Home Blog

First Quran Seminar held by Jamaat Kosovo

0
Jinahuddin Saif, National President, Jamaat Kosovo
Quran Seminar-Kosovo
Image: Kosovo Jamaat

Jamaat-e-Ahmadiyya Kosovo held its first Quran Seminar at the Jamaat Centre in Pristina, on 21 December 2025. Members and guests from different regions of Kosovo participated in this spiritually enriching gathering, which focused on the importance of reciting, understanding and practically applying the teachings of the Holy Quran.

The seminar began with a recitation from the Holy Quran, followed by a speech by Shkelqim Bytyqi Sahib on “Introduction – The Miracle of the Eloquence of the Holy Quran.” He explained that the Holy Quran is the final and divinely protected Word of God, preserved both in its text and meaning. The second presentation was delivered by Besmir Sahib, National Secretary Ishaat, on “The Contribution of the Worldwide Ahmadiyya Muslim Jamaat Regarding the Holy Quran.” He outlined the extensive services rendered by the Jamaat to the Holy Quran under the blessed guidance of Khilafat.

The final address was delivered by my humble self, on the theme, “Let us Read the Quran, Understand it and Put it into Practice.” In his address, he emphasised that a believer’s relationship with the Holy Quran must go beyond mere recitation. Citing ahadith, he explained that true benefit from the Quran lies in reciting it thoughtfully, reflecting upon its meanings and acting upon its guidance.

The formal programme concluded with a silent prayer. A meal was then served, followed by an interactive question-and-answer session, during which participants engaged thoughtfully with the speakers and reflected on the themes discussed. Approximately 30 participants, including men, women, children and guests, attended the seminar. Participants travelled from Mitrovica, Pristina, Peja and Fushë Kosova, reflecting a growing interest in gaining a deeper and more meaningful understanding of the Holy Quran.

Khatm-e-Nabuwwat conference held by Jamaat-e-Ahmadiyya Calgary, Canada

0
Syed Mukarram Nazeer, Canada Correspondent
Khatm-e-Nabuwwat-conference-Calgary-Canada
Image: Canada Jamaat

On 13 December 2025, Jamaat-e-Ahmadiyya Calgary, Canada, hosted a Khatm-e-Nabuwwat conference. The conference focused on presenting the true Islamic understanding of Khatamun-Nabiyyeen (the Seal of the Prophets), highlighting the unparalleled dignity, supremacy and exalted rank of the Holy Prophet Muhammadsa, and affirming Islam as the perfect and living religion.

The background

In May 2025, a non-Ahmadi Muslim organisation in Calgary held a conference on the same topic and publicly invited Ahmadi Muslims to attend and participate through questions and discussion. A delegation from the Jamaat Calgary attended the event and engaged with them.

Following the programme, the non-Ahmadi Muslim organisation expressed interest in pursuing a structured and scholarly dialogue with the Jamaat on this subject. Correspondence took place to establish mutually acceptable terms for such a dialogue. Despite Jamaat-e-Ahmadiyya Calgary accommodating several unreasonable conditions in good faith, the other party continued to introduce new restrictions, ultimately abstaining totally from proceeding with the dialogue.

With the approval of Amir Jamaat-e-Ahmadiyya Canada, Lal Khan Malik Sahib, it was decided that, regardless of the outcome of the proposed terms for the dialogue, Jamaat Calgary would independently host a public conference to educate Muslim brothers and sisters on the authentic Quranic and scholarly understanding of this vital doctrine. It was named ”Khatm-e-Nabuwwat Conference.”

The conference was promoted through a multi-platform outreach strategy that included community engagement, social media and broadcast media. A printed invitation letter was distributed among Jamaat members to personally invite non-Ahmadi contacts and friends, with a digital version shared across Jamaat Calgary’s local communication groups. In addition, advertisements were placed on Facebook, while unpaid promotional content was shared on social media platforms. A radio interview was also conducted on a local Urdu-language radio station to raise awareness of the event. Furthermore, the event poster and invitation were shared online within a large Pakistani community group of over 90,000 members, where they received significant online engagement.

Proceedings of the conference

Khatm-e-Nabuwwat-conference-Calgary-Canada
Image: Canada Jamaat

The conference was held at the Genesis Centre, a prominent community venue in Calgary. The programme commenced with lunch, followed by the Zuhr prayer. The formal proceedings began with a recitation from the Holy Quran, followed by Urdu and Arabic poetry of the Promised Messiahas, expressing profound love and reverence for the Holy Prophet Muhammadsa and the perfection of Islam.

The first address, delivered in English, was presented by a missionary, Hafiz Attaul Wahab Sahib and the second address, delivered in Urdu, was by Naib Amir Jamaat Canada, Hadi Ali Chaudhary Sahib. Both speakers comprehensively addressed the concept of Khatamun-Nabiyyeen, drawing upon Quranic evidence, linguistic analysis, authentic ahadith, historical precedents and classical Islamic scholarship. Their presentations powerfully demonstrated that the Ahmadiyya understanding of this title in no way diminishes, but rather magnifies and exalts the status of the Holy Prophet Muhammadsa.

This was followed by a question-and-answer session, where audiences asked questions on the topic. Closing remarks were delivered by the Local Amir of Jamaat Calgary. Silent prayer brought the session to an end, followed by the Asr prayer.

The event also featured an exhibition showcasing the Holy Quran in multiple translations, as done by Ahmadiyya Muslim Jamaat. In addition, the exhibition also highlighted the life of the Holy Prophet Muhammadsa. Finally, a well-organised bookstall offered books and literature to all attendees of the conference.

It is noteworthy that despite efforts by certain individuals from the non-Ahmadi Muslim community in Calgary to discourage Muslims from attending the conference through social media campaigns, the event saw a strong turnout. Just before the conference started, one non-Ahmadi individual was observed holding a placard near the entrance of the venue in an attempt to dissuade attendees. 

A total of 111 non-Ahmadi guests, along with 456 members of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Jamaat, attended the conference. Additionally, the event was live-streamed. The conference also received media coverage, including reporting by a Bengali news outlet.

‘Spread of Islam in the world’: Qadian sends its first telegram (1926)

Qadian

First telegram from Qadian

Friends have already been informed that a telegraph facility has been installed at the post office in Qadian and that it will commence operations within a few days.

It is now announced that the telegraphic apparatus has been fully installed, operations have begun and the very first telegram – sent by Hazrat Khalifatul Masih II[ra] – was dispatched to the secretaries of the Ahmadiyya Jamaat in Peshawar, Lahore, Delhi, Lucknow, Calcutta, Madras, Bombay (now Mumbai), Karachi, Rangoon, Quetta, Hyderabad Deccan and Patna.

The text of the telegram is as follows:

“[We] are grateful to Allah the Almighty for this divine favour that, with the arrival of the telegraph at the Ahmadiyya Jamaat’s centre in Qadian, its connection with the outside world has now been established. The coming of the telegraph here also constitutes the fulfilment of those prophecies of the Promised Messiahas which he made regarding the progress and prosperity of Qadian. Taking advantage of this occasion, I exhort all those who are called Ahmadis to devote all their efforts and energies to the spread of Islam in the world and to the swift fulfilment of that singular objective for which God the Almighty sent Hazrat Ahmadas into this world.” – Khalifatul Masih

Henceforth, friends should send telegrams directly to Qadian. Such developments in Qadian constitute clear and compelling proof of the truthfulness of the Promised Messiahas. There was a time when flour itself was not available for purchase to prepare a single meal in this place; yet today, by virtue of the Promised Messiahas, this town has attained such remarkable progress that the need for a telegraph arose – and, by the grace of God Almighty, the telegraph has indeed been installed.

Nazarat Da‘wat-o-Tabligh

Although all the activities of the Ahmadiyya Jamaat and the present administrative structure – namely, the various directorates – are by no means of lesser importance, the distinctive significance accorded to this department (Da‘wat-o-Tabligh) is nonetheless profound, in view of the very purpose for which the Promised Messiahas appeared, the urgent spiritual thirst of the age and the era of the completion of the worldwide spread of faith.

The magnificent achievement accomplished by the Promised Messiahas through his advent and the foundational principle which his Khulafa upheld and fulfilled in the most befitting manner, may – if expressed briefly and in summary – be encapsulated in a single word: tabligh [preaching and propagation of Islam]. In other words, if Islam Ahmadiyyat possesses a very lifeblood, it is tabligh.

It therefore becomes the duty of every individual who is called an Ahmadi to be ready, in every possible way, to assist in the fulfilment of this objective. In order to accomplish, in the best possible manner, the purpose underlying the advent of the Promised Messiahas, it was essential that this work be carried out in an organised form – so that time, financial resources and labour might be economised, while the objective itself be effectively realised. With these benefits in view, just as other directorates were established to administer different functions, this directorate (Da‘wat-o-Tabligh) was likewise constituted.

By the grace of Allah, this department has, during the year (1925), undertaken several endeavours that are distinguished both in quality and in scope. As is evident, its sphere of activity is not confined merely to the length and breadth of India; rather, extending beyond its borders, it now encompasses London, America, Hong Kong, Mauritius, Australia, Damascus, Sumatra, Africa, Iran, Turkestan and other foreign lands. Everywhere, solely through the grace, mercy and divine succour of God, the work of the complete spread of the true faith of Islam is being carried out. The accounts of the London Mission are presented first.

London Mission

The construction of the London Mosque has commenced. While it may not be the first house of God in the midst of the temples of idols of the world at large, it certainly stands as the first house of God in London. It is hoped, God willing, that this house of God will be completed by March of the coming year and will thereafter serve as a guiding proof for the people of that area.

As friends are aware, Maulvi Abdul Rahim Sahib Dard[ra] MA and Maulvi Ghulam Farid[ra] MA – two capable young men – are engaged there with complete devotion and steadfast perseverance.

In addition to the construction of the mosque, strong protest meetings were held in response to the martyrdom of Hazrat Maulvi Nimatullahrh Sahib Shaheed of Kabul and other Ahmadi martyrs. Thereafter, through the press, concerted efforts were made to absolve Islam of the blame which ignorant Afghan clerics, by their own actions, sought to attach to it.

Among such endeavours was the raising of a strong voice of protest against a cartoon published – deliberately or otherwise – by The Star newspaper of London, in which blasphemy was committed against the Holy Prophetsa through pictorial representation.

In addition to missionary correspondence, this mission successfully delivered lectures on various aspects of Islam in different cities and societies. For instance, besides lectures held at their own residence and in Hyde Park, successful lectures were delivered in cities such as Manchester, Harrow, Chatham, Portsmouth and others, which proved to be an effective means of drawing people towards Islam.

Some European converts to Islam had, owing to certain weaknesses, adopted apostasy; however, through the dedicated efforts of Ahmadi missionaries, they were once again brought under the banner of Islam.

The Review of Religions magazine, which was previously published in the English language from Qadian, has now been permanently transferred to London and is being published there with renewed vigour and prominence.

American Mission

This mission, too, is a successful one. After Mufti Muhammad Sadiq Sahib[ra], Maulvi Muhammad Din Sahib[ra] was deputed there; having completed his term of service, he has now returned. In his place, Muhammad Yusuf Khan Sahib has been appointed as the person in charge of the mission.

The mission owns a building of its own, named Al-Masjid, on which a sum of thirty thousand rupees has been expended, the greater part of which was met through contributions from America.

Australian Mission

Maulvi Hassan Musa Khan Sahib[ra] serves as its in-charge. Despite his advanced age, he continues to work with the vigour and energy of a young man. In addition to his other efforts in propagation and struggle, his most notable achievement of the year (1925) was lodging a protest against a businessman’s advertisement which declared: “The mountain would not go to Muhammad, so Muhammad must perforce go to the mountain.” Upon being protested against, the businessman issued an apology.

Damascus Mission

This mission has been established only recently. Syed Zain-ul-Abidin Waliullah Shah Sahib[ra] and Maulvi Jalal-ud-Din Shams Sahib[ra] are serving there and by the grace of God Almighty, a jamaat has also been formed.

Our missionaries are conveying the message of truth to the people through both speech and writing and are also publishing articles in newspapers. This, as it were, constituted the completion of the divine argument, after which divine chastisement manifested itself in the form of war, leading to widespread disorder in Syria. Having rendered gratitude to God Almighty, we also consider the British Government deserving of thanks for the care it took of our missionaries during this period of turmoil and arrests and for ensuring their protection to the fullest possible extent.

Sumatra Mission

For the islands of Sumatra and Java, Maulvi Rahmat Ali Sahib[ra] (Maulvi Fazil), was deputed during the year (1925). He has been undertaking preaching tours in various regions, wherein, by the grace of God Almighty, he has met with success and several individuals have entered the Ahmadiyya Jamaat. It is hoped, God willing, that very soon a jamaat will be established there which will assist Maulvi Sahib[ra] in the work of the spread of the message of God Almighty.

Some students from these islands are currently receiving education in Qadian; upon completion of their studies, they will, God willing, render valuable service in carrying out this work in that region.

African Mission

Although the light of Islam Ahmadiyyat is spreading throughout the entire African continent – and the time is not far when its mirage-like deserts will, through the surging waves of the River of Unity, be transformed into ever-green oases – certain regions of this continent hold the distinction of having been the first to lend attentive ears to the call of truth, thus standing in the rank of the foremost pioneers.

