Home Blog Page 3

The importance of offering two rak‘ahs upon entering the mosque for the Friday prayer

0

عَنْ جَابِرَ بْنَ عَبْدِ اللَّهِ رضى الله عنهما قَالَ قَالَ رَسُولُ اللّٰہ صلّى الله عليه وسلّم وَهُوَ يَخْطُبُ: إِذَا جَاءَ أَحَدُكُمْ وَالإِمَامُ يَخْطُبُ ـ أَوْ قَدْ خَرَجَ ـ فَلْيُصَلِّ رَكْعَتَيْنِ

Hazrat Jabir bin Abdullahra narrated that, “Allah’s Messengersa, while delivering the sermon, said: ‘If any of you arrives while the imam is delivering the sermon – or has come out for it – let him offer two rak‘ahs.”

(Sahih al-Bukhari, Kitab at-tahajjud, Bab ma ja’a fi t-tatawwu‘i mathna mathna, Hadith 1166)

Friday Sermon – Muhammad (sa): The great exemplar (3 October 2025)

0

Friday Sermon

3 October 2025

Muhammadsa: The great exemplar

Friday Sermon

After reciting the tashahhud, ta‘awwuz, and Surah al-Fatihah, Hazrat Khalifatul Masih Vaa stated:

The distribution of the spoils of war that were acquired following the Battle of Hunain was being discussed. Further incidents related to this have been recorded as follows:

Following the victory at Hunain, the Holy Prophetsa instructed that all the spoils of war be collected at a place called Ji’ranah, and following this, he set off towards Ta’if. After approximately one month, he returned from Ta’if to Ji’ranah and upon his arrival, he did not distribute the spoils of war; rather, he waited for a few days. According to some, he waited 13 or 14 days in the hope that the Banu Hawazin would repent and return so that their family members and their horses and cattle could be returned to them. On one hand, the Holy Prophetsa waited for them, and on the other, the Banu Hawazin contemplated whether their return would be beneficial or not.

At last, after waiting for such a long period, the Holy Prophetsa distributed the spoils of war and the captives when he saw that they were not returning. Once he had distributed them, 14 noblemen from the Banu Hawazin came to the Holy Prophetsa. They had already accepted Islam, and they said that their entire tribe had accepted Islam as well. They then asked the Holy Prophetsa to be merciful and said: “O Messengersa of Allah! We are noble and respectable people. The trials and tribulations that we are facing are not hidden from you. Be compassionate towards us, and Allah will be compassionate towards you.” The leader of this delegation was Abu Surad Zuhair bin Jarwal. He was an orator and poet. He appealed for mercy to the Holy Prophetsa in a very charming and moving manner and said: 

“O Messengersa of Allah! Your paternal aunts, your maternal aunts and your sisters are among the captives as well, who have raised and nourished you.”

Why did he mention this? Because the Holy Prophetsa was suckled by the Banu Sa’d and grew up among them. Furthermore, his foster parents belonged to the Banu Sa’d, which was a branch of the Banu Hawazin. Abu Surad further said: 

“If we had suckled the Ghassanid Emperor, Harith bin Abi Shimr, or the Emperor of Iraq, Nu’man bin Mundhir, and if we were facing such difficulties, they would most certainly have shown us mercy. However, you are the most merciful and generous.”

Following this, he recited a poem in praise and admiration of the Holy Prophetsa. The foster uncle of the Holy Prophetsa was also part of this delegation, and he delivered a speech expressing similar sentiments. He also said: 

“I saw you in your childhood when you were with us, and you were an excellent child. I then had the honour of seeing you when you were a young man, and even then, no one was more virtuous and pious than you. You are an embodiment of goodness and a river of generosity. We belong to your very family. Therefore, be kind towards us. Allah the Almighty will most certainly reward you for this kindness.” 

The Holy Prophetsa listened to their heartfelt appeals and did not reject their requests. Instead, he said:

“I waited for you for many days until I became certain that you would not come. Now you see that only very few of the captives remain with me – the rest have already been distributed. To me, the most pleasing thing is that which is most truthful. So now you may choose one of two things: the captives, whether men or women, or the spoils and belongings.”

He said they could take whichever they wished and that he had waited for them for a long time and had wished to give them both.

When the delegation of the Banu Hawazin saw the whole situation, they requested, “We wish to take back our captives – our men and our women.” The Holy Prophetsa replied, “Those captives who fall into my share and that of the Banu Abd al-Muttalib are yours (meaning he would free them and return them). As for the other captives, I will consult with the rest of the Muslims, to whom I have already distributed the rest.”

At the same time, he instructed the delegation about what to do. He told them that after Zuhr [early afternoon prayer], they should stand before the people and declare that they would appeal to the Holy Prophetsa as their intercessor before the Muslims and that through the Holy Prophetsa, they appealed to the Muslims for the release of their children and women. The Holy Prophetsa further told them to make a public declaration of their acceptance of Islam and to say, “We are your brothers.” Then he would intercede on behalf of the people. 

This was the generous and graceful manner of the Holy Prophetsa that he personally showed how the captives could be released. He not only preserved the self-respect of ordinary Muslims, as the captives had already come into their possession, but he also upheld the honour of the Banu Hawazin as well.

After the Zuhr prayer, the members of the delegation stood up and said exactly as the Holy Prophetsa had instructed them. According to the narration in Sahih al-Bukhari, the Holy Prophetsa then stood and addressed the people, saying:

“Your brothers have come to you, repentant. I wish to return their captives to them. Whoever among you is ready to do so willingly may do so, and whoever wishes to receive something in return may also do so. I will repay him his due from the first spoils acquired.”

At the same time, he declared that he had already released the captives who had fallen into his own share and that of his family – the Banu Abd al-Muttalib.

The Companions – who loved the Holy Prophetsa more than their own lives, their wives, their children and their parents – immediately said, “O Messengersa of Allah, we happily return our captives from the Hawazin for your pleasure.” Seeing their spirit, the Holy Prophetsa was very pleased. But he thought it best to ensure that the consent of all was discerned clearly, since in the general assembly everyone was speaking at once, and it was not clear who had agreed and who had not. So he said, “Go back, and let your chiefs and leaders come to me and present the stance of their people.”

Upon this instruction, all of them happily expressed their willingness to return the captives, and their leaders conveyed this to the Holy Prophetsa. Thus, the Holy Prophetsa bestowed this immense favour upon that enemy tribe; all their captives were returned to them without any ransom or exchange. At the same time, he also took care of the sentiments of his loyal, devoted Companions by announcing that for every captive returned, six camels would be given.

The example of Hazrat Umar’sra love and obedience to the Holy Prophetsa was such that at the time of the release of the captives, he was not present. When he returned, he saw the slaves rejoicing, full of joy. On inquiring, he learned that the Holy Prophetsa had freed all the captives. Upon hearing this, he felt no need for further questioning or investigation. He immediately said to his son, “O Abdullah, go and set free that bondwoman whom the Messengersa of Allah had granted to me.”

The Holy Prophetsa not only freed the captives of the Banu Hawazin without any ransom or compensation, but he also gave them clothing. He emphatically instructed: 

فَلَایَخْرُجُ الْحُرُّ مِنْہُمْ اِلَّاکَاسِیًا

“None of them should leave as a free person except in new clothes.” 

To fulfil this command, a Companion, Busr bin Sufyan, was sent to purchase garments. He brought new cloaks, and each freed captive was given fresh clothing. (Sahih al-Bukhari, Kitab al-‘itq, Bab mun malaka min al-‘arab rafiqa, Hadith 2539-2540; Taken from Sirat al-Nabi li Ibn Hisham, Dar Al-Kotob Al-Ilmiyah, 2001, p. 130; Da’irah Ma’arif Sirat Muhammad Rasulullahsa, Vol. 9, Bazm Iqbal, Lahore, pp. 309-314; Bashmil, Ghazwah Hunain, Nafees Academy, p. 266)

According to narrations, three individuals refused to release their captives. Aqra‘ bin Habis said, “As far as I and the Banu Tamim are concerned, we refuse.” Uyainah bin Hisn al-Fazari said, “I and my tribe, the Banu Fazarah, refuse.” Abbas bin Mirdas said, “I and the Banu Sulaim will not release our captives.” But the Banu Sulaim immediately rejected their chief’s stance and declared, “Whatever belongs to us, we have already given to the Messengersa of Allah.”

According to other narrations, the Holy Prophetsa declared: “All the captives of the Banu Hawazin are free. As for anyone who does not wish to release his captive, he will be compensated with six young camels from the treasury for each captive.” Upon this, even those who had initially refused agreed, and thus six thousand captives of the Banu Hawazin were set free.

According to some narrations, Uyainah bin Hisn al-Fazari still didn’t return his prisoner. But as a result of this disobedience, he had to face great embarrassment and was deprived of good and blessings as a result.

Thus, it is recorded that when the Messengersa of Allah was informed that everyone had returned their prisoners of war except Uyainah, the Holy Prophetsa replied, “May Allah cause him to suffer the consequences of this.” 

The story of this prisoner is as follows: instead of a young woman, Uyainah took as a prisoner an older lady. When people asked him why, he explained that when her family members came to procure her release, he would be able to get as much ransom as he wanted, owing to the fact that she had so many family members. So, when the instruction came to free all prisoners but he refused, this elderly woman’s son came to Uyainah and asked that he release his mother in exchange for 100 camels. Uyainah felt that her son would continue to increase the ransom offer and refused, upon which the elderly woman’s son left. 

Sometime later, when Uyainah began to realise that her son was not coming back, he decided to go to him and ask whether his offer of 100 camels still stood. The elderly woman’s son replied that now he would only give 50 camels. This conversation continued until the offer was reduced to only 10 camels. Each time Uyainah sought to bargain, the lady’s son would reduce the offer, and Uyainah would agree. So, the offer continued to drop lower. Ultimately, it became so low that Uyainah said that he should just take the elderly woman back for free. At this, the woman’s son replied that the Messengersa of Allah had actually given free clothes in addition to releasing the prisoners for free, and this elderly woman was bereft of that, and so Uyainah should also provide new clothes for her. Uyainah replied that he was a poor man and did not have much to give, and had already incurred a loss due to his greed. However, the son insisted on receiving something in return. 

In the end, Uyainah had to give his own cloak. Thus, not only did that man free the elderly woman, but he also obtained clothing. The man left with his mother, but not before remarking to Uyainah, “Your mind is entirely bereft of intellect and understanding, and you do not possess the wisdom to take advantage of a situation.” Even Uyainah’s own friends would mock him for this. (Subul al-Huda, Vol. 5, Dar Al-Kotob Al-Ilmiyah, 1993, pp. 393-394; Bashmil, Ghazwah Hunain, Nafees Academy, pp. 295-297; Da’irah Ma’araif Sirat Muhammad Rasulullahsa, Vol. 9, Bazm Iqbal, Lahore, pp. 314-315; Ali bin Burhan Halabi, Ghazawat al-Nabisa, Urdu Translation, Dar al-Ishaat, 2001, pp. 680-681)

Ultimately, his greed got him nowhere.

Regarding the chief of the Hawazin tribe, Malik bin Auf’s acceptance of Islam, it is recorded that the Holy Prophetsa enquired from his tribe about their chief’s whereabouts, to which they replied that he was in Ta’if among the Banu Thaqif.

The Holy Prophetsa told them to convey to their chief that if he accepted the obedience of the Messengersa of Allah, all of his family members who had been taken as prisoners of war would also be returned to him. According to some narrations, the Holy Prophetsa had given special instructions regarding this chief’s family members: that they not be given as servants to anyone and that their accommodations be arranged at the house of Umm Abdillah bint Abi Umayyah in Mecca.

The tribesmen conveyed the message immediately to their chief, and he was ready to return to the Holy Prophetsa right away. However, he feared that the Banu Thaqif might discover that he was going to Muhammadsa and imprison him. Thus, he prepared a camel and horse, setting out in the darkness of the night from Ta’if, and presented himself before the Holy Prophetsa in Ji’ranah.

The Holy Prophetsa freed all of his family members and even gave him 100 camels as a gift on top of that. Witnessing the Holy Prophet’s great magnanimity and forgiving disposition, Malik became a Muslim and spent the rest of his life as a sincere and devoted believer. Later, the Holy Prophetsa even appointed him as the leader of the Muslims of Hazwazin and the commander of their army. (Bashmil, Ghazwah Hunain, Nafees Academy, pp. 299-300; Al-Sirah al-Nabawiyyah li Ibn Hisham, Amr Amwal Hawazin wa Sabayaha, Dar Al-Kotob Al-Ilmiyah, Beirut, 2001, p. 797)

This was the very same Malik bin Auf who had rallied the entire Banu Thaqif, Hawazin, and other tribes with the intent of eradicating all the Muslims. 

He was thirsty for the blood of the Holy Prophetsa, but it was the genius of the Holy Prophet’ssa shining example of forbearance and forgiveness that, on his part, the Holy Prophetsa was thirsty only for Malik’s guidance and salvation. And when the time came that Malik came before the Holy Prophetsa as a seeker of guidance, not only did the Holy Prophetsa forgive him for all that he had done in the past, but he also gave him a significant financial sum at the time, of 100 camels.

Among the prisoners of war from this battle was a woman called Shaimah. This was her title, and her real name was Hudhafah. When she was captured, she addressed her captors, saying, “I am the foster sister of your prophet, Muhammadsa.” However, the Companions did not accept this.

A group of Ansar escorted her to the Holy Prophetsa. She said, “O Muhammadsa, I am your foster sister.” The Holy Prophetsa asked, “Do you have anything that proves your claim?” She showed him a bitemark and said, “You had bitten me in your childhood when I was holding you in my lap (perhaps the Holy Prophetsa remembered this incident). At the time, we used to graze the goats. Your foster father is my biological father, and your foster mother is my biological mother. O Messengersa of Allah, remember the time when I used to milk the goats for you.” 

The Holy Prophetsa recognised these signs and stood up. He spread out his cloak for her and asked her to sit upon it, welcoming her. His eyes began to flow with tears as he asked about the well-being of his foster parents. She informed him that they had passed away. The Holy Prophetsa said, “If you think it best, you may stay with us. You will receive honour, respect, and love. If you wish to go back to your people, I will treat you as kin and you may return.” She replied, “I wish to return to my people.” Nonetheless, she accepted Islam. The Holy Prophetsa granted her three slaves and one bondswoman, and he instructed that two camels also be given to her. Since he was in Hunain at the time, he said to her, “Go to Ji’ranah and stay with your people. I am going toward Ta’if.” Thus, she went to Ji’ranah. The Holy Prophetsa met her in Ji’ranah and granted her goats and sheep. 

According to one narration, the Holy Prophetsa said to her: “Whatever you ask shall be granted, and whatever intercession you make shall be accepted.” She interceded on behalf of a man of Banu Sa‘d named Bajad, who had killed a Muslim and burnt him, then fled, yet the Companions had captured him. When Shaimah requested his pardon, the Holy Prophetsa forgave him. (Bashmil, Ghazwah Hunain, Nafees Academy, pp. 389-390; Subul al-Huda wa al-Rashad fi Sirah Khair al-Ibad, Vol. 5, Dar Al-Kotob Al-Ilmiyah, 1993, p. 333; Da’irah Ma’araif Sirat Muhammad Rasulullahsa, Vol. 9, Bazm Iqbal, Lahore, pp. 318-319)

Though there are no details to the effect, later, the Holy Prophetsa would certainly have offered his blood money.

Later, as recorded in Abu Dawud, it is also mentioned that at Ji‘ranah, the Holy Prophet’ssa foster mother came to meet him. However, scholars note that this narration is not authentic, and in fact, he did not meet his foster mother. It is possible that this meeting occurred on a different occasion, or that the narrator erred, for according to the prevalent and sounder reports, the Holy Prophet’ssa foster mother had already passed away before the Battle of Hunain. (Bashmil, Ghazwah Hunain, Nafees Academy, p. 289; Sunan Abi Dawud, Kitab al-adab, Bab fi birri l-walidayn, Hadith 5144; Taken from Sirat Ibn Kathir, Vol. 3, Dar al-Ma’rifah, Beirut, Lebanon, 1976, p. 690; Fath al-Wadood, Vol. 7, Ja’izah Dubayy al-Duwaliyyah li al-Qur’an al-Karim, p. 410)

When the Holy Prophetsa migrated from Mecca to Medina, the people of Mecca had announced that whoever captured him alive or dead would receive a reward of one hundred camels. This event is well-known and has been narrated many times. Upon hearing this, Suraqah bin Malik pursued the Holy Prophetsa until he caught up with him. However, Allah the Almighty miraculously protected the Holy Prophetsa, rendering Suraqah powerless. On that occasion, the Holy Prophetsa told him: “Suraqah, how will you feel when the bangles of Chosroes are upon your hands?” At that time, Suraqah also requested a written guarantee of safety, which the Holy Prophetsa granted.

