Home Blog

The blessed physical appearance and character of the Holy Prophet

Sheharyar Bajwa, Student, Jamia Ahmadiyya UK
The blessed physical appearance and character of the Holy Prophet
Image: Ahmet Kürem/Unsplash

The Holy Prophet, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, had a blessed face which was أَزْهَرَ اللَّوْن “radiant in complexion” and أَبْيَضُ مُشْرَب “white with a reddish tinge.” His eyes were large and dark with long lashes, and his brows were finely curved and naturally separate. His cheeks were smooth, his mouth beautifully wide and his teeth were أفلج الثنيّتین “slightly spaced and shining.” When he smiled, it lit his whole face with a softness that the Companionsra never forgot. (Shamail alTirmidhi, Hadith 7-14)

إِذَا تَكَلَّمَ رُئِيَ كَالنُّورِ يَخْرُجُ مِنْ بَيْنِ ثَنَايَاه

“When he spoke, it was as if light came out between his front teeth.” (Mishkat al-Masabih, Hadith 5797)

His hair was naturally wavy, neither straight nor tightly curled. At times it reached his earlobes and at times his shoulders. He would part it on some occasions and leave it unparted on others. His beard was thick and full, dignifying his appearance. 

A Companionra is reported to have said:

كَأَنَّ عُنُقَهُ جِيدُ دُمْيَةٍ فِي صَفَاءِ الْفِضَّة

“His neck was as if it were the neck of a finely crafted statue in the purity of silver.” (Shamail al-Tirmidhi, Hadith 7)

يَتَلأْلأُ وَجْهُهُ، تَلأْلُؤَ الْقَمَرِ لَيْلَةَ الْبَدْر

“His face shone with the radiance of the moon on the night of the full moon.” (Ibid.)

Hazrat Abu Hurairara said:

مَا رَأَيْتُ شَيْئًا أَحْسَنَ مِنْ رَسُولِ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم

“I did not see anyone more handsome than the Messengersa of Allah, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him.”

كَأَنَّ الشَّمْسَ تَجْرِي فِي وَجْهِه

“It was as if the brightness of the sun had shone from his auspicious face.”

He continued: “I never saw anyone walk faster than the Messengersa of Allah. It was as if the earth was folded up for him. We would tire ourselves out (trying to keep up), while he did not seem concerned in the least.” (Jami at-Tirmidhi, Hadith 3648)

Hazrat Alira said the Holy Prophetsa “walked as if going downhill, energetically. He was neither short nor tall. I have never seen anyone like him before or since.” (Musnad Ahmad, Hadith 1122)

When walking, the Holy Prophetsa did not drag his feet, nor did he lift them harshly. When he turned, he turned his whole body. When he spoke to someone, he faced them entirely, giving them his full attention. His gait, his posture, and the calmness with which he sat all carried a quiet majesty – a humility that neither diminished his presence nor allowed it to overwhelm. (Shamail al-Tirmidhi, Hadith 7) 

He stood with balanced, natural height – “neither conspicuously tall nor short.” His chest was broad, his shoulders strong and his limbs well-built. His palms were wide and firm, and his joints powerful. (Ibid.

His physical strength can be gathered from many incidents, two of which are as follows:

During the digging of the trench before the Battle of the Ditch, the Companionsra came across a huge rock that none of them could break. They struck it repeatedly but their blows made no difference. The Holy Prophetsa descended into the trench, took the pickaxe and struck the rock himself. With each strike, a spark flashed, and a portion of the boulder shattered until it broke completely.  (Sahih al-Bukhari, Hadith 4101)

Rukanah ibn Abd Yazid, may Allah be pleased with him, a renowned wrestler of the Quraish, was famed in Mecca for his unmatched strength and wrestling skills. Once, Rukanah challenged the Holy Prophetsa to a wrestling contest. The result? صَرَعَهُ النَّبِي – “the Prophetsa wrestled him to the ground.” (Sunan Abi Daud, Hadith 4078) 

This did not happen once, but to Rukanah’s astonishment, the Holy Prophetsa threw him down three times. This left Rukanah deeply impressed by the strength and skill of the Holy Prophetsa, leading him to accept Islam.

The endurance and physical prowess of the Holy Prophetsa are also reflected by how he would regularly hike up to the cave of Hira for prayers. This hike is roughly three miles from the Ka‘bah at an elevation of 600 meters, which, at a time when the terrain was undeveloped and extremely rocky, would have required an extremely strong and healthy physique.

His majesty and presence

Many could not even fully look at him out of reverence and awe. On his deathbed, Hazrat Amrra bin al-Aas said:

ما كانَ أحَدٌ أحَبَّ إلَيَّ مِن رَسولِ اللهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عليه وسلَّمَ، ولا أجَلَّ في عَيْنِي منه، وما كُنْتُ أُطِيقُ أنْ أمْلأَ عَيْنَيَّ منه إجْلالًا له، ولو سُئِلْتُ أنْ أصِفَهُ ما أطَقْتُ؛ لأَنِّي لَمْ أكُنْ أمْلأُ عَيْنَيَّ منه

“No one was more beloved to me than the Messengersa of Allah, and no one was greater in my eyes than him. Out of reverence for him, I could not gather enough courage to look fully at his face. If I were asked to describe him, I would not be able to, for I never filled my eyes with a full glimpse of him.” (Sahih Muslim, Hadith 121)

After accepting Islam, addressing the Holy Prophetsa, Hazrat Thumamahra ibn Uthal declared:

يَا مُحَمَّدُ وَاللَّهِ مَا كَانَ عَلَى الأَرْضِ وَجْهٌ أَبْغَضَ إِلَىَّ مِنْ وَجْهِكَ فَقَدْ أَصْبَحَ وَجْهُكَ أَحَبَّ الْوُجُوه

“O Muhammadsa, by Allah! There was no face on the face of the Earth that was more hateful to me than your face, but now your face has become the most beloved of all faces to me.” (Sahih al-Bukhari, Hadith 4372)

Bravery and courage

The Messengersa of Allah was the epitome of bravery and courage, embodying steadfastness and valour without any arrogance. 

In Sahih al-Bukhari, the Holy Prophetsa is reported to have described five unique distinctions that set him apart from all other prophets. The first was: نُصِرْتُ بِالرُّعْب “I have been reinforced with awe” (Sahih al-Bukhari, Hadith 335). This means that whenever an enemy stood before the Holy Prophetsa, Allah would instill fear and awe into their hearts.

In battle, he always led from the heart of the war. The Companionsra would seek protection behind the Prophetsa during war, as reported by Hazrat Bara’ bin Azibra:

إِذَا احْمَرَّ الْبَأْسُ نَتَّقِي بِهِ وَإِنَّ الشُّجَاعَ مِنَّا لَلَّذِي يُحَاذِي بِهِ ‏.‏ يَعْنِي النَّبِيَّ صلى الله عليه وسلم

“When the battle grew fierce, we, by God, would seek protection by his side, and the bravest among us was he who confronted the onslaught – and it was the Holy Prophetsa.” (Sahih Muslim, Hadith 1776b)

At the Battle of Uhud, when the enemies launched a sudden attack and exposed the Muslim army, the Holy Prophetsa, sword in hand, stood facing the enemy attack and endured severe injuries. A rock struck his face and his tooth was broken. Another blow caused his helmet to jam into his cheek. He also fell unconscious. Yet he rose again and continued fighting and leading the Companions to safety.

When the Muslims faced the ambush of the archers in the Battle of Hunayn and the enemy shower of arrows overwhelmed the army, many of the new converts to Islam fled – the Holy Prophetsa , on the other hand, stood firmly facing the enemy and declared: 

أَنَا النبيُّ لا كَذِبْ أَنَا ابنُ عبدِ المُطَّلِب

“I am the Prophet; that is no lie. I am the son of Abd al-Muttalib.” (Sahih al-Bukhari, Hadith 4315) 

He did not stop there. He dismounted from his mule, took a handful of sand and hurled it into the faces of the enemy. The enemy’s eyes filled with dust and they turned and fled. (Sahih Muslim, Hadith no. 1777)

The Holy Prophetsa embodied not only intense awe but also immense humility. He accepted no praise for himself, reminded others of his servitude to Allah and carried authority without arrogance. 

Once a man came to the Holy Prophetsa shaking and awe-struck. The Holy Prophetsa said to him: 

هَوِّنْ عَلَيْكَ فَإِنِّي لَسْتُ بِمَلِكٍ إِنَّمَا أَنَا ابْنُ امْرَأَةٍ تَأْكُلُ الْقَدِيد

“Be calm, for I am not a king. Verily, I am only the son of a woman who ate dried meat.” (Sunan Ibn Majah, Hadith 3312)

Hazrat Alira, who was raised by the Holy Prophetsa, provides a beautiful description summarising the characteristics of the Holy Prophetsa:

“He was the best of the people in generosity, the most truthful of the people in speech, the gentlest of them in temperament and the noblest of them in social speech. If someone saw him unexpectedly, he was awestruck by him, and if someone came to know him, he loved him. His describer says: ‘I have never seen the like of him neither before him nor after him.’”  (Shamail al-Tirmidhi, Hadith 6)

Hazrat Anasra bin Malik, who served the Holy Prophetsa for ten years, said:

لَمَّا كَانَ الْيَوْمُ الَّذِي دَخَلَ فِيهِ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ الْمَدِينَةَ أَضَاءَ مِنْهَا كُلُّ شَيْءٍ فَلَمَّا كَانَ الْيَوْمُ الَّذِي مَاتَ فِيهِ أَظْلَمَ مِنْهَا كُلُّ شَيْءٍ وَمَا نَفَضْنَا أَيْدِيَنَا عَنِ التُّرَابِ وَإِنَّا لَفِي دَفْنِهِ حَتَّى أَنْكَرْنَا قُلُوبنَا

“When the day came on which God’s Messengersa entered Medina, everything in it shone; but when the day came on which he died, everything in it was dark. We did not brush the earth off our hands when we were engaged in burying him, and we felt sore at heart.” (Mishkat al-Masabih, Hadith 5962)

Opinion: US strikes Venezuela and ‘captures’ President Nicolas Maduro – A playbook of despots, oil reserves and destruction

Daniyal Mahmood Ahmad, UK
Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro
Image: Library

In the early hours of Saturday, 3 January 2026 – two days after Trump announced his New Year’s resolution to establish world peace – social media was flooded with news of US airstrikes on military targets in Venezuela. This initial shock was followed by an even greater shock; US President Donald Trump announced that Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro and his wife had been “captured and flown out of the country”. The charge: Narco-terrorism. Trump went on to share an image on his platform – Truth Social – of Maduro being transported to the US.

This has been followed by mixed sentiments across social media, depending on the algorithms and how your feed might be curated. Whilst some Venezuelans are celebrating the removal of Maduro, the “despot”, others are vehemently denouncing Trump as the “despot” and his actions as illegal.

With regard to international law – or whatever is left of it since its double standards were exposed during the Israel-Gaza conflict and the Russia-Ukraine war – many are calling this an act of terror and an illegal operation waged against a sovereign country.

There is no doubt that a portion of the Venezuelan people were unhappy with Maduro, and of course, there were many who supported him, but whether he was the right leader for the country or not can often turn into an unfruitful debate.

What can be done, however, is study and investigate the past to learn what might be in store for Venezuela, the US and potentially even the international community.

Iran: When a leader tries to nationalise

A look through history can give us some interesting parallels to what might be unfolding in front of our very eyes.

In 1951, Iran elected its first democratically elected prime minister, Mohammad Mosaddegh. Due to Iran being rich in oil reserves, the UK and the West had a vested interest in the country, since they were extracting that oil and filling their coffers. When Mosaddegh decided to nationalise Iran’s oil, it all came crashing down for the new democracy.