Among the most prominent of these regions are the Gold Coast, Northern Nigeria and Southern Nigeria. It is in these very areas that not merely hundreds but thousands of African souls […] have entered the Ahmadiyya Muslim Jamaat and the majority of them are now themselves actively engaged in the work of tabligh.

With regard to these regions, it is also noteworthy that, by the blessings of Islam Ahmadiyyat, not only is their spiritual condition being reformed, but their physical and material circumstances are also improving. Just as their religious standing has been rectified, their worldly condition has likewise begun to flourish. Thus, while individuals devoted to traversing spiritual ranks – saints, righteous missionaries, steadfast in prayer and fasting – have emerged, personalities pursuing worldly attainments have also appeared; they are becoming doctors, barristers and the like. This comprehensive progress is solely a blessing of Islam Ahmadiyyat: an unenlightened people advancing, in full measure, not only in religion but also in civilisation and thereafter exerting themselves in the work of spreading and preaching [of Islam].

Accordingly, as a result of their preaching and outreach, a magnificent building valued at thirty thousand rupees has now been established in the Gold Coast, serving as a central hub for missionary activity. The missionary there, Maulvi Fazlur Rahman Sahib Hakim, also undertook a tour to Ashanti during his travels and conveyed the message of truth to the local ruler, King Prempeh.

In this region, Chief Mahdi had served as amir; however, following his demise, the young amir Yahya was appointed to the position. He had previously received training under Maulvi Abdul Rahim Nayyar Sahib[ra].

The condition of Northern Nigeria is similarly reassuring. On land acquired from the government at Kano, construction of a mosque has commenced and has, in all likelihood, already been completed. The local imam of this jamaat, Shams-ud-Din Sahib, will, during his missionary tour in January, also visit essential centres such as Ebo.

In Southern Nigeria, too, the condition of the people continues to improve and they have achieved success in a legal case concerning the mosque. By the grace of Allah, all missionary activities there are being conducted under the supervision of imam Ijo, who is working with diligence and sincerity.

Mauritius Mission

In Mauritius, Sufi Ghulam Muhammad Sahib[ra] BA is engaged in missionary work. This is the very land that bears within its soil the body of the young Ahmadi missionary, Maulvi Obaidullah Sahib and will continue to bear it until the Day of Judgement.

In recent days, certain well-known lecturers of the Arya Samaj have made this region the field of their extensive travels and have initiated their propagandist activities. However, thanks be to God, the commendable efforts of Sufi Ghulam Muhammad Sahib[ra] and other Ahmadi friends are continually neutralising their harmful effects. The time is not distant when, in accordance with the prophecy of the Messiah of God, Arya Samaj will everywhere breathe its last and become permanently extinguished. Overall, the work in this region is also satisfactory and steadily progressing.

Several other regions

In addition to the above, there are many other regions which, for fear of undue length, cannot be mentioned here. They, too, are advancing towards progress and the friends serving as missionaries in those areas are exerting themselves in this cause with their full strength and dedication.

(Translated by Al Hakam from the original Urdu, published in the 12 January 1926 issue of Al Fazl)

This Week in History: 16-22 January

A glimpse into the rich history of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Jamaat

This Week in History

16 January 1936: On this day, Haji Ahmad Khan Ayaz, a missionary to Europe, departed Qadian for Hungary. He reached Budapest on 21 February 1936. (Tarikh-e-Ahmadiyyat, Vol. 7, p. 290)

17 January 1905: On this day, the Promised Messiahas received a letter in English from someone in Europe. In the letter, the gentleman stated that he and his wife had read the English parts of the books of the Promised Messiahas that they had available. He added that his affiliation was with a small sect of Christianity, which had abandoned the belief in the godship of Christ and believed him to be a pious person who guided people. He further said that he would like to read about Hazrat Ahmad’sas beliefs regarding Prophet Jesusas and that he desired to read about the evidence proving his grave to be in Kashmir. (Malfuzat, 1988, Vol. 4, pp. 226-227)

17 January 1914: Hazrat Hakim Maulvi Nur-ud-Din, Khalifatul Masih I’sra health took a turn for the worse. However, despite the intensity of his deteriorating health, on this day, he delivered lectures on the Holy Quran and Sahih al-Bukhari. Huzoorra even said, “Due to my frailty, sometimes when I must work while lying down, if I find a new book, I cannot set it aside without finishing it.” (Tarikh-e-Ahmadiyyat, Vol. 3, p. 501)

18 January 1889: Hazrat Mirza Bashir-ud-Din Mahmud Ahmadra was born on 12 January 1889. Thus, for the next nineteen years, he enjoyed the nearness and affection of Hazrat Ahmadas. After the birth of the promised son, the Promised Messiahas carried out the sunnah of ‘aqiqah on this day. (Maktubat-e-Ahmadiyya, Vol. 5, p. 163)

To read more about this, see: ‘‘Unique Relationship of a Father and Son’’ at www.alhakam.org (15 February 2019).

18 January 2014: On this day, Hazrat Khalifatul Masih Vaa inaugurated the Noor Mosque in Crawley, UK. (“New Mosque Opened by World Muslim Leader in Crawley”, www.pressahmadiyya.com)

19 January 1954: On this day, a court of inquiry for the investigation of the disturbances against the Jamaat in Punjab took the statement of Hazrat Sir Chaudhry Muhammad Zafrulla Khanra. In this statement, he dispelled many misconceptions spread in the country about Jamaat-e-Ahmadiyya. Essential parts of this statement can be read on pages 420 to 432 of volume 15 of Tarikh-e-Ahmadiyyat.

19 January 1999: On this day, Hazrat Khalifatul Masih IVrh urged members during his Eid-ul-Fitr sermon to celebrate Eid with the less fortunate. Members of the Jamaat responded enthusiastically, and a large number of gifts were distributed to the needy in various countries around the world on the occasion of Eid. (Silsila Ahmadiyya, Vol. 4, p. 897)

20 January 1954: During his Friday sermon on this day, Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra urged members of the Jamaat to study the books of the Promised Messiahas carefully. Huzoorra also directed Sadr Anjuman Ahmadiyya to take suitable measures to ensure the preservation and protection of the clothes and relics [tabarrukat] that belonged to the Promised Messiahas. (Tarikh-e-Ahmadiyyat, Vol. 17, p. 385)

20 January 1956: On this day, during his Friday sermon, Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra talked about Jamaat’s mission in the USA and expressed his targets regarding the amount of Chanda and the number of mosques and missionaries needed in future. (Khutbat-e-Mahmud, Vol. 37, pp. 23-24) To read more about this, see: ‘‘Hazrat Musleh-e-Maud’s ‘American dream’’’ at www.alhakam.org (5 March 2021, p. 19).

21 January 1886: On this day, the Promised Messiahas went for a chillah (a 40-day retreat specifically for worship) to Hoshiarpur on a small, ox-drawn, two-wheeled vehicle. During this journey, Huzooras crossed the Beas River. (Tarikh-e-Ahmadiyyat, Vol. 1, p. 275) For more details, see “Forty nights of seclusion”, at www.alhakam.org (19 February 2021, pp. 35-36).

21 January 1909: On this day, Hazrat Khalifatul Masih Ira asked Jamaat members to pay special attention to helping orphans, people in need, and students with insufficient resources. (Badr Qadian, 21 January 1909, p. 1)

22 February 1920: Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra delivered his famous lecture Sadaqat-e-Islam aur zara’i taraqqi-e-Islam (i.e., The truth of Islam and the means of progress of Islam) about the truthfulness of Islam and the way to spread its teachings. This historic speech was delivered at the famous Vande Mataram Hall in Amritsar, India. (Tarikh-e-Ahmadiyyat, Vol. 4, p. 255)

22 January 1982:On this day, Hazrat Khalifatul Masih IIIrh, observing the needs of the Jamaat, urged young individuals who had completed their BA, BSc, MA, or MSc degrees to dedicate their lives to the service of Islam. (Khutbat-e-Nasir, Vol. 9, pp. 369–373)

The deeper reality of the word of Allah and the soul

People have gravely misunderstood the term ‘Word of Allah’ which is used for the Messiahas. They have understood this as being a means of some distinction for the Messiahas, but this is not the case at all. Every human being becomes a ‘Word of Allah’ when they emerge from the darkness, impurity and gloom of the baser self.

Bear in mind that every human being is a Word of Allah because they possess a soul, which has been referred to as the command of the Lord (amri-rabi) in the Holy Quran. However, on account of his foolishness and ignorance, as man does not give due importance to the soul, he essentially chains it in fetters and shackles, blinding its vision and blackening its pure state with perilous darkness and evil, marring the soul to such an extent that it becomes so dim that it can hardly be perceived. But when man repents and turns towards Allah the Exalted, and removes the cloak of his impure life of darkness, the heart begins to shine, and the journey to the original source—which is God—begins, until finally, when a person reaches the highest state of righteousness, all of their dirt and filth is removed and what remains of man is Allah’s Word. This is a subtle point of knowledge and wisdom. All people do not have the ability to attain to the depth of this matter.

(Malfuzat [English], Vol. 2, pp.121-122)

True patience at the first shock

0

عَنْ أَنَسِ بْنِ مَالِكٍ رضى الله عنه قَالَ مَرَّ النَّبِيُّ صلى الله عليه وسلم بِامْرَأَةٍ تَبْكِي عِنْدَ قَبْرٍ فَقَالَ : اتَّقِي اللَّهَ وَاصْبِرِي‏‏.‏ قَالَتْ إِلَيْكَ عَنِّي، فَإِنَّكَ لَمْ تُصَبْ بِمُصِيبَتِي، وَلَمْ تَعْرِفْهُ‏.‏ فَقِيلَ لَهَا إِنَّهُ النَّبِيُّ صلى الله عليه وسلم‏.‏ فَأَتَتْ باب النَّبِيِّ صلى الله عليه وسلم فَلَمْ تَجِدْ عِنْدَهُ بَوَّابِينَ فَقَالَتْ لَمْ أَعْرِفْكَ‏.‏ فَقَالَ: إِنَّمَا الصَّبْرُ عِنْدَ الصَّدْمَةِ الأُولَى.‏

Hazrat Anas ibn Malikra narrates: 

“The Prophetsa passed by a woman who was weeping beside a grave. He said to her, ‘Fear Allah and be patient.’ She replied, ‘Leave me alone, for you have not been afflicted with a calamity like mine.’ She had not recognised him. Then she was told that he was the Prophetsa. So she came to the door of the Prophetsa and found no doorkeepers there. She said, ‘I did not recognise you.’ He said, ‘True patience is shown only at the first shock.’”

(Sahih al-Bukhari, Kitab al-jana’iz, Bab ziyarati l-qubur, Hadith 1283)

Friday Sermon – Muhammad (sa): The excellent exemplar – Uswatun Hasanatun (19 December 2025)

0

Friday Sermon

19 December 2025

Muhammadsa: The excellent exemplar – Uswatun Hasanatun

Friday Sermon

After reciting the tashahhud, ta‘awwuz and Surah al-Fatihah, Hazrat Khalifatul Masih Vaa recited verse 22 of Surah al-Ahzab. 

لَقَدْ كَانَ لَكُمْ فِيْ رَسُوْلِ اللّٰہِ اُسْوَۃٌ حَسَنَۃٌ لِّمَنْ كَانَ يَرْجُوا اللّٰہَ وَالْيَوْمَ الْاٰخِرَ وَذَكَرَ اللّٰہَ كَثِيْرًا

Allah the Almighty states: 

“Verily you have in the Prophet of Allah an excellent model, for him who fears Allah and the Last Day and who remembers Allah much.”

Someone once asked Hazrat Aishara to share something in relation to the excellent morals and the noble character of the Holy Prophetsa. Upon this, Hazrat Aishara replied, “Have you not read the Holy Quran?” Allah the Almighty has Himself testified to his excellent character, as Allah the Almighty says: 

وَاِنَّكَ لَعَلٰى خُلُقٍ عَظِيْمٍ

“And thou dost surely possess high moral excellences.” (The Holy Quran, Ch.68: V.5; Musnad Ahmad bin Hanbal, Vol. 8, Alam Al Kotob, Beirut, pp. 144-145)

Only those can serve as a model for others in any given quality, who possess an excellence in that very quality. As far as the Holy Prophetsa is concerned, whether it is in relation to the rights due to Allah the Almighty, or the rights due to His creation, the Holy Prophetsa held such a lofty status in regard to both virtues that Allah the Almighty Himself testified to it. Hence, Allah the Almighty has stated that the Holy Prophetsa is a model for you. Do not merely listen to his words, but also act in accordance with them; merely professing belief is not sufficient. When you act in accordance [with these teachings], then surely you will be able to obtain that rank for which Allah the Almighty sent his Messengersa. Hence, this is the responsibility of every Muslim, every believer. There are people in the world who perform a few good deeds, or they do something which becomes widely known and as a result, they become renowned and receive accolades and rewards. Some receive the Nobel Prize, whereas others receive other types of rewards. Nevertheless, this reward is given by a committee or the government, who are appointed for this task. However, it has never been the case that an entire nation has agreed upon something so unanimously. The true reward is that which was bestowed upon the Holy Prophetsa even before his prophethood, in his youth, when people called him Sadiq (the Truthful) and Amin (the Trustworthy). (Ibn Hisham, Al-Sirah al-Nabawiyyah, Dar Al-Kotob Al-Ilmiyah, Beirut, p. 155; Sahih al-Bukhari, Kitab at-tafsir, Hadith 4792)

Though he was not in need of any accolade, yet, in the eyes of the people, he had reached a station that was unparalleled, and the entire nation gave him this title. Hence, this is the lofty rank of the Holy Prophetsa and he himself said that “you should follow my sunnah and practice.” (Sunan Abi Dawud, Kitab as-sunnah, Hadith 4607)

Because Allah the Almighty has sent me for your reformation. 