It was this very Suraqah, holding the very same document of protection, who later appeared at Ji‘ranah and accepted Islam. (Taken from Da’irah Ma’araif Sirat Muhammad Rasulullahsa, Vol. 9, Bazm Iqbal, Lahore, pp. 306-307) 

It was also on this occasion that Hazrat Umarra mentioned a vow he had made. He submitted: “O Messengersa of Allah, during the days of ignorance, I vowed that one day I would perform I’tikaf [a period of devoted, secluded worship] in the Sacred Mosque. What is your command?” The Holy Prophetsa replied: “Go and fulfil your vow.” Hazrat Umarra accordingly went and fulfilled it. (Sahih al-Bukhari, Kitab al-i‘tikaf, Bab mun lum yara ‘alaihi sawman idha i‘takafa, Hadith 2042; Fath al-Bari, Kitab al-maghazi, Vol. 8, Qadimi Kitab Khana, p. 43)

While the Holy Prophetsa was still at Ji‘ranah, one night he set out towards Mecca with the intention of performing Umrah. According to narrations, he departed by night, performed Umrah, and returned the same night. To the people, it seemed as though the Holy Prophetsa had not even gone anywhere, as he had been absent only for a short while. (Imam Halabi, Ghazawat al-Nabisa, Urdu Translation, Dar al-Isha’at, 2001, p. 683; Umdah al-Qari, Kitab al-Hajj, Vol. 9, Dar Ahya al-Turath, 2003, p. 301; Da’irah Ma’araif Sirat Muhammad Rasulullahsa, Vol. 9, Bazm Iqbal, Lahore, p. 375)

As for the Holy Prophet’ssa return to Medina, it is recorded that with twelve days remaining of Dhu al-Qa‘dah, on a Thursday, he began the journey back. Before departing, the Holy Prophetsa appointed Hazrat Attab bin Asidra as governor of Mecca and left Hazrat Mu‘adh bin Jabalra and Hazrat Abu Musa Ash‘arira behind to teach the Quran and religion to the people. The Holy Prophetsa also kept some animals with him in order to distribute them to those he encountered along the way. Departing from the valley of Ji‘ranah, he passed through Sarf and then Marr al-Zahran, and after nine days of travel, he reached Medina, with three nights still remaining of Dhu al-Qa‘dah.

All these campaigns – the Conquest of Mecca, the victory against the Hawazin [Battle of Hunain], and the expedition against the people of Ta’if – spanned a period of two months and sixteen days. (Subul al-Huda wa al-Rashad fir Sirah Khair al-Ibad, Vol. 5, Dar Al-Kotob Al-Ilmiyah, 1993, pp. 406-407; Bashmil, Ghazwah Hunain, Nafees Academy, pp. 306-307) 

Orientalists have levelled criticisms against the events of the Conquest of Mecca, the Battle of Hunain, and Ta’if. In truth, they found no substantial ground for objection but still sought to raise doubts with two objections, which I will mention. The modern orientalist William Montgomery Watt writes (the translation of which is presented): “The booty had been left at al-Ji’ranah, not far from Hunayn, under the charge of Mas’ud b. Amr al Ghifari. The prisoners were also there, except that a few of the women had been given to the leading Companions.” (W Montgomery Watt, Muhammad at Madina, Chapter: The Battle of Hunayn, The Consolidation of Victory, Oxford University Press Karachi 2006, p. 73)

Similarly, Sir William Muir writes:

“Among the captives were three beautiful women, who were brought to Mohammad[sa]. One was presented by him to All, another to Othman, and the third to Omar. Omar transferred the one allotted to him to his son Abdallah, who returned her as she was, with the rest of the prisoners. Whether the other two were restored likewise is not stated, but (he says) be this as it may, it throws a curious light on the domestic history of Mohammad[sa] that he should have presented such gifts as slave girls to the father of one of his wives and the husbands of two of his own daughters.” (The Life of Mahomet, Chapter The Hawazinite Prisoners Released, Mahomet Presents Female Slaves to Ali, Othman and Omar, London Smith, Elder, & CO., 15 Waterloo Place, 1878, p. 435)

This, he claims, reveals nepotism. This objection has been raised either merely for the sake of objecting or for raising mischief, though it holds no actual weight. 

In the accounts of the Battle of Hunain, there is no mention in authoritative works such as Sirah al-Halabiyyah or Tabaqat Ibn Sa‘d of female prisoners of war being distributed in this manner. What is indeed recorded is the division of wealth. It is recorded in Tabaqat Ibn Sa‘d that on that day, the Muslims acquired six thousand captives. The polytheists, after embracing Islam, came to the Holy Prophetsa and said: “O Prophetsa of Allah, you are the best of men. You have captured our wealth, our women, and our children.” The Holy Prophetsa then addressed the Muslims: “Whoever has anything of theirs and is content to return it, this is the better way. But if any one of you is not content, then I shall compensate you. Consider it a debt upon me. When we are able, we shall repay it.”

The people replied: “O Prophetsa, we are content, and we submit.” The Holy Prophetsa then said: “I do not know; perhaps among you there may yet be one who is not content (as was mentioned before), so send forth your representatives to me.” Their representatives came forward, confirming that all were indeed content and had consented. (Al-Tabaqat al-Kubra li Ibn Sa’d, Vol. 2, Ghazwah Rasulillahsa ila Hunain, Dar Al-Kotob Al-Ilmiyah, Bierut, 1990, p. 118)

The arrangements made for the prisoners from the Battle of Hunain and the Holy Prophet’ssa merciful strategy for their freedom have already been mentioned in light of authentic historical references. Sir William Muir is well acquainted with this historical fact. Hence, despite presenting these events in a critical manner, Sir William Muir had no choice but to accept this fact. He writes: 

“The prisoners [from Hunain] were all released.” (The Life of Mahomet, Chapter The Hawazinite Prisoners Released, Mahomet Presents Female Slaves to Ali, Othman and Omar, London Smith, Elder, & CO., 15 Waterloo Place, 1878, p. 435)

This statement of his alone refutes his own allegation. An analysis of the events from this battle shows that the prisoners were initially given to the Companions for supervision; however, it is also clear that once the arrangements were finalised, they were all sent to Ji’ranah under the custodianship of Hazrat Mas’ud bin Amr Ghifarira. Upon returning from Ta’if, when the Holy Prophetsa had a conversation with the Banu Hawazin, he employed a very merciful strategy whereby the prisoner assigned to each person was freed. This has all been elucidated in the details I mentioned previously. The renowned orientalist Montgomery Watt is well aware of this fact because, in the same instance, he writes: 

“Such stories, however, seem to be told mainly for the edification of the hearers and may have been invented or developed long after Muhammad’s[sa] time. (Muhammad at Madina, Chapter The Battle of Hunayn, The Consolidation of Victory, Oxford University Press Karachi 2006, p. 73)

Another allegation is by Margoliouth regarding Malik bin Auf Nasri, the chief of Ta’if, saying, “…he was presently forced to become a Moslem.” (Mohammed and the Rise of Islam, Chapter The Taking of Meccah, G.P. Putnam’s Sons, New York and London, The Knickerbocker Press, Third Edition, p. 403)

This allegation, levelled by Margoliouth, is utterly baseless. It is an example of the general attitude of orientalists towards the history of the Holy Prophetsa, whereby they take an incident of kindness shown by the “Mercy for All Peoples” and paint it as one of coercion, which is completely contrary to reality.

The details of this incident have been recorded in Sirat Ibn Hisham, which states that when the Mercy for All Peoples accepted the Hawazin’s appeal for mercy and returned their prisoners and wealth to them, then, as mentioned before, the Holy Prophetsa also thought of the chief Malik bin Auf, who was in Ta’if. The Holy Prophetsa asked, “Tell me about Malik bin Auf, how is he doing?” He was told that Malik was in Ta’if with the Thaqif. In response, the Holy Prophetsa exhibited the same mercy once again, this time for Malik bin Auf, and said, “Go and inform him that if he accepts Islam, his family and his wealth will be returned to him.” That was not all; in fact, the Holy Prophetsa continued, “He will also be given a hundred camels.”

Here, it should be noted that the Holy Prophetsa was the victor; there was nothing he needed, nor did he have anything to gain from Malik bin Auf. By no standard of any law was the Holy Prophetsa responsible in the slightest for Malik bin Auf. Yet, with his enduring spirit of mercy, he sent Malik an invitation to accept Islam, along with a promise to grant him his family and wealth, including some camels. It appears that Islam had already taken root in Malik’s heart, and when he received the Holy Prophet’ssa message, he set out to meet the Holy Prophetsa. He walked from Ta’if to Ji’ranah or Mecca and met the Holy Prophetsa. Malik had now accepted Islam; the Holy Prophetsa granted him his family, his wealth, and further granted him a hundred camels, and Malik accepted Islam. As he accepted Islam, Malik said some poetic couplets, of which one of the couplets is as follows:

مَا اِنْ رَاَیْتُ وَلَا سَمِعْتُ بِمِثْلِہٖ

فِی النَّاسِ کُلِّھِمْ بِمِثْلِ مُحَمَّدٍ

“I have never seen anyone like Muhammadsa, nor have I ever heard about anyone of similar stature.” (Al-Sirah al-Nabawiyyah li Ibn Hisham, Amr Amwal Hawazin wa Sabayaha, Dar Al-Kotob Al-Ilmiyah, Beirut, 2001, p. 797)

These were all the incidents pertaining to Hunain. I will later mention the remaining expeditions, insha-Allah.

At this time, I wish to mention two deceased members, and I will also subsequently lead their funeral prayers.

The first is Dr Laiq Ahmad Farrukh Sahib, who recently passed away while residing in Canada. He served for many years as a life-devotee doctor in Africa. He recently passed away at the age of 83.

اِنَّا لِلّٰہِ وَاِنَّآ اِلَيْہِ رٰجِعُوْنَ

[“Surely, to Allah we belong and to Him shall we return.”]

The deceased was a musi. He is survived by his wife, a son and two daughters. He was sent to Ghana in 1974 under Majlis Nusrat Jehan, where he served in the central hospital until 1978. After completing three years of devotion, he sought leave due to ill health; however, Hazrat Khalifatul Masih IIIrh instructed him to continue working for another year. He would be presented with very complicated and challenging cases. He would refer some cases to other state hospitals; however, the patients would refuse, saying that if they were to be treated, they desired it to be at an Ahmadi hospital by an Ahmadi doctor. There were many operations that proved successful by the grace of Allah despite there being no hope. One such case that he dealt with was of a strangulated hernia; it was a very difficult case. He prayed to Allah the Almighty, Who enabled it to be successful. 

He was sent to Africa once again in 1984, to The Gambia, where he served his devotion until 1993 and served with the true spirit of devotion. His son writes, and very accurately so, “He had a quiet disposition; he was exemplary in being prayerful, humble, meek, patient, and steadfast. He spent his entire life in the service of humanity. During his devotion, especially in the small and undeveloped Gambian village of Njawara, the conditions were very strained; there would not be any food to eat, it would be hot, and there would be no electricity or water, yet he continued serving there.” He says, “I was sick and I would develop blisters on my feet, and so he would carry me to school. He would drop me off at school, and he never complained.” He says, “It was a great honour for us that when Hazrat Khalifatul Masih IVrh visited The Gambia in 1988, he made a special visit to his home. There were no chairs in the home to sit on; however, Huzoorrh said that he would stay to eat with him and asked his staff to leave.” He says this was a great honour for him. 

Dr Laiq would recall an incident from his time working in Lahore: “Once my blood pressure became very low, and I lay down on the table. I felt as though I was about to die.” Doctors become fearful about themselves as they have the knowledge. However, right in that moment, he heard a voice saying, “It is not yet time. Your time will come after you go to Canada.” His son says that Allah the Almighty fulfilled this in an extraordinary manner, many years later, when he was in Canada.

Once, when he returned from Ghana in 1978, a delegation of his Jamaat went to meet Hazrat Khalifatul Masih IIIrh. Hazrat Khalifatul Masih IIIrh said, “You have returned, but I will send you back to the place you came from.” He says that he did not understand because he had not renewed his devotion. However, in 1983, he received a letter from the secretary of Nusrat Jehan informing him that his assignment was under review, and so he should present himself. Thus, in 1984, Hazrat Khalifatul Masih IVrh sent him to Africa once again, to The Gambia. He said that this was an extraordinary miracle for him to see one Khalifa say something and for it to be fulfilled by another. 

The late Wahhab Adam Sahib, former Amir of Ghana, used to say that whenever Dr Sahib observed a patient in a critical condition, he would immediately begin offering voluntary prayers. I myself had the opportunity to spend time in Ghana while he was also there, and I spent time with him, observing him closely – he was a man of extremely noble character, humble, and ever-ready to serve. He had great respect for life devotees, and his hospitality was deeply ingrained in his nature. Both husband and wife were exceptionally hospitable. He possessed many such qualities that are rare to find in others.

Daud Hanif Sahib, who is currently serving as the Principal of Jamia Ahmadiyya Canada and who previously served as Amir Jamaat of The Gambia, relates that Dr Sahib was always prepared to serve humanity. He never distinguished between night and day; he only saw that if someone was in distress, it was his duty to serve them immediately.

He was posted to a remote area where the hospital was quite small. To reach it, one had to change ferries twice. His residence was an old, abandoned store that had been cleaned and repurposed into a living space. Yet, he lived there happily. There was no electricity, no running water, and no telephone. Water had to be drawn either from a well or fetched from the river. Candles and lanterns were used for light. Surgeries were often performed during the day using sunlight, and the surgical instruments were sterilised over a gas stove.

He continued rendering medical services in such difficult conditions. Today’s doctors would hardly be able to imagine, let alone accept, working under such circumstances.

On one occasion during his stay there, a robbery took place at a house in the area. When the commotion arose, the local people surrounded the thieves. One of them was struck on the head with a cutlass – a sword-like weapon – causing a serious injury. Dr Sahib was immediately summoned during the night. Without delay, he performed surgery under the light of a torch and candles – a scenario almost unimaginable today. By the grace of Allah, the operation was successful, and the patient survived.

On one occasion, a poor man came to Dr Sahib and said, “My village is very far away, and there are transport issues. I am unable to bring the patient. Would you be kind enough to see the patient yourself?” He immediately stood up and went with the man to go and see the patient. He treated him, and he regained health. When the Member of Parliament of that area found out, he came to his clinic to thank him. Subsequently, whenever he would visit that area, he would visit him and would acknowledge that he was truly serving humanity. 

May Allah the Almighty bestow His forgiveness and mercy and elevate his rank. May He safeguard his wife and children and grant them patience and comfort.

The second funeral is of Hameed Ahmad Ghauri Sahib of Hyderabad, India. He passed away recently at the age of 74:

اِنَّا لِلّٰہِ وَاِنَّآ اِلَيْہِ رٰجِعُوْنَ

[“Surely, to Allah we belong and to Him shall we return.”]

The deceased was a musi. Aside from his wife, he is survived by one daughter, four sons, as well as grandchildren. All of his children are serving the Jamaat in some capacity. He was the younger brother of Inam Ghauri Sahib, Nazir-e-A‘la of Qadian. He was the father of Samad Ghauri Sahib, the missionary and National President of the Albania Jamaat. He was regular in salat and observing fasts as well as offering Tahajjud prayers. He loved the Holy Quran dearly; he would regularly recite it and try to memorise it as well. As long as his health permitted, after offering his voluntary prayers, he would go to the mosque and on the way, he would knock on the doors of Ahmadi houses in his area to call them for Fajr [prayer offered right before dawn]. He had the opportunity to perform Hajj and Umrah. He would follow the directives of Khilafat, whether it was the smallest of instructions or a major instruction; he would try to ensure that he followed them. Since he would deliver sermons in different jamaats, he would act on them first so that he could advise Jamaat members. In this manner, through the grace of Allah the Almighty, he was successful.

He would also provide treatment through homoeopathy and kept a stock of medicines at home, which he would distribute to patients free of charge. He was always at the forefront in financial sacrifice. A close relative related that once his Hissa ‘Aamad [obligatory contribution] had become overdue. The deceased went to the Secretary Maal, paid the contribution on his behalf, and then admonished him, saying that in the future such dues should not remain outstanding and that financial contributions should always be paid first.