The whole situation, as well as the domino effect that it caused, has been summarised by Harvard Business School:

“Many of the West’s political problems in the Middle East and in Iran in particular can be traced to the overthrow of Prime Minister Mohammad Mossadegh by military forces supported by the American CIA and the British MI6 in August 1953. Mossadegh, at the head of a newly-elected nationalist government, had nationalized the Iranian oil industry that had been controlled by the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company (AIOC), now known as BP.

“Since 1908, the AIOC had been producing enormous revenue for London, and control of Iranian oil was essential to the British Empire. In order to gain Washington’s assent to the coup, the Americans had to be convinced that Mossadegh represented a geopolitical threat, not merely an economic one.

“Ever since, the overthrow of Mossadegh has been seen as evidence of the extent of the supposed neo-imperialist motivations of the West in the post-colonial world.”

Mossadegh was assassinated. The democratically elected leader of a sovereign state – for the sake of oil companies and their profits – and this is causing the nation to spiral into whatever it is now.

And since respected institutions like Harvard Business School admit that Western intervention is what caused today’s problems in that region, you’d expect Western leaders to learn from those mistakes and not repeat them.

Iraq: A repeated mistake

Only a few decades later, news headlines raged on about Saddam Hussein and his WMDs (weapons of mass destruction). And so, the US and its Western allies felt obliged to rid the country of the despot and bring freedom to its people and the region in general from that threat.

The resulting freedom: Millions of people dead, whether directly or indirectly, and a country and its infrastructure in ruins.

Was Saddam the right leader for his people? That depends on who you ask, but there are many Iraqis (especially those who died as a result of the invasion) who might have preferred to sort out their problems with Saddam in-house, rather than having the US invade.

Needless to say, Saddam was executed. Coincidentally, Iraq has a lot of oil, which is an important common factor throughout these historical examples.

Libya: Never again, surely

Then came Libya’s turn. General Muammar Gaddafi had been ruling Libya with an iron fist, not allowing any democratic elections and providing free housing, free electricity, free land, free education, free health care and much more to his people.

But he wasn’t aligned with the West, so he had to go. And go he did, as many would have seen in videos circulating on social media in those days.

The result of the freedom brought by the US and its Western allies? Well, a free country where elections could take place. Also, destroyed infrastructure, poverty, hunger and amongst many other things, amongst the chaos, a newly established slave market. The sweet smell of “freedom”.

Another dead leader, another major oil reserve (9th largest in the world) given “freedom”. Another destroyed civilisation.

Venezuela’s future

In light of these atrocious results of such “freedom” based operations and wars, one can only be so optimistic about Venezuela’s future. The playbook is the same, so why shouldn’t the result be? Maduro, just like the others, was a sovereign leader of a sovereign nation which just happened to be sitting on large oil reserves. Was he the right person? That is for the Venezuelans to decide.

With regard to Venezuela’s oil reserves, its future seems to be set in stone as Trump announces that the US will be “strongly involved” in the industry.

In any case, this act of aggression, whether right or wrong, clearly goes against Trump’s claim to have ended wars and not to begin any new ones.

And since Maduro has been captured, Trump has declared that the US will “run” the country temporarily. He went on to say that US oil companies will fix Venezuela’s “broken infrastructure” and “start making money for the country” and that if needed, a second, much larger strike will be carried out on the country if needed. This is obviously being disputed by the Vice President of Venezuela, Delcy Rodriguez who claims that Maduro is the country’s only president.

It is only a matter of time before we see how the country responds. Will it give up its sovereignty and oil for “freedom”? And what about the opposition leader, the Nobel Peace Prize winner who has repeatedly declared her intentions to foster warmer relations with Israel? Where does this fall in all of the chaos?

In any case, it would be interesting to see whether the “international community” that vehemently defended Israel’s “right to defend itself” also keeps the same stance regarding Venezuela, or will the double standards and hypocrisy be exposed once again?

Justice, which has remained elusive for decades and has allowed the injustices of powerful nations to escalate to a critical point, may still prove to be the force that saves countless lives and safeguards their futures. This is what the Holy Quran teaches:

“O ye who believe! be steadfast in the cause of Allah, bearing witness in equity; and let not a people’s enmity incite you to act otherwise than with justice. Be always just, that is nearer to righteousness. And fear Allah. Surely, Allah is aware of what you do.” (Surah al-Maidah, Ch.5: V.9)

Answers to Everyday Issues – Part 99: Tattoos, music in religious videos, qasr of salat, rape and adultery

Guidance regarding basic Islamic issues that Hazrat Amirul Momineen, Khalifatul Masih Vaa, has given on various occasions in his written correspondence and during MTA programmes is being published officially below for everyone’s benefit.

Click here for Part 98

Is getting a tattoo haram in Islam?

Answers to Everyday Issues – Part 99: Tattoos, music in religious videos, qasr of salat, rape and adultery
Image: aamiraimer/Pixabay

Someone from Türkiye asked Hazrat Amirul Momineen, Khalifatul Masih Vaa, whether getting a tattoo is haram. He also asked whether it is permissible to include photographs of the Promised Messiahas and his Khulafa in videos that also feature music.

Huzoor-e-Anwaraa, in his letter dated 12 October 2023, provided the following guidance regarding this matter:

“To make or get a tattoo is not permissible. It has been prohibited in ahadith, where Allah the Exalted has condemned, in very strong terms, those who practise tattooing and those who get themselves tattooed for the sake of beauty. (Sahih al-Bukhari, Kitab al-libas, Bab al-mutafallijati li l-husn)

“The objective behind getting a tattoo is to show it off or to beguile the opposite sex in an impermissible manner. That is why people usually get tattoos on body parts that they may then expose and exhibit to the public. However, even if someone gets a tattoo on parts of the body that must be covered, the mindset behind it is the same: to display the tattoos made on these hidden parts to the opposite gender at the time of committing evil deeds and immorality. Both of these methods are impermissible, as they are contrary to Islamic teachings.

“Furthermore, tattoos have also been linked to a host of physical and health issues. For instance, the sweat glands under the skin are badly affected in the areas of the body that have tattoos; that is, having a tattoo reduces the sweating in the concerned parts of the body, which is harmful to one’s health. Similarly, since tattoos become permanent features on the skin, sometimes as the body grows or shrinks, so does the shape of the tattoo, which makes the tattoo look ugly instead of ‘beautiful’. Then such individuals begin to think of them as a plague that they cannot get rid of. Thus, for these reasons alone, it is futile and absurd to get a tattoo.”

Can we use photos of the Promised Messiah or his Khulafa in videos with music?

image 1
Image: Library

“The answer to your second question is that it is absolutely not permitted to include photographs of the Promised Messiahas or his Khulafa in videos where music, etc., is playing. Music is considered among vain or laghw things and Allah the Exalted mentions in the Holy Quran as a sign of the believers that they shun vain acts and frivolous matters (Surah al-Mu’minun, Ch.23: V.4) Thus, how can it be permissible to mix something good with something vain?”

Should one perform qasr prayer when visiting one’s son’s or parents’ house?

pexels timur weber 9127104
Image: Timur Weber/Pexels

Someone from Germany wrote to Hazrat Amirul Momineen, Khalifatul Masih Vaa, stating: “I live in a city in Germany and one of my sons has a home in another city. When I visit that son’s home, should I shorten [qasr] the salat and when my son visits my home, should he offer the full salat or shorten it?”

Huzoor-e-Anwaraa, in his letter dated 14 October 2023, replied to this question as follows:

“In my view, these are one’s own homes; there is no need to shorten the salat in them. However, as you have written that you have a separate home and your son also has a separate home, in such a situation, according to some Islamic jurists, a person would be considered a traveller and would shorten the salat. Whereas, according to the Ahmadiyya jurisprudence, in such a case, a person has the choice to either shorten the salat or offer it in full. Accordingly, it is written in Fiqh-e-Ahmadiyya that if a person is staying at the home of such a relative, which he considers his own home – such as the parents’ home, the in-laws’ home, or a religious centre like Mecca, Medina, Qadian, Rabwah, etc. – then during a stay of less than 15 days, he may choose to avail himself of this concession and offer two rak‘ats, or he may choose to offer the full salat, i.e., four rak‘ats. (Fiqh-e-Ahmadiyya, ‘Ibadaat, p. 189)” […]

What is the punishment for adultery in Islam?

pexels nicetomizzu 6934550
Image: Mizzu Cho/Pexels

Someone wrote to Hazrat Amirul Momineen, Khalifatul Masih Vaa, asking whether the punishment for adultery [zina] mentioned in the Holy Quran is only for premarital intercourse, or if the same punishment applies if a man or woman commits adultery with someone other than their spouse during marriage. Furthermore, if the one who committed adultery realises their sin, can they hope that Allah will forgive them?

Huzoor-e-Anwaraa, in his letter dated 16 October 2023, provided the following guidance regarding this issue:

“Where the punishment for adultery is mentioned in the Holy Quran, no such distinction has been made as to whether this punishment is for premarital adultery or for adultery committed after marriage. Rather, the punishment for adultery has been stated generally: that whether the adulterer is a man or a woman, when their sin is proven through four witnesses in accordance with the conditions of testimony established by Islam, they should be administered 100 lashes. Regarding the punishment for adultery, Hazrat Khalifatul Masih Ira states:

“‘When the charge of adultery is proven against a man and a woman, their punishment is that the man should be given 100 lashes and the woman should also be given 100 lashes.’ (Haqaiq-ul-Furqan, Vol. 3, p. 200)

“Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra states with reference to verse 3 of Surah an-Nur:

“‘It is manifestly proven from this verse of the Holy Quran that the punishment for an adulterous man and an adulterous woman is 100 lashes.’ (Tafsir-e-Kabir, Vol. 8, UK, 2023, p. 423)

“Thus, whether a person is married or unmarried, when they commit a heinous act like adultery, in both cases, their punishment is 100 lashes. However, this punishment is for such a habitual criminal who has become so involved in this evil that there exist witnesses against him, for whose testimony Islam has set extremely strict conditions (Sunan Abi Dawud, Kitab al-hudud, Bab fi rajmi l-yahudiyyain); or [it is for one who] commits this lewd act so publicly as to outrage public decency and thus encourages its spread in society. Accordingly, explaining this matter with reference to verse 3 of Surah an-Nur, Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra states:

“Thus, by al-zaniyah and al-zani, a perfect [complete] adulterer is meant, who is either habitual in adultery or has become so fearless that he commits this act openly or is muhsan, i.e., married, or elderly and yet commits adultery. Regarding all such people, the Holy Quran states the same: Upon their crime being proven, administer 100 lashes to them.” (Tafsir-e-Kabir, Vol. 8, UK, 2023, p. 435)

“The answer to your second question is that in the Holy Quran and the ahadith of the Holy Prophetsa, there is abundant mention of God Almighty’s mercy with reference to His attributes of Rahman [Gracious], Rahim [Merciful], ’Afuww [The Effacer of Sins], Ghafoor [Most Forgiving], Ghafir [Forgiver] and at-Tawwab [Oft-Returning with Compassion], etc. Just as Allah the Exalted states in the Holy Quran: ‘O ye who believe! Turn to Allah in sincere repentance. It may be that your Lord will remove the evil [consequences] of your deeds and make you enter Gardens through which rivers flow.’ (Surah at-Tahrim, Ch.66: V.9) Similarly, the Holy Prophetsa stated that the one who sincerely repents after committing a sin is like one who has not committed the sin at all. (Sunan Ibn Majah, Kitab az-zuhd, Bab zikri t-tawbah)

“Hazrat Ubadah bin Samitra narrates that, ‘On one occasion, the Holy Prophetsa said to the Companions present around him: ‘Take a pledge of allegiance with me that you will not associate anything with Allah, will not commit theft, will not commit adultery, will not kill your children, will not bring any calumny which you have deliberately forged and will not disobey in any good matter. Thus, whoever among you fulfils [this pledge], his reward is with Allah; and whoever becomes involved in any of these [evils] and receives its punishment in this world, that punishment will be an expiation [kaffarah] for him. And whoever becomes involved in any of these [evils] and Allah veils his sin in this world, then his matter is with Allah; He may forgive him if He wills, or punish him if He wills.’’ (Hazrat Ubadah bin Samitra says,) ‘So we all pledged allegiance to the Holy Prophetsa on these matters.’ (Sahih al-Bukhari, Kitab al-iman, Bab ‘alamati l-imani hubbu l-’ansar)

“Thus, when Allah the Almighty, Who is the Master of everything, continues to overlook the sins of His weak servants, if any party among a husband and wife falls prey to such an evil and subsequently repents – and they are granted sincere repentance such that they never turn back to this evil again – then the other party should also overlook the one who has repented and leave the matter to Allah the Almighty.”