The Holy Prophetsa stated that he had been sent to perfect the high moral qualities. (Al-Bayhaqi, Al-Sunan al-Kubra, Vol. 10, Kitab ash-shahadah, Hadith 21379, Maktabat-ul-Rushd, Riyadh, p. 310)

Thus, only the one who personally possesses all these qualities can be said to have perfected his morals and possess all such attributes. As I have mentioned, Allah the Almighty Himself has said that the Holy Prophetsa is an excellent model for us. Therefore, we must give his life such great importance so that we act in accordance with every word of his. Furthermore, every word of his is in accordance with the teachings of the Holy Quran and it comes from Allah the Almighty. As such, the Holy Prophetsa is a perfect model for every moral quality a person possesses, or should possess, and also in demonstrating the attributes of Allah the Almighty. In the Introduction to the Study of the Holy Quran, Hazrat Khalifatul Masih IIra has also presented certain aspects of the morals and character of the Holy Prophetsa and they are also mentioned in books of sirah [biographical accounts of the Holy Prophetsa]. I will briefly mention some of these today, and whenever future opportunities arise, I shall continue to shed light on them.

The first aspect is the rights that are owed to God Almighty – i.e., the rights owed to His worship. What do we learn about this within the example of the Holy Prophetsa? We find that his entire life was immersed in the love of God. Despite the fact that he was made to shoulder enormous responsibilities – he had to disseminate the new religious law and morally train the people – just like the Promised Messiahas said, he turned savages into humans, then civilised humans and then ultimately transformed them into godly people. (Lecture Sialkot, Ruhani Khazain, Vol. 20, p. 206)

Despite the fact that this was such a heavy task, he never once forgot the rights owed to Allah the Almighty, which was to worship Him. 

This is a point of vital importance. During this time, he was made to endure a great many difficulties as well. He had to participate in wars, and enemies attacked him. But he never wavered in fulfilling rights that were due to the worship of Allah. Thus, this is the shining example that we have before us – that we always keep God Almighty at the forefront of our affairs, for if we prioritise God Almighty in every situation, then all of our personal difficulties will be resolved naturally. 

People often mention that they have this problem and that problem; that they have prayed in such and such manner – mentioning that they pray for their various difficulties – but the truth is that we do not fulfil the rights of God Almighty. This is why, then, people remain deprived. 

God Almighty says you should also fulfil the rights that you owe to Him. And what was the standard of worship of the Holy Prophetsa? When night would fall, the Messengersa of Allah would stand up for prayer, meaning that after half the night had passed, he would rise for prayer, and God Almighty himself has testified to this. Hazrat Aishara narrates that on one occasion, when the Holy Prophetsa was standing for prayer at night, “I asked him, ‘O Messengersa of Allah, you are already the beloved of God Almighty. Why, then, do you subject yourself to such difficulties – spending a majority of the night worshipping and continuously weeping before God Almighty?’ He replied, ‘O Aisha: 

اَفَلَا اَکُوْنَ عَبْدًا شَکُوْرًا

(Dibacha Tafsir-ul-Quran, Anwar-ul-Ulum, Vol. 20, p. 382)

While it is true that I am a beloved of God and that out of His grace, He has bestowed this station of nearness to me, is it not my responsibility then to express my gratitude to Him? After all, gratitude is expressed in response to benevolence.

Thus, look at how, as a result of being made the final law-bearing Prophet and having been given the final book of religious law by God Almighty through Divine grace, he responded by asking, “Shall I not be grateful?”

There are many blessings that God Almighty has bestowed upon every human being. And it is incumbent upon us to express our gratitude and to strive to raise our standards of worship. People ask at times, especially the youth, who come and ask, “How can we worship God Almighty? What need does God Almighty have for our worship?” Affected by the prevailing environment of modernity, youngsters ask this question. The answer is: God Almighty does not stand in need of our worship.

But do not the spiritual and worldly blessings that He has bestowed upon you demand that you then fulfil the right of expressing gratitude to Him in exchange for His favours upon you and that you become His grateful servants? 

Similarly, it is also recorded in the biographies of the Holy Prophetsa that when he would hear the word of Allah being recited, his eyes would well with tears, especially upon hearing those verses which emphasised the great duties and responsibilities he had been given. 

Thus, it is recorded that one day, the Holy Prophetsa asked Hazrat Abdullah bin Mas‘udra to recite some portion of the Holy Quran to him. Hazrat Abdullahra responded, “The Holy Quran has been revealed upon you directly, O Messengersa of Allah. How could I recite a portion to you?”

The Holy Prophetsa stated, “I like to have others recite the Holy Quran to me so that I may listen to it.” Hazrat Abdullah bin Mas‘udra says that upon this, I began to recite Surah an-Nisa to him. When, while reciting, I reached this verse: 

فَكَيۡفَ إِذَا جِئۡنَا مِن كُلِّ أُمَّۂٍ بِشَهِيدٖ وَجِئۡنَا بِكَ عَلَىٰ هَـٰٓؤُلَآءِ شَهِيدٗا

Meaning, “What will be the condition when We will bring forth from every nation their prophet, and stand him before his people and pass judgement on that nation, and We will also stand you before your nation and take them to account.” Then the Holy Prophetsa said, “Enough, enough.” The Companion says, “I looked towards him, and tears were flowing from his eyes.” (The Holy Quran, Ch.4: V.42)

Such fear of God had overtaken him, and at that moment, he was surely also concerned about his people, lest they should commit such an act that becomes a cause of Allah the Almighty’s displeasure, and then he be required to give testimony against them. Thus, one aspect also emerges from this: that where there are many matters whereby the Holy Prophetsa shall testify in our favour, at the same time, we should also fear, lest the testimony of the Holy Prophetsa be against us, lest such truths become apparent that would expose our sins, so that we become deserving of Allah the Almighty’s punishment. Thus, this is something to greatly fear. We too should fulfil the due rights of worship, and we should possess such a love for Allah the Almighty which the Holy Prophetsa instructed us to have and which Allah the Almighty has commanded us in the Holy Quran. 

Take the example of the observance of prayer: the Holy Prophetsa was so mindful of it that even during severe illness – in the final days when permission was granted to lie down whilst offering prayer – it is recorded in history that he went to the mosque by using others as support. And one day, when he could not come, he instructed Hazrat Abu Bakrra to lead the prayer. During this time, when he felt some improvement in his health, taking the support of two men, he immediately set out towards the mosque. Hazrat Aishara states that even in that condition, the situation was such that both his feet were dragging on the ground. (Dibacha Tafsir-ul-Quran, Anwar-ul-Ulum, Vol. 20, p. 383)

But the importance of congregational prayer was his main objective. He bore that hardship because he wished to show its importance to the Muslims. Dragging his feet, he reached there. He went into the mosque, showing no concern about his illness. This was the state of his love for Allah the Almighty, and regarding this, he would morally train people as well. On the one hand, there is his attention to the observance of prayers, and on the other, how he would instil the greatness and grandeur of Allah the Almighty in the hearts of people. 

It was a custom among the Arabs to clap in order to draw attention, and this custom was common at that time. But the Holy Prophetsa abolished this custom and said that in its place there should be the remembrance of Allah. In this regard, it is written that once the Holy Prophetsa was occupied in some matter, when the time for prayer arrived. He said, “Tell Abu Bakr to lead the prayer.” In the meantime, he finished the task and immediately proceeded towards the mosque. When he reached the mosque, Hazrat Abu Bakrra was leading the prayer. When the people came to know that he had arrived in the mosque, those offering the prayer began clapping in worry. On the one hand, the intent of this was to show that their hearts had become extremely joyful due to the Holy Prophet’ssa arrival, and on the other hand, they wanted to draw Hazrat Abu Bakr’sra attention, that now your leading of the prayer has ended, because the Holy Prophetsa has arrived. Hazrat Abu Bakrra stepped back and left the place of the Imam for the Holy Prophetsa. After the prayer, the Holy Prophetsa said, “Abu Bakr, when I had instructed you to lead the prayer, why did you move back?” Hazrat Abu Bakrra stated with such sincerity, “In the presence of Allah’s Messengersa, what status does the son of Abu Quhafah have that he should lead the prayer?” Then the Holy Prophetsa turned towards the Companions and said, “What was your purpose in clapping? In the remembrance of God, clapping is not appropriate. When such a matter arises during the prayer to which it is necessary to draw attention, then instead of clapping, one should loudly proclaim the name of God. One should say ‘SubhanAllah’ [Holy is Allah]. When you do this, then the attention of others will automatically turn towards that matter.” 

Similarly, the Holy Prophetsa did not like the habit of undue and unnecessary hardship and trouble. Despite drawing attention to so much worship, he said that there should be no undue hardship or trouble in one’s practice. Once, the Holy Prophetsa went into a house and saw that a rope was hanging between two pillars. He asked, “Why is this rope tied?” People informed him, “This is the rope of Hazrat Zainabra. When she becomes tired while worshipping, she takes support by holding this rope.” The Holy Prophetsa said, “This should not be done. Untie this rope. Every person should worship only for as long as their heart remains inclined towards it. When they become tired, they should sit down. This kind of strain-filled worship cannot bring any benefit.” (Dibacha Tafsir-ul-Quran, Anwar-ul-Ulum, Vol. 20, p. 384)

On the one hand, this demonstrates that under the influence of his moral training, the female Companions as well as members of his household and family, possessed a great desire for worship and would even subject themselves to hardship. On the other hand, he also stated that there is no need to impose hardship; rather, worship should be performed with ease. However, I should also clarify for people that this does not mean what some people have begun to say nowadays, that since there is no need to impose hardship, one should offer the prayer hastily, merely to fulfil an obligation, discharging it as if it is a burden, and be done with it. This is, in fact, a complete reversal of the true meaning of this guidance, whereby people have started to interpret it as creating personal convenience.

Nowadays, some of the people who come for worship, offer the prayer and finish within a few minutes; or if they pray at home, they are done within a few minutes. On many occasions, people even ask me how the prayer should be offered. The prayer should be offered with care and in a befitting manner. In this regard, there is a Hadith of the Holy Prophetsa in which he instructed a Companion to offer the prayer again, three or four times. That Companion had arrived late to the gathering of the Holy Prophetsa. The Holy Prophetsa was seated in the gathering after offering the prayers. The congregational prayer was finished, and there was a gathering underway. Each time the Companion offered the prayer and returned to him, the Holy Prophetsa would say, “Go back and offer the prayer again.” He would return after offering the prayer, and the Holy Prophetsa would again say, “Go back and offer the prayer again.” In this manner, he instructed him to offer the prayer three or four times. When the Companion submitted that he did not know a better way of offering the prayer and asked him to explain how it should be offered, the Holy Prophetsa said: “Offer the prayer calmly and with composure; remember Allah, recite the Durood, and remember His Oneness and praise Him. The bowing and prostration should also be performed properly.” (Sahih al-Bukhari, Kitab al-adhan, Hadith 793)

Therefore, keep this matter in mind as well. It is not that offering the prayer with ease means offering it hastily just because there is a narration which states that one should offer the prayer with ease. It does not mean that if one feels sleepy, one should quickly offer the prayer in merely a few minutes. In fact, offering the prayer in a state of intoxication is, in any case, forbidden. This is not permissible. Rather, when one offers the prayer, one must fulfil its due right. This, too, has been emphatically enjoined.

The Holy Prophetsa detested shirk [associating partners with Allah] to such an extent that even at the time of his demise, when he was in pain during his final moments, he would at times lie on his right side and at times on his left, and would repeatedly say: “May Allah curse those Jews and Christians who turned the graves of their prophets into places of worship.” (Dibacha Tafsir-ul-Quran, Anwar-ul-Ulum, Vol. 20, p. 385)

That is, they prostrated before the graves of their prophets and supplicated to them. By this, he meant that if my community, after me, were to commit such an act, they should not think that they would thereby become deserving of my prayers; rather, I would be completely dissociated from them.

As has already been mentioned, Allah the Almighty will take testimony [from the Prophets]. One can observe that in Medina the authorities have imposed strict restrictions at the blessed grave of the Holy Prophetsa; for this very reason, no one is allowed to prostrate there or even get too close. However, in many Muslim countries, prostrations are made at the shrines of saints and leaders of religious groups, and vows and supplications are made to those saints. This practice is shirk, the very thing which the Holy Prophetsa forbade, and which he forbade even with regard to his own person. Then what right does any other saint or religious leader or elder have that prostration should be made at his grave? It is by the grace of God Almighty that, by accepting the Promised Messiahas, we have safeguarded ourselves from these practices; nevertheless, we must still strive to reach the proper standards of worship. Among others, i.e. the rest of the Muslims, this practice is widespread. May Allah the Almighty have mercy on them as well and grant them reason and understanding so that they may desist from this shirk.

