Home Blog Page 2

National Flag Day observed by Ahmadis in Kosovo

0
Jinahuddin Saif, Missionary, Kosovo
National Flag Day observed by Ahmadis in Kosovo

On 30 November 2025, Jamaat-e-Ahmadiyya Kosovo marked National Flag Day with a special programme held at the Jamaat Center in Prishtina.

Members and guests from several regions participated in the gathering, which focused on Islamic teachings regarding patriotism, loyalty and service to one’s homeland. Among the attendees was Lt Mr Imer Zeqiri from the Kosovo Police, whose presence added further significance to the occasion.

The programme was conducted by Besmir Yvejsi Sahib, Secretary Ishaat, Jamaat Kosovo. It commenced with a recitation from the Holy Quran, followed by an address by Rexhep Hasani Sahib, Secretary Maal Jamaat Kosovo, on “The Holy Prophetsa: A perfect example of loyalty to one’s homeland.” Rexhep Sahib is a veteran of the Kosovo War, having sustained injuries in 1999 due to a grenade explosion.

The formal programme concluded with silent prayer, after which Maghrib and Isha prayers were offered. A meal was then served, followed by an engaging question-and-answer session. Participants asked questions related to the Holy Prophetsa, the Promised Messiahas, Khilafat, the importance of Jumuah, loyalty in Islam and the power of prayer. The discussion created a valuable opportunity for tabligh and spiritual reflection.

Approximately 35 members and guests attended the event, including participants from Mitrovica, Fushë Kosova, Podujeva, Prishtina and several nearby villages.

This Week in History: 19-25 December

A glimpse into the rich history of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Jamaat

This Week in History: 25 December 1907

19 December 1965: On this day, the first Jalsa Salana of the Khilafat of Hazrat Khalifatul Masih IIIrh commenced in Rabwah, continuing until 21 December. Despite some really challenging circumstances, the total attendance at the Jalsa reached 80,000. The event was prominently reported in the national news bulletin of Radio Pakistan. During his address, Huzoorrh gave the following motto to khuddam

تیرى‭ ‬عاجزانہ‭ ‬راہیں‭ ‬اس‭ ‬كو‭ ‬پسند‭ ‬آئیں۔

“He is pleased with your humble ways.” (Tadhkirah, Qadian, India, 2019, p. 961)

In the women’s session of Jalsa, speeches by Hazrat Syeda Maryam Siddiqua (Choti Apa) and Sayyida Mehr Apa were played via tape recordings. During this Jalsa, with Huzoor’srh permission, Hazrat Chaudhry Muhammad Zafarulla Khanra presented the proposal for the Fazl-e-Umar Foundation to the Jamaat members. He called for a reserve fund of 2.5 million rupees, and within a single day, pledges amounting to 1.5 million rupees were made. (Tarikh-e-Ahmadiyyat, Vol. 23, p. 326)

19 December 1991: On this day, during his tour of India, Hazrat Khalifatul Masih IVrh reached Amritsar from Delhi by a train named the Shan-e-Punjab Express. In Amritsar, Huzoorrh boarded a local train and reached Qadian at 7 pm. Thus, for the first time after the partition of India in 1947, the blessed presence of Khalifatul Masih was witnessed again in Qadian. (Silsila Ahmadiyya, Vol. 4, p. 868)

20 December 1895: On this day, the Promised Messiah’sas book, Nur-ul-Quran Part II, was published by Zia-ul-Islam Press, Qadian. Fateh Masih, a Christian missionary stationed at Fatehgarh, Gurdaspur, India, had written two letters to the Promised Messiahas, in which he resorted to offensive language regarding the Holy Prophet Muhammadsa. He spoke scurrilously about the Prophet’ssa marriages, character, and the Islamic concept of paradise. In response, the Promised Messiahas authored the second part of Nur-ul-Quran. The book comprised approximately 80 pages. (Maktubat-e-Ahmad, Vol. 1, p. 179)

21 December 1921: Tazkirat-ul-Mahdi, authored by Hazrat Pir Siraj-ul-Haq Sahibra, is a very fine and beneficial treatise, which contains the accounts and sayings of the Promised Messiahas. On this day, the second part of this book was presented to Hazrat Khalifatul Masihra. Examining it, Huzoorra said, “[Having good memory] is also an innate ability. Pir Sahib has a natural gift of committing events to memory. He remembers [the details] to such an extent that it seems as if he even remembers the actual words.” (Al Fazl, 20 February 1922, p. 7)

21 December 1944: On this day, based on one of his visions, Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra directed the Jamaat to thoroughly study the emerging Communist movement and formulate counterarguments against it. 

Huzoorra instructed the Jamaat’s scholars, jurists, teachers, professors, life devotees, and students of Madrasa-e-Ahmadiyya and Jamia Ahmadiyya to study the Communist movement critically and comprehensively. (Tarikh-e-Ahmadiyyat, Vol. 8, p. 573)

22 December 1936: King Edward VIII announced his abdication. On this day, Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra said that this abdication was a manifestation of the prophecy about the rise and fall of Christianity.

For more details, see “The abdication of Edward VIII: An Islamic take on the crisis that shook the Crown” at www.alhakam.org (4 December 2020, issue no. 142, pp. 8-11).

23 December 1959: In December 1959, Dag Hammarskjöld, Secretary-General of the United Nations, visited Monrovia, the capital of Liberia, during his official tour of African countries. On this day, Maulana Muhammad Siddiq Amritsari Sahib, the Missionary-in-Charge of the Ahmadiyya Mission in Liberia, had the opportunity to meet him and present him with a copy of the English translation of the Holy Quran and other Jamaat literature. (Ruh Parwer Yadain, p. 534)

To read more about his missionary activities, see: “Pioneer Missionaries: Part 4 – Taking Ahmadiyyat’s message to the highest echelons of society” at alhakam.org (11 November 2022, pp. 10-11).

23 December 2005: On this day, Hazrat Khalifatul Masih Vaa delivered his Friday sermon from the jalsa gah in Qadian, which was the first time that a live transmission from the jalsa gah of Qadian was broadcast throughout the world. During his Friday sermon, Huzooraa granted valuable guidance to the volunteers and guests of Jalsa Salana Qadian. (Khutbat-e-Masroor, Vol. 3, pp. 731-746 )

24 December 1902: In this day’s issue of Al Hakam (24 December 1902, pp. 11–12), it was reported, “On the night between 21 and 22 December, which was the first night of the last ten nights of Ramadan, the Promised Messiahas received the revelation:

يَأْتِيْ‭ ‬عَلَيْكَ‭ ‬زَمَنٌ‭ ‬كَمِثْلِ‭ ‬زَمَنِ‭ ‬مُوْسٰی

“[A time is coming for you which will be like the time of Moses.]

“The Promised Messiahas said, ‘I have not received this revelation before during this period of 24 or 25 years, even though I have been given the name Musa [Moses] several times in divine revelations.” (Tadhkirah, Qadian, India, 2019, p. 605)

25 December 1907: On this day, the staff of Tashheez-ul-Azhan held a meeting in Qadian. This initiative was inspired by Hazrat Mirza Bashir-ud-Din Mahmud Ahmad’sra vision to provide like-minded individuals with a platform to discuss ways to propagate the message of Islam.

The meeting commenced after Zuhr prayer, beginning with Hafiz Abdur Rahim Sahib’s presentation of the yearly report. This was followed by various speeches and poems. Hazrat Mirza Bashir-ud-Din Mahmud Ahmadra, while describing the state of affairs, drew the youth’s attention to their responsibilities and duties.

The meeting concluded with a speech by Hazrat Khalifatul Masih Ira. (Tarikh-e-Ahmadiyyat, Vol. 2, p. 508)

To read more about the history of Tashheez, see: “Hazrat Mirza Bashir-ud-Din Mahmud Ahmad: The young editor of Tashheez-ul-Azhan” at alhakam.org (16 February 2024, pp. 8-9).

25 December 1946: Dr Oscar Brunler was a renowned German inventor, as he was a multifaceted genius, with 49 patents accredited to his name. Oscar Brunler visited Qadian in 1946. On this day, Al Fazl reported that Brunler read an academic article on the subject of religion and science. This session was held in the presence and under the presidency of Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra at the Mubarak Mosque in Qadian.

To learn more about Oscar Brunlar and this visit and lecture, see: “Coming from every distant track: Dr Oscar Brunler visits Qadian and presents research at Mubarak Mosque” www.alhakam.org (20 October 2023, pp. 8-9).

Christmas and Jalsa Salana Qadian in December (1925)

0
Hazrat Maulana Abdur Rahim Dardra(1894-1955)
Christmas and Jalsa Salana Qadian in December (1925)

Christmas

Christmas (i.e., the Mass of Christ) is a Christian festival of the nativity of Jesus Christ. It is now celebrated on 25 December.

Was Jesus born on 25 December?

As to the date of Jesus’ birth, opinions differ greatly. The Basilidian Gnostics probably thought that he was born on 20 May. Others set it on 19 or 20 April. Clement of Alexandria, who condemns these as superstitious, sets it on 17 November. The author of a Latin tract written in Africa in 243 makes it by private revelation to be 28 March.