[Note: The above response is provided for theological understanding only and is not legal advice. It must not be construed as endorsing any private enforcement, accusation, coercion or punishment, nor as encouraging conduct contrary to the laws of the land. Any discussion of prescribed punishments in classical Islamic law pertains to lawful judicial authority and due process, not individual action. —Editor, Al Hakam]

(Compiled by Zaheer Ahmad Khan, Head of Records Department, Private Secretariat, London and translated by Al Hakam)

“Smite him for a part of it”: A misreading of Surah al-Baqarah (2:73-74) and Hazrat Musleh-e-Maud’s correction

Mahad Ahmad, Student, Jamia Ahmadiyya UK
Surah al-Baqarah -Holy Quran
Image: ZITOUNI REDA/Pexels

The commentaries of the Holy Quran produced by the Promised Messiahas and his Khulafa are unique as they have not only given new insights into the Quran but also corrected mistakes made by classical commentaries (tafasir). 

One such profound commentary is Tafsir-e-Kabir by Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra, a work which is vast and full of astonishing Quranic insights. Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra also clarifies many mistakes made in past commentaries.

This article highlights Hazrat Musleh-e-Maud’sra discussion of verses 73 and 74 of Surah al-Baqarah and gives his critiques of earlier interpretations – including some offered by scholars of our Jamaat – and presents a more accurate reading. (Taken from Tafsir-e-Kabir (new edition), Vol. 2, pp. 182-207)

The beginning verses of the ninth ruku of Surah al-Baqarah state:

وَاِذۡ قَتَلۡتُمۡ نَفۡسًا فَادّٰرَءۡتُمۡ فِیۡہَا وَاللّٰہُ مُخۡرِجٌ مَّا کُنۡتُمۡ تَکۡتُمُوۡن

“And [remember the time] when you slew a person and differed among yourselves about it; and Allah would bring to light what you concealed.” (Surah al-Baqarah, Ch.2: V.73)

فَقُلۡنَا اضۡرِبُوۡہُ بِبَعۡضِہَا کَذٰلِکَ یُحۡیِ اللّٰہُ الۡمَوۡتٰی وَیُرِیۡکُمۡ اٰیٰتِہٖ لَعَلَّکُمۡ تَعۡقِلُوۡن

“Then We said: ‘Smite him (the murderer) for a part of [the offence against] him (the murdered person).’ Thus, Allah gives life to the dead and shows you His Signs that you may understand.” (Surah al-Baqarah, Ch.2: V.74)

Classical commentaries and Hazrat Musleh Maud’s difference

The common classical reading of these verses refers to a miracle: a murdered man is struck with part of the slaughtered cow (mentioned in Surah al-Baqarah prior), the man briefly returns to life, identifies his killer and dies again.

Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra challenges this framing by showing a mistake in reading the context of these verses. He also argues that such interpretations do not align with Islamic teachings and have instead been adopted from Jewish scriptures. 

Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra explains that classical commentators make a key mistake: they assume verses 73 and 74 are a continuation of the earlier “cow” narrative mentioned in Surah al-Baqarah in the previous ruku. They misunderstood verses 73 and 74 just because they were adjacent to the cow narrative verses.

Two examples (summarised) illustrate this mainstream approach in commentaries:

  1. Tafsir Ibn Kathir presents the episode as a literal miracle: after people dispute over a murder, the dead person is struck with a piece of the cow (the specific part is left unspecified), he returns to life, and the event is framed as evidence of Allah’s power to resurrect and as a proof against Jewish disputation. (Tafsir Ibn Kathir, for Ch.2: V.73)
  2. Ma’arif al-Quran similarly treats the verses as part of the same story: the murderer’s supporters attempt to conceal the crime, but the truth is exposed through a miraculous sign in which the dead man identifies his killer after being touched with part of the sacrificial cow. (Tafsir Ma’arif al-Quran, Ch.2: V.73)

A structural key: The ninth ruku begins a new discourse

Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra notes verses 73 and 74 open the ninth ruku of Surah al-Baqarah and though the addressees remain the Jews (as in the previous ruku), the time-frame and subject shift:

  1. In the eighth ruku, the Jews at the time of Prophet Mosesas are addressed.
  2. From the ninth ruku, a new discussion begins, addressing the Jews at the time of the Holy Prophetsa – this is the key change in the subject. 

Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra says many interpretations stumble here: they assume continuity with the “cow” narrative that the previous verses were referring to simply because the verses are close together, but a more careful reading shows otherwise.

A prior Jamaat interpretation and Hazrat Musleh-e-Maud’s reservation

Before presenting his own reading, Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra records how some Jamaat scholars had interpreted these verses:

  1. They took “And remember the time when you slew a person and differed among yourselves about it” as referring to Jesusas – that the Jews attempted to kill him and later differed over what occurred (whether he died on the cross, what happened to his body, and whether it was stolen or disappeared).
  2. They read “and Allah would bring to light what you concealed” as Allah revealing the truth through the Promised Messiahas, who argued – through the Holy Quran, Hadith, Bible and historical references – that Jesusas survived the crucifixion and later fulfilled his mission among the remaining tribes of Israel.
  3. They interpreted “Then, We said: ‘Smite him’” as a command to the angels to punish the Jews for trying to kill Jesusas.

Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra does not categorically reject this view. However, he raises a textual concern: if “and Allah would bring to light what you concealed” is anchored in the time of the Promised Messiahas, then later verses about the Jews after verse 74 such as “then your hearts became hardened” would appear to fall after or during that period of the Promised Messiahas – whereas the hardening of hearts of the Jews occurred long before. 

Hazrat Musleh-e-Maud’s interpretation 

In brief, Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra explains the interpretation of these verses as follows:

  1. Verse 73 refers to the Jews attempting to kill the Holy Prophetsa.
  2. Verse 74 points to decisive action taken against the principal instigators of that hostility by the Jews – especially Ka’ab bin Ashraf and Abu Rafi – whom Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra identifies as central figures behind a broader conspiracy and escalation against the Holy Prophetsa.

Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra grounds this in the political and social realities around Medina after the Battle of Badr, when tension shifted into open incitement and conspiracy. 

Background: Escalating hostility after Badr

Ka’ab bin Ashraf and Abu Rafi were the Jewish leaders in the Medina region. Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra explains that the Jewish tribes did not initially see the Muslims as a serious threat, but after the Muslim victory at Badr, hatred and enmity became more visible.

He notes that the battle of Badr occurred in Ramadan, during 2 AH and Ka’ab bin Ashraf went to Mecca soon after the Battle of Badr and incited the people of Mecca against Islam and its founder. After returning to Medina, he began uttering inappropriate and filthy couplets about Muslim women and members of the family of the Holy Prophetsa. What followed was open hostility and rebellion against the treaty signed by the Jews as well when Islam came to Medina.

A striking detail used to show the severity of the threat is the report concerning the companion Talha bin Barara. He is described as having been ill for some time; on the night he expected to die, he asked his family not to inform the Holy Prophetsa of his death, fearing Jewish harm if the Prophetsa came out to lead his funeral. 

His words were:

فَإِنِّیْ أَخَافُ عَلَیْہِ الْیَھُودَ وَأَنْ یُصَابَ فِیْ بِسَبَبِیْ

meaning: “I fear for him the Jews, and that he may be harmed because of me.”

From this chain of events, Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra concludes that hostility had moved beyond rhetoric into treaty violation, incitement, sedition and conspiracy to assassinate the Holy Prophetsa. On this basis, he argues that Ka’ab bin Ashraf and Abu Rafi, though killed at different times, were guilty of the same overarching offence.

A close reading of the verses in Hazrat Musleh-e-Maud’s commentary

Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra explains his view by breaking the verses into key phrases and reading each in light of Quranic usage and historical context.

1. “You slew a person…” (Ch.2: V.73)

وَاِذۡ قَتَلۡتُمۡ نَفۡسًا فَادّٰرَءۡتُمۡ فِیۡہَا

“And remember the time when you slew a person and differed among yourselves about it.”

Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra states this addresses the Jews at the time of the Holy Prophetsa, with particular reference to figures such as Ka’ab bin Ashraf and Abu Rafi and when they tried to assassinate the Holy Prophetsa

He says nafsan (person) refers to the Holy Prophetsa, and although qatala typically means “to kill”, Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra notes it can also encompass attempting to kill or plotting to kill.

To support this, he cites Quranic language where “slaying” appears in the context of threatened killing:

وَقَالَ رَجُلٌ مُّؤۡمِنٌ مِّنۡ اٰلِ فِرۡعَوۡنَ یَکۡتُمُ إِيمَٰنَهُۥٓ اَتَقۡتُلُوۡنَ رَجُلًا اَنۡ یَّقُوۡلَ رَبِّیَ اللّٰہُ وَقَدۡ جَآءَکُمۡ بِالۡبَیِّنٰتِ مِنۡ رَّبِّکُم

“And a believing man from among the people of Pharaoh, who concealed his faith, said, “Will you slay a man because he says, ‘My Lord is Allah,’ while he has brought you clear proofs from your Lord?” (Surah al-Mu’min, Ch.40: V.29)

Just as this verse speaks about plotting against Hazrat Musaas (not literally killing him), Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra argues chapter 2, verse 73 can indicate intent and attempt even where killing fails.

2. “Allah would bring to light what you concealed” (Ch.2: V.73)

وَاللّٰہُ مُخۡرِجٌ مَّا کُنۡتُمۡ تَکۡتُمُوۡن

“And Allah would bring to light what you concealed.”

In this verse, Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra interprets the “concealed” matter as the Jews’ ultimate objective: not just general opposition, but the intention to assassinate the Holy Prophetsa. Even if that aim was not openly declared, Allah would expose it.

Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra supports this with two incidents: the attempt by Bani Nadhir to assassinate the Holy Prophetsa by dropping a rock after inviting him for a “discussion,” and the poisoning attempt in Khayber by the Jews. In both cases, Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra argues, Allah exposed the danger and protected the Holy Prophetsa.

3) “Smite him […]” (Ch.2: V.74)

فَقُلۡنَا اضۡرِبُوۡہُ بِبَعۡضِہَا

“Then We said: ‘Smite him (the murderer) for a part of the offence against him (the murdered person).’”

Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra notes that daraba means “to strike”, and that expressions such as daraba bis-saif (to strike with the sword) can signify a fatal blow. Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra then explains that bi-ba‘diha (with a part of it) refers to the offences already described; treaty-breaking, rebellion, incitement, sedition, foul provocation, and conspiracy – through which the instigators became deserving of punishment. 

This is the part where classical scholars have said bi-ba‘diha (with a part of it) means to strike with a part of the slaughtered cow, which is a clear misunderstanding. 

4) “Thus, Allah gives life to the dead” (Ch.2: V.74)

کَذٰلِکَ یُحۡیِ اللّٰہُ الۡمَوۡتٰی

“Thus, Allah gives life to the dead.”

Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra explains this part is an established divine practice: prophets are opposed and plotted against, yet Allah especially protects the first and the last prophet of a dispensation and does not allow enemies to kill them. From the opponents’ perspective, the prophet may appear “as good as dead,” yet Allah saves him even when escape seems impossible – thus “giving life to the dead.”

5) “And shows you His Signs […]” 

وَیُرِیۡکُمۡ اٰیٰتِہٖ لَعَلَّکُمۡ تَعۡقِلُوۡن

“And shows you His Signs that you may understand.”

The “Signs” are not merely abstract proofs; they are also warnings for those inclined to disorder. Here, despite visible and hidden efforts to harm the Holy Prophetsa, Allah protected him and exposed the intent behind the hostility.

Classical commentaries commonly treat verses 73-74 as a continuation of the cow narrative, reading them as a literal miracle in which a murdered man is struck with part of the slaughtered cow, briefly revived, and made to identify his killer. 

Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra clarifies the passage by shifting the key assumption: because these verses open a new ruku, he argues they begin a new discourse – addressing the Jews in the time of the Holy Prophetsa, not the Jews in the time of Prophet Mosesas.

On that basis, he reads the language of the verses in a Quranic and historical register rather than as a tale. “You slew a person” is understood as an attempt or plot to kill the Holy Prophetsa; “Allah would bring to light what you concealed” refers to the exposure of that hidden intent; and “Smite him” points to decisive punishment of the principal instigators behind treaty-breaking, sedition and conspiracy to assassinate the Holy Prophetsa

In short, where classical works emphasise a miraculous reenactment tied to the cow story, Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra presents a structurally grounded, context-driven reading that keeps the verses coherent within the realities of the life of the Holy Prophetsa and Quranic usage.

This was just one example out of the large corpus of Tafsir-e-Kabir. It is important we all study Tafsir-e-Kabir and derive benefits from the insights Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra provided for us. 

5th Annual Award Ceremony of ITQA

0
Firhaad Ahmed, Missionary, ITQA Academy
5th Annual Award Ceremony of ITQA

The 5th Annual Award Ceremony of the International Talimul-Quran Academy (ITQA) was held on 7 December 2025, at Tahir Hall, Baitul Futuh Mosque Complex. The event was presided over by Rafiq Ahmed Hayat Sahib, Amir Jamaat-e-Ahmadiyya UK.

The ceremony commenced with a recitation from the Holy Quran, followed by hadith, selected sayings of the Promised Messiahas and an Urdu poem. This was followed by a 15-minute documentary showcasing the brief history of the Academy’s establishment, the performance of its various learning zones, an introduction to its office departments and feedback from students residing in distant countries who have been attending ITQA classes.

Thereafter, Hafiz Fazle Rabbi Sahib, In-Charge of ITQA, presented the annual report, highlighting the Academy’s educational activities, year-long progress and major achievements. He stated that the International Academy was established in 2020, under the special guidance of Hazrat Khalifatul Masih Vaa. The Academy was launched from London with the aim of delivering Quranic education to Ahmadi boys and girls in their homes across the world.

The Academy currently has approximately 4,000 students receiving online Quranic education from 36 countries, organised into five learning zones, with the number of volunteer teachers exceeding 550. This year, teachers who have continuously served the Academy for five years were also awarded certificates.

Hafiz Sahib further informed the audience about the progress made during the past year in courses related to nazirah (Quran reading), translation of the Quran, Arabic grammar and Hifzul-Quran. He also mentioned that word-by-word Quran translation classes are being conducted in 13 major world languages, which are uploaded to the Academy’s YouTube channel and are benefiting people beyond the Jamaat as well.

Subsequently, Hafiz Aneeq-ur-Rehman Sahib, In-Charge of the Office Management Department, announced the names of students who demonstrated outstanding performance in the examinations. Certificates and prizes were awarded to female students by Dr Qurratul-Ain Sahiba, Sadr Lajna Imaillah UK, while male students received their certificates and awards from Amir Sahib Jamaat UK.

At the conclusion of the ceremony, Amir Sahib Jamaat UK delivered his closing speech.

He briefly mentioned the establishment and rapid progress of ITQA under the guidance of Hazrat Khalifatul Masih Vaa and paid tribute to the dedication, sincerity and services of the Academy’s entire staff and teachers. He then led the gathering in silent prayer, marking the conclusion of this blessed ceremony. Dinner was then served to the guests.

The entire programme was broadcast live on YouTube, enabling students and teachers from other countries to participate virtually.

How Islamic teachings shaped Europe’s path to peace – Hazrat Khalifatul Masih II (1926)

How Islamic teachings shaped Europe’s path to peace – Hazrat Khalifatul Masih II (1926)

A year after his return from England, Hazrat Mirza Bashir-ud-Din Mahmud Ahmadra, Khalifatul Masih II, reflects upon the West’s apparent indifference towards religion and the deeper spiritual realities concealed beneath it. While acknowledging the material progress and religious apathy prevalent in Europe, he argues that this indifference masks an underlying attraction towards faith and reverence for God. His observations lead to a hopeful conclusion – that despite its advanced spiritual malaise, Europe is not beyond cure and that through sympathy, perseverance and the universal principles of Islam, a path towards genuine spiritual and international peace remains open.

Hazrat Khalifatul Masih IIra states:

“It has been a full year since I left England, but the kind treatment which the English people extended to me and my companions during my brief sojourn in England and the attention accorded to me by the English press are yet fresh in my mind. I had gone to England with a heart full of sympathetic feelings for England and the British people. On my return, I found that those feelings had intensified.

Western material progress and religious apathy

“It is true that a general apathy towards religion prevails in all Western countries on account of the great material progress they have made. England is no exception in this respect. It has had its share of this indifference towards religion. I was conscious of this fact and therefore, when I left England last year, I was more solicitous of her spiritual welfare than when I had entered it.

Hidden reverence for religion

“Notwithstanding my consciousness of British apathy towards matters religious, I had, after a deep and careful study of the British mind and the different influences that are affecting it, returned convinced that beneath this apparent indifference lay concealed a liking for and attraction towards religion and though an impenetrable layer of irreligiousness had spread over the English mind, yet England was not absolutely devoid of love and reverence for religion.

Not beyond spiritual cure

“This filled me with greater certainty that England is not beyond the pale of spiritual cure and though the disease is very serious and is in an advanced stage, yet there is hope for her to rally. It requires only perseverance and sympathy on the part of her physicians and the patient shall recover. Then shall the erring flock enter the Master’s fold and the prodigal son shall come to his Father and he shall see that his Father shall not demand from him the shedding of blood for the remission of his sins and his restoration to His favour, as Christianity of today teaches, but as Islam teaches, from which Christianity in its pristine form did not differ a jot, shall accept the sacrifice of his sincere repentance and heartfelt contrition and shall make merry and be glad and shall kill a fatted calf on the return of His penitent son.

East-West unity under the banner of the Messiah

“Those will be the days when all distinctions of East and West shall vanish and all would be God’s servants and the Easterners shall look upon the West as their home and the Westerners shall regard the East as their own. All shall gather under the banner of the Messiah who has been raised a second time to give salvation to the world and shall be presented before the Greatest of all Prophets, Muhammad, peace be upon him, who is the last and the Most Perfect Divine Manifestation. Then shall the whole world say with great joy:

“‘Let His Kingdom be upon earth as it is in heaven.’” [Matt. 6:10]

How the West is moving towards Islam

“I clearly perceive that God is manifesting sign after sign to bring about the desired end and is providing means after means for the same object. The tongue is chanting the praise of Christianity, but the hearts are being attracted towards Islam. The question of divorce is being solved in accordance with Islamic teachings, the objections against polygamy are weakening, women are given their rights on the lines laid down by Islam and a vigorous campaign is being conducted against the use of wine. Sundry other problems are being solved in the light of the Islamic teachings.

“Though the excellence and superiority of the teachings of Islam are not openly acknowledged because old-standing enmities are not so readily got rid of, yet the everyday changes demonstrate that the West, unconsciously and against its will, is coming over to Islam.

The Locarno Pact and Islamic principles of peace

“But what I at present wish to draw the attention of the Western people to is the Locarno Pact. Up till now, Europe has been following the Islamic teachings in social matters. In politics, she thought, she was too advanced to stand in need of guidance from any other quarter. But the Locarno Pact is Europe’s practical admission of the fact that in politics and international problems as well, Islam is the best guide and without acting upon its teachings, no success is possible.

Engagement with the League of Nations

“During my stay in England last year, two representatives of the religious branch of the League of Nations came to see me and they desired that, being the head of a large community, I should use my influence in getting the branches of the League established in India and help those who are already engaged in this work. I had told the aforesaid gentlemen that though the League of Nations had not yet been constituted on such lines so as to establish peace and tranquillity in the world, yet as it was a step in the right direction, I would lend every possible support to it.

“I told them as well that Islam has laid down some lines and principles on which a League of Nations could be made. According to these principles, when two nations which are members of the League go to war against each other, the other nations should, as arbitrators, hear the cases of the belligerent parties and then decide how mutual understanding could be brought about between them. If either of the parties concerned refused to accept the League’s award, they should all unite to fight against it till it submitted to the decision of the League and refrained from encroaching upon the rights of the other party. When the war was over, the victors, to feed fat their grudge or to make the most of the victory, should not impose new financial burdens upon the vanquished and should not make preposterous demands which render the foundations of war stronger and firmer. They evinced their entire sympathy with the scheme but said that the time had not come when the League could be constituted on these lines because mutual mistrust and suspicions were not removed yet and some big powers had not accepted the membership of the League.

“I have outlined the above-said scheme in my book, entitled ‘Ahmadiyyat or True Islam,’ which was originally written for the Conference of Living Religions within the British Empire. I have made it quite manifest in the book that a League of Nations established on these lines only could restore peace in the world.

Why the Locarno Pact succeeded

“I consider it a great heavenly sign that in less than a year, God has made the European nations follow the lines of the scheme outlined by me. Where the League failed, the Locarno Pact has succeeded in establishing peace in Europe because only that Pact can bring about peace in which the interests of all the parties are equally safeguarded and which, if violated by one party, should be vindicated by the united strength of all other parties. Take off from the Pact the clauses about mutual cooperation and the equal representation of all interests and the armed intervention of all parties against that party which violates it and it will become a mere scrap of paper.

“The difference in this Pact and the treaty which the German Chancellor styled as ‘a scrap of paper’ is that in that treaty the interests of one party were quite safe and no provision was made to defend the interests of the other party. Belgium enjoyed every protection, but no safeguard was provided for the German frontiers. Compelled by the existing circumstances and fearing lest Belgium, which was inclined towards France, should give the latter’s armies a passage through her territories, Germany committed that breach of trust which shall remain forever an indelible blot on the names of those in whose hands were then the reins of Germany’s politics. But in the present Pact, as the interests of all parties are equally safeguarded, it has succeeded in creating an atmosphere of trust and confidence. This is the line of action suggested by Islam.

“The second distinctive feature of this Pact is that all the signatories have pledged themselves to armed intervention on behalf of the injured party and the international relations could not be based on a satisfactory basis without this clause.

“Though the Locarno Pact has been signed by a few nations only, if pacts were made among different countries on the same lines and in the same spirit, the possibility of future wars would be greatly reduced.

Islam and the dawn of a new era in European politics

“Europe is delighted and justifiably delighted that a new era has dawned in European politics and there is no doubt about it that the Locarno Pact is the precursor of a new era. But what is that era? It is the era of Islam, which, in order to base international relations on a better and firmer footing, had suggested this line of action.

“Is it then too much to expect of the serious-minded people of Europe that when they have practically accepted the scheme suggested by Islam for establishing peace, they will make verbal acknowledgement also of the excellence of Islamic teachings and will express their indebtedness to Islam, which is the bounden duty of all noble-minded people.