He was extremely kind and compassionate towards relatives; he would frequently call them to his home and share in their times of joy and sorrow. He showed great respect for central representatives and missionaries. He also served in various capacities, such as Naib Amir Hyderabad, Secretary Talimul Quran, President of his local Jamaat, Nazim Ansarullah, and Naib Sadr Majlis Ansarullah, Southern India. Nonetheless, he rendered numerous services for the Jamaat; he had the opportunity to attend the Jalsa here once.

May Allah the Almighty grant him forgiveness and mercy. His son, who is serving as a missionary in Albania, was unable to attend the funeral. May Allah grant him patience and steadfastness as well. 

In any case, I shall lead these funeral prayers after [the Jumuah prayer].

(Official Urdu transcript published in the Daily Al Fazl International, 24 October 2025, pp. 2-7. Translated by The Review of Religions.)

Guidance for expectant parents: Khuddam from MKA USA’s Midwest Region meet Huzoor

0
Guidance for expectant parents: Khuddam from MKA USA’s Midwest Region meet Huzoor

Islamabad, Tilford, 25 October 2025: A delegation of 25 khuddam from the Midwest Region of Majlis Khuddam-ul-Ahmadiyya USA had the blessed opportunity of a mulaqat with Hazrat Mirza Masroor Ahmad, Khalifatul Masih Vaa.

The meeting commenced as Huzooraa graced the hall with his presence and extended his salaam. Huzooraa first addressed Sadr Sahib MKA USA and then the amir-e-qafilah, Syed Raza Ahmad Sahib, who briefly introduced the delegation. Following this, each of the khuddam had the opportunity to introduce himself, mentioning his family background and his academic and professional pursuits.

During the introductions, Huzooraa engaged with several of the young men. One khadim expressed his desire to study electrical engineering and then dedicate his life (waqf). Another khadim said he wished to study media, with the ultimate aim of dedicating his life to serving in MTA International. Another khadim stated his intention to attend Jamia Ahmadiyya, to which Huzooraa enquired if he would be willing to go to Jamia in Ghana, which the khadim affirmed.

Huzooraa imparted direct and poignant advice to the members of the Waqf-e-Nau scheme. He explained that for a waqif-e-nau, the five daily prayers and the recitation of the Holy Quran with its translation are the absolute fundamentals. Only by mastering these, he guided, can one truly be called a waqif-e-nau and begin to fulfil their pledge. To another, Huzooraa counselled that merely having a beard is not enough; one must also embody the true characteristics and spiritual qualities of a life devotee.

After the introductions, the khuddam were graciously granted permission to ask questions for their guidance.

On engaging older khuddam with humility

A khadim serving as a zaeem sought guidance on how to effectively encourage khuddam who are older than him to attend the mosque and participate in Jamaat programmes.

Huzooraa advised him to approach them with great humility and respect. He should tell them that although he is younger, he has been given a responsibility and just as he himself comes for prayers, he requests them to do the same. Huzooraa shared his own experience from when he served as a zaeem in his neighbourhood, where many of the khuddam under his charge were older than him, including some of his own relatives and uncles. He would remind them that while their relationship outside the mosque was one of family, within the Jamaat, the sanctity of the Nizam-e-Jamaat must be respected.

Huzooraa guided the khadim to explain to these elder members, with politeness, the importance of participating in Jamaat programmes. He should especially explain to them that attending the five daily prayers is a divine command. He should appeal to their sense of responsibility as role models, explaining that by coming to the mosque, they are setting a vital example for their own children, who will follow in their footsteps. Furthermore, he should adopt a humble approach by telling them that, as he is young, it is their duty to guide his moral training and that by setting a good example, they will help him become a better Ahmadi Muslim. By speaking with such humility, Huzooraa stated, all will be well.

Memories of the Companions of the Promised Messiahas

A khadim requested Huzooraa to share some memorable incidents from his youth in the company of the Companions of the Promised Messiahas.

Huzooraa explained that during his youth, most of the Companions were either very elderly or had already passed away, so he did not have the opportunity for extensive sittings with them. However, he shared some cherished memories from his childhood and teenage years.

He recalled meeting Hazrat Maulana Ghulam Rasul Rajekira, who was known for being a man of great piety and was always ready to raise his hands in prayer for others. He also remembered visiting Hazrat Hafiz Shahjahanpurira, an elderly Companion who was a man of profound knowledge and possessed an extraordinary memory even in old age. His room was filled with bookshelves, yet he knew the exact location of every single book on every shelf.

Huzooraa also shared faint but poignant memories of being in the presence of Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra and listening to him, as well as recalling his sermons and speeches, though not their specific content. He then spoke of his grandfather, Hazrat Mirza Sharif Ahmadra, a Companion and the youngest son of the Promised Messiahas. He recounted how his grandfather would focus on their moral training by asking the children to read the newspaper or the Holy Quran aloud to him. He would lie down and close his eyes and while the children might think he was not paying attention, he would immediately correct even the slightest mistake in their Quranic recitation, showing that he was listening intently.

Huzooraa also mentioned having seen Hazrat Maulvi Muhammad Hussainra, who lived to a very old age and recalled a meeting with Hazrat Mirza Bashir Ahmadra when he was about 11 or 12 years old. He remembered the immense humility of Hazrat Mirza Bashir Ahmadra, who, despite his great status, would ask even the children to pray for his health and for Allah to make his life easy. These, Huzooraa said, were the kinds of beautiful interactions he was blessed to have with those elders.

The boundless mercy of Allah: Rewards vs punishments

A young man asked for the wisdom behind why the reward for a good deed is greater than the punishment for a bad deed.

Huzooraa explained that this is a manifestation of Allah’s infinite generosity and mercy. God Almighty desires to bestow the best of rewards upon His obedient servants. For this reason, He has decreed that a good deed will be rewarded doubly or even more, while a sin will be counted only as a single bad deed. Huzooraa pointed out that in mathematical terms, this system means that one’s good deeds can effectively nullify one’s bad deeds. This itself is a sign of Allah’s ever-merciful nature. Instead of questioning this favour, Huzooraa guided, one should be happy and deeply grateful. This divine gesture should inspire a person to thank God, increase their obedience to Him and strive to fulfil their duties to Him more than ever before.

On sportsmanship and tarbiyat

A khadim noted that sometimes during sports events at the Ijtema, arguments and poor behaviour can be observed. He asked how this can be curtailed.

Huzooraa stated that the first principle is to instil a true sportsman spirit. The sports programmes within the Jamaat are not life-and-death competitions; they are for recreation and brotherhood and should be treated as such. The more important aspect, however, is moral training. He emphasised that it is the collective responsibility of the Khuddam-ul-Ahmadiyya Amila, the parents and the Tarbiyat Department to train children from a young age to behave with dignity and grace on the sports field. Huzooraa added that while the Jamaat does have a system of punishment, such as banning teams or individuals who misbehave, the ultimate goal should be to foster such excellent moral training that these incidents do not occur in the first place.

Protecting children from materialism

A question was asked on how parents can protect their children from materialism as they pursue higher education and careers, so that they do not divert from the remembrance of Allah.

Huzooraa explained that the foundation is laid by the parents. They must teach their children the principles of Islam from a young age and set their own personal example before them. Parents must be regular in their five daily prayers and should supplicate not only for themselves but also for their children, praying that Allah may keep them on the straight path.

Alongside prayer and personal example, consistent interaction is crucial. Huzooraa guided that every day or at least once a week, the entire family should sit together to discuss matters of faith, listen to a dars, watch an MTA programme, or read from a Jamaat book. Through this regular interaction, children learn that faith is a priority in their household. When they see their parents giving precedence to their religion over all worldly matters, they will naturally follow in their footsteps.

Cherished memories of Khulafa

A khadim requested Huzooraa to share some incidents from his time with the previous Khulafa-e-Ahmadiyyat.

Huzooraa stated that it was difficult to recall specific events offhand, but he shared some blessed memories. He recalled that by the time he was old enough to be fully aware, Hazrat Khalifatul Masih IIra was often unwell, but even then, he would continue to impart counsel.

He then shared a memory of Hazrat Khalifatul Masih IIIrh. As a student, Huzoor’saa father had mentioned to Hazrat Khalifatul Masih IIIrh that he slept a lot and studied less. With a smile, Huzooraa recounted that Hazrat Khalifatul Masih IIIrh lovingly advised him to sleep as much as he needed to and then, after being fully rested, to sit down and study properly.

Huzooraa also narrated an incident from the time of the 1974 anti-Ahmadiyya riots in Pakistan. Ahmadi students had been expelled from university for their safety. Hazrat Khalifatul Masih IIIrh instructed Huzooraa to go back to the university with one or two other Ahmadi boys, reassuring him that no one would harm him. Despite his father’s concerns about the danger, Huzooraa resolved that as the Khalifa had given a command, he had to go. Just as Huzoorrh had said, he himself was not harmed by anyone. However, his two companions were caught and beaten by non-Ahmadis and ironically, a police case was then registered against them and they were jailed. In this, the word of Hazrat Khalifatul Masih IIIrh was fulfilled.

Huzooraa also spoke of his relationship with Hazrat Khalifatul Masih IVrh, both while serving as a life-devotee in Ghana and later in Rabwah. He would receive instructions from Huzoorrh and always tried his utmost to follow them completely. Huzooraa added that he would constantly pray that he might never displease the Khalifatul Masih. These, Huzooraa said, were some of the small but significant memories he could share.

Guidance for expectant parents

Guidance was sought for a newly-married couple who are expecting their first child.

Huzooraa explained that the guidance for raising children is universal, whether it is the first child or the last: parents must set a pious example before them.

However, he gave specific counsel regarding the role of the husband. He explained that a wife goes through a particularly difficult phase after childbirth and it is the husband’s duty to help her during this time. He should be humble, kind, loving and caring towards her. The husband should not expect the wife to bear the full burden of night-time feedings and nappy changes. He should help her so that she can get the rest she needs. 

The Promised Messiahas wrote that if men knew the immense pain and difficulty of childbirth, they would not be able to endure it even once. Therefore, a husband must not add to his wife’s difficulties during this time, but should foster a relationship of love and support to protect her from any form of trauma or depression.

On managing multiple responsibilities

A khadim who is working full-time and studying part-time, while also serving as Nazim Talim, asked for advice on managing these overwhelming responsibilities.

Huzooraa advised that as a young and healthy person, he has the potential and strength to manage it all. The key is organisation. He should dedicate a few hours to his studies regularly after work each day and give time to his Khuddam-ul-Ahmadiyya duties on the weekend. Huzooraa stressed the importance of creating a detailed daily schedule or chart that allocates time for work, study, sleep, prayers and service. By following a well-organised plan, he can manage all his responsibilities effectively.

Strengthening one’s bond with the Jamaat and Khilafat

The final questioner asked how to strengthen his own connection with the Jamaat and Khilafat and how to help other khuddam who do not come to the mosque regularly.

Huzooraa explained that the first and most fundamental connection must be with Allah the Almighty. If one’s relationship with Allah is strong, all other connections will follow. This is achieved by fulfilling the rights of Allah, foremost among which are the five daily prayers offered on time. By regulating one’s life, waking for Fajr and making an effort to read and understand the Holy Quran, one’s bond with the Jamaat will naturally grow, because the Jamaat is what calls us towards these very deeds.

The purpose of Khilafat is also to guide people towards Allah. By listening to and acting upon the counsels given in sermons and addresses and by praying to Allah for the capacity to do so, one’s bond with Khilafat is strengthened.

To bring other khuddam closer, one must first set their own example and then build genuine friendships with them. The mosque programmes should also be made more interactive and engaging, with question-and-answer sessions and topics that are of interest to them. Even if they are initially attracted through sports, this provides an opening for them to become attached to the mosque and they will gradually begin to participate in other programmes as well.

The mulaqat concluded with the khuddam having the honour of a group photograph and each attendee was graciously gifted a pen by Huzooraa before he took his leave.

(Summary prepared by Al Hakam)

Three Islamic remedies for everyday hardships – Guidance of Hazrat Khalifatul Masih I

0
Tanzeel Khurram, Student, Jamia Ahmadiyya UK
Three Islamic remedies for everyday hardships – Guidance of Hazrat Khalifatul Masih I 

When people face difficulties in life, they often don’t know where to turn. Their heart becomes heavy and hopelessness sets in.

Hazrat Hakeem Noor-ud-Deenra, the first Khalifa of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Jamaat, once presented three Islamic remedies a believer can use to find relief and strength during times of hardship. (Irshadat-e-Nur, Vol. 2, p. 419)

The first cure: Remain engaged in the remembrance of Allah

Huzoorra said the first cure was to always remember Allah in every condition, moment and state.

While advising the Jamaat to remember God in every situation, Hazrat Khalifatul Masih Ira once said:

“Whether you go to work or to the marketplace, whether you are standing, sitting, or lying down; whether you are travelling or at home, in health or in illness – in short, in every state, remember your God.” (Irshadat-e-Nur, Vol. 2, p. 497)

Describing some forms of zikr-e-ilahi (remembrance of Allah), Huzoorra once said:

“A believer finds peace and comfort in the remembrance of Allah. The phrases ‘La ilaha illallah’ [There is no god but Allah], ‘Alhamdulillah’ [All praise belongs to Allah], and ‘Astaghfirullah’ [I seek Allah’s forgiveness] – are all forms of the remembrance of Allah.” (Irshadat-e-Nur, Vol. 2, p. 377)

He advised that one should engage in the remembrance of Allah during times of leisure too:

“When you are free from your official or daily duties, do not waste your time in idle discussions that bring no benefit to your worldly life or your faith. Instead, turn your heart towards God. Recite ‘La ilaha illallah’ [There is no god but Allah], send durood (blessings) upon the Holy Prophetsa, do istighfar a lot [seek Allah’s forgiveness often], recite ‘Alhamdulillah’ [All praise belongs to Allah], and read the Holy Quran.” (Irshadat-e-Nur, Vol. 2, p. 386)

Urging members of the Jamaat to especially remember Allah at night to ease hardships, Hazrat Khalifatul Masih Ira said:

“If at night you remember God, your soul will draw closer to Him. When a believer turns even slightly toward God, every hardship becomes easy. Take a moment to focus your attention on Him, and all difficulties will become light.

وَاذۡکُرِ اسۡمَ رَبِّکَ وَتَبَتَّلۡ اِلَیۡہِ تَبۡتِیۡلًا

[“So remember the name of thy Lord, and devote thyself to Him with full devotion.” (Surah al-Muzzammil, Ch.73: V.9)]

“Remember Allah’s name, and in the quiet of the night, detach yourself from the world.” (Khutbat-e-Nur, p. 527)

The second cure: Read the Holy Quran often

The second cure Hazrat Khalifatul Masih Ira prescribed for difficult times was to “read the Holy Quran often.” He presented the following verse to explain this point:

وَٱتۡلُ مَآ أُوحِيَ إِلَيۡكَ مِن كِتَابِ رَبِّكَ

“And recite what has been revealed to thee of the Book of thy Lord.” (Surah al-Kahf, Ch.18: V.28)

Once, during a sermon, Huzoorra said:

“Listen – I will tell you about the armour that the Holy Prophetsa described, the armour that protects us in every hardship and sorrow. That armour is Islam. Yes, it is here in my hands – it is the Holy Quran. I believe with absolute conviction and complete satisfaction that no other book can ever equal it.” (Khutbat-e-Nur, p. 381)

Discussing how a lack of peace led to the suicides of learned Western scholars and emphasising the importance of the Quran for inner contentment, Huzoorra once said:

“What is the reason behind the suicides of Europe’s most learned philosophers? It is simply this: they could never find inner peace or tranquillity, because they had no faith in God – that very faith which, in times of pain and suffering, becomes a sweet and comforting companion.

“Remember this well: the faith and certainty brought by the Holy Quran are the true nourishment and sustenance of human nature. No nation, no religion, no creed, and no book possesses that delightful faith which, in moments of sorrow and hardship, brings to the human heart the soothing voice of God; a voice that grants comfort and reassurance.

“Just as a patient feels relief when a doctor tells him, ‘Do not worry, your illness is leaving you, you are getting better,’ so too – and far more sweetly – does God’s voice reach the ears of the believer, bringing them peace beyond measure.” (Khutbat-e-Nur, p. 43)

He further said:

“Nothing in this world surpasses the Holy Quran in light, healing, mercy, grace, and guidance – nor is there any collection of truer words than the Quran itself.” (Khutbat-e-Nur, p. 45)

On another occasion, Huzoorra said that if he ever felt physically weak, he would recite the Quran:

“The Holy Quran is my nourishment. When I feel extremely weak, I begin to recite the Holy Quran, and as I read it, strength returns to me.” (Irshadat-e-Nur, Vol. 2, p. 402)

And so, Huzoorra constantly urged the Jamaat to hold fast to the Holy Quran and to recite it often, as it would remain a constant companion in times of difficulty.