The earliest identification of 25 December with the birthday of Christ is made in a passage attributed to Theophilus of Antioch (AD 171-183). Hippolytus also says that Jesus was born on 25 December.

Celebration of Christmas

No festal celebration, however, is recorded up to the middle of the fourth century. Origen (245) is said to have regarded the idea of keeping the birthday of Christ as sinful. The festal idea has perhaps its root in the belief that the divine element was present in Christ from the very beginning, and that the divine life in him did not date from his baptism as suggested by the Epiphany feast (i.e., the feast of the presentation in the Temple).

The celebration of the feast of his human birth is also regarded as a protest against the Manichaean propaganda, the chief tenet of which was that Jesus either was not born at all, was a mere phantasm, or anyhow did not take flesh of the virgin Mary.

Christmas in Britain

It is interesting to note that to Britons it is something more than a Christian festival. Bede says:

“In Britain, the 25th of December was a festival long before the conversion to Christianity.”

The ancient Britons began their year on 25 December. That is why the English Puritans forbade any merriment or religious services by Act of Parliament in 1644. They thought it a heathen festival and ordered it to be kept as a fast.

However, the feast was revived by Charles II. From the middle of November, preparations are now begun for Christmas. Shopkeepers broadcast their advertisements for the novelties, the toys and the gifts to be sold on this occasion. The richest and the poorest set about in search of some suitable presents for their dear ones. Something new or novel, something precious or useful, something sweet or beautiful, and something which is full of meaning. If any of these cannot be afforded, a Christmas card bearing the sincerest good wishes of the humblest Christian is considered to be an indispensable present which must be sent at home or abroad in sweet and loving remembrance of his relations:

“A few brief words I here am sending,

But may the token small contrive,

To bear my wishes that from Christmas,

You the best of joys derive.”

Christmas puddings and Christmas trees are prepared in every home. The Postmaster-General is busy employing thousands more men for the prompt and satisfactory delivery of the millions and billions of presents bought now for the memorable day. To avoid previous mistakes and complaints, he is emphasising the necessity of early posting, yet the post offices are bound to be overcrowded as usual on Christmas Eve.

The telegraph companies reduce their rates to enable all to send cables to their dear ones overseas on this happy day.

In short, with all kinds of increased facilities, the whole of Christendom indulges these days wholeheartedly in every kind of earthly merriment and enjoyment.

Forgetting the true mission of Jesus

Few, however, know […] for what Jesus was born and what he tried to achieve. People worship their own individual fancies and their own desires, while the mission of Jesus – in fact, the message of all the Prophets – was the mission of sacrifice and complete submission to the will of God. And it is this which the world, even now, as ever, stands in need of.

Hazrat Ahmadas– Reviving the spirit of Jesus

And it is this to remind which the same Merciful God has sent the Prophet Ahmadas of Qadian, who is truly the Messiah of our age. He has brought us back to God, to the true spirit of sacrifice and complete submission to His will. By the force of his noble example, people have been again enthused and inspired to devote themselves body and soul to the cause of God. By believing in him alone, we believe in Jesus and by seeing his face, we indeed see the face of all the chosen prophets of God.

Why believers gather in December for Jalsa Salana Qadian

And it is a striking coincidence that people flock to his birthplace [Qadian] in the last week of December. […] The followers of Hazrat Ahmadas from all parts of the globe gather together in thousands at Qadian and sit rapt in admiration and fervour listening hours and hours to the holy spirit which descends on all those assembled there. They enjoy a happy and deep communion with, and are really at one with God the Heavenly Father.

Rediscovering the true mission of the Messiah

When the other sons of Christ play about and revel in earthly enjoyments, the true sons of God, keeping themselves away from all sorts of frivolous jovialities and bearing hardships of every kind, turn most sincerely towards purity, piety and righteousness. Living in this world, they cut themselves away from all earthly bonds and soar high above the heavens and then bring the Kingdom of God on earth.

Blessed, blessed are those who follow the footsteps of Hazrat Ahmadas, the Messiah of our age! […]

– AR Dard

(Transcribed and edited by Al Hakam from the original English, published in the December 1925 issue of The Review of Religions)

Three states of the human soul

0

There are three states of the soul: the self that incites to evil, the reproving self and the soul at rest. One state of the soul at rest is known as the soul that is pure. The soul that is pure is the one found to exist in children. It is the soul that has not been defiled by the winds of this world, and which moves forward on a smooth and level plain, without any highs or lows. The self that incites to evil is the self that has been adulterated by worldly elements. The reproving self is the self that develops a sense of understanding, reflects over its lapses, and strives and prays to save itself from vices, and is cognisant of its own weaknesses. The soul at rest is one which, by the grace of Allah, finds the strength and power to abstain from all forms of evil, and feels safe from all sorts of calamities and afflictions, and in turn, feels tranquillity and comfort at heart, with no traces of apprehension or restlessness.

(Malfuzat [English], Vol. 2, p.118)

The Holy Prophet’s (sa) Tahajjud

0

عَائِشَة رضى الله عنها أَخْبَرَتْهُ أَنَّ رَسُولَ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم كَانَ يُصَلِّي إِحْدَى عَشْرَةَ رَكْعَةً، كَانَتْ تِلْكَ صَلاَتَهُ، يَسْجُدُ السَّجْدَةَ مِنْ ذَلِكَ قَدْرَ مَا يَقْرَأُ أَحَدُكُمْ خَمْسِينَ آيَةً قَبْلَ أَنْ يَرْفَعَ رَأْسَهُ، وَيَرْكَعُ رَكْعَتَيْنِ قَبْلَ صَلاَةِ الْفَجْرِ، ثُمَّ يَضْطَجِعُ عَلَى شِقِّهِ الأَيْمَنِ حَتَّى يَأْتِيَهُ الْمُنَادِي لِلصَّلاَةِ‏.‏

Hazrat Aishara reported that, “Allah’s Messengersa of Allah used to offer eleven rak‘at; that was his prayer – meaning his night prayer. In that prayer, he would remain in prostration for so long that, before he raised his head, one of you would be able to recite fifty verses [of the Quran in that span of time]. He would also perform two rak‘at before the Fajr prayer, then lie down on his right side until the caller to prayer [muezzin] came to him.”

(Sahih Bukhari, Kitab al-witr, Bab ma ja’a fi l-witr, Hadith 994)

Friday Sermon – Muhammad (sa): The great exemplar (21 October 2025)

0

Friday Sermon

21 November 2025

Muhammadsa: The great exemplar

Friday Sermon

After reciting the tashahhud, ta‘awwuz, and Surah al-Fatihah, Hazrat Khalifatul Masih Vaa stated:

Accounts relating to the Battle of Tabuk were being mentioned. Today, I will mention further details of this journey. The attempt of the hypocrites to harm the Holy Prophetsa on this occasion has also been recorded. These details are as follows. 

In relation to the Battle of Tabuk, behind the scenes, a joint conspiracy was being hatched by the Jews, the Christians and the hypocrites. When all their schemes failed and when they were unsuccessful in putting an end to Islam and the Holy Prophetsa, as they had tried to assassinate the Holy Prophetsa on several occasions, this conspiracy was their last resort. And if, as before, divine help and succour would not be [with the Muslims], there is no doubt that this conspiracy of the hypocrites would prove to be most successful. The reason for this is that at every stage, the destruction of the Muslims was certain. We have already observed this in their previous attempts. However, the same God Who granted the Muslims an unimaginable triumph in the battlefield of Badr and Whose continuous help and succour made the Muslims triumphant all the way until the Battle of Hunain would help them again. At every occasion of danger, the very protection of Allah the Almighty was with the Holy Prophetsa. Similar incidents occurred on this occasion. 

The journey from Madinah to Tabuk was equivalent to travelling into the valley of death. Travelling safely to Tabuk and back was sufficient to leave the hypocrites utterly stunned. Furthermore, the retreat of the army supported by the Emperor of Rome, or for them not to come forward to confront [the Muslims], was another astonishing fact. Additionally, all the opposing powers living on the borders of Arabia became terrified and subsequently, most of them came to the Holy Prophetsa, sought reconciliation, paid the jizya and considered this the means for their protection. From all these incidents, the conspiracies of the hypocrites seem to have been reduced to dust. The reason for this is that the hypocrites could not even have imagined that any Muslim could have safely returned to Medina alongside the Holy Prophetsa

As such, when this army of 30,000 soldiers waves its flags of victory and [divine] support and sets off to return to Medina under the leadership of its beloved Prophetsa, the hypocrites considered it essential to shoot the last arrow in their quiver, and that was to prevent the Holy Prophetsa in any way possible from returning to Medina, God forbid. To achieve this, they conspired to assassinate the Holy Prophetsa. In fact, it is not far-fetched to say that this had been pre-planned as a final blow. That is, their first [conspiracy] was that the Muslims would die on the journey, or in Tabuk. However, if they survived and started returning, they would be killed on the way. This opinion could be true, as not all of the leaders of the hypocrites were with them. Rather, a party of the hypocrites was with them, which did not leave any stone unturned in spreading vicious propaganda against the Muslims on every occasion. However, they could not have taken such a big step if this had not been pre-planned. 