“I pray that the new era, for which the foundations are laid on the teachings of Islam, may prove an era of real peace, because Islam means ‘to give peace.’

“What harm did the boycott of Russia by other powers do to her? If she was isolated on one side, she contracted relations and established her influence on other sides. A boycott could coerce into submission only that country which depends on other countries for its very life. A big country sustains no serious loss on account of such a boycott; neither can all its neighbours maintain this boycott against it, because some financially weak nations take advantage of such an opportunity to improve their fiscal condition.

“When a nation is bent upon shedding innocent blood and reducing a sister nation to slavery, particularly when she is advised by other nations that she is not justified in what she is doing, nothing can check such a nation from her inhuman and unjust course except for the fear of or actual armed intervention by other nations in favour of the aggrieved party. By providing this most important clause, the Locarno Pact has done much greater service in creating an atmosphere of mutual trust and confidence than the League Protocol had done.

A call to Europe’s moral and spiritual vanguard

“I pray also that God may vouchsafe strength to those thousands of British and other European people who are convinced in their hearts of the excellence and truth of the teachings of Islam, that they should come forward and should prove themselves the vanguard of the era which is about to dawn.

“True, it is the vanguard which always suffers most, but it is they who constitute the vanguard that deserve undying fame and endless reward. It is they whose memories are perpetuated in this world and whose souls in the next are guided to the interminable summits of spiritual altitude. I appeal to the noble feelings of these great souls that they should extend us their hand of sympathy and help in this apparently doomed-to-failure task of the propagation of Islamic ideas and should tarry no longer. They should come forward and should faithfully and bravely discharge that sacred obligation which they owe to their own selves, to the whole of mankind, to coming generations, nay, to humanity and to the cause of truth, justice and morality. Then they shall deserve to be called God’s elect and then shall they claim Him as their own.” – Khalifatul Masih II

(Transcribed and edited by Al Hakam from the original English, published in the January 1926 issue of The Review of Religions)

This Week in History: 2-8 January

A glimpse into the rich history of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Jamaat

This Week in History: 2-8 January
Maulana Nazir Ahmad Mubashar Sahib giving a speech during a session chaired by Hazrat Chaudhry Sir Zafrulla Khanra

2 January 2000: On this day, a tragic collision occurred between a train and a passenger wagon at the railway crossing in Rabwah during the morning hours. On this occasion, Majlis Khuddam-ul-Ahmadiyya, Fazl-e-Umar Hospital and local Ahmadis of Rabwah rendered invaluable services. For instance, 28 khuddam immediately donated blood for the injured. (Al Fazl, Rabwah, 4 January 2000, p. 1)

2 January 2006: During his tour of India, on this day, Hazrat Khalifatul Masih Vaa visited various places in Qadian, including Talim-ul-Islam College, Noor Mosque, Tahrik-e-Jadid’s boarding, SS Bajwa School, Kothi Darus Salam, Noor Hospital, Aqsa Mosque and the Ahmadiyya Central Library, etc. (Al Fazl International, 24 February 2006, p. 11)

3 January 1898: The Promised Messiahas had expressed multiple times his intention to open and establish a middle school in Qadian to meet the educational requirements of the growing Jamaat. On this day, this historic milestone was achieved and Talim-ul-Islam School was inaugurated in Qadian. (Tarikh-e-Ahmadiyyat, Vol. 2, p. 3)

3 January 2014: During his Friday sermon on this day, Hazrat Khalifatul Masih Vaa mentioned Yusuf Latif Sahib of Boston, USA, who had passed away on 23 September 2013 at the age of 93. He had accepted Ahmadiyyat in 1948 and was amongst the early Afro-American Ahmadis. He was the author of various books. Once, President Clinton invited him to the White House and Yusuf Sahib attended the event wearing a shalwar kameez.

4 January 1952: On this day, Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra directed the central administrative Jamaat offices to draw up a list of projects in detail that needed to be completed during the year. He also instructed that the projects should be completed within their given timeframe. (Al Fazl, 11 January 1952)

5 January 1944: In the night between 5 and 6 January 1944, Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra was shown in a vision that he was the person mentioned in the Promised Messiah’sas announcement of 20 February 1886 that spoke of a ‘promised son’. At the time, Huzoorra was staying in Lahore at Sheikh Bashir Ahmad Sahib’s residence located on 13 Temple Road.

To read more about the background and fulfilment of this divine prophecy and heavenly sign, read: “Friday sermon – Musleh-e-Maud: The Prophecy and The Man (23 February 2024)” at alhakam.org (22 March 2024, pp. 21-24).

5 January 1945: On this day, Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra instructed that every Ahmadi family must ensure that at least one person from their family devote their lives to serving the Jamaat.

Huzoorra explained that the work of tabligh and spreading religion could not solely be done with finances; the efforts of people were also required. (Khutbat-e-Mahmud, Vol. 26, p. 1)

6 January 1945: On this day, Hazrat Hafiz Mirza Nasir Ahmadrh, then principal of Talim-ul-Islam College, was elected as a member of the academic council of Punjab University for 1945-46. The principals of the concerned intermediate colleges elected him unanimously.

As soon as Talim-ul-Islam College was established, its reputation grew due to its teaching standards. This had an effect not only on the province of Punjab but also on the whole country. (Tarikh-e-Ahmadiyyat, Vol. 9, p. 63)

7 January 1910: On this day, Hazrat Mir Qasim Alira, a companion of the Promised Messiahas, launched his paper Al Haq from Delhi. The name of the newspaper was granted by Hazrat Khalifatul Masih Ira.  (Tarikh-e-Ahmadiyyat, Vol. 3, p. 313)

To learn about the services of this magazine, see: www.ahmadipedia.org.

7 January 1947: Jamaat’s missionary Maulana Nazir Ahmad Mubashar Sahib, who rendered invaluable services on the African continent under the guidance of Hazrat Khalifatul Masih IIra, returned to Qadian on this day after spending over 10 years in the field, serving as a missionary.

To read more about his sacrifices and achievements, see: “Pioneer Missionaries: Part 10 – Eleven years in Gold Coast: A lesson of sacrifice, resilience and love for Islam Ahmadiyyat” at alhakam.org (9 June 2023, p. 16).

7 January 2017: On this day, Hazrat Khalifatul Masih Vaa inaugurated the Baitul Ehsan Mosque in Mitcham, London. In addition to the prayer halls, the five-storey building holds conference rooms, offices and various other facilities. (“Head of Ahmadiyya Muslim Community Inaugurates New Mosque in Mitcham, London”, www.pressahmadiyya.com)

8 January 1932: On this day, Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra initiated a remarkable scheme for the propagation of Islam Ahmadiyyat and added that every year, there should be a large number of people entering the Jamaat from around the world. To achieve this noble goal, Huzoorra also stressed that Jamaat members had to unite, bridging any internal rifts. (Al Fazl, 14 January 1932)

8 January 2010: During his Friday sermon on this day, Hazrat Khalifatul Masih Vaa mentioned Professor Muhammad Yusuf Sahib of Rachna Town, Lahore, Pakistan, who had been martyred on 5 January, at the age of 65. He had been serving as the local president for the last 20 years.

The heart in Arabic

The word qalb, which is used for ‘heart’ in Arabic, has two meanings. Firstly, there is the apparent and physical meaning, and then there is the spiritual meaning. The apparent meaning of qalb is one of ‘turning about’. Since it is the heart that causes the circulation of blood in our bodies, it is referred to as qalb in Arabic. In the spiritual sense, this word implies that any progress an individual hopes to attain in terms of spirituality can only be attained through the power of the heart. Just as the circulation of blood, which is absolutely critical in sustaining human life, is powered by the heart or qalb, in the same manner, all forms of spiritual advancement are dependent on the power of the heart.

(Malfuzat [English], Vol. 2, pp.118-119)

Do not wish for death

0

عَنْ أَنَسٍ ـ رضى الله عنه ـ قَالَ قَالَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم: لاَ يَتَمَنَّيَنَّ أَحَدٌ مِنْكُمُ الْمَوْتَ لِضُرٍّ نَزَلَ بِهِ، فَإِنْ كَانَ لاَ بُدَّ مُتَمَنِّيًا لِلْمَوْتِ فَلْيَقُلِ اللَّهُمَّ أَحْيِنِي مَا كَانَتِ الْحَيَاةُ خَيْرًا لِي، وَتَوَفَّنِي إِذَا كَانَتِ الْوَفَاةُ خَيْرًا لِي‏‏.‏

Hazrat Anasra narrated that “Allah’s Messengersa said, ‘None of you should wish for death because of a hardship that has befallen him. But if he finds himself compelled to wish for death, then he should say, ‘O Allah, keep me alive for as long as life is better for me and cause me to die when death is better for me.’’”

(Sahih al-Bukhari, Kitab ad-da‘awat, Bab ad-du‘a’i bi l-mawti wa l-hayat, Hadith 6351)

Friday Sermon – Muhammad (sa): The great exemplar (5 December 2025)

0

Friday Sermon

5 December 2025

Muhammadsa: The great exemplar

Friday Sermon

After reciting the tashahhud, ta‘awwuz and Surah al-Fatihah, Hazrat Khalifatul Masih Vaa stated:

In the previous sermon, it was mentioned that Hazrat Ka’b bin Malik and some other Companions remained behind on the occasion of the Battle of Tabuk, and the Holy Prophetsa subsequently expressed his displeasure at this. Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra has also discussed this and admonished the Jamaat through this. He states: 

“In the ahadith, it is recorded that three believers did not participate in this battle. In the ahadith, a lengthy statement of one of them has been recorded. He (i.e., the Companion) says: ‘When I went to the Holy Prophetsa after his return, I inquired from the people whether or not any of the others who stayed behind had come as well, what excuses they presented and how they were treated.’ They said that people came and presented excuses as soon as they arrived and said, ‘O Messengersa of Allah! Pray for our forgiveness.’ In return, the Holy Prophetsa prayed for them. He further says (i.e., Hazrat Ka’b), ‘I also thought of presenting an excuse and being saved from rebuke. However, another thought came to mind, and I asked the Companions about who had already come. They named a few individuals, but they were all hypocrites. They only mentioned two believers and said that they did not present any excuses. On the contrary, they acknowledged their mistake. Upon this, I thought to myself, why should I join the hypocrites? Rather than presenting excuses, which cannot be deemed as valid excuses, it would be better to clearly say that I made a mistake and that the Holy Prophetsa could deal with me as he pleased. As this thought entered my mind, I decided to confess to my mistake, and by doing so, Allah the Almighty protected me from joining the hypocrites. I went and clearly told the Holy Prophetsa that it was due to my indolence and negligence that I did not participate in the battle; there was no other valid excuse. Upon this, the Holy Prophetsa said that “until Allah the Almighty reveals His decree in relation to you, we will break our ties with you.”’ The name of this Companion was Ka’b bin Malik. He says: ‘This decision caused us great distress as only Muslims were living in Medina and not even anyone from among the hypocrites dared to speak to us.’”

I have mentioned this entire incident very briefly, as I have already presented the details in the previous sermon. Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra mentioned this in a sermon, and as I said, he also referenced this incident in order to impart guidance to the Jamaat. Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra states: “I have seen here (this was referring to Qadian in 1936) that regarding those whom it is stated they must not be spoken to (that is, those who have been handed a punishment), they go to the houses of Ahmadis in the local areas. It appears as if the locals are heedless and are not even aware of this. Some Ahmadis here are nourishing vipers in their chests, but they should remember that these vipers can neither harm God nor His Messengersa nor the Khalifa. They can only harm those who are hosting them. By the grace of Allah the Almighty, we are safe, because who can bite the one whom Allah the Almighty takes into His protection? They will only bite those whom they are able to bite. It is regrettable that although they are able to see, they are turning a blind eye to the movement of these vipers.”

