrat Khalifatul Masih Vaa delivered his Friday sermon from the jalsa gah in Qadian, which was the first time that a live transmission from the jalsa gah of Qadian was broadcast throughout the world. During his Friday sermon, Huzooraa granted valuable guidance to the volunteers and guests of Jalsa Salana Qadian. (Khutbat-e-Masroor, Vol. 3, pp. 731-746 )

24 December 1902: In this day’s issue of Al Hakam (24 December 1902, pp. 11–12), it was reported, “On the night between 21 and 22 December, which was the first night of the last ten nights of Ramadan, the Promised Messiahas received the revelation:

يَأْتِيْ‭ ‬عَلَيْكَ‭ ‬زَمَنٌ‭ ‬كَمِثْلِ‭ ‬زَمَنِ‭ ‬مُوْسٰی

“[A time is coming for you which will be like the time of Moses.]

“The Promised Messiahas said, ‘I have not received this revelation before during this period of 24 or 25 years, even though I have been given the name Musa [Moses] several times in divine revelations.” (Tadhkirah, Qadian, India, 2019, p. 605)

25 December 1907: On this day, the staff of Tashheez-ul-Azhan held a meeting in Qadian. This initiative was inspired by Hazrat Mirza Bashir-ud-Din Mahmud Ahmad’sra vision to provide like-minded individuals with a platform to discuss ways to propagate the message of Islam.

The meeting commenced after Zuhr prayer, beginning with Hafiz Abdur Rahim Sahib’s presentation of the yearly report. This was followed by various speeches and poems. Hazrat Mirza Bashir-ud-Din Mahmud Ahmadra, while describing the state of affairs, drew the youth’s attention to their responsibilities and duties.

The meeting concluded with a speech by Hazrat Khalifatul Masih Ira. (Tarikh-e-Ahmadiyyat, Vol. 2, p. 508)

To read more about the history of Tashheez, see: “Hazrat Mirza Bashir-ud-Din Mahmud Ahmad: The young editor of Tashheez-ul-Azhan” at alhakam.org (16 February 2024, pp. 8-9).

25 December 1946: Dr Oscar Brunler was a renowned German inventor, as he was a multifaceted genius, with 49 patents accredited to his name. Oscar Brunler visited Qadian in 1946. On this day, Al Fazl reported that Brunler read an academic article on the subject of religion and science. This session was held in the presence and under the presidency of Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra at the Mubarak Mosque in Qadian.

To learn more about Oscar Brunlar and this visit and lecture, see: “Coming from every distant track: Dr Oscar Brunler visits Qadian and presents research at Mubarak Mosque” www.alhakam.org (20 October 2023, pp. 8-9).

Christmas and Jalsa Salana Qadian in December (1925)

0
Hazrat Maulana Abdur Rahim Dardra(1894-1955)
Christmas and Jalsa Salana Qadian in December (1925)

Christmas

Christmas (i.e., the Mass of Christ) is a Christian festival of the nativity of Jesus Christ. It is now celebrated on 25 December.

Was Jesus born on 25 December?

As to the date of Jesus’ birth, opinions differ greatly. The Basilidian Gnostics probably thought that he was born on 20 May. Others set it on 19 or 20 April. Clement of Alexandria, who condemns these as superstitious, sets it on 17 November. The author of a Latin tract written in Africa in 243 makes it by private revelation to be 28 March.

The earliest identification of 25 December with the birthday of Christ is made in a passage attributed to Theophilus of Antioch (AD 171-183). Hippolytus also says that Jesus was born on 25 December.

Celebration of Christmas

No festal celebration, however, is recorded up to the middle of the fourth century. Origen (245) is said to have regarded the idea of keeping the birthday of Christ as sinful. The festal idea has perhaps its root in the belief that the divine element was present in Christ from the very beginning, and that the divine life in him did not date from his baptism as suggested by the Epiphany feast (i.e., the feast of the presentation in the Temple).

The celebration of the feast of his human birth is also regarded as a protest against the Manichaean propaganda, the chief tenet of which was that Jesus either was not born at all, was a mere phantasm, or anyhow did not take flesh of the virgin Mary.

Christmas in Britain

It is interesting to note that to Britons it is something more than a Christian festival. Bede says:

“In Britain, the 25th of December was a festival long before the conversion to Christianity.”

The ancient Britons began their year on 25 December. That is why the English Puritans forbade any merriment or religious services by Act of Parliament in 1644. They thought it a heathen festival and ordered it to be kept as a fast.

However, the feast was revived by Charles II. From the middle of November, preparations are now begun for Christmas. Shopkeepers broadcast their advertisements for the novelties, the toys and the gifts to be sold on this occasion. The richest and the poorest set about in search of some suitable presents for their dear ones. Something new or novel, something precious or useful, something sweet or beautiful, and something which is full of meaning. If any of these cannot be afforded, a Christmas card bearing the sincerest good wishes of the humblest Christian is considered to be an indispensable present which must be sent at home or abroad in sweet and loving remembrance of his relations:

“A few brief words I here am sending,

But may the token small contrive,

To bear my wishes that from Christmas,

You the best of joys derive.”

Christmas puddings and Christmas trees are prepared in every home. The Postmaster-General is busy employing thousands more men for the prompt and satisfactory delivery of the millions and billions of presents bought now for the memorable day. To avoid previous mistakes and complaints, he is emphasising the necessity of early posting, yet the post offices are bound to be overcrowded as usual on Christmas Eve.

The telegraph companies reduce their rates to enable all to send cables to their dear ones overseas on this happy day.

In short, with all kinds of increased facilities, the whole of Christendom indulges these days wholeheartedly in every kind of earthly merriment and enjoyment.