In any case, they acted upon this dangerous conspiracy in the following manner. On the journey back, there was a path in the valley which was divided into two. One was a wide, open field, and the other was a narrow path, a passage through a rugged, elevated valley.

This was also a shortcut, and the Muslim army had to pass through this mountain pass. The hypocrites devised a plan that when the entire army would be passing over the height of the pass – with the huge crowd and large number of people – they would use the darkness of the night (as the journey was happening at night). At that moment, all these hypocrites would gather near the Holy Prophet’ssa camel and somehow force his camel towards the edge of the pass and cut the ropes of the saddle. In this way, the camel would throw – God forbid – the Holy Prophetsa into the ravine, into the pit below, or fall in itself along with him. And in the darkness of the night, it would be assumed to be an accident, and no one would suspect a planned assassination.

Hazrat Urwah bin Zubair relates that when the Messengersa of Allah left Tabuk to return to Medina, a group of hypocrites intended to kill him. They had planned that they would throw him from the top of a mountain pass along the route. However, at the exact moment, Allah Almighty informed the Holy Prophetsa of the hypocrites’ plot. The Holy Prophetsa then had it announced that no one was to use the mountain pass except the Holy Prophetsa and three of his Companions. He said, “Only I will go through the pass; everyone else will go through the open valley.”

The Companions who accompanied him were Hazrat Hudhaifah bin Yaman, Hazrat Hamzah bin Amr Aslami, and Hazrat Ammar bin Yasir.

As for the rest of the army, they were to pass through a wide open plain in the valley.

Because of this sudden change of route, the hypocrites’ plan appeared to be ruined. Yet even then, they did not give up their evil intention. They immediately selected twelve or fifteen men and agreed that they would cover their faces with cloths, rush towards the mountain pass, and, according to their earlier plan, suddenly scare the camel, causing it to bolt. Their aim – God forbid – was to cause the very accident they had been hoping for.

And so, they proceeded with this plan. As the Holy Prophetsa was walking along the pass, he heard the sound of people approaching. They came near and frightened his camel, causing some of the luggage to fall. The Holy Prophetsa then instructed Hazrat Hudhaifah to attack these hypocrites and drive them away. Hazrat Hudhaifah began striking their mounts with a stick and saying, “Enemies of Allah, move aside!” He continued striking their animals.

The hypocrites realised that the Holy Prophetsa had become aware of their scheme, and they did not want to be recognised. Therefore, they quickly descended from the pass and blended into the army.

Hazrat Hudhaifah returned to the Holy Prophetsa. The Holy Prophetsa said, “Hudhaifah, strike my camel from behind, for it has become frightened, and O Ammar, guide it from the front (so that this startled camel regains its proper course).”

In one narration, Hazrat Hudhaifah relates, “When we reached the mountain pass, twelve men confronted the Holy Prophetsa in that pass. When I informed the Messengersa of Allah, he called out to them. At this, they turned their backs and fled. The Messengersa of Allah then said to us, ‘Did you recognise them?’ We submitted, ‘O Messengersa of Allah, we did not recognise them, because they had covered their faces and it was dark. But we recognised their mounts.’ (The Arabs were also very good at recognising people’s mounts.) He said, ‘These people will remain hypocrites until the Day of Resurrection. And do you know what their intention was?’” 

Then he enquired from the Companions who were with him in relation to this. He further relates, “We submitted, ‘No, we do not know [who they are].’ The Messengersa of Allah said, ‘They intended to confront the Messenger of Allah in the pass and cause him to fall there.’

We submitted, ‘Will you not send a message to their tribes, instructing each tribe to send you the head of their man (so they may be punished or executed)?’ The Holy Prophetsa replied, ‘No. I do not want the Arabs to start saying among themselves that Muhammadsa has begun killing his own people.’”

According to some narrations, the Holy Prophetsa was still on his camel when revelation descended upon him. Hazrat Hudhaifah was standing nearby. The Holy Prophetsa called out, “Who is there?” He replied, “Hudhaifah.” The Holy Prophetsa then said, “I am going to tell you something in confidence. Do not mention it to anyone.” He then gave the names of each of the attackers one by one and added, “I have been forbidden from offering their funeral prayer. They are hypocrites.”

According to various narrations, the Holy Prophetsa named twelve, or thirteen, or fifteen individuals. Because the Holy Prophetsa had instructed Hazrat Hudhaifah not to reveal this secret to anyone, Hazrat Hudhaifah never disclosed the names to anyone. Even during the Khilafat of Hazrat Umarra, when Hazrat Umarra learned that Hudhaifah knew the identities, he adopted the following method: whenever someone passed away, and Hazrat Umarra had a suspicion that the deceased might be among those individuals, he would take Hudhaifah by the arm and bring him along to the funeral. If Hudhaifah refused to attend the funeral prayer, Hazrat Umarra would understand that this was one of those people, and he too would refrain from attending the funeral prayer.

According to a narration in Sahih Muslim, there were 14 or 15 [hypocrites], but it has also been explained that 12 of them were hypocrites who took part in this plot, and the other three were Companions who had climbed the pass at that time, but they had not heard the announcer call out that the open plain field should be taken instead of this route. Due to this, these three people were considered innocent. 

In the morning, the chief of the Aus tribe, Hazrat Usaid bin Hudair, met with the Holy Prophetsa. The Holy Prophetsa told him that the previous night, some hypocrites intended to follow the Holy Prophetsa in the mountain pass, cut his camel’s reins in the darkness of the night, and poke it with something sharp to cause it to run fast in hopes of making him fall off the camel. Upon this, Hazrat Usaid said, “O Messengersa of Allah, give every tribe the order to kill any person who was part of this plot.” He very passionately continued, “O Messengersa of Allah, will such people be left to roam freely? How much longer will we go without taking action against them, despite the fact that the hypocrites are fewer in number today and have been disgraced, while Islam has become firmly established?” The Holy Prophetsa replied, “I do not like for people to say that ‘once the battle between myself and the disbelievers concluded, Muhammad began killing his Companions’.” Hazrat Usaid said, “O Messengersa of Allah, these people are not companions. (How could they be considered to be from among your Companions?)” The Holy Prophetsa said, “Do they not profess the Islamic Creed?” Hazrat Usaidra said, “Indeed, they do, but this declaration doesn’t mean anything. (It is merely superficial; they do not profess the creed in their heart.)”

The Holy Prophetsa said, “Since they profess the Islamic creed (even if they do so superficially), I will not kill them.” (Sahih Muslim, Kitab sifati l-munafiqina wa ahkamihim, Hadith 2779; Subul Al-Huda Wa Al-Rashad, Vol. 5, Dar Al-Kotob Al-Ilmiyah, 1993, p. 466; Al-Bidaya Wa Al-Nihaya, Vol. 3, Part 5, Dar Al-Kotob Al-Ilmiyah, 2001, pp. 20-21; Al-Lu’ Lu’ Al-Maknoon Sirat Encyclopaedia, Vol. 9, Maktabah Dar-ul-Islam, pp. 542-550; Da’irah Ma’arif Sirat Muhammad Rasulullahsa, Vol. 9, Bazm Iqbal, Lahore, pp. 513-515; Ghazwah-e-Tabuk, Bashmil, Nafees Academy, pp. 189-201)

The so-called scholars of today who issue edicts to kill those who profess the Islamic Creed should bear this statement in mind. Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra states that when the hypocrites of Medina came to know that no fighting had occurred, and that the Holy Prophet Muhammadsa was returning safely, they realised that the secrets of their hypocritical ways had become known to the Holy Prophetsa, and that they would likely not escape punishment now. Thus, they stationed a few men from Medina at a distance along such a path that was extremely narrow, upon which only one rider could pass at a time. 

When the Holy Prophetsa approached this area, Allah the Almighty informed him through revelation that ahead, on both sides of the path, enemies were lying in ambush. The Holy Prophetsa instructed one Companion to go ahead and survey. That Companion ordered his mount forward quickly, and when he reached there, he saw some men hiding in exactly the manner that those who lie in ambush would sit. (There are several narrations. This was also a narration quoted by Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra.) When they saw him approaching, they fled from there. However, the Holy Prophetsa did not deem it appropriate to pursue them. When the Holy Prophetsa returned to Medina, the hypocrites who had not taken part in the battle began presenting varying excuses, and the Holy Prophetsa accepted their excuses. But now the time had come for the reality of the hypocrites to be made manifest before the Muslims. (Dibacha Tafsir-ul-Quran, Anwar-ul-Ulum, Vol. 20, p. 362)

In any case, whether the accounts say they were sitting down or if they ran away, the incident of exposing them is one in every [narration]: every effort was made to try and inflict damage to the Holy Prophet Muhammadsa in this narrow gorge (God forbid). 

As has been mentioned, following the victory at Mecca, the hypocrites’ movements intensified. And when these hypocrites observed that the surrounding tribes of Arabia – Jewish tribes included – had suffered defeat and lost their power, they began planning to seek the support of powers outside Arabia, like the Caesar of Rome. 