In that time, certain trials had arisen due to which he had to give such instructions. In short, he goes on to say that in Medina, not even the hypocrites would speak to them. 

“Ka‘b bin Malikra further narrates: ‘A few days after this instruction, it became known that the Messengersa of Allah had said that even their wives and children should separate from them. Among the three of us, one Companion was elderly. His wife went to the Holy Prophetsa and said, ‘O Messengersa of Allah, my husband is already nearing his end. He neither eats nor sleeps, and due to his old age, he is constantly in need of help. He has not been capable of conjugal relations for some time now. If you permit, I can assist him with food and drink.’ The Holy Prophetsa replied, ‘Alright – you may give him this much help.’

“Hazrat Ka‘bra says, ‘This made me think that perhaps I should also request similar permission. But then I thought – he is an elderly man, whereas I am young. It would not be appropriate for me. So I said to my wife, “Go to your parents’ home, lest I call you one day and you refuse.” I did not think anyone else would speak to me. Due to the Holy Prophet’ssa love and compassion, I thought that, seeing my distress, he might take pity on me.

“‘For this reason, I would go to his gathering and loudly say “assalamu alaikum” [peace be upon you], then look to see whether his blessed lips moved. But he would not reply. I would become anxious, thinking perhaps his lips had moved, but I had not seen it. Then I would leave that sitting, return once again, say “assalamu alaikum” loudly, and look at his lips. Then I would leave again. But he would not reply – though occasionally he would glance at me from the corner of his eye.’

“He continues: ‘When many days passed, I went to my cousin, with whom I always ate and lived. He was working in his orchard. I said, “My brother, you are my confidant. We have always lived together and kept nothing hidden from each other. You know very well that I am a sincere Muslim and that there is not a fibre of hypocrisy in me. I have come today in great anxiety to ask you – tell me, am I a hypocrite?” He did not reply. He only raised his gaze to the sky, which meant: “Allah and His Messengersa know best.”’

“He then says, ‘When such a brother – my closest confidant – gave me this answer, it felt as though the earth had become constricted for me. I panicked, climbed over the orchard wall and ran toward the city in a frenzy. When I neared Medina, a man approached me and asked, “Are you so-and-so?” I said, “Yes.” He handed me a letter and said, “This is from such-and-such king” – a Christian Arab ruler under the Roman Empire.

“‘I opened the letter. In it, he had written: “We have learned that you are one of the nobles amongst the Arabs, yet Muhammad[sa] has humiliated you, while you deserved to be honoured. If you come to us, we will treat you according to your true rank.”’

“Ka‘b bin Malikra continues: ‘My heart was already in a state of distress from the answer my brother (i.e., by the answer his cousin had given him when he went to the orchard. He was deeply distressed at the time). When I read this letter, I was overcome by a state of shock, and I thought: “This is Satan’s last attack. It should not be the case that this causes me to stumble!” So I said to the messenger, “Follow me.” Nearby, a man was lighting a furnace. I tore the letter into pieces and threw it into the fire. I said, “Tell your king that this is my answer.”’

“These were the final moments of their trial. Eventually, Allah the Almighty showed mercy and revealed to the Messengersa of Allah that their mistake had been forgiven.” (Khutbat-e-Mahmud, Vol. 17, Friday Sermon 9 October 1936, pp. 655-658)

In another place, Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra states:

“Just observe how great a lesson can be drawn from the incident of Ka’b bin Malik. He fought alongside the Holy Prophetsa in all battles. He was even present in the Conquest of Mecca. Yet, owing to indolence on his part, he remained behind in the Battle of Tabuk. The Holy Prophetsa gave him such a severe punishment that he did not even return his greetings of peace. He forbade the Muslims from speaking to him. To the extent that even his wife was ordered to stay separate from him. It was during this time that the messenger of the Ghassanid king brought a letter in which it was written: ‘Your companion has not shown you due regard; come and stay with me.’ Ka’b said, ‘This is the final onslaught from Satan,’ and with this, he put the letter in the furnace. He then told the messenger to relay his message to his king.”

Given the situation at the time, Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra further states:

“There are some members of the Jamaat who, if they are questioned on a matter, reply by saying that ‘No consideration has been shown for our services and we were not shown due regard.’ It should be remembered that the administrative system of the Jamaat is one matter, and the services one renders are a separate matter. And in order to uphold the system of the Jamaat, the person who makes an error must be questioned, irrespective of who they may be. Therefore, in line with the command of God, strive in the way of faith in such a manner that Satan runs away. But do not do it for the sake of receiving praise, nor do it so that one may be spared from the consequences of their mistakes. Furthermore, do not boast of your favours before God Almighty, nor employ taunts or injury. Serve Islam through all means.” (Khutbat-e-Mahmud, Vol. 5, Friday Sermon 27 July 1917, pp. 527-528)

One should not remind of the favours conferred by them; this should be the spirit in which one should serve and seek to attain the pleasure of Allah. This was an excerpt from the early sermons of his Khilafat; the first one was from 1936. 

The journey of the Battle of Tabuk proved to be such a wise and blessed journey that the awe of the Muslims was established over the whole region of Arabia, and in a short time, the flag of Islam began to wave over all of Arabia. (Dibacha Tafsir-ul-Quran, Anwar-ul-Ulum, Vol. 20, p. 363)

Thus, regarding this as well, Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra has stated that, “After the return from Tabuk, the people of Ta’if also came and accepted their authority. (Before, they were adamant on fighting but then they accepted their rule.) Subsequently, various tribes came turn by turn and asked for permission to live under Islamic rule, and in a short period, the Islamic flag began to wave over all of Arabia.” 

After returning, there was also a campaign, which is called the expedition of Hazrat Khalid bin Walid, which was towards Najran, to the Banu ‘Abd al-Madan, who were from among Banu Harith bin Ka‘b. Abd al-Madan, to whom the attribution of the tribe is made, was the forefather of Banu Harith, and his name was ‘Amr bin Yazid. According to the narration of Ibn Sa‘d, this expedition occurred in Rabi al-Awwal in 10 AH, whereas according to Ibn Hisham, this expedition took place in Rabi al-Akhir or Jumada al-Ula of 10 AH. 

In The life and Character of the Seal of Prophets, Hazrat Mirza Bashir Ahmad Sahibra has stated the date of the expedition of Khalid bin Walid towards Najran as Rabi al-Awwal, 10 AH. (Ibn Sa’d, Al-Tabqat Al-Kubra, Vol. 2, Dar Al-Kotob Al-Ilmiyah, Beirut, 1990, p. 128; Ibn Hisham, Al-Sirah al-Nabawiyyah, Dar Al-Kotob Al-Ilmiyah, Beirut, 2001, p. 861; Ibn Habban, Al-Sirah al-Nabawiyyah Wa Akhbar-ul-Khulafa, Vol. 2, Part 3-4, Al-Kotob Al-Thaqafiyyah, Beirut, 1987, pp. 385-386; Sirat Khatam-un-Nabiyyeen, p. 833)

Nonetheless, the details are as follows: the Holy Prophetsa instructed Hazrat Khalid to invite them to Islam three times before fighting, i.e., the people towards whom the expedition was sent. If they accept, then it is better; otherwise, fight them. This meant that if they attempted to fight you, even then, you should give them the invitation to Islam’s teachings three times. If, after that, they still desire to fight, then so be it; wage war against them. 

Thus, Hazrat Khalid did exactly that and all of them became Muslims. Hence, Hazrat Khalid stayed among them (meaning he only preached to them, and a war did not occur), and they became Muslims. Hazrat Khalid stayed among them and began teaching them about Islam, the Book of Allah, and the Sunnah of the Holy Prophetsa and this was exactly what the Holy Prophetsa had instructed Hazrat Khalid.

After this, Hazrat Khalid sent a letter to the Holy Prophetsa. In the letter he wrote: “To the Messengersa of Allah from Khalid bin Walid. May the peace, blessings and mercy of Allah be upon you, O Messengersa of Allah. I praise that God besides Whom there is no deity. After this: O Messengersa of Allah, may Allah send mercy upon you. You sent me to Banu Harith and instructed me to invite them to Islam for three days. Then if they accept Islam, I should stay among them and teach them the commandments of Islam, the Holy Quran, and the Sunnah of the Prophetsa. And if they do not accept Islam, then I should wage war against them. (Some matters are not detailed, and in other places, certain matters and reports are found, but the teaching of Islam is not that Islam should be forced upon anyone. The meaning was that if they do not enter a treaty, or if they still attempt to fight, then permission is given to fight against them.) So, I came to them, and according to your instruction, I invited them to Islam for three days, and I sent riders to them saying: ‘O Banu Harith, accept Islam, and you will remain safe.’ Thus, the people accepted Islam and refrained from war. (He preached, and they accepted Islam. From this phrase, it also becomes very clear that they refrained from war; if the opponents did not initiate the war, they did not do so either. These people had not gone to wage war; they had gone to preach, and this is what they did. Then he writes:) Now I am residing among them and am informing them of the commandments and prohibitions of the religion. Whatever command shall later be issued by you, I shall act according to it. May the peace, mercy and blessings [of God] be upon you, O Messengersa of Allah.’” 

The Holy Prophetsa replied to this letter of Hazrat Khalid, saying: “In the name of Allah, the Gracious, the Merciful. From Muhammad, the Messengersa of Allah, to Khalid bin Walid. Peace be upon you. I praise that God besides Whom there is no other deity. After this: Your letter reached us along with its messenger, and I have come to know that Banu Harith have accepted Islam, and before any battle took place, they bore witness to ‘There is no god but Allah, Muhammadsa is the Messenger of Allah’, and this is the guidance of God, which He bestowed upon them. So, give them the glad tidings of God’s reward and make them fear the punishment of God. And take some of their men with you and come to us. May the peace, mercy and blessings of Allah be upon you.”

Hearing this instruction, Hazrat Khalid, along with some members from the Banu Harith tribe, presented himself before the Holy Prophetsa. The names of the people he brought with him are as follows: Qais bin Husain, Yazid bin Abdil Madan, Yazid bin Mu‘ajjal, Abdullah bin Qarad, Shidad bin Abdullah, and Amr bin Abdullah. When these people presented themselves before the Holy Prophetsa, he asked, ‘Who are these people? It seems like they are from the land of al-Hind?’ The Holy Prophetsa was told, “O Messengersa of Allah, these people belong to the tribe of Banu Harith.”

These people then addressed the Holy Prophetsa, saying, “We bear witness that you are Allah’s Messengersa and that there is none worthy of worship besides Allah.”

The Messengersa of Allah replied, “I also bear witness that there is none worthy of worship except Allah, and that indeed, I am His Messengersa.” 

The Messengersa of Allah then asked them, “Are you those people who cause their enemy to flee when you engage them in battle?”

They remained silent. Nobody from among them spoke. The Messengersa of Allah asked them a second time, but they remained quiet again. Not one of them responded. He asked them a third time, and they did not respond. Finally, he asked them a fourth time – are you those people who used to cause your enemies to flee? Meaning they thought themselves to be very powerful. 

Finally, Yazid bin Abdil Madan stepped forward and replied, “O Messengersa of Allah, we are indeed those people; when we engage our enemy in battle, we cause them to flee.” He repeated this four times – that indeed we are brave and experienced in warfare, but now this has come to pass.

The Messengersa of Allah replied, “If Khalid had not written to me that you all have accepted Islam, I would have had you all beheaded.”

Yazid responded: “We are neither indebted to you nor to Khalid.” He had just accepted Islam and so responded in this manner. 

The Holy Prophetsa asked them, “Then who are you grateful to?”

He replied, “O Messengersa of Allah, we are grateful to Allah Who enabled us to be guided through you.” He also gave an excellent response too. 

The Holy Prophetsa replied, “You have spoken the truth.”