Forgetting the true mission of Jesus

Few, however, know […] for what Jesus was born and what he tried to achieve. People worship their own individual fancies and their own desires, while the mission of Jesus – in fact, the message of all the Prophets – was the mission of sacrifice and complete submission to the will of God. And it is this which the world, even now, as ever, stands in need of.

Hazrat Ahmadas– Reviving the spirit of Jesus

And it is this to remind which the same Merciful God has sent the Prophet Ahmadas of Qadian, who is truly the Messiah of our age. He has brought us back to God, to the true spirit of sacrifice and complete submission to His will. By the force of his noble example, people have been again enthused and inspired to devote themselves body and soul to the cause of God. By believing in him alone, we believe in Jesus and by seeing his face, we indeed see the face of all the chosen prophets of God.

Why believers gather in December for Jalsa Salana Qadian

And it is a striking coincidence that people flock to his birthplace [Qadian] in the last week of December. […] The followers of Hazrat Ahmadas from all parts of the globe gather together in thousands at Qadian and sit rapt in admiration and fervour listening hours and hours to the holy spirit which descends on all those assembled there. They enjoy a happy and deep communion with, and are really at one with God the Heavenly Father.

Rediscovering the true mission of the Messiah

When the other sons of Christ play about and revel in earthly enjoyments, the true sons of God, keeping themselves away from all sorts of frivolous jovialities and bearing hardships of every kind, turn most sincerely towards purity, piety and righteousness. Living in this world, they cut themselves away from all earthly bonds and soar high above the heavens and then bring the Kingdom of God on earth.

Blessed, blessed are those who follow the footsteps of Hazrat Ahmadas, the Messiah of our age! […]

– AR Dard

(Transcribed and edited by Al Hakam from the original English, published in the December 1925 issue of The Review of Religions)

Three states of the human soul

0

There are three states of the soul: the self that incites to evil, the reproving self and the soul at rest. One state of the soul at rest is known as the soul that is pure. The soul that is pure is the one found to exist in children. It is the soul that has not been defiled by the winds of this world, and which moves forward on a smooth and level plain, without any highs or lows. The self that incites to evil is the self that has been adulterated by worldly elements. The reproving self is the self that develops a sense of understanding, reflects over its lapses, and strives and prays to save itself from vices, and is cognisant of its own weaknesses. The soul at rest is one which, by the grace of Allah, finds the strength and power to abstain from all forms of evil, and feels safe from all sorts of calamities and afflictions, and in turn, feels tranquillity and comfort at heart, with no traces of apprehension or restlessness.

(Malfuzat [English], Vol. 2, p.118)

The Holy Prophet’s (sa) Tahajjud

0

عَائِشَة رضى الله عنها أَخْبَرَتْهُ أَنَّ رَسُولَ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم كَانَ يُصَلِّي إِحْدَى عَشْرَةَ رَكْعَةً، كَانَتْ تِلْكَ صَلاَتَهُ، يَسْجُدُ السَّجْدَةَ مِنْ ذَلِكَ قَدْرَ مَا يَقْرَأُ أَحَدُكُمْ خَمْسِينَ آيَةً قَبْلَ أَنْ يَرْفَعَ رَأْسَهُ، وَيَرْكَعُ رَكْعَتَيْنِ قَبْلَ صَلاَةِ الْفَجْرِ، ثُمَّ يَضْطَجِعُ عَلَى شِقِّهِ الأَيْمَنِ حَتَّى يَأْتِيَهُ الْمُنَادِي لِلصَّلاَةِ‏.‏

Hazrat Aishara reported that, “Allah’s Messengersa of Allah used to offer eleven rak‘at; that was his prayer – meaning his night prayer. In that prayer, he would remain in prostration for so long that, before he raised his head, one of you would be able to recite fifty verses [of the Quran in that span of time]. He would also perform two rak‘at before the Fajr prayer, then lie down on his right side until the caller to prayer [muezzin] came to him.”

(Sahih Bukhari, Kitab al-witr, Bab ma ja’a fi l-witr, Hadith 994)

Friday Sermon – Muhammad (sa): The great exemplar (21 October 2025)

0

Friday Sermon

21 November 2025

Muhammadsa: The great exemplar

Friday Sermon

After reciting the tashahhud, ta‘awwuz, and Surah al-Fatihah, Hazrat Khalifatul Masih Vaa stated:

Accounts relating to the Battle of Tabuk were being mentioned. Today, I will mention further details of this journey. The attempt of the hypocrites to harm the Holy Prophetsa on this occasion has also been recorded. These details are as follows. 

In relation to the Battle of Tabuk, behind the scenes, a joint conspiracy was being hatched by the Jews, the Christians and the hypocrites. When all their schemes failed and when they were unsuccessful in putting an end to Islam and the Holy Prophetsa, as they had tried to assassinate the Holy Prophetsa on several occasions, this conspiracy was their last resort. And if, as before, divine help and succour would not be [with the Muslims], there is no doubt that this conspiracy of the hypocrites would prove to be most successful. The reason for this is that at every stage, the destruction of the Muslims was certain. We have already observed this in their previous attempts. However, the same God Who granted the Muslims an unimaginable triumph in the battlefield of Badr and Whose continuous help and succour made the Muslims triumphant all the way until the Battle of Hunain would help them again. At every occasion of danger, the very protection of Allah the Almighty was with the Holy Prophetsa. Similar incidents occurred on this occasion. 