The extent of the Holy Prophet’ssa humility before Allah the Almighty was such that when people said to him, “O Messengersa of Allah, through the strength of your deeds you will surely attain the grace of Allah, for Allah the Almighty has granted you a certification, praised your morals and has established your example as a standard of conduct for the Muslims. This means that your deeds are such that Allah the Almighty will forgive you, or has already forgiven you.” He replied, “No, no; I too shall be forgiven only by the grace of Allah.” 

Accordingly, Hazrat Abu Hurairahra relates that one day he heard the Messengersa of Allah say: “No person will enter Paradise by virtue of his deeds alone.” I submitted, “O Messengersa of Allah, will you also not enter Paradise by virtue of your deeds?” He replied, “I too cannot enter Paradise on the strength of my deeds; rather, the only means is if I am covered in the mantle of Allah’s grace and mercy.” This is a narration from Sahih al-Bukhari. (Dibacha Tafsir-ul-Quran, Anwar-ul-Ulum, Vol. 20, pp. 386-387; Sahih al-Bukhari, Kitab al-marda, Hadith 5673)

Thereafter, he advised us, saying: “Ensure your actions are in line with righteousness and seek the paths that draw you closer to Allah the Almighty”. He further said: “None of you should ever wish for death. If a person is righteous, then by remaining alive he will increase further in righteousness; and if he is sinful, then by remaining alive he will be granted the opportunity and could incline towards repentance of his sins.” (Sahih al-Bukhari, Kitab at-tamanni, Hadith 7235)

This is very important guidance which we must bear in mind: one should never desire death. He explained the reason for this by saying that if one does so because of hardship – for it is always due to some hardship or pain that a person wishes for death – and if one has some good deeds, then Allah the Almighty will grant further ability to perform good deeds and will make better arrangements for them in the Hereafter and forgive their sins. And if they have committed sins, then they will be granted the opportunity to seek repentance and forgiveness if their attention has been drawn towards it, and thus they will be saved from sins and will attain the nearness of Allah the Almighty. And when the time of their demise approaches, then Allah the Almighty may even provide the means for their forgiveness. 

The standard of worship that he himself maintained has already been observed; however, he also consistently drew the attention of others towards it. It is related in a tradition that on one occasion, during the night, he went to the house of his son-in-law, Hazrat Alira, and his daughter, Hazrat Fatimara, and asked them whether they observed the Tahajjud prayer. Hazrat Alira submitted, “O Messengersa of Allah, we do try to offer it, but when, according to the will of God Almighty, our eyes remain closed at times, then the Tahajjud is missed.” Upon this, he said, “Observe the Tahajjud prayer,” and then stood up and proceeded towards his home. While returning, he repeatedly recited the words: 

وَکَانَ الْاِنْسَانُ اَکْثَرَ شَیْءٍ جَدَلًا

That is, “But of all things man is most contentious.” (The Holy Quran, Ch.18: V. 55). In other words, a person hesitates to acknowledge his own shortcomings and instead conceals his faults by advancing various arguments.

Thus, the Holy Prophetsa advised them directly and explained the matter to them, and even while returning, he continued to repeat this point so that others too might convey its meaning to Hazrat Alira. Through this, he taught the lesson that what Hazrat Alira should have stated is, “At times we err and do not wake up,” rather than attributing it to God Almighty and saying, “If God Almighty had so willed, we would have awakened; otherwise, we remained asleep.” His purpose was to explain why one should not ascribe one’s own shortcomings to God Almighty.

As has already been stated, the Holy Prophetsa did not approve of any kind of pretence or undue hardship in worship. On one occasion, when he saw ropes hanging in the house, he instructed that they be removed. His principle was that the faculties which God Almighty has bestowed upon man should be utilised correctly, and this alone constitutes true worship. To close one’s eyes despite having them, or to deliberately disable them, is not worship; rather, it is an act of irreverence. Misuse of these faculties, however, is indeed sinful.

In the present age, one may observe that there are numerous attractions and desires in the world that draw people towards themselves. If one becomes inclined towards them, watches inappropriate programmes on television, views improper material on the internet, or looks at anything indecent, then this constitutes sin. He taught that safeguarding oneself from such sin is the essential matter, and it is this restraint that becomes a source of reward.

Similarly, blocking one’s ears is not a virtue. God Almighty has granted a faculty; why then should it be suppressed? Rather, this too is irreverence, for God Almighty has bestowed a blessing which one is wasting. Yes, listening to backbiting and speaking ill of others is sinful. There are many who both engage in backbiting and listen to it, who hear false and harmful things about others, and even derive pleasure from it, laughing while listening to people’s weaknesses and faults. Such conduct is wrong and sinful, and with regard to this, he instructed that such actions should be avoided.

The Holy Prophetsa stated that moral excellence means the proper use of one’s natural faculties. To suppress these faculties is foolishness; to employ them in unlawful pursuits is immorality; and their correct and rightful use is virtue. This is a concise summary of his teachings, and indeed, this is the very essence of the life of the Holy Prophetsa. It is for this reason that God Almighty has commanded us to adopt the life of the Holy Prophetsa as a perfect model.

Regarding his conduct, Hazrat Aishara states at one place that there never arose an occasion in the life of the Messengersa of Allah where two options were presented to him and he did not choose the easier of the two, provided that there was no trace of sin in choosing the easier path. Thus, when two paths were available – one easy and one difficult – his effort was always to adopt the easier course, for God Almighty does not wish to place people under unnecessary hardship. However, whenever there was even the slightest suspicion that the easier path might lead to sin, he would avoid it entirely and adopt the longer or more difficult path. Indeed, it may be said that even the faintest doubt would cause him to distance himself from it to an extent unmatched by any other human being.

One may observe in the world that, at times, people deliberately place themselves in hardship in order to deceive others and to display supposed extraordinary qualities, claiming that they have performed great spiritual struggles. So-called spiritual leaders also relate such tales. However, the Holy Prophetsa sought the path of ease, for those who engage in such ostentation merely subject themselves to hardship to proclaim their own greatness or to solicit praise. They do not act for the sake of God Almighty, for God Almighty derives no benefit from their suffering, nor do they earn any reward from it. Such acts are performed to deceive people, and when a person acts with the intention of deception, God Almighty, due to this ill-intent of theirs, grants sin rather than reward.

Some people engage in exaggerated displays in order to conceal their own faults, attempting in one way or another to draw a veil over their weaknesses, while loudly proclaiming their supposed virtues and the hardships they endured for them. Concerning such conduct, God Almighty declares that these deeds will not draw one nearer to Him; rather, they will become a cause of His displeasure, because the intention is not pure. Such actions are undertaken to win the favour of people, in the hope that public display may incline others in their favour. Thus, these subtle yet profound lessons were imparted by the Holy Prophetsa through both his practical example and verbal admonition.

As far as his relations with fellow humankind are concerned, we can observe the example of the Holy Prophetsa in his own home and his treatment of his wives. The Holy Prophetsa treated his wives with great compassion and justice. If people of the present age were to understand this, many domestic disputes and conflicts would be resolved. At times, his wives would speak sternly or express displeasure, yet he would calmly smile and overlook it.

On one occasion, he said to Hazrat Aishara, “O Aisha, I always know when you are displeased with me.” She asked how he perceived this. He replied, “When you are pleased with me, and the occasion arises to take an oath, you say, ‘By the Lord of Muhammadsa, it is so’; but when you are displeased with me and need to take an oath, you say, ‘By the Lord of Ibrahimas, it is so.’” Upon hearing this, Hazrat Aishara laughed and affirmed that he had understood correctly.

Then there are the accounts relating to Hazrat Khadijara, who was his first and eldest amongst his wives, and who made immense sacrifices for his sake. After her demise, the Holy Prophetsa married younger wives, yet he never forgot his bond with Hazrat Khadijara. Whenever her friends visited, he would stand to receive them, and whenever any item prepared by her came before him, tears would flow from his eyes.

During the incident of the Battle of Badr, one of his sons-in-law, who had not yet accepted Islam, was brought as a prisoner and possessed no wealth with which to pay his ransom. When his wife – the daughter of the Messengersa of Allah – saw that there was no other means to secure her husband’s release, she sent to Medina her mother’s final keepsake, a necklace, as ransom. When this necklace was presented before the Holy Prophetsa, he recognised it, and his eyes welled up with tears. He addressed the Companions, saying, “I do not command you, for I have no right to issue such a command, but I know that this necklace is Zainab’s last memento of her mother. If you are willing to do so of your own accord, I recommend that the daughter not be deprived of her mother’s final keepsake.” The Companions replied, “O Messengersa of Allah, what greater source of joy could there be for us than this?” Accordingly, they returned the necklace to Hazrat Zainabra.

The kindnesses shown to him by Hazrat Khadijara had such a profound effect upon the Holy Prophetsa that he would frequently mention her in the presence of his wives. On one occasion, as is related, that, at times, there can be some feelings of unhappiness or jealousy amongst the wives if one of the wives is praised more, even if she has passed away. As such, on one occasion, the Holy Prophetsa praised Hazrat Khadijara before Hazrat Aishara, whereupon she said, “O Messengersa of Allah, why do you continue to mention that elderly woman? Let the matter rest now. God Almighty has granted you younger and more beautiful wives in her place.” Upon hearing this, the Holy Prophetsa was deeply moved and said, “Aisha, you do not know how greatly Khadija served me.” (Dibacha Tafsir-ul-Quran, Anwar-ul-Ulum, Vol. 20, pp. 389-393)

What was the standard of the Holy Prophet’ssa excellent morals? If we look back at history, we observe that even before the Holy Prophet’ssa birth, his father passed away, and his mother passed away when the Holy Prophetsa was a child. He spent the first eight years of his life under the care of his grandfather. Thereafter, the Holy Prophetsa was raised under the care of his uncle Abu Talib. On account of being related by blood, and also because Abu Talib’s father had especially advised him at the time of his demise regarding the Holy Prophetsa, Abu Talib had a special love for the Holy Prophetsa and took great care of him. However, Abu Talib’s wife did not possess the same kindness, nor a sense of fulfilling familial duties. If ever something came to the home, Abu Talib’s wife would often give it to her own children first and would remain unmindful of the Holy Prophetsa at a time when he was only just a child. When Abu Talib would return home, rather than seeing his young nephew crying or complaining, he would observe his own children eating something, while his young nephew remained a pillar of dignity as he sat to one side. In other words, from his very childhood, the Holy Prophetsa endured everything with great patience. Abu Talib would be overcome with the love of an uncle and with fulfilling familial responsibilities, and so he would run to his nephew, take him in his embrace and say, “Take care of this child of mine as well, take care of this child of mine as well.” This was a frequent occurrence. 

Citing this narration, Hazrat Musleh-e-Maudra has written at one instance: “Those who were witnesses to this have testified that the Holy Prophetsa never complained or expressed any displeasure or expressed any stubbornness as a result of this, nor expressed any ill feeling towards his cousins. Later in life when his circumstances completely changed, he took upon himself the care and upbringing of two of his uncle’s sons, Hazrat Alira and Hazrat Ja‘farra, and discharged this responsibility in the most excellent manner.” (Dibacha Tafsir-ul-Quran, Anwar-ul-Ulum, Vol. 20, p. 393)

You can see that today, even in their adulthood, people hold on to grievances from their childhood and seek revenge. However, the Holy Prophetsa always extended kind treatment. These days, we observe that even after becoming older and reaching an age of maturity – if some people have to go and live with their relatives even to the age of 14 or 15 because they do not have a father or due to some other reason – if there is some sort of ill treatment committed by those relatives, then such things are never forgotten and they seek to exact revenge whenever the opportunity presents itself. However, the Holy Prophetsa never retaliated; to the contrary, when the time came, the Holy Prophetsa took his family members into his embrace, tended to their moral training and bestowed them with rank. 

With regards to the Holy Prophet’ssa excellent moral character, observe yet another example of his patience: once, a woman whose son had passed away was mourning over his grave. The Holy Prophetsa passed by and said, “O woman, be patient. Everyone is subject to God’s will.” The woman did not recognise the Holy Prophetsa, and she said in response, “If ever one of your children were to die as mine has died, then you would know what patience really means.” As the Holy Prophetsa walked away, he said, “Not one, in fact, seven of my children have passed away.” (Dibacha Tafsir-ul-Quran, Anwar-ul-Ulum, Vol. 20, p. 394)

At such instances, this was the extent of what the Holy Prophetsa would say about difficulties he had previously endured; he never expressed anything more than this. He would never let his grief hinder his service to humanity. 

The standard of the Holy Prophet’ssa forbearance was such that when God Almighty granted him rule and authority, even then, the Holy Prophetsa would pause to hear what everyone had to say. Even if someone acted in a harsh manner, the Holy Prophetsa would remain silent and never respond to a harsh person with harshness. It is recorded in history that rather than calling the Holy Prophetsa by his name, Muslims would address him by his spiritual rank; in other words, they would address him by saying “O Messengersa of Allah”. In accordance with their traditions and the customs of the time, non-Muslims would show respect by addressing him as “Abu al-Qasim” rather than addressing him as “Muhammad”, as Abu al-Qasim was his filial appellation, meaning “Father of Qasim”. This was because one of the Holy Prophet’ssa sons was named Qasim, who passed away. 