The third cure: Remain in the company of the righteous

The third cure Hazrat Khalifatul Masih Ira mentioned was to “remain in the company of pure and righteous people.”

He said:

“To remain in the company of pure and righteous people is highly beneficial. From the verse ‘And keep thyself attached to those who call on their Lord’ [Surah al-Kahf, Ch.18: V.29], we learn this lesson. Along with it, it is also necessary to keep away from the company and association of the heedless. A heedless person is one who does not remember Allah and runs after low desires.” (Irshadat-e-Nur, Vol. 2, p. 419)

In today’s age, this guidance clearly points to the importance of remaining firmly attached to the rope of Khilafat and avoiding company that weakens our faith or draws us toward worldly and materialistic pursuits. True spiritual companionship keeps the heart alive and connected to God.

Hazrat Khalifatul Masih Ira gave these three simple but powerful cures for every kind of hardship: to remember Allah often, to read the Holy Quran regularly, and to keep the company of good and righteous people. 

Through these steps, a Muslim learns that ease and comfort do not come from the world, but from turning back to God.

Resurrecting monsters: The dark side of genetic resurrection

Imran Ahsan Karim-Mirza, Australia
Resurrecting monsters: The dark side of genetic resurrection

Age of new weapons

The 20th century was a paradox of progress and peril. While it ushered in unprecedented technological and scientific advancements, it also witnessed the birth of weapons so devastating that they reshaped the course of history and redefined the boundaries of human suffering. We exist beneath the looming shadow of destructive forces, wielded and orchestrated by the world’s dominant powers.

World War I introduced industrialised warfare, where machine guns, tanks, and poison gas turned battlefields into mechanised slaughterhouses. The use of chemical weapons like chlorine and mustard gas inflicted horrific injuries and psychological trauma, marking a grim milestone in the evolution of combat.

World War II escalated the horror. Strategic bombing campaigns razed cities, and the Holocaust mechanised genocide.

But the most chilling legacy was the advent of nuclear weapons. The atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945 killed over 200,000 people, many instantly, others slowly through radiation sickness. These events not only ended the war but inaugurated the nuclear age – a period defined by the existential threat of global annihilation.

The Cold War saw the proliferation of nuclear arsenals, with superpowers locked in a precarious balance of terror. The doctrine of Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD) ensured that any conflict could escalate into a planetary catastrophe.

Meanwhile, proxy wars in Korea, Vietnam, and Afghanistan introduced new forms of guerrilla warfare and chemical defoliants like Agent Orange, leaving long-lasting ecological and human scars.

Beyond the battlefield, the century saw the rise of biological and chemical weapons – silent, invisible killers capable of mass destruction.

We stand at the threshold of a new era – one brimming with extraordinary possibilities yet shadowed by the spectre of unprecedented destructive power.

Emerging genetic technologies, such as CRISPR (Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats), hold the potential to reshape life itself. CRISPR is the guide that identifies the target DNA sequence and Cas9 is the enzyme that cuts the DNA at the targeted location.

With its power comes peril. We may unwittingly unleash forces beyond our control – creations born not of nature, but of ambition – monsters cloaked in the promise of progress.

This is not a warning born of fear, but of foresight. We must be vigilant and forewarn of the coming decades, where the line between innovation and devastation grows ever thinner, and where humanity must tread with wisdom, lest it awaken what it cannot contain. The Holy Quran states:

“‘And assuredly I will lead them astray and assuredly I will excite in them vain desires, and assuredly I will incite them and they will cut the ears of cattle; and assuredly I will incite them and they will alter Allah’s creation.’ And he who takes Satan for a friend beside Allah has certainly suffered a manifest loss.” (Surah an-Nisa’, Ch.4: V.120)

To better grasp the magnitude of potential risks, let us explore a few illustrative examples that shed light on the darker possibilities these technologies may unlock.

Genetic frontiers and the risk of unintended consequences

The woolly mammoth: Engineering the Ice Age

The woolly mammoth, extinct for over 4,000 years, is at the centre of a bold scientific mission led by Colossal Biosciences, a biotechnology company based in Dallas.

Rather than recreating a mammoth in its pure form, the goal is to engineer a cold-adapted “mammophant” – an Asian elephant genetically modified to express mammoth traits such as thick fur, subcutaneous fat, and cold tolerance.

0 2
Figure 1 Woolly Mammoth

Recent breakthroughs include the creation of “woolly mice”, genetically engineered rodents that exhibit mammoth-like traits.

These mice serve as a proof-of-concept for genome editing techniques that may later be applied to elephants. Scientists have identified key genes from mammoth DNA – retrieved from permafrost-preserved specimens – and successfully edited them into mouse genomes to produce longer, golden-coloured fur and cold-adapted fat metabolism.

Researchers hope that reintroducing mammoth-like elephants to Arctic tundra could help restore grasslands and slow permafrost thaw, thereby mitigating climate change.

However, critics caution that the ecological consequences of such reintroductions are unpredictable and potentially disruptive.

The Tasmanian Tiger: Reviving a lost predator

The thylacine, or Tasmanian tiger, was declared extinct in 1936. Now, a partnership between Colossal Biosciences and the University of Melbourne’s TIGRR Lab, led by Professor Andrew Pask, is working to bring it back.

Their approach involves sequencing the thylacine genome and editing the DNA of its closest living relative – the fat-tailed dunnart, a small carnivorous marsupial.

1 1
Figure 2 Tasmanian Tiger

In a major milestone, the team has reconstructed a 99.9% complete thylacine genome, the most accurate ancient genome to date. They also extracted long RNA molecules from a 110-year-old preserved thylacine head, enabling insights into gene expression and tissue function. Over 300 genetic edits have been made to dunnart cells, transforming them into thylacine-like cells – the most edited animal cells ever recorded.

The team is also developing marsupial artificial reproductive technologies, including inducing ovulation and culturing embryos in artificial wombs. These innovations not only support the thylacine project but could aid conservation efforts for endangered marsupials like the Tasmanian devil.

CRISPR and the genesis of tomorrow: Between resurrection and reinvention

In the unfolding story of modern science, few innovations have stirred as much awe and apprehension as CRISPR-Cas9.

The 2020 Nobel Prize in Chemistry was awarded to Dr. Emmanuelle Charpentier and Dr. Jennifer A. Doudna for their pioneering work in developing a method to precisely and efficiently edit DNA.

This revolutionary gene-editing tool, often likened to molecular scissors, allows scientists to cut, modify, and rewrite the genetic code with unprecedented precision. It is a technology that holds the promise of healing, of restoration – and of reinvention.

At the heart of this promise lies a profound ambition: to revive the extinct and to design the living. Beyond the realm of resurrection lies a more controversial frontier: the creation of designer animals.

With CRISPR, it is now possible to engineer organisms with tailored traits – whether for agriculture, companionship, or research. Imagine livestock bred for disease resistance and enhanced productivity. Yet with such extraordinary power comes a cascade of ethical dilemmas that cannot be ignored.

As we begin to shape life at the genetic level, we must ask: are we prioritising human convenience over the well-being of sentient creatures? The welfare of animals – engineered for traits we deem useful or desirable – may be compromised in ways we do not yet fully understand.

There lies another possibility – one both fascinating and deeply unsettling. If the preserved DNA of extinct animals proves too fragmented or degraded, scientists may turn to a broader strategy: analysing multiple specimens to reconstruct a complete genome.

Much like the cloning of Dolly the Sheep, this reconstructed DNA could then be used to create a living organism, gestated not in a natural womb, but in an artificial one, crafted by emerging biotechnologies.

The final word of caution

I find it deeply perplexing that many proponents of Darwinian evolution – who often engage passionately in debates with religious thinkers – remain conspicuously silent on the ethical implications of technologies like CRISPR.

These are tools that, in essence, shortcut a natural process that unfolded over nearly four billion years, shaping the intricate tapestry of life through gradual mutation, selection, and adaptation.

The emergence of traits, the differentiation of species, and the vast diversity of life were not instantaneous – they were the result of countless generations of evolutionary refinement.

Yet today, we stand on the brink of bypassing that entire journey, reconstructing life in laboratories and artificial wombs, guided not by nature, but by human ambition.

The awarding of the Nobel Prize for CRISPR is a celebration of human ingenuity – one that echoes the scientific triumphs of the early 20th century, when minds like Albert Einstein and his contemporaries reshaped our understanding of the universe.

Yet, as history reminds us, such breakthroughs are often double-edged. The same physics that unlocked the mysteries of space and time also laid the foundation for nuclear weapons – tools of immense destruction born from the pursuit of knowledge.

Such technologies, once unleashed, may not stop at restoration. They may evolve – driven not by caution, but by ambition and human greed for power. And as history has shown, when human lust for power and desire take hold of transformative tools, the consequences can be catastrophic.

Just as nuclear technology, discovered 85 years ago, was swiftly weaponised and turned into instruments of mass destruction, so too could genetic engineering be twisted into darker purposes.

The Holy Quran warns us of this very tendency: that unchecked desire for dominance leads humans to align with forces of corruption – associating with Satan, who seeks power through deception and destruction (Surah al-Qasas, Ch.28: V.84).

The monsters born of such ambition may not resemble the towering beasts of Jurassic Park – not mammoths or tyrannosaurs – but could be far more insidious.

They may be microscopic, engineered bacteria or viruses designed not to restore life, but to target and eliminate it – infecting populations, manipulating genetics, or even weaponising biology against specific ethnicities or regions.

This is not a prophecy of doom, but a call for vigilance. For in our pursuit of mastery over life, we must not lose sight of the moral compass that guides it.

CRISPR’s ability to reshape life is both exhilarating and sobering. Reviving extinct species may help heal ecological wounds, but creating designer animals could open a Pandora’s box of unintended consequences.

Hazrat Mirza Tahir Ahmadrh, Khalifatul Masih IV, warned us in his book, Revelation Rationality Knowledge and Truth. He had said:

“The possibility of changing the nature of God’s creation was not an idea that people of earlier times could have entertained. Clearly the verse [Surah an-Nisa’, Ch.4: V.120] is speaking of possibilities that had not yet dawned on the horizon of earlier eras.”

He further stated:

“[…] the possibility of man bringing about substantial changes in God’s creation has always been beyond the reach of human imagination, prior to the most recent times. The addition of genetic engineering as a new branch of scientific study is only a decade or two old.

“Yet this branch of science is moving rapidly to the stage against which a clear warning had been delivered by the Quran fourteen hundred years ago. Man has already started interfering with the plan of creation and to some measure has succeeded in altering the forms of life at the level of bacteria, insects etc. A few steps further and it may spell disaster.” (Revelation Rationality Knowledge and Truth, Hazrat Mirza Tahir Ahmadrh, p. 628)

The Holy Quran speaks of possibilities too:

“From bringing in your place others like you, and [from] developing you into a form which [at present] you know not. And you have certainly known the first creation. Why, then, do you not reflect?” (Surah al-Waqi’ah, Ch.56: V.62-63)

History has shown us that humanity’s pursuit of power, when untethered from wisdom, can turn innovation into devastation.

Just as the discovery of nuclear technology 85 years ago led not only to scientific breakthroughs but also to the creation of weapons of unimaginable destruction, so too does CRISPR and other emerging genetic technologies stand at a similar crossroads.

This time, however, the consequences could be even more profound. The ability to rewrite the genetic code of life itself – whether to resurrect extinct species or engineer new ones – places in our hands a power both magnificent and perilous.

If driven by greed or ambition, rather than guided by ethics and foresight, these tools could unleash biological forces that we neither anticipate nor control.

“Dost thou not see that Allah created the heavens and the earth in accordance with the requirements of wisdom? If He please, He can do away with you, and bring a new creation.” (Surah Ibrahim, Ch.14: V.20)

‘Placing poison in honey’: Al-Azhar journal publishes Egyptian scholar’s inadvertent testimony to Ahmadiyya scholarship

Iftekhar Ahmed, Ahmadiyya Archive & Research Centre
image 2025 10 27 14 39 06
The Ahmadiyya Muslim Jamaat’s first German translation of the Holy Quran | 1954

It strikes me that truth has a curious way of forcing itself upon even those who wish to deny it. This becomes especially clear when religious opposition meets undeniable scholarly excellence, creating what we might call a crisis of knowledge: the need to praise and condemn at the same time, to recognise brilliance whilst rejecting its source, to affirm quality whilst denying its legitimacy.

Such a crisis unfolds with remarkable clarity in Dr Muhammad Abdullah Madi’s 1959 review of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Jamaat’s first German translation of the Holy Quran, published in Majallat al-Azhar,1 the official journal of al-Azhar University. The reviewer’s credentials make this document particularly significant: Dr Madi was no peripheral figure but stood at the apex of Islamic scholarly authority. Born in 1903 in Egypt’s Beheira province, he had memorised the Quran in his village before studying under luminaries like Mahmud Shaltut – later President of Al-Azhar – at the Alexandria Institute. His educational trajectory took him from teaching at that same institute in 1930 to the universities of Berlin and Hamburg, where he earned his doctorate with distinction in 1936, specialising in Islamic history and Eastern studies. By the time of this review, he held the position of Director General of Religious Institutes, having served as Professor of History at Al-Azhar’s Faculty of Theology since 1951, and would later become Deputy of Al-Azhar itself by presidential decree in 1962.

Here, then, we have not merely any reviewer but one who represented the institutional authority of Al-Azhar – that millennium-old bastion of Sunni orthodoxy. His fluency in German, acquired during his years in Berlin and Hamburg, equipped him to assess the translation with scholarly precision. His position at the summit of the Islamic educational establishment meant his words carried institutional weight. Yet this very authority makes his review’s internal contradictions all the more revealing – a text attempting to sustain mutually exclusive positions whilst appearing coherent.

Website Thumbnails Vol 6 18
Al-Azhar University

The architecture of reluctant praise

Dr Madi’s review opens with what appears to be a straightforward scholarly assessment. He examines the 1954 translation – Der Heilige Qur’an – published under the supervision of Hazrat Mirza Bashir-ud-Din Mahmud Ahmadra, whom he cannot name without the parenthetical qualifier

(كذا)

“sic”

when referring to him as the Second Khalifa of the Promised Messiahas. Yet this very punctuation mark, this typographical grimace, reveals the central tension running throughout the review: the need to acknowledge authority whilst denying its legitimacy.

What follows is extraordinary in its surgical precision of praise. Dr Madi declares after testing various passages across different Surahs:

فوجدتها من خير الترجمات التى ظهرت للقرآن الكريم

“I found it among the best translations of the Holy Quran that have appeared.”

Coming from someone of his linguistic competence and institutional standing, this assessment carries considerable weight. Not simply acceptable, not simply adequate, but “among the best.” The superlative cannot be retracted. It stands as testimony.

He continues, noting the translation’s

أسلوب دقيق محتاط

“precise and careful style”

and its

محاولة بارعة لأداء المعنى

“skilful attempt to convey the meaning.”

These are not grudging concessions but professional assessments from one whose entire career had been devoted to Islamic scholarship. The accumulated adjectives – precise, careful, skilful – build a fortress of quality that cannot later be demolished by theological disagreement.

image 2025 10 27 14 45 54
Majallat al-Azhar, Vol. 30, no. 8

The test of jihad: Where prejudice meets precision

Most revealing is Dr Madi’s specific examination of verses relating to jihad and fighting in the way of Allah. Here, one suspects, he hoped to find his smoking gun – evidence of Ahmadi “distortion” that would justify wholesale dismissal. He approaches these verses with explicit suspicion,

بحثاً عما عساه يكون قد ضمن الترجمة مما يتصل بما يراه الأحمدية في الجهاد

“searching for what might have been included in the translation relating to Ahmadi views on jihad.”

The Ahmadi position on jihad – emphasising its spiritual and defensive dimensions whilst rejecting aggressive warfare – has long been a point of theological contention. Dr Madi clearly expected to find this interpretation smuggled into the translation, providing grounds for scholarly and religious objection. Instead, he encounters something that confounds his expectations:

فوجدتها سليمة لا تتضمن أدنى الإشارات إلى هذا الذي كنت أخشى أن تتضمنه

“I found them sound, not containing the slightest indication of what I feared they would contain.”