They also planned on establishing a permanent headquarters within Medina where they could regularly meet to contrive plans against Islam and the Muslims and store weaponry. But the headquarters should be such that the Muslims never catch any word of it. 

Hence, Abu Amir – who for some time had stayed out of the public eye – suddenly started becoming ever-present, and those who spread propaganda in favour of the hypocritical agenda started calling him Abu Amir the Ascetic. 

He suggested that the hypocrites establish their headquarters in Quba. History further records that this person was known as Abu Amir the Ascetic and belonged to the Khazraj tribe. This has been mentioned in other sermons as well. 

After the Holy Prophetsa came to Medina, Abu Amir relocated to Mecca where he instigated the tribes of the Quraish against the Holy Prophet Muhammadsa, reassuring them that they would have the full support of Abu Amir and his tribesmen, saying, “When you attack Muhammadsa we will join you.”

During the expedition to Uhud, he was with the Quraish. Upon seeing the advancement of Islam, Abu Amir became greatly distressed and began to burn in the fire of jealousy. It was he who had ditches dug on the occasion of Uhud, and the Holy Prophetsa fell into one of them and was badly injured. 

When the battle of Uhud commenced, Abu Amir called out to his tribesmen: “O my tribesmen, I am Abu Amir!” But they had become Muslims, and so responded, saying, “O mischief monger, we do not welcome your leadership.” They responded with revulsion and cursed him. Abu Amir responded, “After my departure, my nation has deteriorated.”

After this, many of those who harboured enmity toward the Holy Prophetsa from Abu Amir’s tribe left for Mecca. This actually had taken place before this instance – when Abu Amir left for Mecca, these people also left for Mecca (those who were from his tribe and had not become Muslims). They numbered approximately 50 people. There are narrations in which there is also a mention of a prayer made by the Holy Prophetsa against Abu Amir – that he should die a death of solitude away from his people.

One narration mentions that when the Holy Prophetsa arrived in Medina, Abu Amir met him and asked, “O Muhammad, to what do you invite people?”

Upon this, the Messengersa of Allah replied:

“I invite you to the religion of Abraham – the same faith which you also claim to be searching for.”

Abu Amir asked, “Are you also of that same faith?”

The Holy Prophetsa replied in the affirmative and then invited him to Islam. Abu Amir rejected this invitation. He displayed jealousy and spoke ill of the Holy Prophetsa. Abu Amir mocked the Holy Prophetsa, saying, “Whoever between us is the liar, may God cause him to die alone and outside his homeland.”

He was indicating toward the Holy Prophetsa

The Holy Prophetsa responded, “Yes, may God do so with the liar.”

Abu Amir continued to prevent the people of his tribe from following the Holy Prophetsa and kept urging them not to obey him. Meanwhile, the signs and miracles of the Holy Prophetsa were appearing increasingly with each passing day, and the number of his followers continued to grow – particularly among the very people of Abu Amir’s own tribe, who were entering Islam. Seeing this, Abu Amir became all the more enraged.

He joined hands with the hypocrites and built a mosque, which in the history of Islam came to be known as Masjid Dirar, so that he could gather people there, converse with them, and dissuade them from following the Holy Prophetsa. According to one narration, Abu Amir said to his fellow conspirators, “Build a mosque and establish it as a military base where you can prepare for war. I will go to Caesar of Rome and return with a vast army so that Muhammad[sa] and his Companions may be driven out of Medina.”

Thus, Abu Amir departed for the Roman Empire and met the Roman emperor, Caesar, in Syria. He tried to persuade him to wage war against the Holy Prophetsa and the Muslims, saying: “They are weak, poor, and few in number, whereas their enemies are many. You have nothing to fear from them. But if you do not take action against the Muslims now, it will not bode well for your empire in the future.”

Heraclius accommodated him and promised that he would indeed assist him. During this time, Abu Amir conveyed glad tidings to his co-religionists and immoral conspirators, saying that he would soon attack Medina with a mighty army. Therefore, he told them they should build a special place for him. With this intention, the hypocrites constructed a mosque in Quba – the mosque which came to be known as Masjid Dirar.

However, even this desire of his was never fulfilled. In the end, Abu Amir died alone in a foreign land, in a state of exile in Syria. He had prayed against the Holy Prophetsa, but that very curse turned back upon himself. There is a difference of opinion regarding the year of his death – some say he died in 9 AH, while others say in 10 AH – but in any case, he died in utter isolation. (Tathbit Dalail-ul-Nabuwwah, Vol. 2, Maktabat-ul-Nashir, Dar-ul-Mustafa, Cairo, p. 475; Sharah Allamah Al-Zurqani Ala’ Al-Mawahib Al-Ladunniyyah, Vol. 2, Dar Al-Kotob Al-Ilmiyah, 1996, p. 424; Al-Lu’ Lu’ Al-Maknoon Sirat Encyclopaedia, Vol. 9, Maktabah Dar-ul-Islam, pp. 552-554)

When the hypocrites completed the construction of the mosque, they came to the Holy Prophetsa and requested him to offer prayers in it. By divine wisdom, they came with this request for the inauguration of their so-called mosque at the very time when the Holy Prophetsa was preparing to set out for the expedition to Tabuk.

They said, “O Messengersa of Allah, we have built a mosque for the convenience of the sick and the needy, and for rainy nights. We wish that you would come and lead a prayer in it.”

The Holy Prophetsa replied, “I am occupied at the moment, preparing for the journey. When we return from the expedition, we shall pray there.”

When the Holy Prophetsa returned from the Battle of Tabuk and camped at a place called Dhi Awan, which was about an hour’s distance from Medina, the following verse was revealed concerning the mosque built by the hypocrites:

وَالَّذِينَ اتَّخَذُوا مَسْجِدًا ضِرَارًا وَكُفْرًا وَتَفْرِيقًا بَيْنَ الْمُؤْمِنِينَ وَإِرْصَادًا لِمَنْ حَارَبَ اللَّهَ وَرَسُولَهُ مِنْ قَبْلُ ۚ وَلَيَحْلِفُنَّ إِنْ أَرَدْنَا إِلَّا الْحُسْنَىٰ وَاللَّهُ يَشْهَدُ إِنَّهُمْ لَكَاذِبُونَ

“And among the hypocrites are those who have built a mosque in order to injure Islam and help disbelief and cause a division among the believers, and prepare an ambush for him who warred against Allah and His Messenger before this. And they will surely swear: ‘We meant nothing but good,’ but Allah bears witness that they are certainly liars.” [The Holy Quran, 9:107]

After this revelation, the Holy Prophetsa summoned Hazrat Malik bin Dukhsham and Hazrat Ma’n bin ‘Adi and commanded them to demolish Masjid Dirar.

According to some narrations, the Holy Prophetsa also sent Hazrat Asim bin ‘Adi, ‘Amir bin Sakan, Wahshi – the slayer of Hazrat Hamzah – and Suwayd bin ‘Abbas for this task.

In Sharh al-Zurqani, it is written that it is possible the Holy Prophetsa first sent the two men and later dispatched four more to assist them.

In any case, the Holy Prophetsa instructed them to proceed towards Masjid Dirar, demolish it, and set it ablaze.

Accordingly, they quickly went to the tribe of Banu Salim. Hazrat Malik said to his two Companions, “Wait for me until I return.” He went to his house, set fire to some dry palm branches, and brought them back. When they reached Masjid Dirar between Maghrib and Isha prayers, they set it on fire and razed it to the ground.

At that time, the builders of the mosque were present there, but when the fire broke out, they fled in all directions.

When the Holy Prophetsa returned to Medina, he intended to grant that site to Hazrat Asim bin ‘Adi, telling him to build his house there. But Asim bin ‘Adi excused himself, saying, “Whatever Allah the Almighty had to reveal concerning this place, He has revealed. I do not wish to make my home here, nor do I need it. Rather, grant it to Thabit bin Akram, for he has no house.”

The Holy Prophetsa then granted that land to Thabit bin Akram.

Ibn Ishaq has mentioned the names of those hypocrites who had built Masjid Dirar, and they numbered twelve in total. (Sharah Allamah Al-Zurqani Ala’ Al-Mawahib Al-Ladunniyyah, Vol. 2, Dar Al-Kotob Al-Ilmiyah, 1996, p. 424; Subul Al-Huda Wa Al-Rashad, Vol. 5, Dar Al-Kotob Al-Ilmiyah, 1993, p. 466; Al-Sirah Al-Nabawiyyah, Ibn Ishaq, Dar Al-Kotob Al-Ilmiyah Beirut, 2004, pp. 608-609; Al-Lu’ Lu’ Al-Maknoon Sirat Encyclopaedia, Vol. 9, Maktabah Dar-ul-Islam, p. 555)

The Holy Prophet’ssa vast mercy, patience, and forgiveness are luminously evident in this incident. At every step, he was confronted with dangerous conspiracies from the hypocrites – schemes that caused distress, harm, and even plots to kill him. Yet, though these hypocrites were often caught red-handed, the Holy Prophetsa would always forgive them on every occasion.

Only in cases where the security of the state or the integrity of the system was at risk did he take action, and even then only to the extent necessary to neutralise the danger – not to inflict severe punishment, though he easily could have.

Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra has discussed the conduct of the hypocrites in this regard, stating:

“God Almighty revealed to the Holy Prophetsa through revelation that the mosque in Quba, which the hypocrites had built – so that they might assemble there under the pretext of prayer and hold their hypocritical consultations – should be demolished, and that they should be compelled to pray in the other mosques of the Muslims. Yet, despite so grave a mischief, they were given neither physical nor financial punishment.” (Dibacha Tafsir-ul-Quran, Anwar-ul-Ulum, Vol. 20, pp. 362-363)

The Holy Prophetsa was fully aware of their deeds.

There is another narration in which the Holy Prophetsa expressed love for Medina and for the Ansar: After a journey of approximately two months, the Holy Prophetsa returned to Medina. As he was returning, the love that he had for Medina and its inhabitants was exhibited when, as soon as the Holy Prophetsa caught sight of Medina, he said:

هذِه طَابَةُ، وَهذا أُحُدٌ، جَبَلٌ يُحِبُّنَا وَنُحِبُّهُ.

“This is Tabah (Tabah is also one of the names of Medina, meaning pure and excellent) and this is Uhud, the mountain that loves us and we love it.” (Sahih al-Bukhari, Kitab al-maghazi, Hadith 4422)

In other words, the Holy Prophetsa had love for every part of Medina. Another aspect to this is that with the mention of Uhud, the Holy Prophetsa never forgot the stories of sincerity and loyalty that the Companions had written with their own blood in the Battle of Uhud.

In one narration it is stated that the Holy Prophetsa said: “I must reach Medina quickly, so whoever among you wishes to travel quickly with me should do so.” Then the Holy Prophetsa also said: “Shall I not tell you about the best households among the Ansar?” The Companions replied, “Certainly.” The Holy Prophetsa said, “The households of Banu Najjar.” Then he said, “The households of Banu Abd al-Ash’al.” Then he said, “The households of Banu Sa‘idah, or the households of Banu Harith bin Khazraj. And there is goodness in all the households of the Ansar.” (Sahih al-Bukhari, Kitab az-zakat, Hadith 1481, translation, Vol. 3, pp. 124-125)

In one narration the narrator states: “Sa‘d bin Ubadah met us, and Abu Usaid said, ‘Do you know that the Messengersa of Allah mentioned the excellence of the households of the Ansar and placed us at the end?’ Hazrat Sa‘d went to the Messengersa of Allah and said, ‘O Messengersa of Allah, you have mentioned the excellence of the households of the Ansar and have placed us at the end.’ (The Companions were mindful even of the order in which the Holy Prophetsa mentioned names when giving praise). Upon this, the Holy Prophetsa said, ‘Is it not enough for you that you are among the people of goodness?’” (Sahih al-Bukhari, Kitab manaqibi l-ansar, Hadith 3791; Sahih Muslim, Kitab al-fada’il, Hadith 4216, Translation, Vol. 12, p. 187)

The Holy Prophetsa said that it should suffice that he mentioned their name and included them among the people of goodness.

As mentioned at the outset, there were two major groups who remained behind from the Expedition of Tabuk: one was the group of hypocrites, regarding whom Allah the Almighty expressed His displeasure; and the second group consisted of those who were sincere in their faith and wished to partake in jihad, but either they were so poor that despite their efforts they could not find the means and resources to go, or they were unable to participate because of illness or disability. Allah the Almighty accepted their excuse in the Holy Quran in Surah at-Taubah, verses 91 and 92.

Accordingly, in a narration of Bukhari, it is stated that when the Holy Prophetsa was returning from the Expedition of Tabuk and neared Medina, he said: “There are some people in Medina who were with you whenever you undertook a journey or traversed a valley.” The Companions, astonished, said, “O Messengersa of Allah, they are in Medina, how could they be with us while remaining there?” The Holy Prophetsa replied, “They are indeed in Medina, but some sort of illness or other excuse prevented them from joining us.” (Sahih al-Bukhari, Kitab al-maghazi, Hadith4423)

Another narration states that when the Holy Prophetsa returned from Tabuk, he expressed gratitude to Allah the Almighty and said:

ٱلْحَمْدُ لِلّٰهِ عَلَىٰ مَا رَزَقَنَا فِي سَفَرِنَا هٰذَا مِنْ أَجْرٍ وَحَسَنَةٍ، وَمِنْ بَعْدِنَا شُرَكَاؤُنَا فِيهِ

“All praise belongs to Allah Who granted us reward and goodness in this journey, and Who also included those who remained behind as participants with us in this reward and goodness.” 

Hazrat Aishara submitted, “O Messengersa of Allah, you endured the hardships and difficulties of the journey and thus became deserving of this reward, but how did they come to share in this reward without having borne any hardships? And who are these people who have been included?” The Holy Prophetsa replied, “There are some people in Medina who were with us no matter where we travelled and no matter which valley we were in. Illness prevented them from going out with us. We are their warriors, and they are our companions while remaining in their homes. By Him in Whose hand is my life, their prayer against the enemy is more effective than our weapons.” The prayers they offered while remaining in their homes were such that Allah the Almighty accepted them. (Anara-tul-Duja Fi Maghazi Khair-ul-Wara, Vol. 1, Dar-ul-Minhaj, pp. 721-722; Imta’ ul Asma’, Vol. 2, Dar Al-Kotob Al-Ilmiyah, 1999, p. 79; Kitab-ul-Maghazi, Waqdi, Vol. 2, Dar Al-Kotob Al-Ilmiyah, 2004, p. 428)

Regarding the return from the Expedition of Tabuk, there is also mention of the heartfelt manner in which the people of Medina welcomed them back. It is recorded that when the Holy Prophetsa returned from Tabuk, the people of Medina, including men, women, and children, went to Thaniyah al-Wada, just outside of Medina, as they brimmed with love for the Holy Prophetsa and longed to see him and be in his blessed presence. There, they recited the following couplets:

طَلَعَ ٱلْبَدْرُ عَلَيْنَا مِنْ ثَنِيَّاتِ ٱلْوَدَاع وَجَبَ ٱلشُكْرُ عَلَيْنَا مَا دَعَا لِلّٰهِ دَاعَ

“The full moon has risen upon us from the valley of Thaniyah al-Wada. Gratitude to Allah has become obligatory upon us, so long as there remains anyone who calls unto Allah.”

The people of Medina reciting these couplets in deep love for the Holy Prophetsa is mentioned in two instances: one, when the Holy Prophetsa migrated from Mecca to Medina; and the second, when the Holy Prophetsa entered Madinah upon returning from Tabuk. Some commentators of Hadith, such as Allamah Ibn Hajar Asqalani, a commentator of Bukhari, are of the opinion that it is entirely possible that the couplets mentioned in the narration from Hazrat Aishara relate to the time when the Holy Prophetsa returned from the Expedition of Tabuk, because at that time, the people and the children welcomed the Holy Prophetsa at Thaniyah al-Wada, since those arriving from the direction of Syria were received at that location.

When the people of Medina learned of the Holy Prophet’ssa safe return from Tabuk, they came out joyfully to welcome him outside Medina at Thaniyah al-Wada, just as Hazrat Sa’ib bin Yazid narrates: “I remember that I too went with the other children to Thaniyah al-Wada to welcome the Holy Prophetsa when he was returning from the Expedition of Tabuk.” Imam Baihaqi has also recorded that the children welcomed the Holy Prophetsa with these very couplets when he returned to Medina from the Expedition of Tabuk. (Sirat Khatam-un-Nabiyyeen, Hazrat Mirza Bashir Ahmad Sahibra MA, p. 267; Justajoo-e-Madinah, Abdul Hameed Qadri, Oriental Publications, 2007, pp. 403-404; Mu’jam-ul-Buldan, Vol. 2, Dar Al-Kotob Al-Ilmiyah, p. 100)

In any case, it is entirely possible that these couplets were recited on both occasions. However, the likelihood of their being recited upon the return from Tabuk is greater because, as mentioned, the people of Medina, overwhelmed with emotion, would have come out in overflowing love to behold and welcome the Holy Prophetsa. It has been described that this journey was one regarding which the hypocrites had spread such rumours that when the good news was received that the Holy Prophetsa and the Companions had returned safely, it was as though dried crops had received rain. On this joyous occasion, the Muslims of Medina, including the children and elderly, women and men, all came out to welcome the Holy Prophetsa.

In any case, it is very possible that these couplets were also recited upon the migration from Mecca, and expressions of love could certainly have occurred on both occasions; there is no need for debate in this regard. However, it is established that after arriving in Medina, the realisation and depth of love that the Muslims attained for the Holy Prophetsa was far greater than what they had previously possessed at the time of the migration.

Insha-Allah, I will mention some other incidents and aspects from the life of the Holy Prophetsa in the future.

(Official Urdu transcript published in the Daily Al Fazl International, 12 December 2025, pp. 2-7. Translated by The Review of Religions.)