Once, a Jewish person visited Medina and started arguing with the Holy Prophetsa. During his argument, he constantly said, “O Muhammad, the matter is such that […]” The Holy Prophetsa would respond to him without any reservation; however, the Companions grew restless upon observing the Jewish man’s audacity. Eventually, one Companion could not bear to see this any longer, and he said to the Jewish person, “Do not dare address him by his name whilst speaking to him. If you find yourself unable to say, ‘Messenger of Allah,’ then at least address him as ‘Abu al-Qasim.’” The Jewish person said, “I will use the name which his parents gave him.” The Holy Prophetsa smiled and said to the Companion, “Look, what he says is true. My parents named me Muhammad. Let him use the name he is calling me by, do not express any sort of anger.”

The Holy Prophet’ssa forbearance was such that sometimes, when he would go out for a certain task, some people would stop him along his way and start expressing their needs to him. The Holy Prophetsa would remain standing there until they had completed what they wished to say, and then the Holy Prophetsa would go along his way. Then, some people have the habit that when they shake hands, they continue holding on to the other person’s hand for a while; when this happened, the Holy Prophetsa would also hold on to the other person’s hand as well. Although this is not preferable, the Holy Prophetsa never moved his hand away from another’s. (Dibacha Tafsir-ul-Quran, Anwar-ul-Ulum, Vol. 20, pp. 394-395)

People with all sorts of needs would present their needs before him. At times, the Holy Prophetsa would grant them something to fulfil their need. However, compelled by their greed, they would ask for more, and the Holy Prophetsa would fulfil their desire. Sometimes people would continue making requests, and every time, the Holy Prophetsa would grant them something. In these circumstances, when the Holy Prophetsa saw someone to be particularly sincere, he would grant what that person requested, after which he would only say to the sincere person, “It would be better if you placed your trust in Allah.”

Once, a Companion continually persisted in requesting the Holy Prophetsa for money in order to fulfil his needs. The Holy Prophetsa fulfilled his request; however, in the end, he also said, “The best position is for one to place his complete trust in God.” The Companion was sincere and was also respectful. Out of respect, he did not return that which he had received; however, regarding the future, he said, “O Messengersa of Allah, this is the last time I will do this. From now on, under no circumstances will I make a request to anyone.”

There is an incident recorded regarding the same Companion, in which a battle was ongoing, and the condition on the battlefield was extremely precarious. Spears were being thrown, swords were being wielded, and arrows were being fired. Soldiers were fighting soldiers, and people were being killed. In the very midst of this, as the Companion was surrounded by opponents, his whip fell from his hand. A fellow Muslim soldier who was on foot thought that if the commanding officer were to dismount, it could lead to him being harmed; he bent down to pick up the whip and hand it back to him. That Companion saw this soldier and said, “My brother, by God, do not touch the whip.” Upon saying this, he jumped down from his horse and picked up the whip himself. Then he said to his comrade, “I vowed to the Holy Prophetsa that I would never make a request to anyone. Had I let you pick up the whip then, though I did not make a verbal request, there is no doubt that owing to the current circumstances, it would appear as though I am asking from you, and doing so would have made me act contrary to my oath. Though this is a battlefield, I will carry out my own tasks.” Even under those dangerous circumstances, he remembered his oath. (Dibacha Tafsir-ul-Quran, Anwar-ul-Ulum, Vol. 20, pp. 395-396)

These and many other accounts from the life of the Holy Prophetsa exhibit his justice, his regard for the sentiments of others, and his care for the poor, all of which are examples for us. His protection of the wealth of the poor and kind treatment of women – earlier I mentioned his treatment of his wives at home – but he generally treated women very kindly as well. 

There are countless examples found in the blessed life of the Holy Prophetsa regarding service to humanity, kindness towards neighbours and good treatment of relatives. His life is full of lessons about how he strove to protect the property of others, how he concealed their faults, how he taught cooperation, and how he himself acted upon it. He exemplified how he forgave others and how he concealed the shortcomings of people. He imparted guidance on truthfulness, avoiding suspicion and thinking ill of others. He warned against despair, enjoined kindness even towards animals, and spoke of religious tolerance. All these are examples that form a perfect model for us.

As I have said before, insha-Allah, I will continue to mention such examples in the future as occasions arise. For now, I conclude this part here and will read out an excerpt from the writings of the Promised Messiahas. He states:

“That man who, through his own person, through his attributes, through his deeds, through his actions, and through the powerful river of his spiritual and pure life, manifested perfect excellence in knowledge and practice, in truthfulness and steadfastness, and who was called the Perfect Man – he is that blessed Prophet, the Seal of the Prophets, the Leader of the Chosen Ones, the Pride of the Messengers, our Master Muhammadsa.
O Allah, O Beloved God, send such blessings and peace upon this beloved Prophet as Thou hast never sent upon anyone since the beginning of the world.” (Itmam-ul-Hujjah, Ruhani Khazain, Vol. 8, p. 308)

May Allah the Almighty enable us to follow the example of the Holy Prophetsa and to strive to become true Muslims. May He also grant us the ability to spread his message throughout the world so that we may bring mankind under his banner. May Allah the Almighty enable us to do so.

اللَّهُمَّ صَلّ عَلَى مُحَمَّدٍ وَعَلَى آلِ مُحَمَّدٍ وَبَارِكْ وَسَلّمْ إِنَّكَ حَمِيدٌ مَجِيدٌ

[O Allah, send blessings upon Muhammadsa and upon the followers of Muhammadsa. Grant blessings and peace. Surely, You are Praiseworthy, Exalted.]

After the prayer, I shall also lead a funeral prayer. [Huzooraa enquired whether the funeral had arrived.] There is one present funeral, that is of Laiq Ahmad Tahir Sahib, who served as a missionary in the United Kingdom. He recently passed away at the age of 83. 

اِنَّا لِلّٰہِ وَاِنَّآ اِلَيْہِ رٰجِعُوْنَ

[“Surely, to Allah we belong and to Him shall we return.”]

The deceased was a musi. He is survived by one daughter and three sons.

Laiq Tahir Sahib was born in Qadian to Hazrat Sheikh Fazl Ahmad Batalvira, a Companion of the Promised Messiahas. His father had taken the Bai‘at in 1907. After matriculation, Laiq Sahib devoted his life in 1959 and enrolled in Jamia Ahmadiyya Rabwah. He graduated from Jamia in 1966. During his Jamia studies, he also completed FA, Adeeb Fazil and Arabic Fazil qualifications, and after graduating, he earned a BA degree from the Punjab University.

In July 1967, he was sent as a missionary to England, where he served as Naib Imam of the Fazl Mosque, London. In 1970, he returned to Pakistan and continued his service under the Department of Islah-o-Irshad as a missionary in various regions. Later, he was transferred to the Tasnif Department. He was the son-in-law of Maulana Abul Munir Noor-ul-Haq Sahib.

During his service, he was appointed as a lecturer at Jamia and taught for about 10 years. In 1982, he was appointed as Naib Wakil-ut-Tabshir in the Wakalat-e-Tabshir office. During his Jamia years and his time as a missionary in Pakistan, he also rendered services in Khuddam-ul-Ahmadiyya and other auxiliary organisations.

In 1986, he was posted as a missionary to the United States, but later that same year, Hazrat Khalifatul Masih IVrh called him to the United Kingdom and appointed him to Glasgow, where he served as a missionary and muballigh. In 2005, when Jamia Ahmadiyya UK was established, he was appointed its first principal. His lifetime of service spanned approximately 59 years.

Ataul Mujeeb Rashed Sahib, Imam of the Fazl Mosque, London, writes:

“The late Laiq Ahmad Tahir Sahib was a devotee of Islam, a loyal servant of Khilafat, and one who fulfilled the demands of Waqf-e-Zindagi in an exemplary manner. He was a highly successful missionary who served the faith for a long period with utmost devotion. His recitation of the Holy Quran was melodious and deeply moving. He would speak on matters of moral training in a most captivating and effective manner. Wherever he served, he left behind lasting and fond memories. He was a beloved servant of the faith who showed love and affection towards members of the Jamaat. He also rendered many services in the field of writing. He was particularly devoted to prayer. His home was adorned with inscriptions of prayers written on its walls. He possessed many excellent qualities.”

Mubarak Siddiqi Sahib writes:

“I have known him since the days in Rabwah. He was very cheerful and possessed a noble and dignified nature. His devotion to Khilafat and the administrative system of the Jamaat was deep and sincere. He would always advise others to show absolute obedience to the Khalifa of the time. He always kept a small notebook in his pocket, in which he would immediately note down any good thing he heard or observed, wherever it came from. He did not distinguish whom he would take guidance from, but anywhere he heard a good word, he would write it down. From his student days, he had made it a habit to sit in the company of the elders of the Jamaat. He remembered many sayings of Hazrat Hafiz Mukhtar Ahmad Shahjahanpuri Sahibra and would often recount them in his gatherings.”

His daughter, Qurratul Ain, says:

“One quality of my father that stood out most prominently was the way he prayed. His prayers were filled with passion, humility, reliance on God and a loving pleading before Allah. It often felt as though he would not stop praying until he received an answer from God. And indeed, Allah the Almighty treated him with special grace. On many occasions, Allah the Almighty would inform him beforehand through dreams about various matters. He used to remind us of a saying of the Promised Messiahas: ‘He who asks dies a death, so die and then ask.’ This is the real point – that the one who asks should be in such a state, as though he has died; and when you ask in that condition, Allah the Almighty indeed listens.”

May Allah the Almighty grant him His forgiveness and have mercy upon him. May He elevate his station. His funeral is present, and I shall go outside to lead the funeral prayer after the Jumuah prayer.

The second funeral is in absentia. It is for respected Sega Jalloh Sahib, Naib Sadr of the Segou Region in Mali. He too recently passed away. 

اِنَّا لِلّٰہِ وَاِنَّآ اِلَيْہِ رٰجِعُوْنَ

[“Surely, to Allah we belong and to Him shall we return.”]

The deceased was also a musi.

The missionary, Ta’sir Sahib, writes that the late Sega Jalloh Sahib accepted Ahmadiyyat in 2016 after listening to a radio programme and that he made great progress in faith. He was a devoted and active Ahmadi, always at the forefront of Jamaat programmes and financial sacrifices. He would attend the mosque daily for Fajr, Maghrib and Isha prayers, even though it was far from his home. His love and devotion for Khilafat were immense.

In 2018, he was blessed to join the Wasiyyat scheme and continued to pay his Wasiyyat contributions regularly at the beginning of every month until his passing. Once, for six months, he did not receive his salary due to certain local circumstances in Africa, yet he was deeply troubled that he could not make his payments. When Allah granted ease, and he received his salary, the very first thing he did was pay his chanda Wasiyyat and other contributions.

He is survived by his wife and three sons. He would preach to his family, and by the grace of Allah, two of his sons accepted Ahmadiyyat, although his wife and one son did not, which caused him deep concern. His faith in Ahmadiyyat was strong and unwavering. His views regarding non-Ahmadis and clerics were clear and firm; he would say that they can never succeed unless they accept the Promised Messiah and Mahdias. He was a devoted preacher and an active servant of the Jamaat.

May Allah the Almighty grant him His forgiveness and have mercy upon him.

(Official Urdu transcript published in the Daily Al Fazl International, 9 January 2026, pp. 1-8. Translated by The Review of Religions.)

The Ahmadi position on the createdness of the Quran: A comprehensive theological analysis

0
Iftekhar Ahmed, Ahmadiyya Archive & Research Centre
Holy Quran-Old-Handwritten
Image: mohamed abdelghaffar/Pexels

In a mid-20th-century survey of Middle Eastern religions, a brief but significant assertion is made regarding the theology of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Jamaat.1 The author, AJ Arberry, a noted scholar of Islamic studies, remarks that the Promised Messiahas appeared not to accept the orthodox Muslim doctrine of the Quran’s eternal and uncreated nature, a conclusion purportedly based on a direct conversation with the then-serving imam of the London Mosque. This assertion, recorded in a reputable academic work, presents a clear puzzle, for it stands in stark and direct contrast to the voluminous textual record left by the Promised Messiahas and his immediate Successors.

This article will demonstrate that the foundational texts of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Jamaat, when examined in their own context and with attention to their specific theological terminology, articulate a consistent, multi-faceted and sophisticated position affirming that the Quran is, in fact, uncreated (ghayr makhluq).

The argument will proceed not by simple counter-assertion but by a systematic examination of the primary sources, beginning with the foundational metaphysical framework upon which the entire doctrine rests, moving to the explicit creedal statements from the Jamaat’s highest authorities, examining how the leadership framed the debate’s central question and historical context, exploring the supporting theological structure that identifies the Quran as a divine attribute, addressing the nuanced resolutions offered for apparent paradoxes regarding the mechanics of revelation and the status of the Word of God and concluding with an analysis of the remaining philosophical arguments that reinforce this core position.

The centrality of this inquiry to the Ahmadi theological tradition is explicitly established by Hazrat Khalifatul Masih IIra, who identified the entire controversy as a necessary subject for any substantive study of the scripture. In a single, dense passage from his work Fada’il al-Quran, he defined the issue by its classical name, posed the pivotal research question at its heart and immediately tethered it to its most potent historical symbol: the suffering of Imam Ahmad ibn Hanbal.