The Holy Prophetsa then said, “Tell me, by what means did you use to fell your enemy in battle during the age of ignorance?”

They replied, “We used to fight as a united front. We knew that if we fought as one, we would be victorious, and no one would be able to overpower us. When Islam came and caused all the tribes to unite, the people of our tribe understood that this unity is too strong to compete with and not only is it better not to engage with them in battle, but we should accept Islam because it is the true religion.”

The Holy Prophetsa appointed Hazrat Qais bin Husain as the leader of the Banu Harith tribe. And either at the end of Shawwal or the beginning of Dhul-Qa‘dah, bid these people farewell. Four months after these people returned to their tribesmen, the Messengersa of Allah passed away. (Ibn Hisham, Al-Sirah al-Nabawiyyah, Dar Al-Kotob Al-Ilmiyah, Beirut, 2001, pp. 861-863)

The final expedition that the Holy Prophetsa took part in was Tabuk, while the final expedition he dispatched was that of Hazrat Usama. 

The details of this expedition have already been mentioned in the accounts of Hazrat Usama and Hazrat Abu Bakrra, but I will briefly mention some of the context to the battle here as well. There is a narration in Sahih al-Bukhari by Hazrat Anas bin Malik, who stated that the Holy Prophetsa informed people of Hazrat Zaid, Hazrat Ja‘far and Hazrat Abdullah bin Rawaha’s demise before any news of their death reached the people. He explained that Zaid had taken the flag. (There was an expedition that took place before Usama’s expedition.) He explained that Zaid took the flag but was martyred. Then Ja‘far took the flag, and he too was martyred. Then Ibn Rawahah took the flag, and he was also martyred. The Holy Prophet’ssa eyes welled with tears while he described this account. He continued explaining; then finally, a sword from among the swords of Allah – Hazrat Khalid bin Walid – took the flag, until God Almighty granted him victory over the enemy. (Sahih al-Bukhari, Kitab al-manaqib, Hadith 3757, [Translation], Vol. 7, p. 243)

Upon returning from the Farewell Pilgrimage, when the Holy Prophetsa reached Medina, there no longer remained any threat to the people of Medina from the south. However, the danger from the Byzantines in the north still persisted. The Christians took great pride in their strength; thus, an attack from their side could occur at any time. Moreover, retribution for the martyrs of the Battle of Mu’tah had not been exacted. In that battle it was owing to the skill of Hazrat Khalid bin Walid that the Muslim army succeeded in returning to Medina.

Not many days had passed after the Holy Prophetsa returned from Hajj when, a few days later, he ordered that an army under the command of Hazrat Usamah bin Zaid be dispatched to launch an attack on Syria. (Muhammad Husain Haikal, Hiyat-e-Muhammad, Abu Afzal Muhammad Khan, p. 597)

The preparations for the army of Usamah were completed on Saturday, two days before the passing of the Holy Prophetsa, and its preparations had begun prior to the onset of his final illness. Towards the end of Safar, the Holy Prophetsa had instructed for preparations to be made to fight against the Byzantines. He called for Hazrat Usama and said, “Set out towards the place where your father was martyred.” Hazrat Zaid was martyred in that same place in an earlier battle. The Holy Prophetsa said, “Go there and trample them – i.e., the enemy – with your horses. I have appointed you as the commander of this army.” (Ibn Hajr, Fath-ul-Bari, Vol. 8, Qadeemi Kutub Khana Maqabil Aram Bagh, Karachi, p. 192) 

In another narration, it is recorded that the Holy Prophetsa said, “Trample Balqa and Darum with your horses.” Balqa is a region in the land of Syria situated between Damascus and Wadi al-Qura. Darum is a place in Palestine after Gaza on the route to Egypt. While instructing the departure towards Syria, he said, “Then at daybreak launch an attack upon the people of Ubna.” Ubna is the name of a place in Syria towards Balqa. He further said, “Travel swiftly so that you reach them before the news of your advance reaches them. Thus, if Allah grants you victory, then do not prolong your stay there, and take guides with you for the route, and send informers and scouts ahead of you.”

The Holy Prophetsa tied a banner for Hazrat Usama with his own hands. He then said, “In the name of Allah, perform jihad in His path, and fight against him who denies Allah. Do not commit treachery. Do not kill women or children and do not desire confrontation with the enemy.” This clause, too, points to the danger from the enemy – that if the enemy attacks, then one must fight, but one must not desire confrontation. He said, “You may not be aware, but perhaps you may be tried through this. But you should say: ‘O Allah, be sufficient for us against them in whatever manner You please and avert this war away from us.’” Thus, he taught this prayer as well: that war is not necessary; if war can be averted, then avert it.

He continued, “If they clash with you and if battle ensues and they gather together raising a clamour, even then dignity and silence are incumbent upon you. Then fight with composure and dignity, and do not quarrel among yourselves, otherwise you will become cowardly, and your awe and prestige will vanish. Become unified, and say: ‘O Allah, we are Your servants and they too are Your servants. Our forelocks and their forelocks are in Your hand, and You alone can be sufficient against them.’ And know that Paradise lies beneath the shade of the swords.”

Hazrat Usama departed bearing the banner tied by the hand of the Holy Prophetsa and entrusted it to Hazrat Buraydah bin Husayb. He gathered the army at Jurf. Jurf is a place three miles north of Medina. From among the honourable Muhajirin and Ansar, not a single person remained who was not called for this expedition. Among them were Hazrat Abu Bakr, Hazrat Umar, Hazrat Abu ‘Ubaidah bin al-Jarrah, Hazrat Sa‘d bin Abi Waqqas, Hazrat Sa‘id bin Zaid, Hazrat Qatadah bin Nu‘man and Hazrat Salamah bin Aslam: all of them were placed under the command of Hazrat Usama. Some people began to say, “This youth has been made a commander over the most eminent of the Muhajirin. Among them are great and senior Companions! How can a young boy be appointed as their leader?”

When these comments reached the Holy Prophetsa, he became greatly displeased. At that time, his blessed head was wrapped with a cloth, and he had covered himself with a cloak. He ascended the pulpit, praised and glorified Allah, and said:

“O people! The words that some of you have uttered concerning Usama’s appointment as commander have reached me. If you object to my appointing Usama as leader, then know that you had objected before when I appointed his father as a leader. By God, he was fully deserving of leadership, and after him, his son too is deserving of it. He was among those dearest to me, and indeed, both father and son are of such noble character that only goodness can be thought of them. Therefore, think well of this man (i.e., Usama), for he is among the best of you.”

The Muslims who were to depart with Hazrat Usama would go to bid farewell to the Holy Prophetsa and then proceed to join the army at Jurf. Meanwhile, the Holy Prophet’ssa illness intensified, but he continued to urge them, saying: “Dispatch Usama’s army! Let them march ahead without delay.”

On Sunday, the pain of the Holy Prophetsa became more severe. When Hazrat Usama returned from the camp, the Holy Prophetsa was unconscious. He returned because he learned of his critical condition. 

That day, the people had given the Holy Prophetsa some medicine. Hazrat Usama knelt down and kissed him. The Holy Prophetsa could not speak, but he raised both his hands toward the heavens and then placed them on Usama’s head. Hazrat Usama says, “I understood that he was praying for me.”

Hazrat Usama then returned to his army. On Monday, he came again to the Holy Prophetsa and found that he had somewhat recovered. The Holy Prophetsa said to him:

“Go forth with the blessings of Allah the Almighty.”

Thus, Hazrat Usama departed from the Holy Prophetsa and went to his army, ordering them to prepare for departure. But before they could set out, a messenger came from his mother – Hazrat Umm Aiman, the mother of Usama – bringing news that:

“It would seem that the Holy Prophetsa is in his final moments.”

Upon hearing this, Hazrat Usama immediately returned to the Holy Prophetsa, accompanied by Hazrat Umarra and Hazrat Abu Ubaidah. The Holy Prophetsa was nearing his demise at the time. Soon after this, he passed away.

Owing to his demise, the Muslim army returned from Jurf to Medina. Hazrat Buraidah bin Husaib brought back Hazrat Usama’s standard and fixed it at the door of the Holy Prophetsa.

According to one narration, when Hazrat Usama’s army had reached Dhu Khushab, the Holy Prophetsa passed away. Dhu Khushab is a valley about a night’s journey from Medina, on the route to Syria. In any case, the army returned.

After the demise of the Holy Prophetsa and the pledge of allegiance to Hazrat Abu Bakrra, Hazrat Abu Bakrra ordered Hazrat Buraidah bin Husaib to take the banner to Usama’s house and instruct him to proceed with his mission.

Hazrat Buraidah took the flag to the place where the army had first encamped. (Tarikh al-Tabari, Vol. 2, Dar Al-Kotob Al-Ilmiyah, Beirut, 2012, p. 244; Ibn Sa’d, Al-Tabqat Al-Kubra, Vol. 2, Dar Al-Kotob Al-Ilmiyah, Beirut, 2012, pp. 146-147; Subul al-Huda wa al-Rashad, Vol. 6, Dar Al-Kotob Al-Ilmiyah, Beirut, 1993, p. 248; Ibn Kathir, Al-Bidayah Wa Al-Nihayah, Vol. 3, Part 6, Dar Al-Kotob Al-Ilmiyah, Beirut, 2001, p. 302; Mu’jam-ul-Buldan, Vol. 1, Dar Al-Kotob Al-Ilmiyah, pp. 101 and 579-580; Furhang-e-Sirat, Zawar Academy Publications Karachi, 2003, pp. 87, 114 and 119)

The army consisted of three thousand men, among whom, according to one report, was a cavalry unit of one thousand. Another narration states that Hazrat Usama bin Zaid was sent towards Syria with seven hundred men. (Sharh Al-Allamah Al-zarqani ‘ala Al-mawahib Al- Ladunniyyah, Vol. 4, Dar Al-Kotob Al-Ilmiyah, Beirut, 1996, p. 155; Subul al-Huda wa al-Rashad, Vol. 6, Dar Al-Kotob Al-Ilmiyah, Beirut, 1993, p. 250; Ibn Kathir, Al-Bidayah Wa Al-Nihayah, Vol. 3, Part 6, Dar Al-Kotob Al-Ilmiyah, Beirut, 2001, p. 302)

It is related that on the second day after the Holy Prophet’ssa demise, Hazrat Abu Bakrra made a public announcement:

“The expedition of Usama will be completed as planned. No one from among the army of Usama shall remain behind in Medina. All of them must join the army at Jurf.” (Tarikh al-Tabari, Vol. 2, Dar Al-Kotob Al-Ilmiyah, Beirut, 2012, p. 244)

Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra has described the situation as follows:

“When the Holy Prophetsa passed away, the whole of Arabia fell into apostasy. Even courageous men like Hazrat Umarra and Hazrat Alira were momentarily disheartened at the sight of this great turmoil. Shortly before his passing, the Holy Prophetsa had prepared an army to march towards the Roman territories and had appointed Hazrat Usama as its commander. However, the army had not yet departed when the Holy Prophetsa passed away.

“At his demise, when Arabia rose in rebellion, the Companions thought: ‘If, during such a time of revolt, the army of Usama is sent away towards the Roman frontiers, then only elderly men, women and children will remain behind in Medina, and there will be no means left for the city’s defence.’

“Therefore, they proposed that a delegation of the senior Companions should go to Hazrat Abu Bakrra and request him to delay the dispatch of the army until the rebellion subsides.

“Accordingly, Hazrat Umarra and other leading Companions went to him and presented their request to delay dispatching the army until the rebellion subsides. 

“When Hazrat Abu Bakrra heard this, he replied with great indignation:

“‘Do you wish that after the demise of the Messengersa of Allah, the very first act of Abu Quhafah’s son should be to halt the army that the Holy Prophetsa himself had ordered to be dispatched?