The diet dilemma: A philosophy of the limit of human reasoning

0
Ibraheem Lawal, Graduate, Mechanical Engineering
The diet dilemma: A philosophy of the limit of human reasoning

In a recent discussion I had with a colleague at an exhibition, she highlighted that cruelty to animals has often been enjoyed as a form of sport by humans, particularly bull riding. It is a spectacle in which animals are subjected to a certain level of pain or discomfort to make them aggressive for entertainment. Enjoyable as it may seem to onlookers, such practices stand in contradiction to what the Western ideology often advocates – the conservation of nature and compassion toward animals.

Interestingly, this very ideology has led some Western “extremists” to abstain from eating meat altogether and adopt a vegetarian lifestyle. My colleague also mentioned that she would love to adopt a vegetarian lifestyle in the near future. When I asked why, she explained that she believes animals should be allowed to roam freely, without fear or harm.

I responded by acknowledging that cruelty to animals is indeed inhumane and extreme. I also mentioned how, in some parts of Africa, people make rams fight as a form of entertainment. However, I did not agree with the notion that all animals should roam “freely.” In the animal kingdom, a natural hierarchy exists, a cycle of life in which one species depends on another. Carnivores eat herbivores, and the cycle continues. Every creature has been created for its own purpose and role in sustaining balance.

The Holy Quran beautifully highlights this, stating:

“And the cattle too He has created; you find in them warmth and [other] uses; and some of them you eat.” (Surah an-Nahl, Ch.16: V.6)

In the same way, humans have been created for a higher purpose – to worship God, the Cause of all causes. I was reminded of an article written by a friend, in which he explained the Russell Paradox and how it leads to an infinite regression of reasoning problems: “No doubt, relying solely on logic inevitably leads to problems – the greatest of which is, whose logic should we follow?”

This endless loop exposes the limitations of human intellect, our inability to reach absolute and perfect judgments, for we are bound to err. If we advocate for all animals to live freely, then we alter the balance of nature. This means that, in a way, we stop the lions from preying on the antelope and the antelope from grazing on the grass. This creates a kind of philosophical inconsistency that ultimately leads to extinction.

kevin grieve RdzrCogdDSo unsplash

Returning to the main topic, it is this same cruelty toward animals that has driven people to adopt extreme lifestyles, some abstaining from meat altogether in the name of mercy, while others, on the opposite end, embracing the zero-carb diet, consuming mostly meat. Proponents of each school argue from a philosophical and ethical standpoint that the other diet is not sustainable. For instance, the vegetarians often argue from an extreme negative utilitarian standpoint, arguing that to maximise happiness, we have to completely forgo the “suffering” animals are made to go through.

Porphyry, a Neoplatonic philosopher, was one of the popular proponents of vegetarianism. In his letter to his friend, Castricius Firmus, “On Abstinence from Eating Animals,” he argued that animals are rational beings and justice ought to be extended to them. (Porphyry: On Abstinence from Killing Animals, Bloomsbury, 2000, p. 80) His argument takes the form of the argument from marginal case, a proof by contradiction, which opines that “you cannot coherently believe that all humans have moral status, and that all non-humans lack moral status.”

That is, if we argue that animals can be killed based on their inability to have a concept of self, and to be logically consistent, we need to pass the same judgment towards humans with non-cognitive ability, like the senile, comatose and infants.

A counterargument to this is the argument from species normality, which argues upon the intrinsic property of the “human class”. (“The Argument from Marginal Cases: is Species a Relevant Difference”, researchgate.net, January 2011) While there are some people who, at some point in their lives, may lack the normal cognitive operation or moral agency, they still possess this intrinsic capacity and must be respected and protected.

This logical back and forth, however, does not end there, and each argument continues to be countered. It is interesting to note that Porphyry, however, does not advocate the vegetarian lifestyle for soldiers or athletes – an interesting gap explained by the Promised Messiahas.

In contrast, the carnivore community argue from an extreme human-centred egoism that the natural phenomenon requires that life be sustained by feeding on animals, and that animals lack the moral rectitude or complex mental activity that makes killing them inherently wrong. They often believe that the “good for the self” outweighs every other moral consideration.

A recent proponent of the carnivore diet is Paul Saladino, an American health influencer and former psychiatrist. In his book, The Carnivore Code, he describes plants as “poison” and advocates a meal exclusively based on meat. This has gained popularity even on social media, in modern times, with influencers like Jordan Peterson and his daughter following a strict type of carnivore diet, popularly known as the “lion diet” on TikTok.

Both extremes, as observed by the Promised Messiahas, have psychological effects. Though there may appear to be short-term benefits, long-term consequences reveal imbalances: vegetarians, often lacking certain nutrients, may develop timidity and reduced courage, while excessive meat-eaters may become overly aggressive or suffer a decline in humility and meekness. (The Philosophy of the Teachings of Islam, pp. 9-10)

The Holy Prophetsa perfectly addressed this by teaching moderation in all aspects of life. (Sahih al-Bukhari, Kitab ar-Riqaq, Hadith 6463) Likewise, the Promised Messiahas advised that human reason should be applied in its proper time and place – not to justify extremes, but to maintain harmony and balance. (The Philosophy of the Teachings of Islam, p. 101)

In essence, everything in creation has been designed with a purpose. True wisdom lies in recognising that purpose and living in moderation, neither in excess nor in neglect. And as for where philosophy goes too far, there is no better way to understand its problem save through the lens of religion.

From child-friendly to child-free: A societal shift

0
Ayezah Jehan, Germany
From child-friendly to child-free: A societal shift

Recently I drove by a newly opened children’s cafe in my small town in Germany. My initial thought was how nice it is that parents and their children have a safe space where they can drink something warm and socialise with others.

But then another thought crossed my mind: What is wrong with normal cafes? Why do parents not feel comfortable in ordinary cafes? What is the need for exclusive child friendly cafes or child friendly spaces in general. Shouldn’t every space in society be child friendly?

The child-free dream

I am sure you’ve seen or heard about it before. Child-free weddings, child-free restaurants, child-free cafes, child-free hotels and so on. It seems as if many people prefer child-free spaces now and are ready to pay premium prices for that.

Why as a society have we become so “unfriendly”? Why do mothers nowadays especially feel the need to apologise simply for having children and carrying those children outside? Why do we as people see children as a burden? We were once children too, and no doubt loud and noisy at times. Why are we now so easily triggered by the presence and sound of children?

Declining birth rates and a minority

A potential reason for this might be the declining birth rate in almost all Western and industrialised countries. In 2024 South Korea had a birth rate of 0.75, the lowest in the world, with some experts even arguing it would be the first country to go extinct.

As children increasingly become a minority, as German sociologist Aladin El-Mafaalani describes in his book Kinder – Minderheit ohne Schutz (Children – A Minority Without Protection), they are also treated as such. Our aging society fails to address the rights and needs of younger people, especially children. This can potentially cause an immense crisis in the next future as it is these children that will inherit it.

A child-free schedule

Another reason is that parents and their children can be seen as a burden to our everyday tasks. The average day in modern society is planned around the normal 9 to 5 work hours. A child is seen as a disturbance from these work hours. A child can get sick, generally have a bad day and will in any case require constant attention, especially during the early years.

This is also why the concept of all-day school has become increasingly popular in Germany. In the past, school used to end at 1 pm whilst a normal workday ends at 5 pm. If you put your children into the all-day school, you can work a fulltime job instead of a part-time job. Especially for mothers who have trouble finding a carer to look after their children while going to work, this is seen as a huge relief.

Our routines have become very fast-paced, and our daily life is strictly time-bound. In such an environment, especially where both parents are working at their jobs all day, often neither parent takes time out of their busy schedule (or has the energy) to have meaningful conversations with their children and give them due attention. In the same manner, children might not have the energy after a long and demanding school day either, which is something children themselves can feel and sense as well.

“Every child needs at least one adult who is irrationally crazy about him or her”, said the renowned psychologist Urie Bonfenbrenner.

But are we as adults able to give our children enough time to be “irrationally crazy” about them? Often the problems of children are overlooked and downplayed. “You’re just a child, what do you know about the troubles of the real world?”, is something many children have heard before. 

Whether intentionally or unintentionally, we do our best to exclude – rather even isolate – our children from our everyday life. If we keep excluding our children in this way, naturally society in general and policies will not focus on their needs and rights.

Often the term “inclusiveness” is focused on gender-based or race-based inclusion. Society and decision makers must also try to include age-based discrimination in their procedures. Children should not be seen as a burden but rather a hope for our future.

The Islamic perspective

Allah the Almighty says in the Holy Quran: “Kill not your children for fear of poverty. It is We Who provide for them and for you. Surely, the killing of them is a great sin.” (Surah Bani Isra’il, Ch.17: V.32)

This verse not only refers to killing children in the literal sense, rather according to one interpretation it refers to those who do not give proper education to their children and contribute to the latter’s moral and intellectual death. (Five Volume Commentary, Vol. 3, p. 1775)

Therefore, one does not have to “kill” their children in the literal sense to take their life away. Rather, also by neglecting their physical and moral needs, their future can also be destroyed.

Thus, if policy-makers neglect or even endanger the rights and needs of children, they are sinful. One should not just think selfishly about their own children but rather all children in society.