The journey from Madinah to Tabuk was equivalent to travelling into the valley of death. Travelling safely to Tabuk and back was sufficient to leave the hypocrites utterly stunned. Furthermore, the retreat of the army supported by the Emperor of Rome, or for them not to come forward to confront [the Muslims], was another astonishing fact. Additionally, all the opposing powers living on the borders of Arabia became terrified and subsequently, most of them came to the Holy Prophetsa, sought reconciliation, paid the jizya and considered this the means for their protection. From all these incidents, the conspiracies of the hypocrites seem to have been reduced to dust. The reason for this is that the hypocrites could not even have imagined that any Muslim could have safely returned to Medina alongside the Holy Prophetsa

As such, when this army of 30,000 soldiers waves its flags of victory and [divine] support and sets off to return to Medina under the leadership of its beloved Prophetsa, the hypocrites considered it essential to shoot the last arrow in their quiver, and that was to prevent the Holy Prophetsa in any way possible from returning to Medina, God forbid. To achieve this, they conspired to assassinate the Holy Prophetsa. In fact, it is not far-fetched to say that this had been pre-planned as a final blow. That is, their first [conspiracy] was that the Muslims would die on the journey, or in Tabuk. However, if they survived and started returning, they would be killed on the way. This opinion could be true, as not all of the leaders of the hypocrites were with them. Rather, a party of the hypocrites was with them, which did not leave any stone unturned in spreading vicious propaganda against the Muslims on every occasion. However, they could not have taken such a big step if this had not been pre-planned. 

In any case, they acted upon this dangerous conspiracy in the following manner. On the journey back, there was a path in the valley which was divided into two. One was a wide, open field, and the other was a narrow path, a passage through a rugged, elevated valley.

This was also a shortcut, and the Muslim army had to pass through this mountain pass. The hypocrites devised a plan that when the entire army would be passing over the height of the pass – with the huge crowd and large number of people – they would use the darkness of the night (as the journey was happening at night). At that moment, all these hypocrites would gather near the Holy Prophet’ssa camel and somehow force his camel towards the edge of the pass and cut the ropes of the saddle. In this way, the camel would throw – God forbid – the Holy Prophetsa into the ravine, into the pit below, or fall in itself along with him. And in the darkness of the night, it would be assumed to be an accident, and no one would suspect a planned assassination.

Hazrat Urwah bin Zubair relates that when the Messengersa of Allah left Tabuk to return to Medina, a group of hypocrites intended to kill him. They had planned that they would throw him from the top of a mountain pass along the route. However, at the exact moment, Allah Almighty informed the Holy Prophetsa of the hypocrites’ plot. The Holy Prophetsa then had it announced that no one was to use the mountain pass except the Holy Prophetsa and three of his Companions. He said, “Only I will go through the pass; everyone else will go through the open valley.”

The Companions who accompanied him were Hazrat Hudhaifah bin Yaman, Hazrat Hamzah bin Amr Aslami, and Hazrat Ammar bin Yasir.

As for the rest of the army, they were to pass through a wide open plain in the valley.

Because of this sudden change of route, the hypocrites’ plan appeared to be ruined. Yet even then, they did not give up their evil intention. They immediately selected twelve or fifteen men and agreed that they would cover their faces with cloths, rush towards the mountain pass, and, according to their earlier plan, suddenly scare the camel, causing it to bolt. Their aim – God forbid – was to cause the very accident they had been hoping for.

And so, they proceeded with this plan. As the Holy Prophetsa was walking along the pass, he heard the sound of people approaching. They came near and frightened his camel, causing some of the luggage to fall. The Holy Prophetsa then instructed Hazrat Hudhaifah to attack these hypocrites and drive them away. Hazrat Hudhaifah began striking their mounts with a stick and saying, “Enemies of Allah, move aside!” He continued striking their animals.

The hypocrites realised that the Holy Prophetsa had become aware of their scheme, and they did not want to be recognised. Therefore, they quickly descended from the pass and blended into the army.

Hazrat Hudhaifah returned to the Holy Prophetsa. The Holy Prophetsa said, “Hudhaifah, strike my camel from behind, for it has become frightened, and O Ammar, guide it from the front (so that this startled camel regains its proper course).”

In one narration, Hazrat Hudhaifah relates, “When we reached the mountain pass, twelve men confronted the Holy Prophetsa in that pass. When I informed the Messengersa of Allah, he called out to them. At this, they turned their backs and fled. The Messengersa of Allah then said to us, ‘Did you recognise them?’ We submitted, ‘O Messengersa of Allah, we did not recognise them, because they had covered their faces and it was dark. But we recognised their mounts.’ (The Arabs were also very good at recognising people’s mounts.) He said, ‘These people will remain hypocrites until the Day of Resurrection. And do you know what their intention was?’” 

Then he enquired from the Companions who were with him in relation to this. He further relates, “We submitted, ‘No, we do not know [who they are].’ The Messengersa of Allah said, ‘They intended to confront the Messenger of Allah in the pass and cause him to fall there.’

We submitted, ‘Will you not send a message to their tribes, instructing each tribe to send you the head of their man (so they may be punished or executed)?’ The Holy Prophetsa replied, ‘No. I do not want the Arabs to start saying among themselves that Muhammadsa has begun killing his own people.’”

According to some narrations, the Holy Prophetsa was still on his camel when revelation descended upon him. Hazrat Hudhaifah was standing nearby. The Holy Prophetsa called out, “Who is there?” He replied, “Hudhaifah.” The Holy Prophetsa then said, “I am going to tell you something in confidence. Do not mention it to anyone.” He then gave the names of each of the attackers one by one and added, “I have been forbidden from offering their funeral prayer. They are hypocrites.”