This admission from a scholar of his calibre is striking not for what it says but for what it demonstrates about the review’s underlying structure. Dr Madi approached the text actively, searching for flaws, bringing to bear all his scholarly expertise to hunt for ideological contamination in the most controversial areas. His failure to find such flaws – indeed, his public admission of this failure in Al-Azhar’s own journal – establishes the translation’s integrity more convincingly than any positive endorsement could achieve.

image 2025 10 27 14 44 49
Muhammad Abdullah Madi, “Al-Qur’an al-Muqaddas: Der Heilige Qur-ân,” Majallat al-Azhar, Vol. 30, no. 8

The Introduction: “Wonderful Islamic research”

The review’s treatment of Hazrat Mirza Bashir-ud-Din Mahmud Ahmad’sra extensive Introduction to the Study of The Holy Quran represents perhaps its most striking contradiction. Dr Madi, whose own doctoral dissertation had involved rigorous textual analysis and historical research, methodically catalogues the Introduction’s contents, listing its comprehensive treatment of Islamic theology, Quranic sciences and spiritual philosophy. His assessment:

بحوث إسلامية رائعة

“wonderful Islamic research.”

From someone like him, the adjective

رائعة

“wonderful”, “splendid”, “magnificent”

exceeds mere adequacy. It expresses genuine scholarly admiration.

He notes how the Introduction addresses humanity’s need for divine guidance, the corruption of previous scriptures, the preservation of the Quran, prophecies fulfilled, the nature of prayer, fasting, pilgrimage, charity, women’s rights, economic systems, the soul, divine attributes – a comprehensive presentation of Islamic thought. Each topic, he acknowledges, receives sophisticated treatment. The phrase

في ثوب وإطار إسلامى

“in an Islamic garment and framework”

confirms that this representative of Al-Azhar recognises this as authentically Islamic scholarship, not some syncretic innovation.

Yet embedded within this praise lies the review’s central tragedy. Dr Madi – recipient of the Order of the Republic First Class for his services to Islamic education – cannot simply acknowledge excellence; he must qualify it with hypothetical conditions. If only – the perpetual subjunctive of sectarian prejudice – if only the author were not who he is, what beautiful things he writes! This hypothetical framing imprisons him – he can acknowledge excellence but never accept it.

The volta: “But!”

The review’s pivot arrives with theatrical emphasis:

ولكن!

“But!”

Dr Madi even repeats it:

نعم ولكن مع الأسف الشديد

“Yes, but with great regret.”

This linguistic performance – the affirmation followed by negation, the “yes, but” structure – reveals the review’s impossible position. Great regret indeed, but regret for what? For the excellence that must be rejected? For the truth that must be denied? Or for the reviewer’s own inability to transcend the sectarian boundaries that his position at Al-Azhar required him to maintain?

The final section of the Introduction, discussing the Promised Messiahas, triggers Dr Madi’s institutional antibodies. Suddenly, all previous praise becomes irrelevant. The “wonderful Islamic research” transforms into

وضع السم فى العسل

“placing poison in honey.”

The metaphor illuminates much: even the Deputy of Al-Azhar acknowledges the honey’s sweetness whilst declaring it contaminated. Yet honey’s sweetness remains honey’s sweetness, regardless of what one claims has been added to it.

The extraordinary conclusion

The review’s conclusion represents a masterpiece of cognitive dissonance. After praising the translation as among the best available, after finding no fault even where he most expected it, after acknowledging the Introduction’s comprehensive excellence, Dr Madi calls for the book’s confiscation:

ينبغى مصادرته

“it should be confiscated.”

Yet even here, he cannot maintain consistency. He immediately qualifies:

وحبذا لو كان من المستطاع فصل هذا الجزء الأخير

“How wonderful if it were possible to separate this last section.”

He wishes to preserve the excellence whilst removing what challenges Al-Azhar’s theological assumptions. The tragedy is that he recognises the value –

لكان فيه خير كثير

“there would be much good in it”

– but his institutional position prevents him from accepting the source.

The inadvertent testimony

What Dr Madi achieves, despite himself, is to provide one of the most compelling testimonies to Ahmadi scholarship from within the Sunni establishment itself. His review, published in Al-Azhar’s official journal and carrying all the weight of his institutional authority, intended as a warning, becomes a witness. His very inability to find fault where he desperately sought it, his compulsion to acknowledge excellence even whilst calling for suppression, his recognition of authentic Islamic scholarship even whilst denying the authors’ Islamic credentials – all serve to highlight the intellectual poverty of sectarian prejudice when confronted with genuine achievement.

The significance of this testimony cannot be overstated. Here was not some marginal figure but one who had ascended through every level of Islamic scholarly authority. His training in both traditional Islamic sciences and modern Western academia prevents him from simply dismissing what his eyes read and his mind comprehends. He must acknowledge quality because quality exists independently of his theological preferences or institutional obligations.

This creates a document of extraordinary historical importance: evidence that even at the height of anti-Ahmadi sentiment in the Arab world, even from the very pinnacle of Sunni religious authority, even from one whose entire career was built within orthodox institutions, excellence could not be denied. The translation’s precision, the Introduction’s comprehensiveness, the scholarship’s authenticity – all had to be acknowledged by Al-Azhar’s own Deputy, even if immediately followed by calls for suppression.

The universal structure illuminated

Dr Madi’s review illuminates a universal pattern in religious discrimination: the simultaneous recognition and rejection of the other’s humanity, scholarship and spiritual insight. It is not ignorance that drives such prejudice but precisely the opposite – the recognition of excellence that threatens established hierarchies. The call to confiscate emerges not from finding flaws but from finding none. The demand for excision comes not from discovering poison but from tasting honey.

The great irony – and Dr Madi seems partially aware of this – is that his review serves the opposite of its intended purpose. By so thoroughly documenting the translation’s excellence whilst simultaneously calling for its suppression, this representative of orthodox Islam provides future generations with evidence of both Ahmadi achievement and establishment prejudice. His review, published in Al-Azhar’s own pages, becomes a monument to the very scholarship it attempts to deny.

Perhaps most poignantly, Dr Madi’s wish to separate the final section and preserve the rest demonstrates a deep truth: even from his position at the summit of Sunni orthodoxy, he recognises that the Islamic scholarship is genuine, the Quranic translation authentic, the theological insights valuable. His objection is not to the content but to its source – a position that indicts not the Ahmadiyya Muslim Jamaat but the institutional framework that required such intellectual contortions from even its most educated representatives.

The review thus stands as inadvertent testimony from the highest echelons of Islamic authority – evidence against its own position, witness to what it attempts to deny, proof of the very excellence it must reject. In attempting to warn against Ahmadi scholarship, Dr Madi has instead preserved for posterity one of its most compelling vindications: that even Islam’s most authoritative institutions, when confronted with Ahmadi reality rather than its caricature, cannot help but recognise its truth.

Endnotes

1.  Muhammad Abdullah Madi, “Al-Qur’an al-Muqaddas: Der Heilige Qur-ân,” Majallat al-Azhar, Vol. 30, no. 8 (Sha‘ban 1378/February 1959), pp 653-659.

Answers to Everyday Issues – Part 93: Prophet Joseph and women of Egypt, Earth’s orbit, naming of Ruhani Khazain, reading directly from the Quran in prayers, parentage and identity

Guidance regarding basic Islamic issues that Hazrat Amirul Momineen, Khalifatul Masih Vaa, has given on various occasions in his written correspondence and during MTA programmes is being published officially below for everyone’s benefit.

Click here for Part 92

What is the meaning of ‘cutting hands’ as mentioned in Surah Yusuf?

Answers to Everyday Issues – Part 93
Image: PiotrZakrzewski/Pixabay

A lady from the UK enquired of Hazrat Amirul Momineen, Khalifatul Masih Vaa, that “In Surah Yusuf, it is mentioned that the wife of Prophet Joseph’sas master placed knives in the hands of the women. Hazrat Khalifatul Masih IVrh wrote in a commentary note that these women found Prophet Josephas beyond the reach of their hands; they did not cut their hands. The question is, why did the wife of the Aziz of Egypt place knives in their hands?”

In his letter dated 7 July 2023, Huzoor-e-Anwaraa gave the following reply to this question:

“The Aziz of Egypt was among the nobles of the empire and the feast in his house was certainly no ordinary gathering; it must have been a very opulent feast. Therefore, the finest arrangements for dining would have been made according to the standards of that era, in which knives and forks would have been laid out for eating, or knives would have been placed before the guests for peeling fruit and the like. Accordingly, Hazrat Khalifatul Masih Ira, in his commentary on this verse, translating the word sikkin, states:

“‘Sikkinan: A knife. For peeling fruit.’ (Haqaiq-ul-Furqan, Vol. 2, p. 392)

“Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra, explaining the reason for the knives being present, states:

“‘She invited them to a meal or breakfast. A table was laid out and a knife was placed before each of them. (From this, it is known that the use of knives in dining has been a practice since ancient times and it was also a custom, as it is today, that the knives were laid out first and then the food items would arrive).’ (Tafsir-e-Kabir, Vol. 3, Qadian: 2004, p. 307)

“Thus, the wife of the Aziz of Egypt, in keeping with her status, arranged the finest feast for her friends, in which she also provided knives for peeling fruit and other delicacies.

“Regarding the words of the verse that they ‘cut their hands’, I should also mention that both types of explanations for this are present in the Jamaat’s literature. One meaning of cutting their hands is that upon seeing Prophet Josephas, on account of his piety and nobility, in a state of rapt absorption and out of astonishment, they bit their own fingers between their teeth and, due to his piety and nobility, found him beyond the reach of their nefarious intentions. And it is also correct that, due to the awe-inspiring power of Prophet Joseph’sas beauty, in a state of astonishment, they cut their hands instead of the fruit. Accordingly, the Promised Messiahas writes:

“‘And it was that very effect of rapt absorption that caused the companions of Zulaikha to cut their fingers.’ (Maktubat-e-Ahmad, Vol. 1, p. 594)

“Hazrat Khalifatul Masih Ira states in this regard:

“‘قَطَّعْنَ أَيْدِيَهُنَّ: This is an idiom; it means they expressed wonder and, out of astonishment, bit their hand in their mouth. Some have taken it to mean that due to wonder, the awe of his beauty and being utterly captivated, they cut their hands instead of the fruit.’ (Appendix to Badr, Qadian, No. 10, Vol. 9, 30 December 1909, p. 130)

“Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra has translated this verse in Tafsir-e-Saghir as follows:

“‘When they beheld him, they esteemed him highly and in wonderment pressed their fingers between their teeth and exclaimed: He has resisted evil for fear of Allah: He is superhuman; he must be a noble angel.’ (Tafsir-e-Saghir, p. 293 and footnote)

“Similarly, in his commentary on this verse in Tafsir-e-Kabir, he states:

“‘As for the statement that they cut their hands, it can have two meanings. One is that they were so engrossed in the sight of his innocence and nobility that the hands of some of them were injured by the knives. And it can also mean that they bit their fingers between their teeth in astonishment, as if to say, ‘How could we speak of such a person in this manner?’ Accordingly, in Arabic, the idiom ‘adda l-anamila – to bite one’s fingertips – is indeed used to express astonishment. Furthermore, it is a feature of Arabic rhetoric that the whole is sometimes used to denote a part. It is possible, therefore, that the word aydia [hands] was used here in place of anamila [fingertips].

“‘In the Talmud, which is the book of Jewish traditions, it is written that the wife of Potiphar had placed citrons before these women and had instructed them to be served. They kept gazing at him and, in their inattentiveness, injured their hands. [Midrash Tanhuma, Vayeshev 8]’ (Tafsir-e-Kabir, Vol. 3, Qadian: 2004, p. 307)

“Therefore, both interpretations of the phrase ‘cutting their hands’ are correct, based on idiomatic usage and different meanings according to the context.”

How do Islamic teachings explain the Sun’s ‘circuit’ and the Earth’s orbit?

Answers to Everyday Issues – Part 93
Image: Pixabay

Someone wrote to Hazrat Amirul Momineen, Khalifatul Masih Vaa: “The Promised Messiahas has written in Chashma-e-Ma‘rifat that ‘the Sun completes its cycle in 364 days’. However, we have always heard that the Earth takes approximately 364 days to circle the Sun. I request guidance on this matter.”

In his letter dated 7 July 2023, Huzoor-e-Anwaraa gave the following reply to this question:

“The Promised Messiahas has certainly not stated that the Sun revolves around the Earth. Rather, he stated that the Sun completes its circuit and that circuit is undoubtedly fulfilled by the Earth’s revolution around the Sun. This is precisely what the Promised Messiahas meant: that when the Earth revolves around the Sun, this apparent annual cycle of the Sun is completed in 364 days.

“Furthermore, it is this solar cycle that causes the change in seasons and the orientation of the Sun in summer and winter also differs for this reason. Accordingly, the Promised Messiahas also states at another place on this matter:

“‘And He has subjected to you the Sun and the Moon, both ever-revolving’: That is, they do not remain in one state with respect to their qualities and properties. For example, the property of the Sun in the months of spring is by no means the same as in the months of autumn. Thus, in this way, the Sun and the Moon are ever-revolving. Sometimes, from their motion, the season of spring arrives and at other times, autumn. And sometimes, one particular type of property manifests through them and at other times, its opposite properties appear.’ (Tauzih-e-Maram, Ruhani Khazain, Vol. 3, p. 75)

“The second point to bear in mind is that the Promised Messiahas is speaking here in accordance with the apparent celestial motion as perceived from Earth, a perspective tailored to the understanding of an ordinary person. From our terrestrial viewpoint, we observe the Sun rising on one horizon and setting on the other. An observer who perceives themselves as stationary on the Earth naturally concludes that the Sun is revolving around us. It is in this phenomenological context that the Promised Messiahas used this illustration to explain his point to a general audience. The actual subject he is explaining at this point in Chashma-e-Ma‘rifat is that everything in this universe is the property of God Almighty, that He has created all things and that He has set a limit for the power and function of every creature, beyond which it cannot go. It is in this context that the Promised Messiahas has given the example of the Moon and the Sun.

“Finally, I will also clarify for you that in this universe, stars and planets are in motion, each rotating on its own axis and revolving in its own orbit. The Earth’s revolution around the Sun does not mean the Sun is static while the Earth orbits it. Rather, the Earth is moving in its orbit and the Sun is also moving in its orbit. Thus, just as the Earth completes its revolution around the Sun in approximately 364 days and the Moon completes its revolution around the Earth in 29 or 30 days, so too does the Sun complete one rotation on its axis in approximately 27 days. Furthermore, the Sun is also revolving in its own vast orbit [around the galactic centre], completing one such revolution in approximately 230 million years.”

Who named the collected works of Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, the Promised Messiah (as), ‘Ruhani Khazain’?

Answers to Everyday Issues – Part 93
Image: Library

Someone from Canada sent an enquiry to Hazrat Amirul Momineen, Khalifatul Masih Vaa: “Who gave the name ‘Ruhani Khazain’ to the collection of works?”

In his letter dated 11 July 2023, Huzoor-e-Anwaraa gave the following reply:

“The collection of books authored by the Promised Messiahas first began to be published in 1957, during the era of the Khilafat of Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra, at which time the name of this collection was established as ‘Ruhani Khazain’ [Spiritual Treasures]. Its publication was then completed in 1968, in the early years of the era of Hazrat Khalifatul Masih IIIrh.

“Before and during the publication of this collection, announcements regarding it were published at various times in the Daily Al Fazl of Rabwah and it was also mentioned in the annual reports of the Sadr Anjuman Ahmadiyya, Rabwah. (Daily Al Fazl, Rabwah, 17 March 1957, p. 8; Daily Al Fazl, Rabwah, 20 April 1958, p. 4; Annual Report of the Sadr Anjuman Ahmadiyya Rabwah for 1957-58, p. 58)

“Furthermore, before the publication of this collection began, an announcement was published in the Daily Al Fazl, Rabwah, on behalf of the Al-Shirkatul Islamiyyah Limited, in which this academic collection was mentioned in these words:

“‘Allah the Exalted revealed to the Promised Messiahas, ‘فاکْتُبْ وَلْیُطْبَعْ وَ لْیُرْسَلْ فِی الْاَرْضِ’. That is, write down the revelations and insights that have been bestowed upon you and then let them be printed, published and sent to the people.