خلق قرآن کا مسئلہ

(۲۷) کلام الہی کو خدا تعالیٰ کے علم سے کیا نسبت ہے۔ پہلے زمانہ میں اس پر بہت بڑی بحث ہوئی ہے۔ اور بڑے بڑے علماء کو خلق قرآن کے مسئلہ پر ماریں پڑی ہیں۔ حضرت امام احمد بن حنبل کو عباسی خلیفہ نے مار مار کر اتنا چور کر دیا کہ وہ فوت ہو گئے۔ غرض خلق قرآن کے مسئلہ پر بھی بحث ضروری ہے یعنی خدا کے کلام کو خدا سے کیا نسبت ہے۔

“The issue of the createdness of the Quran

“(27) What is the relationship of God’s Speech to God’s Knowledge? In former times, a great debate took place on this and great scholars were beaten over the issue of the createdness of the Quran. An Abbasid Caliph had Imam Ahmad ibn Hanbal beaten so severely that he passed away. In short, a discussion on the issue of the createdness of the Quran is also necessary – that is, what is the relationship of God’s Speech to God?”2

This statement, presented here at the outset, provides the internal justification for the present analysis and serves as a roadmap for the key themes – theological, philosophical and historical – that the Jamaat’s leadership considered essential to this debate.

The foundational distinction – amr vs. khalq

Any substantive examination of the Ahmadi position regarding the nature of the Quran must begin with a foundational theological principle articulated with marked consistency in the writings of the Promised Messiahas, a principle that serves as the primary hermeneutical key to the entire question – namely, the categorical distinction drawn between God’s creation (khalq Allah), a category encompassing all phenomena operating through intermediary causes, and God’s Command or Affair (amr Allah), a separate order of direct divine effectuation. This conceptual division is not a peripheral point, it is the principal framework through which the issue is consistently addressed, establishing two distinct metaphysical domains of divine action whose properties are mutually exclusive.

The Promised Messiahas deploys this core concept as a direct rebuttal to the naturalist proposition that divine revelation is merely an elevated form of human thought, identifying such thoughts as belonging to the created order:

اس کا جواب یہ ہے کہ یہ تمام خیالات خلق اللہ ہیں، امر اللہ نہیں اور اس جگہ خلق اور امر میں ایک لطیف فرق ہے۔ خلق تو خدا کے اس فعل سے مراد ہے کہ جب خدائے تعالیٰ عالم کی کسی چیز کو بتوسط اسباب پیدا کر کے بوجہ علت العلل ہونے کے اپنی طرف اس کو منسوب  کرے اور امر وہ ہے جو بلا توسط اسباب خالص خدائے تعالی کی طرف سے ہو اور کسی سبب کی اس سے آمیزش نہ ہو۔

“The answer is that all these thoughts are God’s creation (khalq Allah), not God’s Command (amr Allah), and there is a subtle distinction between khalq and amr. Khalq refers to that act of God whereby God Almighty, being the Cause of all causes, creates something in the universe through the medium of causes and attributes it to Himself. And amr is that which proceeds directly from God Almighty, without the medium of causes, and with which no cause is intermixed.”3

Within this specific theological lexicon, khalq is assigned a precise and technical definition. Its defining characteristic is its operation through the medium of secondary causes (ba-tawassut-e asbab). It is the domain of mediated divine action, a process wherein God operates through the very chains of causality He has established. The Promised Messiahas further refines this concept, associating khalq not with absolute origination but with the act of fashioning a composite entity (murakkab) from pre-existing forms or elements – a process of transformation that occurs within time and space.

اور اگر ایسے طور سے کسی چیز کو پیدا کرے کہ پہلے وہ چیز کسی اور صورت میں اپنا وجود رکھتی ہو تو اس طرز پیدائش کا نام خلق ہے […] مرکب چیز کو کسی شکل یا ہیئت خاص سے متشکل کرنا عالم خلق سے ہے

“And if He creates a thing in such a way that the thing previously existed in some other form, then this mode of origination is called khalq […] to fashion a composite thing into a particular shape or form is from the realm of khalq.”4

Set in direct contradistinction to this mediated domain of causality is the concept of amr – an affair proceeding directly from God’s will without the intercession of any secondary causes or temporal processes, representing not creation through sequence but effectuation by pure command. This is the ontological reality behind the Quranic formula:

كُن فَيَكُونُ

“‘Be,’ and it is.”5

This is a command whose effectuation is described as being without suspension or delay (tawaqquf nahin hota), an instantaneous manifestation of divine intent that stands outside the sequential logic of khalq.

The Promised Messiahas clarifies this immediacy:

جو چیز علل اور اسباب سے پیدا ہوتی ہے وہ خلق ہے اور جو محض کُنْ سے ہو وہ امر ہے […] عالم امر میں کبھی توقف نہیں ہوتا

“That which is produced through causes and means is khalq and that which comes into being merely through kun [be] is amr […]. In the realm of amr, there is never any suspension.”6

This concept is further delineated by distinguishing between the legislative command (amr shar‘i), to which a created being may or may not conform, and the irresistible cosmic or ontological command (amr kawni), which is an absolute decree that cannot be contravened, as seen in the command to the fire concerning the Prophet Abrahamas.

The Promised Messiahas says:

دوسرے اوامر کونی ہوتے ہیں جس کا خلاف ہو ہی نہیں سکتا۔ جیسا کہ فرمایا يَٰنَارُ كُونِي بَرۡدٗا وَسَلَٰمًا عَلَىٰٓ إِبۡرَٰهِيمَ (الانبیاء:۷۰)۔ اس میں کوئی خلاف نہیں ہو سکتا۔ چنانچہ آگ اس حکم کے خلاف ہر گز نہ کر سکتی تھی۔

“Secondly, there are the cosmic commands (awamir kawni), which cannot be opposed. For instance, when He commanded, ‘O fire, be thou cold and a (means of) safety for Abraham!’7 There can be no opposition to this. Indeed, the fire could not act contrary to this command in any way.”8

The direct and unavoidable consequence of this meticulously established framework is the decisive placement of Divine Speech outside the created order. Having defined the terms, the Promised Messiahas applies them with analytical finality, asserting that the Quran, as God’s Speech, does not belong to the category of created things but originates from the higher, unmediated realm of divine command.

The Promised Messiahas states with explicit clarity:

پس کلام الہی جو اس قادر مطلق کی طرف سے نازل ہوتا ہے اس کا نزول عالم امر سے ہے نہ عالم خلق ہے۔

“Thus, Divine Speech which is sent down from that Absolute All-Powerful One, its descent is from the realm of amr and not from the realm of khalq.”9

This entire theological construct is not presented as a standalone philosophical innovation but is explicitly grounded in the text of the Quran itself, specifically in a verse that has historically served as the scriptural anchor for this very argument within mainstream Islamic thought. The Promised Messiahas roots his entire framework in the classical proof-text:

أَلَا لَهُ ٱلۡخَلۡقُ وَٱلۡأَمۡرُ

“Verily, His is the creation and the command.”10

The analytical force of the verse, as understood within this tradition, comes from the conjunction “and” (wa), which separates “the creation” (al-khalq) and “the command” (al-amr) into two distinct categories belonging to God, a line of reasoning, it is worth observing, that directly mirrors the primary scriptural proof used by classical Sunni authorities like Sufyan ibn ‘Uyayna and Imam Ahmad ibn Hanbal to affirm that the Quran is uncreated.

The Promised Messiahas explains the verse’s implication as follows:

اَلَا لَهُ الْخَلْقُ وَالْاَمْرُ‌ یعنے بسائط کا عدم محض سے پیدا کرنا اور مرکبات کو ظہور خاص میں لانا دونوں خدا کا فعل ہیں اور بسیط اور مرکب دونوں خدائے تعالیٰ کی پیدائش ہے

“‘Verily, His is the creation and the command,’ i.e., to create simple substances from absolute non-existence and to bring composite things into a specific manifestation are both acts of God and both simple and composite things are the creation of God Almighty.”11

By identifying the Quran as an instance of amr, the argument logically concludes that it cannot, therefore, be an instance of khalq.

Explicit statements on the uncreated nature of the Quran

While the metaphysical distinction between amr and khalq provides the foundational framework for the Ahmadi position, the argument does not rest on this conceptual basis alone. It is further substantiated by explicit and categorical statements from the Jamaat’s earliest leadership that directly address the nature of the Quran in unambiguous, creedal terms. The most decisive of these declarations comes from Hazrat Khalifatul Masih Ira, who, in the course of his scriptural exegesis, makes a clear statement of his personal belief on the matter, leaving no room for speculation.

While interpreting a verse that some might use to argue for the Quran’s createdness, he pre-empts this by stating his position directly:

ذِكْرٍ مُحْدَثٍ کے معنے ہیں نئے نئے پیرایوں میں کلام بھیجتے رہے۔ یہی معنے صحیح ہیں کیونکہ کلام کو میں اللہ تعالی کی صفت مانتا ہوں اورمتکلم خدا کی ذات ہے اور میں قرآن مجید کو مخلوق نہیں مانتا

“The meaning of dhikr muhdath is that He continued to send Speech in ever-new styles (na’e na’e payrayun mein). This is the correct meaning, because I consider Speech (kalam) to be an attribute (sifa) of God Almighty and the Speaker (mutakallim) is the Essence of God and I do not believe the Noble Quran to be created (makhluq nahin manta).”12

This statement is of considerable theological weight, containing as it does the two central pillars of the classical traditionalist argument: first, that the Quran’s essence is an eternal attribute (sifa) of God and second, the necessary conclusion that it is, therefore, not created. He approached this same conclusion from another, philosophically rich angle by identifying Divine Speech (kalam-e-ilahi) with the concept of the “Spirit” (ruh). Having established this equivalence, he proceeds to make a definitive ontological statement about its nature – namely, that this Spirit is not a created entity but an attribute of God Himself.

In his work Tasdiq Barahin-e-Ahmadiyya, his reasoning culminates in this declaration:

روح کو کتب مقدسہ اور پاک کتاب قرآن کریم نے بہت معنوں پر استعمال کیا ہے۔ اوّل، روح کلام الہی کا نام ہے۔ […] ان معنے کے رو سے روح مخلوق نہیں بلکہ اللہ تعالیٰ کی ایک صفت ہے اس لئے کہ یہ روح الہی کلام ہے اور اللہ تعالی اس کا متکلم

“The Holy Scriptures and the pure book, the Noble Quran, have used the word ruh for many meanings. Firstly, ruh is the name for God’s Speech. […] In this meaning, the ‘Spirit’ (ruh) is not created (makhluq nahin) but is an attribute (sifa) of God Almighty, because this Spirit is the Divine Speech (kalam) and Allah Almighty is its Speaker (mutakallim).”13

These direct affirmations from Hazrat Khalifatul Masih Ira are themselves aligned with the technical vocabulary employed by the Promised Messiahas, who used a term that carries immense weight and historical significance in this precise context. In describing the Quran’s pre-temporal existence in the Preserved Tablet (lawh mahfuz), he uses the word qadim, a term which, within the lexicon of this historic controversy, functions as the direct antithesis to hadith, i.e., contingent or created, and is synonymous with the ghayr makhluq position.

In A’ina-e-Kamalat-e-Islam, he states:

قرآن کریم جس کی خلق اللہ کو بہت ضرورت تھی اور جو لوح محفوظ میں قدیم سے جمع تھا تئیس سال میں نازل ہوا

“The Noble Quran, whose creation was greatly needed by God’s creation (jis ki khalqullah ko bahut zarurat thi) and which was eternally (qadim) collected in the Preserved Tablet, was revealed over twenty-three years.”14

The deliberate selection of the term qadim, i.e., eternal or pre-existent, represents a conscious act of theological positioning, one that bypasses ambiguity and directly situates his doctrine within the lexical and conceptual framework of the historical ghayr makhluq stance by affirming the Quran’s pre-existence before the creation of the temporal universe.

Framing the debate: The central question and its historical symbol

The dense and multi-faceted statement from Hazrat Khalifatul Masih IIra presented in the introduction serves as the primary lens for understanding how the Ahmadi leadership framed this historic debate. By positing the relationship between God’s Speech and God’s Knowledge as the central point of investigation, he demonstrates an acute and theologically precise understanding of the classical debate’s core problematic. His question thus functions as a guide, directing the inquiry towards the specific theological premises upon which the ghayr makhluq position is constructed, for in that historical context, to affirm that Speech is an expression of God’s eternal and uncreated Knowledge is, by logical necessity, to affirm that Speech itself must partake in that same uncreated nature.

The immediate invocation of Imam Ahmad’s persecution within the same breath is not incidental. It frames the ghayr makhluq stance as the one for which the righteous have historically suffered. This veneration is not an isolated reference but a consistent theme. In a separate Friday Sermon, Hazrat Khalifatul Masih IIra again held up the Imam as a heroic exemplar, clarifying his creed with explicit approval:

خلق قرآن کے مسئلہ پر بحث ہوئی تو امام احمد بن حنبل نے مار کھا کر اپنے ہاتھ تڑوا لیے مگر بادشاہ سے دبے نہیں۔ وہ یہی کہتے رہے کہ قرآن مخلوق نہیں مقول ہے۔ یعنی یہ خدا تعالیٰ کا قول ہے۔ کوئی ایسی چیز نہیں جو پیدا کی گئی ہو۔

“When the issue of the createdness of the Quran was debated, Imam Ahmad ibn Hanbal was beaten and had his arms broken, but he did not yield to the king. He kept insisting that the Quran is not created (makhluq nahin), it is Speech (maqul hai). Meaning, it is God Almighty’s Speech, not something that came into existence.”15

The significance of this praise is amplified when, in the next paragraph, he elevates Imam Ahmad to a status akin to the Companionsra of the Prophet Muhammadsa, applying to him the famous hadith that they are like “guiding stars” from whom a world obtains guidance. To consistently lionise the primary historical champion of the ghayr makhluq doctrine and to do so by specifically highlighting his steadfastness on that very issue functions as a powerful rhetorical and theological endorsement.