According to various narrations, the Holy Prophetsa named twelve, or thirteen, or fifteen individuals. Because the Holy Prophetsa had instructed Hazrat Hudhaifah not to reveal this secret to anyone, Hazrat Hudhaifah never disclosed the names to anyone. Even during the Khilafat of Hazrat Umarra, when Hazrat Umarra learned that Hudhaifah knew the identities, he adopted the following method: whenever someone passed away, and Hazrat Umarra had a suspicion that the deceased might be among those individuals, he would take Hudhaifah by the arm and bring him along to the funeral. If Hudhaifah refused to attend the funeral prayer, Hazrat Umarra would understand that this was one of those people, and he too would refrain from attending the funeral prayer.

According to a narration in Sahih Muslim, there were 14 or 15 [hypocrites], but it has also been explained that 12 of them were hypocrites who took part in this plot, and the other three were Companions who had climbed the pass at that time, but they had not heard the announcer call out that the open plain field should be taken instead of this route. Due to this, these three people were considered innocent. 

In the morning, the chief of the Aus tribe, Hazrat Usaid bin Hudair, met with the Holy Prophetsa. The Holy Prophetsa told him that the previous night, some hypocrites intended to follow the Holy Prophetsa in the mountain pass, cut his camel’s reins in the darkness of the night, and poke it with something sharp to cause it to run fast in hopes of making him fall off the camel. Upon this, Hazrat Usaid said, “O Messengersa of Allah, give every tribe the order to kill any person who was part of this plot.” He very passionately continued, “O Messengersa of Allah, will such people be left to roam freely? How much longer will we go without taking action against them, despite the fact that the hypocrites are fewer in number today and have been disgraced, while Islam has become firmly established?” The Holy Prophetsa replied, “I do not like for people to say that ‘once the battle between myself and the disbelievers concluded, Muhammad began killing his Companions’.” Hazrat Usaid said, “O Messengersa of Allah, these people are not companions. (How could they be considered to be from among your Companions?)” The Holy Prophetsa said, “Do they not profess the Islamic Creed?” Hazrat Usaidra said, “Indeed, they do, but this declaration doesn’t mean anything. (It is merely superficial; they do not profess the creed in their heart.)”

The Holy Prophetsa said, “Since they profess the Islamic creed (even if they do so superficially), I will not kill them.” (Sahih Muslim, Kitab sifati l-munafiqina wa ahkamihim, Hadith 2779; Subul Al-Huda Wa Al-Rashad, Vol. 5, Dar Al-Kotob Al-Ilmiyah, 1993, p. 466; Al-Bidaya Wa Al-Nihaya, Vol. 3, Part 5, Dar Al-Kotob Al-Ilmiyah, 2001, pp. 20-21; Al-Lu’ Lu’ Al-Maknoon Sirat Encyclopaedia, Vol. 9, Maktabah Dar-ul-Islam, pp. 542-550; Da’irah Ma’arif Sirat Muhammad Rasulullahsa, Vol. 9, Bazm Iqbal, Lahore, pp. 513-515; Ghazwah-e-Tabuk, Bashmil, Nafees Academy, pp. 189-201)

The so-called scholars of today who issue edicts to kill those who profess the Islamic Creed should bear this statement in mind. Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra states that when the hypocrites of Medina came to know that no fighting had occurred, and that the Holy Prophet Muhammadsa was returning safely, they realised that the secrets of their hypocritical ways had become known to the Holy Prophetsa, and that they would likely not escape punishment now. Thus, they stationed a few men from Medina at a distance along such a path that was extremely narrow, upon which only one rider could pass at a time. 

When the Holy Prophetsa approached this area, Allah the Almighty informed him through revelation that ahead, on both sides of the path, enemies were lying in ambush. The Holy Prophetsa instructed one Companion to go ahead and survey. That Companion ordered his mount forward quickly, and when he reached there, he saw some men hiding in exactly the manner that those who lie in ambush would sit. (There are several narrations. This was also a narration quoted by Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra.) When they saw him approaching, they fled from there. However, the Holy Prophetsa did not deem it appropriate to pursue them. When the Holy Prophetsa returned to Medina, the hypocrites who had not taken part in the battle began presenting varying excuses, and the Holy Prophetsa accepted their excuses. But now the time had come for the reality of the hypocrites to be made manifest before the Muslims. (Dibacha Tafsir-ul-Quran, Anwar-ul-Ulum, Vol. 20, p. 362)

In any case, whether the accounts say they were sitting down or if they ran away, the incident of exposing them is one in every [narration]: every effort was made to try and inflict damage to the Holy Prophet Muhammadsa in this narrow gorge (God forbid). 

As has been mentioned, following the victory at Mecca, the hypocrites’ movements intensified. And when these hypocrites observed that the surrounding tribes of Arabia – Jewish tribes included – had suffered defeat and lost their power, they began planning to seek the support of powers outside Arabia, like the Caesar of Rome. 

They also planned on establishing a permanent headquarters within Medina where they could regularly meet to contrive plans against Islam and the Muslims and store weaponry. But the headquarters should be such that the Muslims never catch any word of it. 

Hence, Abu Amir – who for some time had stayed out of the public eye – suddenly started becoming ever-present, and those who spread propaganda in favour of the hypocritical agenda started calling him Abu Amir the Ascetic. 

He suggested that the hypocrites establish their headquarters in Quba. History further records that this person was known as Abu Amir the Ascetic and belonged to the Khazraj tribe. This has been mentioned in other sermons as well. 

After the Holy Prophetsa came to Medina, Abu Amir relocated to Mecca where he instigated the tribes of the Quraish against the Holy Prophet Muhammadsa, reassuring them that they would have the full support of Abu Amir and his tribesmen, saying, “When you attack Muhammadsa we will join you.”

During the expedition to Uhud, he was with the Quraish. Upon seeing the advancement of Islam, Abu Amir became greatly distressed and began to burn in the fire of jealousy. It was he who had ditches dug on the occasion of Uhud, and the Holy Prophetsa fell into one of them and was badly injured. 