“‘The primary purpose of the establishment of the Al-Shirkatul Islamiyyah Limited is the publication of the sciences of the Holy Quran and the publication of those academic and spiritual treasures that Allah the Exalted bestowed upon the Great Reformer of this age, the Founder of the Ahmadiyya Jamaat, peace be on him, who stated:

’’’وہ خزائن جو ہزاروں سال سے مدفون تھے
اب میں دیتا ہوں اگر کوئی ملے امیدوار‘

“‘The treasures that lay buried for thousands of years, Today I give them away if I find anyone who seeks them.’ [Barahin-e-Ahmadiyya Part V, English, UK: 2018, p. 209]

“‘Therefore, those friends who purchase shares in the Al-Shirkatul Islamiyyah Limited are undoubtedly fulfilling the will of Allah the Exalted that was expressed in the aforementioned revelation.’ (Daily Al Fazl, Rabwah, 23 July 1956, p. 7)

“And since this academic and spiritual work began in the blessed era of Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra, it can be stated with certainty that the name of this academic collection would have been established as ‘Ruhani Khazain’ with the approval and guidance of Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra himself, with the aforementioned couplet of the Promised Messiahas as its likely background.”

Can one read directly from a copy of the Quran during prayers (salat)?

Answers to Everyday Issues – Part 93
Image: kolaoltion/Pixabay

Someone from the USA wrote to Hazrat Amirul Momineen, Khalifatul Masih Vaa: “I have memorised 28 surahs and some verses. Is it acceptable to read directly from a copy of the Holy Quran during voluntary prayer [nafl] with the intention of memorising and understanding it?”

In his letter dated 11 July 2023, Huzoor-e-Anwaraa bestowed the following reply to this question:

“Whether it is an obligatory prayer or a voluntary one, the general method is that a person should recite in the prayer whatever portion of the Holy Quran they have memorised. And they should continue to strive to memorise more of the Holy Quran, because memorising the Holy Quran and reciting it is also a virtuous and rewardable act. Hazrat Mufti Muhammad Sadiq Sahibra states in his book, Zikr-e-Habib:

“‘Dr Mirza Yaqub Baig Sahib once submitted to the Promised Messiahas that he was unable to memorise the long Surahs of the Holy Quran but desired to recite them in salat. He asked, ‘Is it possible for me to place the Holy Quran open on a Quran stand or a table, or to hold it in my hand, and after reciting, set it aside to perform the ruku‘ and sujud and then pick it up again for the second rak‘ah?’ The Promised Messiahas replied, ‘What is the need for that? You should memorise a few Surahs and recite those.’ (Zikr-e-Habib […], p. 136)

“In the books of Hadith and Islamic jurisprudence [fiqh], some reports [athar] are found from which it is known that some of the noble Companions, including Hazrat Uthmanra, Hazrat Anasra and Hazrat Aishara, when they would offer voluntary prayers, would have a person sit beside them with a copy of the Holy Quran who would prompt them if they forgot, or they would offer voluntary prayers in the congregation of a person who would lead them in prayer by reading from a copy of the Holy Quran. (Shaykh ‘Abd al-Wahhab al-Sha‘rani, Kashf al-Ghummah ‘an Jami‘ al-Ummah, Kitab as-salah, Fasl fi l-fathi ‘ala l-imam; Sahih al-Bukhari, Kitab al-adhan, Bab imamati l-‘abdi wa l-mawla)

“Among the Four Great Jurists, the school of thought of Imam Abu Hanifarh is that reading from the Holy Quran during prayer invalidates the prayer. Whereas, according to Imam Shafi‘irh and one view of Imam Ahmadrh, the prayer is not invalidated. And according to Imam Malikrh and another view of Imam Ahmadrh, it is permissible to do so in voluntary prayer, but it is not permissible in obligatory prayer. (Al-Sha‘rani, Kitab al-Mizan, Bab sifati s-salah, Vol. 2, ‘Alam al-Kutub, 1989, p. 47)

“Commenting on these reports and the opinions of the jurists, Hazrat Khalifatul Masih IVrh stated:

“‘As for the issue of the reciter or the listener reading from the Holy Quran during prayer and the listener prompting after reading, in my view, the position of Imam Abu Hanifarh is correct [i.e., doing so invalidates the prayer]. The examples that are given, for instance, that Hazrat Aisha’sra slave, Dhakwan, would lead her in prayer by reading from the Holy Quran, this is not a hadith but a report [athar] and it is not such a report for which permission is proven from the Holy Prophetsa. In such important religious matters, a report does not have the same status as a hadith.’ (Letter of Hazrat Khalifatul Masih IVrh to the Secretary of the Majlis-e-Ifta’, dated 11 May 1993)

“Similarly, during the era of the Khilafat of Hazrat Khalifatul Masih IIIrh, when this matter was presented to the Majlis-e-Ifta’, Huzoorrh gave the following decision on 17 June 1971: 

“‘Reading from the Holy Quran even in voluntary prayers is not desirable [mustahabb]. Furthermore, permitting it would also defeat the purpose of encouraging the memorisation of the Holy Quran. Therefore, adopting this method is disapproved of.’ (Register of Decisions of the Majlis-e-Ifta’, p. 49, unpublished)

“Therefore, my position on this is also that one should recite in one’s prayers whatever portion of the Holy Quran one has memorised and continue to strive to memorise more of the Holy Quran.”

Why is only the father’s name used on official Islamic certificates?

Answers to Everyday Issues – Part 93
Image: Gül Işık/Pexels

A lady from Germany wrote to Hazrat Amirul Momineen, Khalifatul Masih Vaa: “Why is the mother’s name not included alongside the father’s on educational certificates issued by the Jamaat? What would be the harm in writing the mother’s name as well?”

In his letter dated 13 July 2023, Huzoor-e-Anwaraa provided the following guidance on this matter:

“There is no doubt that the father and the mother have an equal share in the birth and upbringing of a child. That is why the Holy Quran has attributed a child to both the father and the mother. As it states: 

لَا تُضَارَّ وَالِدَةٌ بِوَلَدِهَا وَلَا مَوْلُودٌ لَهُ بِوَلَدِهِ

“‘No mother shall be made to suffer on account of her child, and no father shall be made to suffer on account of his child.’ (Surah al-Baqarah, Ch. 2: V.234). In this verse, the child has been declared the possession of both the mother and the father.

“However, alongside this, where the matter of calling a child by someone’s name is concerned, the Holy Quran has clearly stated:

اُدْعُوْهُمْ لِآَبَائِهِمْ هُوَ أَقْسَطُ عِنْدَ اللَّهِ

“This means that they (the adopted children) should be called the sons of their fathers. This is a more just act in the sight of Allah. (Surah al-Ahzab: Ch.33: V.6)

“Similarly, it is also mentioned in a hadith. It is narrated by Hazrat Abu ad-Darda’ra that the Holy Prophetsa said, ‘On the Day of Resurrection, you will be called by your names and the names of your fathers, so you should choose good names for yourselves.’ (Sunan Abi Dawud, Kitab al-adab, Bab fi taghyir al-asma’, [Hadith Hadith 4948])

“Therefore, in light of these instructions from the Quran and Hadith, the child’s name and their father’s name are recorded on the educational certificates issued by the Jamaat; the mother’s name is not recorded.”

(Compiled by Zaheer Ahmad Khan, Head of Records Department, Private Secretariat, London and translated by Al Hakam)

Which chapters of the Holy Quran did Prophet Muhammad recite in salat?

0

Abdul Muqtadir, Student Jamia Ahmadiyya Canada

Which chapters of the Holy Quran did Prophet Muhammad recite in salat?

This article presents various ahadith of the Holy Prophet Muhammadsa with regard to some chapters and portions of the Holy Quran that he would recite in the five daily prayers as well as the Jumuah and Eid prayers.

This is merely a selection of some passages that the Prophetsa used to recite, not a comprehensive list of all portions he is reported to have recited throughout his life.

Fajr

1. Surah al-Ikhlas and Surah al-Kafirun:

It was narrated that Aishara said: “The Messengersa of Allah used to perform two rak’ah before Fajr, and he used to say: ‘The best two surah to recite in the two rak’ah of Fajr are: ‘Say: Allah is One’ and ‘Say: O you disbelievers.’” (Sunan Ibn Majah, Kitab Iqamat al-salat wal-sunnah fiha, Hadith 1150)

2. Surah al-Falaq and Surah an-Nas

Uqbah ibn Amir narrated that once he rode the she-camel of Allah’s Messengersa during a journey. The Holy Prophetsa said: “Uqbah, should I not teach you two of the best surahs ever recited?” He then taught me: ‘Say, I seek refuge in the Lord of the dawn,’ and ‘Say, I seek refuge in the Lord of men.’ He did not see me much pleased (by these two surahs).

“When he alighted for prayer, he led the people in the morning prayer and recited them in prayer. When the Messengersa of Allah  finished his prayer, he turned to me and said: O Uqbah, how did you see.” (Sunan Abi Dawud, Kitab al-witr, Hadith 1462)

In this narration, the Holy Prophetsa  referred to Surah al-Falaq and Surah an-Nas. 

3. Surah Qaf

In Sahih Muslim, we read that the Holy Prophetsa also recited the following in the first rak’ah:

“And the tall palm trees having flower spikes piled one above another or perhaps Surah Qaf.” (Sahih Muslim, Kitab as-salat, Hadith 457c)

4. Surah at-Takwir

‘Amr bin Huraith said: As if I am hearing the voice of the Prophet (may peace be upon him) who would recite at the morning prayer: “Oh, but I call to witness the planets, the stars which rise and set.” (Surah at-Takwir, Ch.81: V.15-16; Sunan Abi Dawud, Kitab al-salat, Hadith 817)

5. Fajr on Fridays: Surah Tanzil as-Sajdah and Surah ad-Dahr (al-Insan)

Hazrat Ibn ‘Abbasra said: the Messengersa of Allah used to recite in the morning prayer on Friday Surah Tanzil as-Sajdah and Surah ad-Dahr. (Sunan Abi Dawud, Kitab as-salat, Hadith 1074)

Narrated Hazrat Abu Hurairahra: “The Prophetsa used to recite the following in the Fajr prayer of Friday, ‘Alif, Lam, Mim, Tanzil’ (Surah as-Sajdah) and ‘Hal-ata-ala-l-Insani’ (i.e., Surah ad-Dahr)”. (Sahih al-Bukhari, Kitab al-jumu’ah, Hadith 891)

6. Fajr on Fridays: Surah Jumuah and al-Munafiqun

Hazrat Ibn Abbasra reported: “The Apostlesa of Allah used to recite in the morning prayer on Friday Surah ‘Alif-Lam-Mim, Tanzil as-Sajdah: Surely there came over the man a time’ and he used to recite in Jumuah prayer Surah Jumuah and al-Munafiqun. (Sahih Muslim, Kitab al-jumuah, Hadith 879a)

Zuhr

1. Surah Luqman and adh-Dhariyat

It was narrated that Al-Bara’ said: “We used to pray Zuhr behind the Prophetsa and we heard some of the verses from Surah Luqman and Adh-Dhariyat from him.” (Sunan an-Nasa’i, Kitab al-iftitah, Hadith 971)

2. Surah al-Buruj and Surah at-Tariq

It was narrated from Jabir bin Samurah that: “The Prophetsa used to recite ‘By the heaven holding the big stars’ and ‘By the heaven, and at-Tariq (the night-comer, i.e. the bright star)’ and similar surahs in Zuhr and ‘Asr.”

Narrated Jabir ibn Samurah: “The Messengersa of Allah used to recite in the noon and afternoon prayer: ‘By the Heaven and the Morning Star’ and ‘By the Heaven, holding mansions of the stars’ and similar surahs of equal length.” (Sunan Abi Dawud, Kitab as-salat, Hadith 805)

3. Surah al-A’la and Surah al-Ghashiyah

Abu Bakr bin an-Nadr said: “We were in at-Taff with Anas, and he led them in praying Zuhr. When he had finished, he said: ‘I prayed Zuhr with the Messengersa of Allah and he recited two surahs for us in the two rak’ahs: ‘Glorify the Name of your Lord, the Most High’ and ‘Has there come to you the narration of the overwhelming (i.e., The Day of Resurrection)?’” (Sunan an-Nasa’i, Kitab al-iftitah, Hadith 972)

Surah al-Lail

Jabir b samurah said: “When the sun declined, the Messengersa of Allah offered the noon prayer and recited the surahs ‘By the night when it covers over’ and (recited similar surahs) in the afternoon prayer, and in the other prayers except the dawn prayer which he used to prolong.” (Sunan Abi Dawud, Kitab as-Salat, Hadith 806)

Asr

1. Surah al-Buruj and Surah at-Tariq

It was narrated from Jabir bin Samurah that: “The Prophetsa used to recite ‘By the heaven holding the big stars’ and ‘By the heaven, and at-Tariq (the night-comer, i.e. the bright star)’ and similar surahs in Zuhr and ‘Asr.” (Sunan an-Nasa’i, Kitab al-iftitah, Hadith 979)

2. Surah al-Lail

Jabir b samurah said:

“When the sun declined, the Messengersa of Allah offered the noon prayer and recited the surahs ‘By the night when it covers over’ and (recited similar surahs) in the afternoon prayer, and in the other prayers except the dawn prayer which he used to prolong.” (Sunan Abi Dawud, Kitab as-salat, Hadith 806)

Maghrib

1. al-A’raf, al-Maidah and al-An’am

Marwan bin al-Hakam said: “Zaid b Thabit asked me: ‘Why do you recite short surahs in the sunset prayer? I saw the Messengersa of Allah reciting two long surahs at the sunset prayers.’ I asked him: ‘Which are those two long surahs?’ He replied: ‘al-A’raf and al-An’am.’ I ( the narrator Ibn Juraij) asked Ibn Mulaikah (about these surahs): He said on his own accord: al-Ma’idah and al-A’raf.” (Sunan Abi Dawud, Kitab as-salat, Hadith 812)

2. Mufassalat Surah

A Mufassal Surah (or Mufassalat) means short surahs of the Holy Quran mainly from the last part.

It was narrated that Abu Hurairahra said: “‘I have never prayed behind anyone whose prayer more closely resembled that of the Messengersa of Allah than so-and-so.’ (The narrator) Sulaiman said: ‘He used to make the first two rak’ah of Zuhr lengthy and the last two shorter, and he would make ‘Asr shorter; in Maghrib he would recite the short Mufassal surahs, in Isha the medium-length Mufassal surahs and in Subh the long Mufassal surahs.’” (Sunan an-Nasa’i, Kitab as-salat, Hadith 982)

Narrated Sulaiman bin Yasar: “‘So-and-so used to prolong the first two rak’ah of the Zuhr prayer and shorten the ‘Asr prayer, and recite the short surah of Mufassal at Maghrib prayer, its medium Surah at the Isha prayer, and its long ones at the Fajr prayer.’ Then Abu Hurairahra said: ‘I never prayed behind anyone whose prayer more closely resembles that of Allah’s Messengersa than this person.’” (Bulugh al-Maram, Kitab as-salat, Hadith 174)

It was narrated from Zaid bin Thabit that: “‘O Abu Abdul-Malik, do you recite: ‘Say: He is Allah, (the) One’ and ‘Verily, We have granted you al-Kawthar’ in maghrib?’ He said: ‘Yes.’ He (Zaid) said: ‘I swear by Allah, I saw the Messengersa of Allah reciting the longer of the two long surahs in it: ‘Alif-Lam-Mim-Sad.’” (Sunan an-Nasa’i, Kitab al-iftitah, Hadith 989)

Marwan bin al-Hakam narrated that: Zaid bin Thabit said: “‘Why do I see you reciting short surahs in Maghrib when I saw the Messengersa of Allah reciting the longer of the two long surahs in it?’ I said: ‘O Abu Abdullah, what is the longer of the two long surahs?’ He said: ‘al-A’raf.’” (Sunan an-Nasa’i, Kitab al-iftitah, Hadith 990)

3. Surah at-Tur

Jubair b Mut’im said: I heard the Messengersa of Allah reciting al-Tur in the sunset prayer. (Sunan Abi Dawud, Kitab as-salat, Hadith 811)

4. Surah al-Mursalat

Um al-fadl, daughter of al-Harith said:

“I heard Ibn ‘Abbas reciting wa’l-mursalat urfan.” She said: “Oh my son, you have reminded me of this surah by your recitation. This is the last surah which I heard the Messengersa of Allah reciting in the sunset prayer.” (Sunan Abi Dawud, Kitab as-Salat, Hadith 810)

Isha

1. Surah al-Shams

Abdullah bin Buraidah narrated that his father (Buraidah) said:

“Allah’s Messenger would recite: By the sun and its brightness, or similar Surah for the latter Isha (prayer).” (Jami` at-Tirmidhi, Kitab as-salat, Hadith 309)

It was narrated from Abdullah bin Buraidah, from his father, that: “The Messengersa of Allah used to recite ‘By the sun and its brightness’ and similar surahs in Isha”. (Sunan an-Nasa’i, Kitab al-iftitah, Hadith 999)

2. Surah which starts with Ha-Mim

It was narrated from ‘Abdullah that: A man came to him and said: “Last night I recited al-Mufassal in one rak’ah.” He said: “That is like reciting poetry. But the Messengersa of Allah used to recite similar surahs, twenty surahs from al-Mufassal, those that start with Ha-Mim.” (Sunan an-Nasa’i, Kitab al-iftitah, Hadith 1006)

3. A medium length mufassal Surah

It was narrated that Abu Hurairahra said: “I have never prayed behind anyone whose prayer more closely resembled that of the Messengersa of Allah than so-and-so.” (The narrator) Sulaiman said: “He used to make the first two rak’ah of Zuhr lengthy and the last two shorter, and he would make ‘Asr shorter; in Maghrib he would recite the short Mufassal surahs, in Isha the medium-length Mufassal surahs and in Subh the long Mufassal surahs.” (Sunan an-Nasa’i, Kitab as-salat, Hadith 982)

‘Abd Allah b Shaqiq said: “I asked ‘Aisha whether the Messengersa of Allah recited a whole Surah (of the Quran) in one rak’ah of the prayer. She replied: (He recited from among) the Mufassal surahs. I asked: Did he pray (at night) sitting? She replied: (he prayed sitting) when the people made him old.” (Sunan Abi Dawud, Kitab as-salat, Hadith 956)

Prohibition of reciting long verses 

It was narrated that Hudhaifah said: “I prayed with the Prophetsa one night. He started to recite al-Baqarah and I thought, ‘he will bow when he reaches one hundred,’ but he carried on. I thought, ‘he is going to recite the whole surah in one rak’ah,’ but he carried on. He started to recite an-Nisa’ and recited (the whole surah), then he started to recite Aal-e-Imran and recited (the whole surah), reciting slowly.