A relationship of trust

Nowadays, more so than ever it seems, children start asking deep and philosophical questions very early on. If parents fail to provide meaningful answers to these questions, these children start to search for answers outside of their homes, potentially at school or elsewhere. This is another factor why Ahmadi Muslim parents especially are responsible to never stop learning about their religion. It is so that they are able to answer such questions raised by their children and thus strengthen their faith.

In order for children to have the courage to ask their parents these meaningful questions, it is first and foremost the duty of the parents to establish a bond with their children based on trust and mutual respect.

Even if the child has troubles at school, if they have a strong bond with their family, they will not feel inferior and unworthy. Parents should also treat their children with due respect and attention according to their age and maturity whilst also preparing them for the future.

Child-friendly arrangements

Another way that the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community specifically tries to include children early on is by making sure that there are spaces for them and their parents.

For example, at the Jalsa Salana – the annual flagship event – organisers are always encouraged to make sure to keep their planning child friendly. On the ladies side, there is always a special marquee/hall for the youngest children, mothers are able to get warm milk for their newborns and even get a quiet place for breastfeeding. Once the kids reach a certain age, they are even encouraged to sit with the adults.

Similarly, when Hazrat Khalifatul Masihaa visits the Jalsa Gah on the ladies site on Saturdays, many fathers keep their children with them to make sure that the mothers and other female relatives can listen to Huzoor’saa words in a quieter and more attentive environment.

Thus, it is all about striking that balance which ensures children do not feel left out but rather included in the activities and day-to-day lives of their parents.

“Nations cannot be reformed without the reformation of the youth.”, as Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra famously said. These words are not merely applicable to Majlis Khuddam-ul-Ahmadiyya, rather it is applicable to everyone. Parents especially should ponder over these words and always keep in mind that they are raising the next generation of the Jamaat.

The true meaning of ‘maghfirah’: Insights from hadith and psychology

0
Mirza Usama Bashir Ahmad, Jamia Ahmadiyya UK graduate specialising in hadith
The true meaning of ‘maghfirah’: Insights from hadith and psychology

The concept of maghfirah occupies a central role in Islamic teachings and is key to the moral and spiritual reformation of all Muslims. However, this concept is often simply translated as “forgiveness,” yet the term carries a far deeper meaning. 

Maghfirah does not merely signify the erasure of past sins – it also denotes the reformation of the human soul.

The term maghfirah derives from the Arabic root غ ف ر (gha-fa-ra). The word غفر means to cover or to shield. Islamic scholars of the Arabic language, such as Imam Raghib al-Asfahani, have noted that maghfirah is fundamentally linked to the idea of a protective covering akin to the nail worn under a helmet (mighfar) in ancient times – something that does not merely hide, but also guards from future harm.

Maghfirah in relation to the Holy Prophetsa

In Sahih al-Bukhari, it is recorded that once the Companions of the Holy Prophetsa said the following to him: 

 إِنَّا لَسْنَا كَهَيْئَتِكَ يَا رَسُولَ اللَّهِ، إِنَّ اللَّهَ قَدْ غَفَرَ لَكَ مَا تَقَدَّمَ مِنْ ذَنْبِكَ وَمَا تَأَخَّرَ

“We are not like you, O Messenger of Allah! Allah has certainly covered up your shortcomings both past and future.”  (Sahih al-Bukhari, The Book of Faith, Hadith 20)

(Here, غفر has been used in the hadith and has been translated as “covered up”.) 

In the commentary of this hadith, Hazrat Sayyid Zain-ul-Abidin Waliullah Shahra says this statement of the Companionsra took place when the Holy Prophetsa attempted to guide them in response to seeing them overexert themselves in worship. In response to this guidance by the Holy Prophetsa, the Companions “responded by suggesting that he did not need to perform good deeds since he was already forgiven.” (Sahih al-Bukhari, Translation and Commentary, Vol. 1, English Edition, p. 140) And thus they had to exert themselves to perform good deeds.

The statement made by the Companionsra in the above hadith was in reference to the following verse of the Holy Quran:

اِنَّا فَتَحۡنَا لَکَ فَتۡحًا مُّبِیۡنًا

لِّيَغۡفِرَ لَكَ ٱللَّهُ مَا تَقَدَّمَ مِن ذَنبِكَ وَمَا تَأَخَّرَ

“Verily, We have granted thee a clear victory, That Allah may cover up thee thy shortcomings, past and future […]” (Surah al-Fath, Ch.48: V.2-3)

Hazrat Sayyid Zain-ul-Abidin Waliullah Shahra writes that this response from the Companions stemmed from a lack of understanding, as benefitting from Allah’s forgiveness necessitates expressing even greater gratitude to Him. (Ibid.) Meaning that the Holy Prophetsa worshipped and expressed gratitude to Allah just as the Companionsra had to, in fact, even more so.

The narration continues that on hearing the reply of the Companions, the Holy Prophetsa became angry, so much so that the anger became apparent on his face and said:

‏  إِنَّ أَتْقَاكُمْ وَأَعْلَمَكُمْ بِاللَّهِ أَنَا ‏‏‏

“Amongst all of you, I fear Allah the most and have the most knowledge of him”.

Here, a misunderstanding needs to be cleared up. When the word غفر is used for the Holy Prophetsa, it does not denote, God forbid, that he would sin and Allah the Exalted had forgiven him for his past and future sins. 

Firstly, the word ذنب alludes to “shortcomings” rather than “sins”. Secondly, maghfirah denotes covering up weaknesses and placing a barrier between man and his sins. 

Under the commentary of this hadith, Hazrat Sayyid Zain-ul-Abidin Waliullah Shahra has written that Imam al-Qastalani defines maghfirah as:

حَالَ بَيْنَكَ وَ بَيْنَ الذُّنُوْبِ فَلَا تَأتِيْها

“A barrier placed between you and your sins, preventing you from committing them further.” (Ibid., p. 141)

He further writes that the word maghfirah, when used regarding prophets, is only used in this sense. Essentially, the term maghfirah in its prophetic application does not indicate pardon after transgression, but protection before transgression and the preservation of purity.

Maghfirah and modern psychology

Now let’s look at maghfirah and how it relates to modern psychology. 

Hazrat Sayyid Zain-ul-Abidin Waliullah Shahra describes maghfirah as the purification of the soul, as good deeds conceal bad deeds, and the effect of bad deeds is suppressed by good deeds.

This shows that the word “forgiveness” alone cannot encapsulate the deeper meaning of maghfirah

Hazrat Sayyid Zain-ul-Abidin Waliullah Shahra says this concept is linked closely to a philosophy found in modern psychology. 

He says modern psychology has shown that the human mind consists of two parts. One that relates to the external world, known as the “conscious mind”, and one which relates internally, known as the “subconscious mind”. 

The conscious mind is where the effects of the external world leave an imprint on one’s psychology. The subconscious mind is the part of the mind that absorbs internal influences and, in Arabic, is known as nafs ghair wa’iyah

In simpler terms, your mind has two levels. The top level (conscious mind) is related to what you notice and think about every day. It can be likened to the surface of a pond. Then you have the lower level, which concerns what lies beneath the surface. You do not see it, but it holds feelings, habits and memories that sink down over time.

So, how do the conscious and subconscious relate to maghfirah?

When an individual commits a sin, it first affects the conscious mind. The person will experience guilt, shame, remorse and related emotions. But after a while, all these feelings will sink into the subconscious mind, akin to a pebble falling into a pond and into darkness. It does not vanish; it just hides deeper down and quietly shapes who you are. 

True maghfirah means Allah’s forgiveness goes deep enough to reach the hidden level of your mind and soul – essentially removing the concealed effects of sins committed via the conscious mind. 

The Promised Messiahas writes that just as a good and noble tree cannot flourish without water, in the same way the good word of a righteous person cannot flourish till a pure spring refreshes its roots through the stream of istighfar. (The Light of the Holy Quran [Number 1], p. 29)

Therefore, just as a pure stream refreshes the deep roots of a tree and gives it new life, in the same way, true maghfirah goes deep into our subconscious mind and gets rid of the effects of our sins there as well.

However, this purification of the soul does not occur through asking for forgiveness alone. The true essence of maghfirah only occurs when one repents sincerely, undertaking good deeds and seeking Allah’s mercy. One who wakes up at night consistently, weeping profusely in prostration before Allah, will certainly be deserving of the mercy of Allah the Exalted and cleansed of the blemishes of sin from within.

Am I too sinful to be forgiven by Allah?

0
Mohammad Ehsan Ahmad, Graduate, Jamia Ahmadiyya UK
Am I too sinful to be forgiven by Allah?

Despite being Muslims and believers in Allah the Almighty, we commit various sins. Some are easy to rectify, whereas others are not. Some sins are such that we continue to commit them despite being fully aware of their harm, and each time we fall into such a deed, we promise ourselves and our Lord that we will do everything possible not to repeat it. Yet, being human, we find ourselves slipping again. 

Gradually, this can lead to a damaging inner dialogue: “I am not strong enough to stop,” followed by, “There is no point in asking for Allah’s help and mercy, for I do not deserve it.” In this way, a person begins to label himself as nothing more than a sinner, too weak and incapable of reform.