When the battle of Uhud commenced, Abu Amir called out to his tribesmen: “O my tribesmen, I am Abu Amir!” But they had become Muslims, and so responded, saying, “O mischief monger, we do not welcome your leadership.” They responded with revulsion and cursed him. Abu Amir responded, “After my departure, my nation has deteriorated.”

After this, many of those who harboured enmity toward the Holy Prophetsa from Abu Amir’s tribe left for Mecca. This actually had taken place before this instance – when Abu Amir left for Mecca, these people also left for Mecca (those who were from his tribe and had not become Muslims). They numbered approximately 50 people. There are narrations in which there is also a mention of a prayer made by the Holy Prophetsa against Abu Amir – that he should die a death of solitude away from his people.

One narration mentions that when the Holy Prophetsa arrived in Medina, Abu Amir met him and asked, “O Muhammad, to what do you invite people?”

Upon this, the Messengersa of Allah replied:

“I invite you to the religion of Abraham – the same faith which you also claim to be searching for.”

Abu Amir asked, “Are you also of that same faith?”

The Holy Prophetsa replied in the affirmative and then invited him to Islam. Abu Amir rejected this invitation. He displayed jealousy and spoke ill of the Holy Prophetsa. Abu Amir mocked the Holy Prophetsa, saying, “Whoever between us is the liar, may God cause him to die alone and outside his homeland.”

He was indicating toward the Holy Prophetsa

The Holy Prophetsa responded, “Yes, may God do so with the liar.”

Abu Amir continued to prevent the people of his tribe from following the Holy Prophetsa and kept urging them not to obey him. Meanwhile, the signs and miracles of the Holy Prophetsa were appearing increasingly with each passing day, and the number of his followers continued to grow – particularly among the very people of Abu Amir’s own tribe, who were entering Islam. Seeing this, Abu Amir became all the more enraged.

He joined hands with the hypocrites and built a mosque, which in the history of Islam came to be known as Masjid Dirar, so that he could gather people there, converse with them, and dissuade them from following the Holy Prophetsa. According to one narration, Abu Amir said to his fellow conspirators, “Build a mosque and establish it as a military base where you can prepare for war. I will go to Caesar of Rome and return with a vast army so that Muhammad[sa] and his Companions may be driven out of Medina.”

Thus, Abu Amir departed for the Roman Empire and met the Roman emperor, Caesar, in Syria. He tried to persuade him to wage war against the Holy Prophetsa and the Muslims, saying: “They are weak, poor, and few in number, whereas their enemies are many. You have nothing to fear from them. But if you do not take action against the Muslims now, it will not bode well for your empire in the future.”

Heraclius accommodated him and promised that he would indeed assist him. During this time, Abu Amir conveyed glad tidings to his co-religionists and immoral conspirators, saying that he would soon attack Medina with a mighty army. Therefore, he told them they should build a special place for him. With this intention, the hypocrites constructed a mosque in Quba – the mosque which came to be known as Masjid Dirar.

However, even this desire of his was never fulfilled. In the end, Abu Amir died alone in a foreign land, in a state of exile in Syria. He had prayed against the Holy Prophetsa, but that very curse turned back upon himself. There is a difference of opinion regarding the year of his death – some say he died in 9 AH, while others say in 10 AH – but in any case, he died in utter isolation. (Tathbit Dalail-ul-Nabuwwah, Vol. 2, Maktabat-ul-Nashir, Dar-ul-Mustafa, Cairo, p. 475; Sharah Allamah Al-Zurqani Ala’ Al-Mawahib Al-Ladunniyyah, Vol. 2, Dar Al-Kotob Al-Ilmiyah, 1996, p. 424; Al-Lu’ Lu’ Al-Maknoon Sirat Encyclopaedia, Vol. 9, Maktabah Dar-ul-Islam, pp. 552-554)

When the hypocrites completed the construction of the mosque, they came to the Holy Prophetsa and requested him to offer prayers in it. By divine wisdom, they came with this request for the inauguration of their so-called mosque at the very time when the Holy Prophetsa was preparing to set out for the expedition to Tabuk.

They said, “O Messengersa of Allah, we have built a mosque for the convenience of the sick and the needy, and for rainy nights. We wish that you would come and lead a prayer in it.”

The Holy Prophetsa replied, “I am occupied at the moment, preparing for the journey. When we return from the expedition, we shall pray there.”

When the Holy Prophetsa returned from the Battle of Tabuk and camped at a place called Dhi Awan, which was about an hour’s distance from Medina, the following verse was revealed concerning the mosque built by the hypocrites:

وَالَّذِينَ اتَّخَذُوا مَسْجِدًا ضِرَارًا وَكُفْرًا وَتَفْرِيقًا بَيْنَ الْمُؤْمِنِينَ وَإِرْصَادًا لِمَنْ حَارَبَ اللَّهَ وَرَسُولَهُ مِنْ قَبْلُ ۚ وَلَيَحْلِفُنَّ إِنْ أَرَدْنَا إِلَّا الْحُسْنَىٰ وَاللَّهُ يَشْهَدُ إِنَّهُمْ لَكَاذِبُونَ

“And among the hypocrites are those who have built a mosque in order to injure Islam and help disbelief and cause a division among the believers, and prepare an ambush for him who warred against Allah and His Messenger before this. And they will surely swear: ‘We meant nothing but good,’ but Allah bears witness that they are certainly liars.” [The Holy Quran, 9:107]

After this revelation, the Holy Prophetsa summoned Hazrat Malik bin Dukhsham and Hazrat Ma’n bin ‘Adi and commanded them to demolish Masjid Dirar.