“When he reached a verse that spoke of glorifying Allah, he glorified Him. When he reached a verse that spoke of supplication, he made supplication. When he reached a verse that spoke of seeking refuge with Allah, he sought refuge with Him. 

“Then he bowed and said: ‘Subhana Rabbi al-Azim (Glory be to my Lord Almighty)’, and he bowed for almost as long as he had stood. Then he raised his head and said: ‘Sami Allahu liman hamidah (Allah hears those who praise Him)’, and he stood for almost as long as he had bowed. Then he prostrated and started to say: ‘Subhana Rabbi al-A’la (Glory be to my Lord Most High),’ and he prostrated for almost as long as he had bowed.” (Sunan an-Nasa’i, Kitab qiyam al-layl wa tatau’ an-nahaar, Hadith 1664)

Jabir said: “Mu’adh b Jabal used to pray along with the Prophetsa; then he returned and led us in prayer. Sometimes he (the narrator) said: then he returned and led his people in prayer. One night the Prophetsa delayed the prayer. Sometimes he (the narrator) mentioned the word ‘the night prayer’.

“Then Mu’adh prayed along with the Prophetsa, then returned to his people and led them in prayer, and recited Surah al-Baqarah. A man turned aside and prayed alone. The people said to him: Have you become a hypocrite, so and so? He replied: I did not become a hypocrite.

“He then came to the Prophetsa and said (to him): Messenger of Allah, Mu’adh prays along with you and then returns and leads us in prayers. We look after camels used for watering and work by day. He came to us leading us in prayer, and he recited Surah al-Baqarah (in prayer). He (the Prophet) said: Mu’adh, are you a troublemaker? Recite such and such ; recite such and such (surahs) The narrator Abu al-Zubair said (recite) ‘Glorify the name of the most high lord’ and ‘By the night when it covers over’. We mentioned this to ‘Amr. He said I think he mentioned it (the names of some surahs).” (Sunan Abi Dawud, Kitab as-salat, Hadith 790)

Jumuah

1. Surah al-Jumuah and Surah al-Munafiqun

It was narrated that ‘Ubaidullah bin Abu Rafi’ said: “Marwan appointed Abu Hurairah in charge of al-Madinah, and set out for Makkah. Abu Hurairah led us in prayer on Friday, and he recited Surah al-Jumu’ah in the first rak’ah, and in the second, ‘When the hypocrites come to you,’” ‘Ubaidullah said: “I caught up with Abu Hurairah when he finished and said to him: ‘You recited two surah that ‘Ali used to recite in Kufah.’ Abu Hurairah said: ‘I heard the Messengersa of Allah reciting them.’” (Sunan Ibn Majah, Kitab iqamat as-salat wa as-sunnati fiha, Hadith 1118)

2. Surah al-A’la and Surah al-Ghashiyah

Narrated Samurah ibn Jundub: “The Messengersa of Allah used to recite in the Friday prayer: ‘Glorify the name of your most high Lord’ and ‘Has the story of the overwhelming event reached you?’”. (Sunan Abi Dawud, Kitab as-salat, Hadith 1125)

It was narrated from an-Nu’man bin Bashir that: The Messengersa of Allah used to recite on the two Eids and on Friday: ‘Glorify the Name of Your Lord, the Most High’ and ‘Has there come to you the narration of The Overwhelming?’ Sometimes the two (Eid and Jumu’ah) occurred on the same day, and he would recite them (these two Surahs).” (Sunan an-Nasa’i, Kitab salat al-eidein, Hadith 1568)

3. Surah Qaf

‘Amra daughter of Abd al-Rahman reported on the authority of the sister of ‘Amra: “I memorised (surah) ‘Qaf, by the glorious Quran’ from the mouth of the Messengersa of Allah on Friday for he recited it on the pulpit on every Friday.” (Sahih Muslim, Kitab al-Jumuah, Hadith 872a)

Eid

1. Surah al-A’la and Surah al-Ghashiyah

It was narrated from an-Nu’man bin Bashir that: “The Messengersa of Allah used to recite on the two Eids and on Friday:‏

‘Glorify the Name of Your Lord, the Most High’ and ‘Has there come to you the narration of The Overwhelming?’ Sometimes the two (Eid and Jumu’ah) occurred on the same day, and he would recite them (these two Surahs). (Sunan an-Nasa’i, Kitab salat al-eidein, Hadith 1568)

Reformation with empathy: Members of Lajna Imaillah North-Rhine meet Huzoor

0
Reformation with empathy: Members of Lajna Imaillah North-Rhine meet Huzoor

Islamabad, Tilford, 20 October 2025: A group of 50 Lajna members and nasirat from the North-Rhine Region of Germany had the blessed opportunity to meet with Hazrat Mirza Masroor Ahmad, Khalifatul Masih Vaa at Islamabad, Tilford, UK.

The mulaqat commenced as Huzooraa entered the hall, extended salaam and took his seat. Huzooraa first addressed the Regional Sadr Lajna Imaillah, who introduced the delegation. Huzooraa enquired if they resided near the Rhine River, which she affirmed. The Sadr then conveyed that the attendees wished to ask some questions and Huzooraa graciously granted permission for the session to begin.

Confidentiality of letters

A Lajna member enquired about the level of confidentiality maintained for the letters sent to Huzooraa and the replies issued from his office.

Huzooraa explained that every letter passes through two or three sets of hands. The staff in his office are strictly instructed to maintain the confidentiality of all correspondence and not to discuss the contents with anyone. Given the sheer volume of letters, he noted that the office staff generally forget the specifics of most letters, unless they happen to be personally acquainted with the sender, in which case they might remember the subject of the query.

Huzooraa further clarified that if a letter is sent via the Amir of Germany, he is unaware of the confidentiality protocols in place there. However, if a letter is sent directly with a personal return address, the reply from his office is sent directly back, ensuring confidentiality. For matters of a highly sensitive nature, Huzooraa advised that the envelope should be marked as “Confidential.” This would ensure that the greatest possible care is taken.

The Importance of durood in salat

The next questioner referred to a recent address by Huzooraa at the UK Ansarullah Ijtema, where he mentioned that supplications remain suspended between the heavens and the earth without the recitation of durood. She asked if it was, therefore, necessary to recite durood at the beginning and end of every prostration for one’s prayers to be accepted.

Huzooraa affirmed that he has spoken on this matter on numerous occasions, including in Friday sermons and recently at the Ansarullah Ijtema. The recitation of durood is indeed essential for the acceptance of prayers. He cited a hadith that encourages sending blessings upon the Holy Prophetsa when making supplications. (Sunan at-Tirmidhi, Kitab al-witr, Bab ma ja’a fi fadli s-salati ‘ala n-nabiyysa, Hadith 486) Furthermore, Huzooraa referenced the Holy Quran, specifically Surah al-Ahzab, verse 57

إِنَّ ٱللَّهَ وَمَلَـٰٓئِكَتَهُۥ يُصَلُّونَ عَلَى ٱلنَّبِيِّ ۚ يَـٰٓأَيُّهَا ٱلَّذِينَ ءَامَنُواْ صَلُّواْ عَلَيۡهِ وَسَلِّمُواْ تَسۡلِيمًا

“Allah and His angels send blessings on the Prophet. O ye who believe! you [also] should invoke blessings on him and salute [him] with the salutation of peace.” 

Thus, invoking blessings is necessary for the acceptance of prayers. In this era, Allah the Almighty has sent the Holy Prophetsa as the final Prophet with the final law, making it our duty to send durood upon him.

Regarding its recitation in prostrations, Huzooraa stated that while it is not obligatory, it is a commendable practice. He narrated an incident from a gathering with the Promised Messiahas where the topic of durood was being discussed. One Companion mentioned that he dedicated half of his prayer time to reciting durood, to which the Promised Messiahas commended the practice. Another Companion mentioned his own portion and a third declared that henceforth, apart from the prescribed Quranic and masnun supplications, he would only recite durood, even in his prostrations. The Promised Messiahas replied that this was an excellent thing to do, explaining that if one recites durood with sincerity and from the heart, Allah the Almighty would, as a result, accept all of their other supplications.

The Dajjal

A young girl asked about the Ahmadiyya belief concerning the Dajjal or the Antichrist.

Huzooraa explained that the Dajjal was prophesied to appear in the era of the Promised Messiahas. He defined the Dajjal as one who lies, guides towards falsehood and presents false attractions. He equated the Dajjal with Satan. In this age, the prophecies concerning Yajuj and Majuj (Gog and Magog) and the Dajjal are being fulfilled. The great powers of the world are involved in this. The new methods, worldly attractions and false ideas presented in the name of education or progress are all deceptions of the Dajjal.

Furthermore, leading people away from religion is also a part of the Dajjal’s schemes. The rise of atheism in this age is a clear example of these deceptions, designed to distance humanity from faith to such an extent that they lose all connection to it. As a result, Christianity and Judaism have become religions in name only, as have other faiths. Only the true teachings of Islam, preserved in the Holy Quran, remain. Unfortunately, even among Muslims, adherence to these teachings is lacking. It was for this reason that the Promised Messiahas was to come in this age to combat the Dajjal and thwart his evil schemes and to establish a Jamaat that would confront him.

Huzooraa told the attendees that they are now the ones who must stand against the Dajjal. To do this, he advised them to read the Holy Quran, understand its teachings, strive to act upon them and present the beautiful teachings of Islam to the world. This constitutes the spiritual fight against the Dajjal. He stressed that it is not enough to believe simply; we must actively confront the Dajjal and prepare ourselves for this struggle.

Wisdom, courage and fear

The Regional Sadr asked about finding the right balance between courage and fear, noting that people sometimes allow fear to escalate into cowardice, while at other times they display a recklessness that can cause harm. She sought guidance on the proper limits of bravery and the appropriate level of fear of worldly matters.

Huzooraa stated that sagacity and intellect are the hallmarks of a believer. Wisdom and prudence are paramount. A permissible act, if performed in the wrong context, can become harmful. Similarly, engaging in an impermissible act is also harmful. He cited the hadith which states that speaking a word of truth before a tyrannical ruler is a great virtue. (Sunan at-Tirmidhi, Kitab al-fitan ‘an rasulillahsa, Hadith 2174) Therefore, one must first consider whether the benefit of speaking a particular truth outweighs the potential harm and whether it is more beneficial to say it publicly.

Huzooraa explained that if, for instance, one needs to point out another’s fault, especially a matter that could affect their life and lead to public humiliation, one must remember that Allah has commanded us to conceal faults. Allah is As-Sattar (the Concealer of Faults) and we should also practice this quality. Therefore, one should not expose another’s weakness publicly. If one is truly concerned, they should approach the person privately and advise them with empathy, explaining their weakness in light of Islamic teachings and the potential harm to the Jamaat.

He mentioned the guidance of the Promised Messiahas: if you see weaknesses in your people, first pray for them for forty days. Then, attempt to reform them. If that fails, the matter can be brought to the relevant office-bearers or those who can facilitate reformation. The primary effort should be one’s own, with the intention to reform, not to defame.

Huzooraa emphasised that Allah has granted intellect to a believer and has commanded us to use wisdom and beautiful exhortation. He quoted the Quranic verse: 

اِدۡفَعۡ بِالَّتِیۡ ہِیَ اَحۡسَنُ فَاِذَا الَّذِیۡ بَیۡنَکَ وَبَیۡنَہٗ عَدَاوَۃٌ کَاَنَّہٗ وَلِیٌّ حَمِیۡمٌ

“Repel evil with that which is best. And lo, he between whom and thyself was enmity will become as though he were a warm friend.” (Surah Ha Mim as-Sajdah, Ch.41: V.35) If you respond even to an enemy in a goodly manner, reconciliation and friendship can be established. Conversely, acting bluntly and foolishly like an uncultured person is mere stupidity.

He drew a parallel with the time of the Holy Prophetsa and the Rightly-Guided Khulafa, when uneducated Bedouins from the villages would sometimes act rudely. He gave the examples of one who tugged the Holy Prophet’ssa cloak so forcefully that it left a mark on his neck (Sahih Muslim, Kitab az-zakat, Hadith 1057) and another who questioned Hazrat Umarra about his garments. Huzooraa noted that some people today cite these incidents, claiming that if the Bedouins could question the Khulafa, why can they not do so now? Huzooraa asked whether any of the senior, well-trained Companions, who had benefited from the direct guidance of the Holy Prophetsa, ever questioned the Khulafa in such a manner. He stated that their training was superior and they knew the proper etiquette. The questions came from the uncultured Bedouins who lacked proper training. He advised the audience to follow the example of the learned and righteous Umarra, not the ignorant Bedouins.

Applying this principle to reforming others within Lajna, he advised that just as one would privately counsel one’s own children or siblings, so too should they advise the members of Lajna and nasirat. This is the correct method of tarbiyat. It is wrong to publicly humiliate someone for their shortcomings, such as their style of hijab or dress. Looking at them with disdain is not appropriate and will have a negative, rather than a positive, effect.

Huzooraa concluded that the role of an office-bearer is not to assert dominance but to reform with empathy. Every Lajna member should feel that her Sadr is her well-wisher and her sister and desires her betterment. This fosters a personal connection, which in turn builds a true society, fulfilling the purpose of the Jamaat’s administrative structure. By adopting this approach, office-bearers can truly represent the institution of the Jamaat and fulfil their duty as representatives of the Khalifa of the Time. Courage is necessary, but it must be paired with wisdom. Allah states in the Holy Quran that sometimes punishment is required for reformation and at other times, forgiveness is more effective. (Surah ash-Shura, Ch.42: V.41-42) One must, therefore, assess the situation and decide accordingly.

Marriage outside one’s nationality, ethnicity or caste

A Lajna member asked a question on behalf of her daughter, who was unable to attend due to illness. She explained that some parents oppose their children marrying someone from a different nationality, ethnicity or caste, even if they are an Ahmadi. She asked for guidance on how to approach parents in such a situation.

Huzooraa stated that the concepts of nationality, ethnicity or caste hold no significance when it comes to Islamic marriages. He referred to the guidance of the Holy Prophetsa, who mentioned that people typically marry for family background, wealth, or physical beauty. Sometimes a man marries for looks, sometimes out of a selfish desire for a woman’s wealth and other times because the person belongs to their own caste. People refuse to marry outside their castes, whether they are Jatt, Syed, Mughal, etc. However, the Holy Prophetsa advised giving precedence to faith. (Sahih al-Bukhari, Kitab an-nikah, Bab al-’akfa’i fi fi d-din, Hadith 5090) If one observes that a person is religious, they should proceed with the marriage. If men seek women of faith, more women will strive to be faithful. Similarly, if girls seek men of faith, more men will do the same. This, Huzooraa explained, is how a true Ahmadi Islamic society is formed.