The Ahmadi position notably avoids the sectarian extremism that characterised the classical debates. The Promised Messiahas explicitly recognised the Mu‘tazila as remaining within the fold of Islam despite their position on this issue:

ولا شك أنهم من المذاهب الإسلامية

“There is no doubt that they are among the Islamic schools.”16

This irenic approach – respecting those who defended the Quran’s uncreated nature while refusing to anathematise those who held different views – distinguishes the Ahmadi position from the mutual excommunications that characterised the classical period.

The theological framework: The Quran as a divine attribute

Holy Quran-Old
Image: Ismaeel Zakariya/Pexels

While the historical framing of the debate demonstrates the high stakes and pious alignment of the Ahmadi position, the intellectual core of the doctrine rests upon a deeper theological principle concerning the nature of God’s attributes (sifa). The explicit statements affirming the Quran’s uncreatedness are not isolated pronouncements but the direct and necessary consequence of this principle, which was articulated with definitive clarity by the Hazrat Khalifatul Masih IIra, when directly questioned on this matter – a format that leaves little room for interpretive ambiguity. His response serves as the foundational premise for the entire argument: that all of God’s attributes are co-eternal with His Essence and are, therefore, not created.

The exchange was as follows:

سوال: خدا کی صفات اس کے ساتھ ہی ازلی ہیں یا پیدا شدہ؟

جواب: صفات الٰہیہ مخلوق نہیں ہیں بلکہ وہ ذات کے ساتھ ہی ازلی ابدی ہیں۔

Question: “Are the attributes of God co-eternal with Him or are they created?”

Answer: “The attributes of God are not created (makhluq nahin hain). Rather, they are co-eternal and co-everlasting (azali abadi hain) with His Essence (dhat).”17

With this axiom established, the argument proceeds by identifying the Quran not as a created object separate from God, but as the tangible manifestation of one of these eternal, inherent attributes – namely, the attribute of Speech (kalam).

This direct application of the doctrine of attributes to the Quran is made most forcefully by Hazrat Khalifatul Masih Ira who, in the creedal statement previously cited, identifies Speech (kalam) as an eternal attribute (sifa) as the very reason for his belief that the Quran is not created.

The logical integrity of this framework, which posits an eternal attribute manifesting in time, depends on resolving a classical theological problem: if Speech is eternal, why is revelation not perpetual? The Promised Messiah’sas writings address this directly by drawing a fine distinction between the permanent suspension of an attribute (ta‘attul dai’mi), which he deems impossible for a perfect Being, and its temporary non-manifestation according to divine will (ta‘attul mi‘adi), which he affirms is permissible. God remains eternally the Speaker, even if He is not revealing new scriptures at every given moment.

He explains this principle in his work Chashma-e-Ma‘rifat:

کسی صفت کے لئے تعطّل دائمی جائز نہیں ہاں تعطّل میعادی جائز ہے

“For any [Divine] attribute, permanent suspension (ta‘attul da’imi) is not permissible, though temporary suspension (ta‘attul mi‘adi) is permissible.”18

This concept directly addresses the core philosophical challenge posed by rationalist theologians like the Mu‘tazila: that an eternal attribute of Speech or Creation would necessitate an eternal audience or an eternal creation, thus implying the existence of other eternal entities alongside God and violating pure monotheism. The Promised Messiah’sas writings answer this objection with a sophisticated distinction between two types of eternality: the eternality of an individual (qadamat-e shakhsi), which he rejects for any created thing, and the eternality of a species or genus (qadamat-e naw‘i), which he affirms. This means that while no single universe or individual soul is co-eternal with God, the genus of creation, in some form, has always existed as a manifestation of God’s eternally active attributes.

The Promised Messiahas explains this as follows:

قدیم سے سلسلہ مخلوق کا اُس کے ساتھ چلا آیا ہے مگر کسی چیز کو اُس کے مقابل پر قدامت شخصی نہیں ہاں قدامت نوعی ہے۔

“From eternity, the chain of creation has run alongside Him, but no thing possesses individual eternality (qadamat-e shakhsi) in opposition to Him, yes, it does possess generic eternality (qadamat-e naw‘i).”19

This doctrine allows for God’s attributes to be eternally active in principle without necessitating that any specific, individual object of those attributes be co-eternal with Him, thereby resolving the apparent philosophical tension and preserving the principle of tawhid.

Resolving the theological status of the ‘Word’ as applied to creation

This rigid theological distinction between the eternal attribute (sifa) and its created result (khalq) provides the necessary framework to resolve a historical polemical objection often levelled against the doctrine of the uncreated Word. Christian theologians, most notably John of Damascus (d. 749), historically argued that if Muslims admit the Word of God (kalam Allah) is uncreated and the Quran acknowledges Jesusas as the “Word of God” (kalimat Allah), then Muslims must logically concede that Jesusas is uncreated and divine.

Foundational Ahmadi texts deconstruct this conflation by distinguishing between the Word as an eternal attribute and the Word as a title for a created entity. The Promised Messiahas argues that if the title “Word of God” implies uncreated divinity, then by the logic of the Quran, all souls would share in this status, for all souls are fundamentally words of command from the realm of amr.

He explains in Izala-e-Auham:

اس جگہ خدائے تعالیٰ نے روح کا نام کلمہ رکھا۔ یہ اس بات کی طرف اشارہ ہے کہ در حقیقت تمام ارواح کلمات اللہ ہی ہیں جو ایک لا یدرک بھید کے طور پر جس کی تہ تک انسان کی عقل نہیں پہنچ سکتی روحیں بن گئی ہیں۔

“Here, God Almighty has named the soul ‘Word’ (kalima). This points to the fact that, in reality, all souls are Words of God (kalimat Allah) which, through an inscrutable mystery that human intellect cannot reach, have become souls.”20

Furthermore, he argues that even entities emerging from the realm of Command (amr) are not the Divine Essence itself but are shadows (zill) or effects of the Command. Here, a crucial distinction must be made between amr as an uncreated Divine Attribute, i.e., the eternal power to Command, and the objects of that Command, i.e., souls or spirits. While the attribute is uncreated, the resultant Spirit is explicitly defined as created (hadith) and a servant of God, possessing no share in divinity.21

If the term “Spirit from Him” (ruh minhu) implied being a part of God’s uncreated essence, then Adamas would have a superior claim to divinity than Jesusas, for the Quran describes the Divine Spirit being breathed directly into Adamas.22

The Promised Messiahas writes:

فيجب أن يكون مقام آدم أرفع منه وأعظم، ويكون آدم أول أبناء ربّ العالمين […]. فإن منطوق الآية يدل علی أن روح الله نزل فی آدم بنزول أجلى

“[T]hen it follows that the status of Adam must be higher and greater than that of Jesus. Adam would be the first of the sons of the Lord of all the worlds […]. The above-mentioned verse indicates that the Spirit of Allah descended into Adam, and that this was a more luminous descent”.23

Hazrat Khalifatul Masih Ira addresses this objection by employing a reductio ad absurdum, noting that in scriptural idiom, the “Word of God” often refers to specific prophecies or commands. If being a “Word” made the recipient uncreated, then the entire creation would lay claim to godhood.

He writes in Ibtal-e uluhiyyat-e Masih:

اگر قرآنی محاورہ سے کسی چیز کا کلمۃ اللہ ہونا اس چیز کے خدا ہونے کی دلیل ہے تو تمام کلمات الہیہ کو چاہئے کہ خدا ہوں […] اگر کوئی چیز کلمۃ اللہ ہونے سے عین اللہ ہو سکتی ہے تو تمام وہ تامہ جملے جو انبیاء علیہم السلام اور ان کے پاک اتباع کو مکالمہ الہیہ اور مخاطبہ ربانیہ سے پہنچے چاہئے کہ وہ سب خدا ہوں۔

“If in the idiom of the Holy Quran something being called the kalimat Allah, ‘the word of Allah’ is an argument in support of that thing being God, then all the words of Allah would have to be God. […] If something could be Allah precisely by virtue of being kalimat Allah, then all those complete sentences that came to the prophets, peace be upon them all, and their holy followers by way of Divine discourse and communications from their Lord, should all be God.”24

He concludes that Jesusas is called “Word” specifically because his birth was the result of a specific verbal prophecy (kalam) delivered to Maryas. In neither case does the recipient of the Command become the Command itself. As Hazrat Khalifatul Masih Ira states in Tasdiq Barahin-e Ahmadiyya, Jesusas remains “His creature (makhluq)”, distinct from the uncreated attribute that brought him into being.25

Addressing nuances and apparent contradictions

The sophistication of the Ahmadi position is demonstrated not merely in its foundational affirmations but in the capacity of its primary sources to address the nuanced questions that arise from the doctrine of an uncreated Quran. The conceptual groundwork for understanding how eternal, uncreated Speech can be received by a temporal, created being is laid by the Promised Messiahas himself. He describes the revelatory process as one that requires the complete suspension of the prophet’s created human faculties to ensure the purity of the divine transmission.

The Promised Messiahas explains this in his work Barahin-e-Ahmadiyya:

خدا کا پاک کلام وہ کلام ہے کہ جو انسانی قویٰ سے بکلی برتر و اعلیٰ ہے۔ […] جس کے ظہور و بروز کے لئے اول شرط یہی ہے کہ بشری قُوَتیں بکلّی مُعطّل اور بیکار ہوں نہ فکر ہو نہ نظر ہو۔ بلکہ انسان مثل میّت کے ہو۔ اور سب اسباب منقطع ہوں اور خدا جس کا وجود واقعی اور حقیقی ہے آپ اپنے کلام کو اپنے خاص ارادہ سے کسی کے دل پر نازل کرے۔

“God’s pure Speech is that Speech which is completely superior and exalted above human faculties. […] The first condition for its appearance and manifestation is that human faculties (bashari quwwaten) be completely suspended (mu‘attal) and useless (be-kar). There should be neither thought (fikr) nor reflection (nazar). Rather, the person should be like a corpse (mithl-e mayyit ke ho) and all means should be cut off. And God, whose existence is real and true, Himself sends down His Speech upon someone’s heart by His special will.”26

This description of the prophet as a passive recipient – “like a corpse” – whose own created faculties of “thought” and “reflection” are rendered “useless,” provides a direct explanation for how uncreated Divine Speech can be received by a created being without being admixed with created human elements. The process itself purifies the channel, ensuring the Speech remains purely divine in its transmission.

This nuanced understanding extends to the mechanics of revelation itself. The founder’s writings bypass the paradox of an eternal entity entering the contingent world by defining the process not as the physical transport of an object but as a purely spiritual influence or manifestation – a process for which he uses the specific theological term tamaththul.

The Promised Messiahas explains in his work A’ina-e-Kamalat-e-Islam:

اگر یہ لوگ اس بات کو قبول کر لیتے کہ کوئی فرشتہ بذات خود ہر گز نازل نہیں ہوتا بلکہ اپنے ظلی وجود سے نازل ہوتا ہے جس کے تمثل کی اس کو طاقت دی گئی ہے […] اور جیسا کہ حضرت مریم کے لئے فرشتہ متمثل ہوا تو کوئی اعتراض پیدا نہ ہوتا

“If these people were to accept that no angel ever descends in its own person, but rather descends through its shadowy existence (zilli wujud), for which it has been given the power of manifestation (tamaththul) […] and just as the angel manifested (mutamaththil hu’a) for Mary, then no objection would arise.”27

This non-physical process is further illustrated with the analogy of the sun, which remains fixed in its station while its light and energy spread across vast distances.

As the Promised Messiahas clarifies:

محققین اہل اسلام ہرگز اس بات کے قائل نہیں کہ ملائک اپنے شخصی وجود کے ساتھ انسانوں کی طرح پیروں سے چل کر زمین پر اترتے ہیں […] اصل بات یہ ہے کہ جس طرح آفتاب اپنے مقام پر ہے اور اُس کی گرمی و روشنی زمین پر پھیل کر اپنے خواص کے موافق زمین کی ہر یک چیز کو فائدہ پہنچاتی ہے اسی طرح روحانیات سماویہ […] اپنے اپنے مقام میں مستقر اور قرار گیر ہے

“The accomplished scholars of Islam are by no means of the view that angels, with their personal existences, descend to the earth walking on their feet like humans. […] The real matter is that, just as the sun is in its place and its heat and light spread over the earth, benefitting every single thing on earth according to its properties, in the same way, the celestial spiritual beings […] are established and settled in their own respective stations.”28

This principled hermeneutic is demonstrated quite convincingly in the direct engagement of Hazrat Khalifatul Masih Ira with a key verse that could be used to argue for the Quran’s createdness: Surah al-Anbiya’, Ch. 21: V. 3, which mentions the arrival of a dhikr muhdath or “new reminder.” Confronted with a term that implies temporal newness, he explicitly rejects the interpretation that this refers to an ontological creation. Instead, he argues that the “newness” pertains only to its phrasing and presentation for a new audience. The justification he provides for this exegesis is the crucial element, for, as seen in the full quotation already presented, he explicitly grounds his interpretation in the foundational doctrine by concluding his reasoning with the decisive clause: “because I consider Speech to be an attribute of God Almighty.” This passage is of singular importance, as it shows the ghayr makhluq doctrine operating not as a passive belief, but as an active, determinative principle of scriptural interpretation, used to resolve textual challenges in a manner that preserves the core theological position on the uncreated nature of divine Speech.