According to some narrations, the Holy Prophetsa also sent Hazrat Asim bin ‘Adi, ‘Amir bin Sakan, Wahshi – the slayer of Hazrat Hamzah – and Suwayd bin ‘Abbas for this task.

In Sharh al-Zurqani, it is written that it is possible the Holy Prophetsa first sent the two men and later dispatched four more to assist them.

In any case, the Holy Prophetsa instructed them to proceed towards Masjid Dirar, demolish it, and set it ablaze.

Accordingly, they quickly went to the tribe of Banu Salim. Hazrat Malik said to his two Companions, “Wait for me until I return.” He went to his house, set fire to some dry palm branches, and brought them back. When they reached Masjid Dirar between Maghrib and Isha prayers, they set it on fire and razed it to the ground.

At that time, the builders of the mosque were present there, but when the fire broke out, they fled in all directions.

When the Holy Prophetsa returned to Medina, he intended to grant that site to Hazrat Asim bin ‘Adi, telling him to build his house there. But Asim bin ‘Adi excused himself, saying, “Whatever Allah the Almighty had to reveal concerning this place, He has revealed. I do not wish to make my home here, nor do I need it. Rather, grant it to Thabit bin Akram, for he has no house.”

The Holy Prophetsa then granted that land to Thabit bin Akram.

Ibn Ishaq has mentioned the names of those hypocrites who had built Masjid Dirar, and they numbered twelve in total. (Sharah Allamah Al-Zurqani Ala’ Al-Mawahib Al-Ladunniyyah, Vol. 2, Dar Al-Kotob Al-Ilmiyah, 1996, p. 424; Subul Al-Huda Wa Al-Rashad, Vol. 5, Dar Al-Kotob Al-Ilmiyah, 1993, p. 466; Al-Sirah Al-Nabawiyyah, Ibn Ishaq, Dar Al-Kotob Al-Ilmiyah Beirut, 2004, pp. 608-609; Al-Lu’ Lu’ Al-Maknoon Sirat Encyclopaedia, Vol. 9, Maktabah Dar-ul-Islam, p. 555)

The Holy Prophet’ssa vast mercy, patience, and forgiveness are luminously evident in this incident. At every step, he was confronted with dangerous conspiracies from the hypocrites – schemes that caused distress, harm, and even plots to kill him. Yet, though these hypocrites were often caught red-handed, the Holy Prophetsa would always forgive them on every occasion.

Only in cases where the security of the state or the integrity of the system was at risk did he take action, and even then only to the extent necessary to neutralise the danger – not to inflict severe punishment, though he easily could have.

Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra has discussed the conduct of the hypocrites in this regard, stating:

“God Almighty revealed to the Holy Prophetsa through revelation that the mosque in Quba, which the hypocrites had built – so that they might assemble there under the pretext of prayer and hold their hypocritical consultations – should be demolished, and that they should be compelled to pray in the other mosques of the Muslims. Yet, despite so grave a mischief, they were given neither physical nor financial punishment.” (Dibacha Tafsir-ul-Quran, Anwar-ul-Ulum, Vol. 20, pp. 362-363)

The Holy Prophetsa was fully aware of their deeds.

There is another narration in which the Holy Prophetsa expressed love for Medina and for the Ansar: After a journey of approximately two months, the Holy Prophetsa returned to Medina. As he was returning, the love that he had for Medina and its inhabitants was exhibited when, as soon as the Holy Prophetsa caught sight of Medina, he said:

هذِه طَابَةُ، وَهذا أُحُدٌ، جَبَلٌ يُحِبُّنَا وَنُحِبُّهُ.

“This is Tabah (Tabah is also one of the names of Medina, meaning pure and excellent) and this is Uhud, the mountain that loves us and we love it.” (Sahih al-Bukhari, Kitab al-maghazi, Hadith 4422)

In other words, the Holy Prophetsa had love for every part of Medina. Another aspect to this is that with the mention of Uhud, the Holy Prophetsa never forgot the stories of sincerity and loyalty that the Companions had written with their own blood in the Battle of Uhud.

In one narration it is stated that the Holy Prophetsa said: “I must reach Medina quickly, so whoever among you wishes to travel quickly with me should do so.” Then the Holy Prophetsa also said: “Shall I not tell you about the best households among the Ansar?” The Companions replied, “Certainly.” The Holy Prophetsa said, “The households of Banu Najjar.” Then he said, “The households of Banu Abd al-Ash’al.” Then he said, “The households of Banu Sa‘idah, or the households of Banu Harith bin Khazraj. And there is goodness in all the households of the Ansar.” (Sahih al-Bukhari, Kitab az-zakat, Hadith 1481, translation, Vol. 3, pp. 124-125)

In one narration the narrator states: “Sa‘d bin Ubadah met us, and Abu Usaid said, ‘Do you know that the Messengersa of Allah mentioned the excellence of the households of the Ansar and placed us at the end?’ Hazrat Sa‘d went to the Messengersa of Allah and said, ‘O Messengersa of Allah, you have mentioned the excellence of the households of the Ansar and have placed us at the end.’ (The Companions were mindful even of the order in which the Holy Prophetsa mentioned names when giving praise). Upon this, the Holy Prophetsa said, ‘Is it not enough for you that you are among the people of goodness?’” (Sahih al-Bukhari, Kitab manaqibi l-ansar, Hadith 3791; Sahih Muslim, Kitab al-fada’il, Hadith 4216, Translation, Vol. 12, p. 187)

The Holy Prophetsa said that it should suffice that he mentioned their name and included them among the people of goodness.