The Promised Messiahas pointed out that one can never be certain about the authenticity of someone’s claimed caste. After a couple of generations, it becomes impossible to distinguish who might have falsely assumed a particular lineage. (Malfuzat, Vol. 1, p. 31) 

Huzooraa shared a well-known joke about a mirasi (musician family) and a tarkhan (carpenter family) from Punjab. After the partition of India, their educated children sought to marry. One claimed to be a Syed and the other a Quraishi. When the families met, they recognised each other’s true origins and questioned the false claims. One replied, “Just as you claim to be a Syed, I call myself a Quraishi.” This illustrates the flawed nature of such distinctions. After a few generations, people forget or cannot trace their origins and the world is deceived.

Therefore, the practice of refusing to marry a daughter to someone from a different caste is wrong. Castes hold no significance; there is only the Ahmadi brotherhood. If a proposal comes from a pious Ahmadi, it should be accepted. The Holy Quran states that even those whose family backgrounds are unknown are our brothers in faith and it is permissible to arrange marriages with them. 

Huzooraa concluded by sharing an anecdote about Hazrat Syed Abdus Sattar Shahra, who was the maternal grandfather of Hazrat Khalifatul Masih IVrh. He himself was in doubt about his Syed lineage. One day, he saw the Promised Messiahas who, despite not knowing him well, addressed him as “Shah Sahib.” This reassured him of his lineage because a Prophet of Allah had addressed him as such. Today, however, no one can guarantee another’s caste.

Sibling squabbles

A young nasirah asked how quarrels between brothers and sisters can be reduced.

Huzooraa advised her to offer her prayers, demonstrate good morals and to drink cold water to cool any anger. He asked why quarrels happen in the first place, suggesting that she must have said something to provoke the other person. If someone starts a fight, one should cover one’s ears, step aside and refuse to engage. He cited a hadith which teaches that if one is fasting and someone quarrels or speaks rudely, they should simply state, “I am fasting,” and refuse to fight or say anything negative. (Sahih Muslim, Kitab as-siyam, Bab hifzi l-lisani li s-sa’im, Hadith 1151) The Holy Quran also teaches to “shun all that which is vain.” (Surah al-Mu’minun, Ch.23: V.4) Similarly, one should avoid vain matters, calm down and leave the scene.

He instructed her to be kind to younger siblings and respectful to older ones. If an older sibling tries to be authoritative, she should walk away. Upon learning that it was her younger brother who quarrelled with her, Huzooraa advised her to forgive him and let it go, telling him, “I forgive you.” He recounted the Quranic story of the two sons of Adam, where one threatened to kill the other. The righteous brother responded that even if his brother tried to kill him, he would not raise his hand against him and would only pray to Allah. The aggressor ultimately killed his brother but was filled with regret. Huzooraa explained that in the end, a person only feels regret for their wrongdoing. (Surah al-Ma’idah, Ch.5: V.28-32) When her younger brother grows up, he will regret having quarrelled with her. Therefore, she should forgive him from the outset.

Teaching children about cleanliness

A Lajna member noted that sometimes young boys are ignorant of fundamental matters, such as physical cleanliness, which can later lead to marital problems. She asked for guidance on how such matters can be taught to children from a young age.

Huzooraa stated that it is the responsibility of parents to teach these things. He pointed out that religious literature is available and the auxiliary organisations of Atfal-ul-Ahmadiyya and Khuddam-ul-Ahmadiyya also provide instruction on these topics, including matters of jurisprudence. If parents share a close relationship with their children, they can explain these things to them. Mothers can teach their daughters about cleanliness and fathers can explain matters to their sons, especially if the mothers are hesitant.

This moral training (tarbiyat) begins at home. No one will come from outside to deliver a sermon on cleanliness. Parents should use their own wisdom and effort and ponder their responsibilities in this regard. Realising this responsibility is the first step in the moral training of children. These matters should be explained to them in their childhood. As boys and girls pass through different stages of their youth, parents should explain things to them accordingly, in small steps. If parents still feel embarrassed to have these discussions, Huzooraa suggested writing a message and leaving it by their bedside. In the message, they can explain the Islamic teachings on cleanliness for both boys and girls. He said that there should be no embarrassment in imparting essential religious and moral training. Writing a note is a practical way to overcome this hesitation and ensure children learn these important Islamic teachings.

The beard in Islam

A Lajna member asked if it is obligatory [fardh] for men to keep a beard, as many Ahmadi men do not seem to take it seriously.

Huzooraa clarified that keeping a beard is not fardh, but it is a sunnah (a practice of the Holy Prophetsa). He recounted an incident where someone complained to the Promised Messiahas about a person who kept a very short beard. The Promised Messiahas replied that the extent to which a person follows his example is a reflection of the extent of their connection with him.

As it is a sunnah of the Holy Prophetsa, a beard should be kept. Huzooraa shared his own experience, mentioning that the thought did not occur to him in his youth and he did not keep one. Later, the thought came to him and he started with a small beard, which he gradually allowed to grow longer. He explained that the more one tries to act upon the sunnah out of love for the Prophetsa, whose followers we are, the greater the reward. So, while not obligatory, it is certainly a sunnah. The Promised Messiahas stated that the strength of a person’s faith and their connection to him would be reflected in their efforts to emulate his practices and appearance. 

For this reason, the Jamaat has a condition that office-bearers should, as a minimum, keep a beard, unless there is a specific medical reason preventing it. This is the extent of the Jamaat’s enforcement; people cannot be forced with a stick. Otherwise, Huzooraa noted, men might also complain about being forced to keep a beard, just as some women complain about being “forced” to observe hijab. However, Huzooraa clarified, there is no force; rather, hijab is a Quranic injunction, whereas the beard is not.

Perseverance during prolonged trials

A young girl asked what one should do when a difficulty or trial becomes very prolonged and how one can remain steadfast and maintain trust in Allah.

Huzoor’saa advice was to continue praying. He cited the Promised Messiahas, who stated that the longer the delay in the acceptance of a prayer, the greater the hope that Allah the Almighty will eventually listen to it. Therefore, one must have patience and courage.

He narrated the well-known story of a saint who prayed for 30 years. On many occasions, Allah would even inform him that his prayers would not be accepted and that the trial was destined for him. One day, the saint heard this voice again and a disciple sitting with him also heard it in a visionary state of kashf. The disciple suggested that since Allah had said He would not accept the prayer, perhaps he should stop praying. The saint replied, “This is the only door I can turn to. What else do I have? If I can place my trust in anyone, it is only in Allah, not in any human.” He resolved that even if Allah did not accept his prayer, He might one day, or perhaps this was His will and he should be content with it. The true reward, he reasoned, is in the Hereafter; not everything is granted in this world. At that very moment, a voice came and both the saint and his disciple entered a revelatory state, wherein they were informed that all the prayers offered over the past 30 years had been accepted.

Huzooraa also gave the profound example of the Holy Prophetsa, who endured 13 years of immense hardship in Mecca. No Prophet was dearer to Allah than him. Even after the migration, he spent many years in battles until the Conquest of Mecca, facing constant persecution. Yet, he endured. Throughout his life, he faced sorrows related to his children, his people, his enemies and even his own relatives, but he endured and never lost his trust in Allah.

Huzooraa concluded by asking: What other path do we have? Where else can we go? We have the hope that if we face trials and tribulations in this world and if we pass the test that Allah has set for us, we will receive a great reward in the next life. The real life is the life Hereafter. Here, we will only spend 70 or 80 years. If we trust in Allah, the reward will come in the next world and insha-Allah, all will be well.

Righteous and unrighteous spouses

A Lajna member asked about the meaning of the Quranic principle that “good women are for good men and bad men are for bad women,” (Surah an-Nur, Ch.24: V.27), particularly in cases where a very righteous person finds themself married to a partner who is far from the path of faith.

Huzooraa responded by first asking whether such a person had prayed for divine guidance before agreeing to the marriage. If they had prayed and then felt content in their heart to proceed, it is possible that Allah had considered other positive qualities in the partner. However, if the partner is truly wicked, Islam provides a way out: a woman has the right to khul‘ (divorce initiated by the wife) and a man has the right to talaq (divorce).

He advised that one should always pray to Allah that if a prospective match is better for them, it should materialise and if not, that Allah should create an obstacle. If, however, someone marries based on caste, wealth, family, or physical appearance, instead of faith, they cannot then blame Allah for the outcome. The general principle stated in the verse means that a wicked person generally prefers another wicked person and such matches are common. Exceptions, of course, exist everywhere. Sometimes, righteous women end up married to wicked men. In such a situation, they should first pray for their spouse and try to counsel them. If, after sincere effort, there is no change and the wickedness reaches an extreme, then the path of separation is open.

Huzooraa clarified that Allah did not say that He had ordained a specific marriage that must take place, unless one received a divine revelation or guidance through a pious person. Therefore, one cannot blame Allah. Generally, a righteous person will not knowingly marry a wicked person. One should thoroughly investigate a prospective partner. If, despite knowing their faults, one proceeds with the marriage, it implies that they themselves are not truly righteous.

At the conclusion of the mulaqat, Huzooraa graciously gifted pens to all the attendees and chocolates to the younger girls.

(Summary prepared by Al Hakam)

The London Mosque’s imam represents Islam at the 1950 ‘World Convention of Religions’

0
Ata-ul-Haye Nasir, Ahmadiyya Archive & Research Centre
The London Mosque’s imam represents Islam at the 1950 ‘World Convention of Religions’

October is a month which has great significance in relation to the Fazl Mosque – known as the London Mosque – as its foundation was laid in October 1924 and the inauguration took place in October 1926.

Since its inception, the Fazl Mosque of London has served as a great means for the spread of Islam Ahmadiyyat, not only in England, but around the world.

Focusing on the London Mission’s impact in Europe, we find that the Ahmadi missionaries serving there would get invitations to attend various conferences and interfaith gatherings as the representatives of Islam where they would highlight the beautiful and peaceful teachings of Islam.

The influx of such invitations increased manifold following the foundation-laying ceremony of the mosque in October 1924.

Just a few weeks after this ceremony, the head of the London Mission was invited to deliver lectures in Amsterdam. These lectures were delivered in May 1925.1

The London Mission continued to raise its voice to defend the honour of Islam and its Holy Foundersa, for instance, responding to the disrespectful cartoon by The Star of London in 1925 and the subsequent apology (see below) from the said newspaper.2

It was the same year when the London Mission organised a protest meeting against the inhumane killings of Ahmadis in Kabul and it was covered by the press globally.3

The Star 1
The British Foreign Office assured the Ahmadiyya Muslim Jamaat (left) that their protest over a blasphemous cartoon in The Star was unofficially raised and that the newspaper published an apology on 9 September 1925. The official transcript of The Star’s published apology can be seen on the right. | National Archives of India – This image cannot be reproduced, copied or transmitted without the written permission of the National Archives of India

This all happened in 1925 alone, exactly a hundred years ago, and one can assess the Fazl Mosque’s impact even prior to its inauguration that was held in October 1926.

In the coming years, the Ahmadi missionaries stationed at the London Mosque continued to receive invitations to attend various interfaith events as Islam’s representatives.

For instance, Ahmadi missionaries were invited to represent Islam at the Universal Religious Peace Conference of Geneva in 1928 and the World Fellowship of Faiths of London in the 1930s.

1936 Address 1
The Second International Congress of the World Fellowship of Faiths, commonly known as the World Congress of Faiths, was held in July 1936. The Ahmadi missionary, Hazrat Maulvi Abdur Rahim Dardra, was a member of the British National Council of this Congress. During this Congress, he represented Islam and read out the special message from Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra and the English rendering of a Persian poem of the Promised Messiahas during his speech on 16 July 1936. | © Archives and Special Collections at the University of Southampton Library. This image cannot be reproduced without the permission from the University of Southampton Library

World Convention of Religions on the Foundations of Peace

Another such event where the Ahmadi missionary was invited to represent Islam, was the “World Convention of Religions on the Foundations of Peace” in 1950, i.e. 75 years ago.

The Ahmadiyya Archive & Research Centre has been able to uncover historical documents related to this convention which provide significant details about this interfaith event.

This article will present some details of this event that was held from 18 to 24 August 1950, at the Denison House, 296 Vauxhall Bridge Road, London, SW1.4

In this convention, Islam Ahmadiyyat was represented by Zuhoor Ahmad Bajwa Sahib, the then imam of the Fazl Mosque, London.

London Mosque
League of Nations Records, UNO Archives

The invitation was originally received by Mushtaq Ahmad Bajwa Sahib, who served as the imam of the Fazl Mosque before Zuhoor Sahib. Mushtaq Bajwa Sahib not only participated in the preparatory events of this convention, but also sent the “Message of Goodwill” for the convention.5

Official records of this convention suggest that it aimed at the coordination of the moral and spiritual forces of the world in order to strengthen the foundations of peace. It was organised on the initiative of the Vedanta Movement – started by Swami Vivekananda who represented Hinduism at the 1893 Parliament of Religions in Chicago. The aim of this movement was to foster mutual understanding between all religions, races and nations.6

In 1949, The Civil and Military Gazette of Lahore reported about a “pacifist convention” in London, which was termed as the “prelude to a world convention of religions on the foundations of peace, to be held in London in a few months’ time.”7

According to the official report of this convention, this preliminary conference was held “with the moral support of the following sponsors: Ronald Allen, M.A., Rev. Alexander Amias, Rev. W. M. Andrew, Swami Avyaktananda, Imam M. A. Bajwa, Dr. S. P. Bhatia, Dame Elizabeth Cadbury […].”8

London Mosque
League of Nations Records, UNO Archives

The committee of this convention included Swami Avyaktananda (Chairman), Vyvyen Jenkins (Secretary) and George Smith (Assistant Secretary).9

More than 300 delegates, members and visitors from 25 countries, consisting of representatives of nine religions, and 50 religious, cultural and political organisations, assembled in London, from 18 to 24 August 1950, to discuss the problems of peace, and to devise means for constructive peace-activities throughout the world.10

As stated above, the invitation was originally received by Mushtaq Ahmad Bajwa Sahib, hence, the official records of the convention mention the following “Message of Goodwill” that was sent by him:

London Mosque Message of Goodwill
League of Nations Records, UNO Archives

“We, the representatives of the Ahmadiyya Movement under the guidance of the Hazrat Khalifatul Masih, the present Head of the Community, are trying to inculcate and develop the spiritual attitude all over the world. You have embarked upon the noble task of holding a World Convention of Religions on the Foundations of Peace. I have great pleasure in associating myself with it, as Imam of the London Mosque, and am offering full support and sympathy. I trust it will evoke quick response from the leaders and followers of great religions of the world and advance the cause of universal brotherhood and peace.”11

An announcement about this convention stated that an appeal was made to “Mr. Truman, Marshal Stalin, Mr. Attlee, Nehru and other world leaders to solve the world’s economic and political problems. The leaders of the great faiths should preach peace, and the United Nations should be developed into a world federal Government.”12

We learn from its schedule in the official records that Mushtaq Ahmad Bajwa Sahib was to deliver a speech on 20 August 1950 during the evening session of the convention, titled “Islam and World Peace”.13

Speech 1
League of Nations Records, UNO Archives

However, Mushtaq Ahmad Bajwa Sahib had to return to the Markaz in Pakistan, as we read in the South Western Star’s report about the 1950 Eid-ul-Fitr reception at the Fazl Mosque that “the present Imam, Mr. M. A. Bajwa, who has been in this country for five years, is returning to Pakistan.”14

Hence, a report of Al Fazl tells us that Mushtaq Ahmad Bajwa Sahib reached Rabwah on 16 August 1950.15

The official report of the World Convention of Religions on the Foundations of Peace makes it clear that Zuhoor Ahmad Bajwa Sahib – the missionary who reached London in June 1950 to replace Mushtaq Ahmad Bajwa Sahib – represented Islam Ahmadiyyat at this convention.16

London Mosque Zuhoor Bajwa Sahib Convention
Zuhoor Ahmad Bajwa Sahib on the left (1953)

Endnotes:

  1. De Tempel, 15 May 1925
  2. The Star, 9 September 1925
  3. Harrow Observer, 13 March 1925
  4. League of Nations Records, UNO Archives, File WILPF/072_05
  5. Ibid., File G.XIV 01/02/143
  6. Ibid., File WILPF/072_05
  7. The Civil and Military Gazette, 23 August 1949, p. 12
  8. League of Nations Records, UNO Archives, File WILPF/072_05
  9. Ibid.
  10. Ibid.
  11. Ibid., File G.XIV 01/02/143
  12. Belfast News-Letter, 19 August 1950, p. 6
  13. League of Nations Records, UNO Archives, File G.XIV 01/02/143
  14. South Western Star, 21 July 1950, p. 5
  15. Al Fazl, 16 August 1950
  16. League of Nations Records, UNO Archives, File G.XIV 01/02/143