“‘By Allah, even if the enemy were to invade Medina, and dogs were to drag the bodies of Muslim women through the streets, I would still not withhold this army which the Holy Prophetsa had commanded to go forth!’

“It was this faith and courage that Allah had instilled in Hazrat Abu Bakrra through His Word:

مُحَمَّدٌ رَّسُوْلُ اللّٰهِ وَ الَّذِیْنَ مَعَهٗ اَشِدَّآءُ عَلَى الْكُفَّارِ

“[Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah. And those who are with him are hard against the disbelievers, tender among themselves (48:30)]

“Just as when a current is passed through an ordinary wire it becomes charged with immense strength, likewise, through their attachment to the Holy Prophet Muhammadsa, his followers became embodiments of: اَشِدَّآءُ عَلَى الْكُفَّارِ “[hard against the disbelievers].” (Sair-e-Ruhani (6), Anwar-ul-Ulum, Vol. 22, pp. 593-594)

The Promised Messiahas has also described the dispatch of Usama’s army in his blessed book Sirr-ul-Khilafah:

“Ibn Athir writes in his chronicles: ‘When the news of the demise of the Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, reached Mecca, its Governor, ‘Itab ibn Usaid, went into hiding and Mecca was shaken to the core, and it seemed imminent that its people would renounce Islam. He also records—The common and elite of every tribe in Arabia apostatised. Hypocrisy came out in the open, and Jews and Christians started looking for favourable opportunities. (In other words, they observed that the Muslims were weakened and could now be attacked.) Muslims were like sheep on a rainy night due to the loss of their Prophet, their small number and the multitude of their enemy. (They were like sheep soaked in the rain and immobilised.)

“It was at such a time that the people said to Hazrat Abu Bakr: ‘These people only consider the army of Usama to be the Muslim army, and, as you can see, the Arabs have rebelled against you. It is, therefore, not prudent to separate yourself from these soldiers.’ Upon this, Hazrat Abu Bakr said: ‘By the One who has my soul in His Hand, even if I am convinced that wild, predatory animals would snatch me away, I would still send out Usama’s army in accordance with what the Messenger of Allah had commanded. I will never go against a decision taken by the Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him.’” (Sirr-ul-Khilafah, Ruhani Khazain, Vol. 8, p. 394 [footnote], Urdu Translation, Nazrat-e-Ishaat Rabwah, pp. 188-189)

In short, Hazrat Abu Bakrra upheld and carried out the command of the Holy Prophetsa exactly as it had been given.

He instructed that all those Companions who had been appointed to the army of Usama by the Holy Prophetsa should immediately rejoin it, saying: “No person whom the Messengersa of Allah included in the army of Usama shall remain behind. I will not grant anyone permission to stay back. Even if he has to go on foot, he must join the army.” Not a single person remained behind – all of them went with the army. (Sharh Al-Allamah Al-zarqani ‘ala Al-mawahib Al- Ladunniyyah, Vol. 4, Dar Al-Kotob Al-Ilmiyah, Beirut, 1996, p. 155)

In any case, regarding Hazrat Abu Bakrra dispatching this army, it is written that when, according to Hazrat Abu Bakr’sra command, Usama’sra army gathered in Jurf, Hazrat Abu Bakrra himself went there and inspected the army and arranged its ranks.

Regarding this, it is also mentioned that Hazrat Abu Bakrra said to Hazrat Usama, “If you consider it appropriate, leave Hazrat Umarra behind so that he may assist me in my work,” as Hazrat Umarra was also included in that army. Hazrat Usama agreed to this. (Tarikh al-Tabari, Vol. 2, Dar Al-Kotob Al-Ilmiyah, Beirut, 2012, p. 246)

After this incident, whenever Hazrat Umarra met Hazrat Usamah, even after he was elected as the Khalifa, he would address Usama saying:

السلام علیک ایھا الامیر

Meaning, “O leader, peace be upon you.” In response, Usama would say: 

غَفَرَ اللّٰہُ لَکَ

[“May Allah grant you forgiveness.”]

Hazrat Abu Bakrra instructed Hazrat Usama: “You must fully carry out everything that the Holy Prophetsa instructed you to do. Do not show any negligence whatsoever in fulfilling the commands of the Holy Prophetsa.” (Al-Kamil Fi Tarikh, Vol. 2, Dar Al-Kotob Al-Ilmiyah, Beirut, 2006, pp. 199-200; Al-Sirah Al-Halabiyyah, Vol. 3, Dar Al-Kotob Al-Ilmiyah, Beirut, 2002, p. 294; Tarikh al-Tabari, Vol. 2, Dar Al-Kotob Al-Ilmiyah, Beirut, 2012, p. 246)

The details of the battle have already been mentioned previously, so I will leave that aside. Just as the Holy Prophetsa had said, this army returned victorious. The enemy was either killed or taken prisoner. Not a single Muslim life was lost in the battle. According to narrations, this army returned to Medina after remaining away for 40 to 70 days.

Hazrat Abu Bakr’sra love for the Holy Prophetsa was such that he said regarding Usama’s flag, which the Holy Prophetsa had tied with his own hands, “How could it be that the son of Abu Quhafah should undo the knot of that flag which the Holy Prophetsa himself tied with his hands?” Consequently, when the army of Usama returned, the knot of that flag was not untied, and that flag remained in Hazrat Usama’s house thereafter, until Hazrat Usama passed away. (Al-Kamil Fi Tarikh, Vol. 2, Dar Al-Kotob Al-Ilmiyah, Beirut, 2006, p. 200; Ibn Sa’d, Al-Tabqat Al-Kubra, Vol. 2, Dar Al-Kotob Al-Ilmiyah, Beirut, 2012, p. 147; Munir Muhammad Al-Ghazban, Al-Maseeratul Islamiyyah Li Jil-ul-Khilafah Al-Rashidah Al-Majlid Al-Awwal Abu Bakr Siddiq, Dar-ul-Islam, 2015, pp. 34-35)

اللّٰھُمَّ صَلِّ عَلیٰ مُحَمَّدٍ وَاٰلِ مُحَمَّد

[“O Allah, send blessings upon Muhammadsa and the people of Muhammadsa.”]

With this, the series on battles and expeditions concludes. I will see about presenting other aspects from the life of the Holy Prophetsa in the future, insha-Allah.

At this time, I also wish to mention two deceased members and will lead their funeral prayers afterwards, insha-Allah.

The first is respected Azizur Rahman Khalid Sahib, a missionary of the Jamaat, who recently passed away in America at the age of 79.

اِنَّا لِلّٰہِ وَاِنَّآ اِلَيْہِ رٰجِعُوْنَ

[“Surely, to Allah we belong and to Him shall we return.”]

The deceased’s maternal grandfather was Hazrat Mian Rang Ali Sahibra, a Companion of the Promised Messiahas. Regarding his admission to Jamia, Azizur Rahman Khalid Sahib relates that when he was in seventh grade, one day during the assembly at Talim-ul-Islam High School, Hazrat Maulana Qazi Muhammad Nazir Sahibra came and delivered a lecture on the need and importance of devoting one’s life. This lecture had a profound effect on many students. When the lecture ended, the deceased felt a strong desire to devote his life. He went straight to Jamia, and after a brief interview, he was admitted in 1960. He obtained the Shahid degree from Jamia in 1969. It took him nine years to complete Jamia as he had suffered a train accident, which caused serious injuries, resulting in him falling behind by two years. Despite this, he did not give up, and his life was saved. He used to say that it was through the prayers of Hazrat Khalifatul Masih IIIrh that his life was saved.

After becoming a missionary, he served abroad in Sierra Leone, Nigeria, Ghana, Tanzania and Zanzibar. In Pakistan, he served in various places as a missionary. Upon returning, he continued serving in Tahrik-e-Jadid, in Wakalat-e-Ishaat in Rabwah. His grandson, Hamza Obaidullah, who is also a missionary and a graduate of Jamia, says that Azizur Rahman Sahib used to tell him that there were times in Africa when he would boil rice, sprinkle salt over it and eat it; there would be no curry or other food available. At times, even such simple food would not be available, not even boiled rice, and sometimes they had to remain hungry for several days. These were the kinds of sacrifices made by the early missionaries, which today’s missionaries should keep before them.

His son, Anisur Rahman Anas, says that he would never allow food to be wasted. Even at Jalsa, many times, instead of having food served on a plate, he would simply eat the leftover pieces of bread from the tables. He would say, “If the Promised Messiahas could eat these pieces of bread, why can’t we?” From his youth, he was devoted to Tahajjud. He was kind, sociable, compassionate, pious, hardworking and loyal. He had a deep bond of love with Khilafat. The deceased was also a musi. He was with me in Ghana while I was there. He worked with great loyalty, effort and simplicity. He served selflessly. He is survived by two sons and three daughters, and many grandchildren. May Allah the Almighty grant the deceased forgiveness and mercy and elevate his station.

The second mention is of respected Eddi Humaedi Sahib from Indonesia. On 22 November, after completing Umrah, he suddenly fell ill, and due to that illness, he passed away in Medina at the age of 77. 

اِنَّا لِلّٰہِ وَاِنَّآ اِلَيْہِ رٰجِعُوْنَ

[“Surely, to Allah we belong and to Him shall we return.”]

Ahmadiyyat entered his family in the 1930s when his maternal uncle, Muhammad Rauf Sahib, pledged allegiance through Hazrat Maulana Rahmat Ali Sahibra. Afterwards, his maternal grandfather and mother also accepted Ahmadiyyat. His son-in-law, Basuki Ahmad Sahib, is a missionary. He says that day and night, he had a passion for propagating the message, and it was always his longing to give his life in the path of propagation. He says that whenever he met him, propagating the message was always his preferred subject of conversation, and his method of preaching was a source of inspiration for many missionaries.

His daughters also write that he would go to the mosque before the call to prayer and spend time engaged in the remembrance of Allah. He recited the Holy Quran daily, studying the translation and commentary. He would mark the verses important for preaching. He never abandoned the Tahajjud prayer. Even at the age of 76, he would travel on a motorcycle for preaching. He used to tell his children, “Do not fall short in financial sacrifice; this is the right of Allah. To the utmost extent, offer as much sacrifice as you can. And beware, never use even a single penny from the Jamaat’s funds; you will be held accountable.”

The group leader who accompanied him during Umrah writes that throughout the pilgrimage, he would keep saying, “When I return from here, I will preach, and I will tell people that members of the Ahmadiyya Jamaat perform the worship of Hajj in Mecca.” When the doctor saw him after he became ill and then passed away, he said, “God Almighty has accepted his good deeds, as he has been granted the honour of burial in Jannat-ul-Baqi.” He passed away there, and he was buried there in Jannat-ul-Baqi.

In Pakistan, Ahmadis are not allowed to bury their deceased in their own cemeteries. And if the grave of another Muslim is nearby, they say, “You cannot come near it.” But Allah the Almighty granted him the opportunity to be buried in Jannat-ul-Baqi. Now, let those people try to dig up his grave from there. They would never have the courage to do so. These clerics will themselves meet their end soon, insha-Allah.

The Secretary for Tabligh in Indonesia, Ghanawun Wardi Sahib, says that he was a successful and extremely passionate preacher, who truly made the motto “Do not let a single day pass without doing tabligh” the principle of his life. He had an old motorcycle, on which he would travel to far-off villages. He would also go to areas where there was opposition to the Jamaat, and as a result of his preaching, he brought hundreds of people into the fold of Ahmadiyyat. He says that he had a very strong bond with Khilafat, full of love and affection. By the grace of Allah, he was a musi. He is survived by four daughters and ten grandchildren. As mentioned, one of his sons-in-law is also a missionary. May Allah the Almighty grant him forgiveness and mercy and elevate his station.

(Official Urdu transcript published in the Daily Al Fazl International, 26 December 2025, p. 2-8. Translated by The Review of Religions.)