In contrast to these emotions, there is a narration of the Holy Prophetsa about a believer who did good deeds himself but at the same time looked down upon and undermined another believer riddled with sin, deeming him unfit for Allah’s mercy and being able to enter paradise. As a result, Allah sent the ‘sinner’ to Paradise, while the so-called saint was admitted to the Hellfire. (Sunan Abi Dawud, Kitab al-adab, Hadith 4901). 

From this, we learn two things: we should never overestimate our good deeds, as this can lead to arrogance and the belief that it is our right to be blessed with Allah’s grace. Moreover, we should never be in despair of Allah’s mercy, for in both cases, He is Al-Malik and does what He wills.

Spirituality is not linear

Sometimes we experience varying levels of spirituality in our lives; it can fluctuate, and such feelings are a normal experience that even the companions of the Holy Prophetsa experienced. For example, Hazrat Hanzalara feared hypocrisy as he felt spiritually uplifted in the company of the Holy Prophetsa, but his spirituality faded at home. The Prophetsa reassured that faith naturally ebbs and flows. (Mishkat al-Masabih, Kitab al-dawat, Hadith 2268)

Therefore, on a day when we may feel too sinful or not holy enough to pray, our task is to keep trying. This is true sacrifice, and this is where we will grow. It may seem more straightforward to give up, but by giving up, we risk becoming the hypocrites that Hazrat Hanzlara feared he was. 

In Arabic, the term used for a hypocrite is منافق which comes from النفاق (an-Nifaq), which means entering faith through one door and leaving it through another (Five Volume Commentary, Vol. 2, p. 1174). So, by giving up, we will be leaving the garden of God’s Mercy. Rather, we should never limit ourselves, no matter how hypocritical it may feel to bow in prostration for forgiveness, just moments after sinning, for it is the best remedy to relieve us from these spiritual ailments.  

Intentional and consistent sinning

There are two types of workers who make mistakes: one who is devoted, remorseful after an error and determined to improve. The other one is indifferent, remorseful in words only, but already scheming to make the same mistake. This is similar to the true believers and those who may not be. A true believer, after committing a sin, feels genuine remorse. This feeling is proof that he is a believer. Despite the fact that he may commit the same mistake, he does everything within his power to prevent himself from doing so. 

In the Holy Quran it states: 

وَمَنۡ یَّعۡمَلۡ مِثۡقَالَ ذَرَّۃٍ شَرًّا یَّرَہٗ 

“And whoso does an atom’s weight of evil will also see it.” (Surah az-Zilzal, Ch.99: V.9)

Does this mean that even a believer who feels deeply remorseful for his misdeed and does everything possible to rectify it will still be punished? The word used in this verse is ‘evil’ (شر), which refers to a sin a person insists on and does not cease from nor repents of. That is why ‘شر’  is used instead of ‘ذنب’ (fault) to show an intended action which one refuses to abandon. (Chashma-e-Ma’rifat, Ruhani Khazain, Vol. 23, p. 24) 

The Holy Quran is abundant with verses proclaiming that sins are forgiven through repentance, and Allah loves those who repent and keep turning back to him, for example:

اِنَّ اللّٰہَ یُحِبُّ التَّوَّابِیۡنَ وَیُحِبُّ الۡمُتَطَہِّرِیۡنَ

“Allah loves those who turn to Him and loves those who keep themselves clean.” (Surah al-Baqarah, Ch.2: V.223)

Hence, if we do our part in trying to rectify ourselves, Allah’s mercy will surely be bestowed on us, either in this world by freeing us of this ailment or in the next with divine forgiveness.

The good diminishes the bad

When a gardener wants to get rid of weeds, he does not just rip them out but also plants strong grass to crowd out the weeds’ roots and prevent future growth. In a similar manner, it is stated in the Holy Quran:

اِنَّ الۡحَسَنٰتِ یُذۡہِبۡنَ السَّیِّاٰتِ

“Surely, good works drive away the evil ones.” (Surah al-Hud, Ch.11: V.114

Therefore, the simplest solution when one seeks to rid oneself of a spiritual ailment is to adopt good deeds in its place. More specifically, the best deed to adopt in such instances is the worship of God as stated in the Holy Quran:

اِنَّ الصَّلٰوۃَ تَنۡہٰی عَنِ الۡفَحۡشَآءِ وَالۡمُنۡکَرِ

“Surely, prayer restrains one from indecency and manifest evil.” (Surah al-Ankabut, Ch.29: V.46)

It is better to be fearful and humble due to one’s sins than to fall into despair and, one after another, into a pit of sins. We are bound to make mistakes. That is what leads us to grow, to improve. Yet improvement comes only when one attempts to resolve the problem and pursue its solution.

Allah’s Mercy is always within reach

Allah increases the weight of our good deeds. But He also forgives many, if not all, of our sins and mistakes. All we have to do is ask for His forgiveness:

قُلۡ يَٰعِبَادِيَ ٱلَّذِينَ أَسۡرَفُواْ عَلَىٰٓ أَنفُسِهِمۡ لَا تَقۡنَطُواْ مِن رَّحۡمَةِ ٱللَّهِ ۚ إِنَّ ٱللَّهَ يَغۡفِرُ ٱلذُّنُوبَ جَمِيعًا

Say, “O My servants who have committed excesses against their own souls, despair not of the mercy of Allah, surely Allah forgives all sins.” (Surah az-Zumar, Ch.39: V.54)

Therefore, never be hopeless in the search for Allah’s mercy. It is never too late to be forgiven, such as the murderer of a hundred people who was informed of Allah’s vast mercy by a scholar of his time. On his journey to a righteous land, he died on the way. Angels of mercy and punishment disputed over him. Allah measured the earth and deemed him closer by a handspan to the land of the righteous, so he was forgiven. (Sahih al-Bukhari, Kitab al-anbiya, Hadith 3470)

Hence, we should strive towards Allah so we can be amongst the blessed ones upon whom Allah bestows His mercy. Regarding this everyday struggle, Huzoor-e-Anwaraa told a khadim:

“When one climbs a ladder, one must take the first step; you do not jump straight onto the final step. You must climb each step one by one; otherwise, if you try to leap forward, you will fall. The same is the case with spiritual rank […] Just as we exert ourselves in worldly matters, we must exert ourselves in religious matters. One does not find Allah in a single day. Allah says, ‘Strive in My path.’ That you worship Allah, and offer your five daily prayers properly.” (“This Week With Huzoor – 21 November 2025”, youtube.com)

If God is so Merciful, why does He punish His people?

A thought that may come to mind is that if Allah is so merciful that he can forgive the greatest of sinners, then why punish us at all? Why talk about Hell? Why not let us do whatever we want and then forgive us in the end?

If it were so, then we would have no order in the world. Islam is a way of life that calls us to reform ourselves so we attain our true purpose. In each country, there is law and order, with a system designed to punish and reform its people. Just as the thought of jail deters many from committing a crime, Hell is a deterrent of sin. Just as the thought of being fined prevents one from speeding, the thought of being punished for an ill action prevents one from sinning. This thought can also lead one to feel remorse for one’s misdeeds.

But not every hardship in this life is a punishment; rather, it can be a trial. Regarding hardships in this life, Huzoor-e-Anwaraa told a Khadim, “A person will continue to face hardships in life.” Huzooraa explained that some are natural, such as illness. Even good people go through great pain and difficulty, and it may make one think that they are being punished. Huzooraa said:

“If you are doing righteous deeds, worshipping God, giving charity, paying alms, and fulfilling the rights of others, yet the trial continues for long, then it means that Allah is testing you.” (“This Week With Huzoor – 21 November 2025”, youtube.com)

Alongside trials, Allah the Almighty admonishes his people to guide them away from the life of sin. As loving parents are firm to protect a child, Allah, who loves us more than any mother, allows trials so we reflect and turn back to our Creator.

The Promised Messiahas states:
“He sometimes punishes sin, He also sometimes forgives it; His power operates on both sides, as befits the prerogatives of true ownership. If He were to punish sin always, what refuge would remain for humankind? In fact, He often forgives, and at times He administers punishment for a sin as a warning, so that the heedless may awaken and turn towards Him, as the Quran states: 

وَمَآ اَصَابَکُمۡ مِّنۡ مُّصِیۡبَۃٍ فَبِمَا کَسَبَتۡ اَیۡدِیۡکُمۡ وَیَعۡفُوۡا عَنۡ کَثِیۡرٍ

“And whatever misfortune befalls you, is due to what your own hands have wrought. And He forgives many of your sins. (Surah ash-Shura, Ch.42: V.31)” (Chashma-e-Ma’rifat, Ruhani Khazain, Vol. 23, p. 23)

So, if we go through a hardship, which after self-reflection may be thought of as a divine warning from Allah, we should also know that it is never too late to attain Allah’s grace and mercy. The path to Allah is not marked by perfection, but by persistence. Falling into sin does not mean failure in this pursuit, but abandoning hope does. Every sincere attempt of repentance and every prayer offered despite feeling unworthy is beloved to Allah. 

No matter how distant we may feel, Allah’s mercy is always closer than we think. With patience, persistence and prayer, we can enter the door of forgiveness which remains forever open.