As mentioned at the outset, there were two major groups who remained behind from the Expedition of Tabuk: one was the group of hypocrites, regarding whom Allah the Almighty expressed His displeasure; and the second group consisted of those who were sincere in their faith and wished to partake in jihad, but either they were so poor that despite their efforts they could not find the means and resources to go, or they were unable to participate because of illness or disability. Allah the Almighty accepted their excuse in the Holy Quran in Surah at-Taubah, verses 91 and 92.

Accordingly, in a narration of Bukhari, it is stated that when the Holy Prophetsa was returning from the Expedition of Tabuk and neared Medina, he said: “There are some people in Medina who were with you whenever you undertook a journey or traversed a valley.” The Companions, astonished, said, “O Messengersa of Allah, they are in Medina, how could they be with us while remaining there?” The Holy Prophetsa replied, “They are indeed in Medina, but some sort of illness or other excuse prevented them from joining us.” (Sahih al-Bukhari, Kitab al-maghazi, Hadith4423)

Another narration states that when the Holy Prophetsa returned from Tabuk, he expressed gratitude to Allah the Almighty and said:

ٱلْحَمْدُ لِلّٰهِ عَلَىٰ مَا رَزَقَنَا فِي سَفَرِنَا هٰذَا مِنْ أَجْرٍ وَحَسَنَةٍ، وَمِنْ بَعْدِنَا شُرَكَاؤُنَا فِيهِ

“All praise belongs to Allah Who granted us reward and goodness in this journey, and Who also included those who remained behind as participants with us in this reward and goodness.” 

Hazrat Aishara submitted, “O Messengersa of Allah, you endured the hardships and difficulties of the journey and thus became deserving of this reward, but how did they come to share in this reward without having borne any hardships? And who are these people who have been included?” The Holy Prophetsa replied, “There are some people in Medina who were with us no matter where we travelled and no matter which valley we were in. Illness prevented them from going out with us. We are their warriors, and they are our companions while remaining in their homes. By Him in Whose hand is my life, their prayer against the enemy is more effective than our weapons.” The prayers they offered while remaining in their homes were such that Allah the Almighty accepted them. (Anara-tul-Duja Fi Maghazi Khair-ul-Wara, Vol. 1, Dar-ul-Minhaj, pp. 721-722; Imta’ ul Asma’, Vol. 2, Dar Al-Kotob Al-Ilmiyah, 1999, p. 79; Kitab-ul-Maghazi, Waqdi, Vol. 2, Dar Al-Kotob Al-Ilmiyah, 2004, p. 428)

Regarding the return from the Expedition of Tabuk, there is also mention of the heartfelt manner in which the people of Medina welcomed them back. It is recorded that when the Holy Prophetsa returned from Tabuk, the people of Medina, including men, women, and children, went to Thaniyah al-Wada, just outside of Medina, as they brimmed with love for the Holy Prophetsa and longed to see him and be in his blessed presence. There, they recited the following couplets:

طَلَعَ ٱلْبَدْرُ عَلَيْنَا مِنْ ثَنِيَّاتِ ٱلْوَدَاع وَجَبَ ٱلشُكْرُ عَلَيْنَا مَا دَعَا لِلّٰهِ دَاعَ

“The full moon has risen upon us from the valley of Thaniyah al-Wada. Gratitude to Allah has become obligatory upon us, so long as there remains anyone who calls unto Allah.”

The people of Medina reciting these couplets in deep love for the Holy Prophetsa is mentioned in two instances: one, when the Holy Prophetsa migrated from Mecca to Medina; and the second, when the Holy Prophetsa entered Madinah upon returning from Tabuk. Some commentators of Hadith, such as Allamah Ibn Hajar Asqalani, a commentator of Bukhari, are of the opinion that it is entirely possible that the couplets mentioned in the narration from Hazrat Aishara relate to the time when the Holy Prophetsa returned from the Expedition of Tabuk, because at that time, the people and the children welcomed the Holy Prophetsa at Thaniyah al-Wada, since those arriving from the direction of Syria were received at that location.

When the people of Medina learned of the Holy Prophet’ssa safe return from Tabuk, they came out joyfully to welcome him outside Medina at Thaniyah al-Wada, just as Hazrat Sa’ib bin Yazid narrates: “I remember that I too went with the other children to Thaniyah al-Wada to welcome the Holy Prophetsa when he was returning from the Expedition of Tabuk.” Imam Baihaqi has also recorded that the children welcomed the Holy Prophetsa with these very couplets when he returned to Medina from the Expedition of Tabuk. (Sirat Khatam-un-Nabiyyeen, Hazrat Mirza Bashir Ahmad Sahibra MA, p. 267; Justajoo-e-Madinah, Abdul Hameed Qadri, Oriental Publications, 2007, pp. 403-404; Mu’jam-ul-Buldan, Vol. 2, Dar Al-Kotob Al-Ilmiyah, p. 100)

In any case, it is entirely possible that these couplets were recited on both occasions. However, the likelihood of their being recited upon the return from Tabuk is greater because, as mentioned, the people of Medina, overwhelmed with emotion, would have come out in overflowing love to behold and welcome the Holy Prophetsa. It has been described that this journey was one regarding which the hypocrites had spread such rumours that when the good news was received that the Holy Prophetsa and the Companions had returned safely, it was as though dried crops had received rain. On this joyous occasion, the Muslims of Medina, including the children and elderly, women and men, all came out to welcome the Holy Prophetsa.

In any case, it is very possible that these couplets were also recited upon the migration from Mecca, and expressions of love could certainly have occurred on both occasions; there is no need for debate in this regard. However, it is established that after arriving in Medina, the realisation and depth of love that the Muslims attained for the Holy Prophetsa was far greater than what they had previously possessed at the time of the migration.

Insha-Allah, I will mention some other incidents and aspects from the life of the Holy Prophetsa in the future.

(Official Urdu transcript published in the Daily Al Fazl International, 12 December 2025, pp. 2-7. Translated by The Review of Religions.)

The diet dilemma: A philosophy of the limit of human reasoning

0
Ibraheem Lawal, Graduate, Mechanical Engineering
The diet dilemma: A philosophy of the limit of human reasoning

In a recent discussion I had with a colleague at an exhibition, she highlighted that cruelty to animals has often been enjoyed as a form of sport by humans, particularly bull riding. It is a spectacle in which animals are subjected to a certain level of pain or discomfort to make them aggressive for entertainment. Enjoyable as it may seem to onlookers, such practices stand in contradiction to what the Western ideology often advocates – the conservation of nature and compassion toward animals.

Interestingly, this very ideology has led some Western “extremists” to abstain from eating meat altogether and adopt a vegetarian lifestyle. My colleague also mentioned that she would love to adopt a vegetarian lifestyle in the near future. When I asked why, she explained that she believes animals should be allowed to roam freely, without fear or harm.

I responded by acknowledging that cruelty to animals is indeed inhumane and extreme. I also mentioned how, in some parts of Africa, people make rams fight as a form of entertainment. However, I did not agree with the notion that all animals should roam “freely.” In the animal kingdom, a natural hierarchy exists, a cycle of life in which one species depends on another. Carnivores eat herbivores, and the cycle continues. Every creature has been created for its own purpose and role in sustaining balance.

The Holy Quran beautifully highlights this, stating:

“And the cattle too He has created; you find in them warmth and [other] uses; and some of them you eat.” (Surah an-Nahl, Ch.16: V.6)

In the same way, humans have been created for a higher purpose – to worship God, the Cause of all causes. I was reminded of an article written by a friend, in which he explained the Russell Paradox and how it leads to an infinite regression of reasoning problems: “No doubt, relying solely on logic inevitably leads to problems – the greatest of which is, whose logic should we follow?”

This endless loop exposes the limitations of human intellect, our inability to reach absolute and perfect judgments, for we are bound to err. If we advocate for all animals to live freely, then we alter the balance of nature. This means that, in a way, we stop the lions from preying on the antelope and the antelope from grazing on the grass. This creates a kind of philosophical inconsistency that ultimately leads to extinction.

kevin grieve RdzrCogdDSo unsplash

Returning to the main topic, it is this same cruelty toward animals that has driven people to adopt extreme lifestyles, some abstaining from meat altogether in the name of mercy, while others, on the opposite end, embracing the zero-carb diet, consuming mostly meat. Proponents of each school argue from a philosophical and ethical standpoint that the other diet is not sustainable. For instance, the vegetarians often argue from an extreme negative utilitarian standpoint, arguing that to maximise happiness, we have to completely forgo the “suffering” animals are made to go through.

Porphyry, a Neoplatonic philosopher, was one of the popular proponents of vegetarianism. In his letter to his friend, Castricius Firmus, “On Abstinence from Eating Animals,” he argued that animals are rational beings and justice ought to be extended to them. (Porphyry: On Abstinence from Killing Animals, Bloomsbury, 2000, p. 80) His argument takes the form of the argument from marginal case, a proof by contradiction, which opines that “you cannot coherently believe that all humans have moral status, and that all non-humans lack moral status.”

That is, if we argue that animals can be killed based on their inability to have a concept of self, and to be logically consistent, we need to pass the same judgment towards humans with non-cognitive ability, like the senile, comatose and infants.

A counterargument to this is the argument from species normality, which argues upon the intrinsic property of the “human class”. (“The Argument from Marginal Cases: is Species a Relevant Difference”, researchgate.net, January 2011) While there are some people who, at some point in their lives, may lack the normal cognitive operation or moral agency, they still possess this intrinsic capacity and must be respected and protected.

This logical back and forth, however, does not end there, and each argument continues to be countered. It is interesting to note that Porphyry, however, does not advocate the vegetarian lifestyle for soldiers or athletes – an interesting gap explained by the Promised Messiahas.

In contrast, the carnivore community argue from an extreme human-centred egoism that the natural phenomenon requires that life be sustained by feeding on animals, and that animals lack the moral rectitude or complex mental activity that makes killing them inherently wrong. They often believe that the “good for the self” outweighs every other moral consideration.

A recent proponent of the carnivore diet is Paul Saladino, an American health influencer and former psychiatrist. In his book, The Carnivore Code, he describes plants as “poison” and advocates a meal exclusively based on meat. This has gained popularity even on social media, in modern times, with influencers like Jordan Peterson and his daughter following a strict type of carnivore diet, popularly known as the “lion diet” on TikTok.

Both extremes, as observed by the Promised Messiahas, have psychological effects. Though there may appear to be short-term benefits, long-term consequences reveal imbalances: vegetarians, often lacking certain nutrients, may develop timidity and reduced courage, while excessive meat-eaters may become overly aggressive or suffer a decline in humility and meekness. (The Philosophy of the Teachings of Islam, pp. 9-10)

The Holy Prophetsa perfectly addressed this by teaching moderation in all aspects of life. (Sahih al-Bukhari, Kitab ar-Riqaq, Hadith 6463) Likewise, the Promised Messiahas advised that human reason should be applied in its proper time and place – not to justify extremes, but to maintain harmony and balance. (The Philosophy of the Teachings of Islam, p. 101)

In essence, everything in creation has been designed with a purpose. True wisdom lies in recognising that purpose and living in moderation, neither in excess nor in neglect. And as for where philosophy goes too far, there is no better way to understand its problem save through the lens of religion.