Philosophical reinforcements

The argument’s historical framing is complemented by several deep philosophical reinforcements articulated by the Promised Messiahas, beginning with a position that posits a direct correspondence between the infinite nature of the Creator and the properties of His unmediated Speech, for an effect cannot possess qualities that transcend its cause. The logic is that since the Quran displays limitless wonders, its source cannot be a finite, creative act but must be the infinite Divine Essence itself.

In his work Karamat as-Sadiqin, the Promised Messiahas develops this argument from infinity:

جو چیز غیر محدود قدرت سے وجود پذیر ہوئی ہے اس میں غیر محدود عجائبات اور خواص کا پیدا ہونا ایک لازمی اور ضروری امر ہے […] پس کیونکر قرآن کریم جو خدا تعالی کا پاک کلام ہے صرف ان چند معانی میں محدود ہو گا

“It is a necessary and essential matter that a thing which has come into existence from an infinite Power (ghayr mahdud qudrat) should possess infinite wonders and properties (ghayr mahdud ‘aja’ibat). […] How, then, can the Holy Quran, which is God Almighty’s pure Speech, be limited to only those few meanings?”29

Finally, the founder establishes the high theological stakes of this debate, concluding the very same foundational exposition on amr and khalq that was detailed before with a stern warning against the alternative view. He argues that to categorise Divine Speech as khalq is to effectively reduce it to the level of human thought, a reduction that leads to a grave theological error bordering on disbelief (kufr), for it implies that the infinite knowledge of God can be fully contained within the finite vessel of the human mind – an implication which is, in its essence, a claim to divinity.

He explains this critical point in Barahin-e-Ahmadiyya:

اس سے زیادہ تر اور کیا کفر ہو گا کہ انسان ایسا خیال کرے کہ جس قدر خدا کے پاس خزائن علم و حکمت اور اسرار غیب ہیں وہ سب ہمارے ہی دل میں موجود ہیں اور ہمارے ہی دل سے جوش مارتے ہیں۔پس دوسرے لفظوں میں اس کا خلاصہ تو یہی ہوا کہ حقیقت میں ہم ہی خدا ہیں

“What greater disbelief (kufr) could there be than for a person to imagine that all the treasures of knowledge, wisdom and unseen mysteries that God possesses are present within our own heart and gush forth from our own heart? In other words, its summary is just this: that in reality, we ourselves are God.”30

This concluding argument frames the ghayr makhluq position not merely as a preferred opinion, but as a necessary safeguard for the absolute transcendence of God and the core principle of pure monotheism (tawhid).

Conclusion

The cumulative weight of the textual evidence, drawn directly from the writings of the Promised Messiahas and his immediate Successors, presents a clear and internally consistent theological position regarding the nature of the Quran. This position is built upon a foundational metaphysical distinction between the unmediated Divine Command (amr) and the realm of mediated creation (khalq), it is substantiated by direct, creedal affirmations of the Quran’s uncreated (ghayr makhluq) and eternal (qadim) nature and it is rooted in the theological principle that the Quran is the manifestation of an uncreated divine attribute (sifa) of Speech. The doctrine’s integrity is maintained through sophisticated resolutions to apparent philosophical and textual challenges – including the differentiation between the eternal attribute of Speech and its created recipients – as well as concepts such as generic eternality (qadamat-e naw‘i) and the temporary suspension of divine attributes (ta‘attul mi‘adi).

This entire intellectual structure is further reinforced by a consistent historical alignment with the traditionalist camp, evidenced by a distinct veneration for Imam Ahmad ibn Hanbal, and is ultimately presented as a necessary bulwark for safeguarding the absolute transcendence of God. This comprehensive theological edifice stands in direct opposition to the statement reported by AJ Arberry, suggesting that the comment from the imam of the London mosque may have represented a misunderstanding or an incomplete articulation of a complex doctrine – perhaps mistaking the contingent nature of the Quran’s temporal manifestation for a denial of the uncreated nature of its essential, divine reality. The textual record itself, however, remains unambiguous, demonstrating that the Ahmadi position upholds the doctrine of the uncreated Quran not merely as a point of classical dogma, but as a necessary consequence of its understanding of divine unity, action and revelation.

Endnotes

1.  A. J. Arberry, Religion in the Middle East: Three Religions in Concord and Conflict (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1969), Vol. 2, p. 352.

2.  Hazrat Mirza Bashir-ud-Din Mahmud Ahmad, Fada’il al-Quran, in: Id., Anwar-ul-Ulum (Qadian: Nazarat-e Nashr-o-Ishaʻat, 2008), Vol. 10, p. 503. It is historically noted that while Huzoor’sra statement speaks of the Imam having “passed away”, Imam Ahmad in fact survived the ordeal. He endured 28 months of imprisonment and torture, was eventually released and resumed his teaching for many years before his death in 241/855.

3.  Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, Barahin-e Ahmadiyya: Part 3, in: Id., Ruhani Khazain (Farnham: Islam International Publications, 2021), Vol. 1, p. 235.

4.  Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, Surma-e Chashm-e Arya, in: Id., Ruhani Khazain (Farnham: Islam International Publications, 2021), Vol. 2, pp. 175-176.

5.  This formulation appears at least eight times throughout the Quran, for instance, Surah Ya Sin, Ch. 36: V. 83.

6.  Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, Malfuzat (Farnham: Islam International Publications, 2022), Vol. 5, p. 75.

7.  Surah al-Anbiya’, Ch. 21: V. 70.

8.  Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, ibid., pp. 182-183.

9.  Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, Barahin-e Ahmadiyya: Part 3, ibid.

10.  Surah al-A‘raf, Ch. 7: V. 55.

11.  Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, Surma-e Chashm-e Arya, ibid., p. 176.

12.  Hazrat Hakeem Noor-ud-Deen, Irshadat-e Nur (Rabwah: Nazarat-e Isha‘at, 2015), Vol. 2, p. 456.

13.  Hazrat Hakeem Noor-ud-Deen, Tasdiq Barahin-e Ahmadiyya (Rabwah: Nazarat-e Isha‘at, 2015), p. 182.

14.  Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, A’ina-e-Kamalat-e-Islam, in: Id., Ruhani Khazain (Farnham: Islam International Publications, 2021), Vol. 5, p. 306.

15.  Hazrat Mirza Bashir-ud-Din Mahmud Ahmad, Khutbat-e Mahmud (Rabwah: Fazl-e Umar Foundation, 2017), Vol. 38, p. 152.

16.  Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, Itmam al-Hujja, in: Id., Ruhani Khaza’in (Farnham: Islam International Publications, 2021), Vol. 8, p. 279.

17.  Hazrat Mirza Bashir-ud-Din Mahmud Ahmad, Farmudat-e Musleh-e Maud: Darbarah Fiqhi Masa’il (Rabwah: Nazarat-e Isha‘at, 2013), p. 3.

18.  Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, Chashma-e-Ma‘rifat, in: Id., Ruhani Khaza’in (Farnham: Islam International Publications, 2021), Vol. 23, p. 272.

19.  Ibid.

20.  Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, Izala-e-Auham, in: Id., Ruhani Khaza’in (Farnham: Islam International Publications, 2021), Vol. 3, p. 333.

21.  Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, Surma-e Chashm-e Arya, ibid., p. 173.

22.  Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, Nur-ul-Haqq: Part 1, in: Id., Ruhani Khaza’in (Farnham: Islam International Publications, 2021), Vol. 8, pp. 135-136.

23.  Ibid.

24.  Hazrat Hakeem Noor-ud-Deen, Ibtal-e uluhiyyat-e Masih (Qadian: Matba‘-e Diya’ ad-Din, 1904), pp. 19-20.

25.  Hazrat Hakeem Noor-ud-Deen, Tasdiq Barahin-e Ahmadiyya (Rabwah: Nazarat-e Isha‘at, 2015), p. 183.

26.  Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, Barahin-e Ahmadiyya: Part 3, ibid., p. 236.

27.  Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, A’ina-e-Kamalat-e-Islam, ibid., p. 96.

28.  Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, Taudih-e Maram, in: Id., Ruhani Khaza’in (Farnham: Islam International Publications, 2021), Vol. 3, pp. 66-68.

29.  Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, Karamat as-Sadiqin, in: Id., Ruhani Khaza’in (Farnham: Islam International Publications, 2021), Vol. 7, p. 60.

30.  Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, Barahin-e Ahmadiyya: Part 3, ibid., p. 237.

‘Never give up; do not lose hope’: Khuddam from US West Coast meet Huzoor

0
Mulaqat Khuddam from US West Coast

Islamabad, Tilford, 11 January 2026: A delegation of khuddam from the West Coast of the USA had the blessed opportunity of a mulaqat with Hazrat Mirza Masroor Ahmad, Khalifatul Masih Vaa.

The mulaqat commenced as Huzooraa graced the hall with his presence and extended his salaam. The amir-e-qafilah introduced the group, explaining that the khuddam hailed from two Regions of Majlis Khuddam-ul-Ahmadiyya USA, namely Southwest and Northwest, representing cities such as Seattle, Sacramento, Silicon Valley, Phoenix, San Diego and largely from Los Angeles.

Following this, each khadim had the opportunity to introduce himself. During the introductions, Huzooraa engaged with the members. To a khadim of Indonesian heritage who introduced himself in Urdu but admitted his proficiency was limited, Huzooraa encouraged him, saying he could learn the language. Upon meeting a kidney specialist, Huzooraa advised him to dedicate time to waqf-e-arzi in one of the Jamaat’s hospitals. Another khadim, serving as the General Secretary of the Los Angeles Jamaat, conveyed the salaam of his entire Jamaat, to which Huzooraa graciously responded with prayers.

After the introductions, the khuddam were granted permission to ask questions.

Finding hope after loss

A khadim shared a deeply personal struggle, explaining that he and his wife had suffered the heartbreak of two miscarriages. He expressed that the pain was intense and they were both afraid to try again despite being young and healthy. He sought Huzoor’saa guidance on how to find the hope to try again.

Huzooraa listened to him and enquired about the details, asking if they had any children, to which the khadim replied in the negative. Huzooraa asked about the medical care they were receiving and the khadim confirmed they were under the supervision of doctors.

Huzooraa acknowledged the severity of the pain, noting that it is especially difficult for a mother to bear such loss. However, he advised the couple to “never give up and never lose hope”. He urged them to pray to Allah the Almighty, assuring them that Allah would help them, insha-Allah. Huzooraa graciously instructed the khadim to inform him when his wife conceives next, offering to send homoeopathic medicine if they wished. He concluded with a prayer that Allah may bless them with a healthy, long-living child.

Dealing with the grief of losing a parent

A khadim spoke about the loss of his father a few years prior, mentioning how deeply connected his father was to the Jamaat, even during illness. He expressed that he missed him dearly and often wished he could ask him questions. He asked how to navigate these feelings of sadness.

Huzooraa advised him to reflect on his father’s character, his service to the Jamaat and his conduct with people, all of which the khadim admired. He reminded him that he knew his father’s desires and wishes for his children. Therefore, the best way to comfort his father’s soul in Paradise is to try to fulfil those pious wishes and follow in his footsteps of good character and conduct. Huzooraa also advised him to continue praying for his father.

Overcoming shyness and gaining confidence

A 15-year-old khadim stated that being an introvert, he finds it difficult to interact with people at school and at the mosque.

Huzooraa encouraged him to build confidence. He explained that the issue was not a dislike for interaction, but rather shyness. Huzooraa stressed that an Ahmadi must be confident. Without confidence and proper exposure, one cannot interact effectively with people, which hinders the duty of tabligh and preaching. Huzooraa advised him to specifically pray during his salat that Allah removes this weakness and grants him the confidence to speak to people properly.

Wisdom of Prophets vs intellect of scientists

A question was raised regarding whether the wisdom of Prophets or the Khulafa could be compared to the IQ of scientists like Albert Einstein and how one can prove the superiority of spiritual wisdom.

Huzooraa explained that there is a fundamental difference. Prophets are guided by Allah the Almighty in every respect. The Khulafa, while guided, can sometimes make minor errors in judgement; however, Allah ensures that such mistakes do not harm the Jamaat and ultimately brings about a good end or rectifies the matter.

Regarding scientists, Huzooraa noted that their intellect and capacity for hard work are also blessings from Allah. Through the law of nature, anyone, religious or not, who uses their God-given mind and strives will achieve results. However, there are also scientists who are religious, such as the Nobel Laureate Dr Abdus Salam, who stated that he found guidance for his research in the hundreds of verses of the Holy Quran. Huzooraa explained that two laws are at work: the law of nature, which rewards effort with results and the law of sharia, which brings both religious blessings and the fruits of one’s labour.

Judgement after death

A khadim asked if a person is judged immediately upon death or if they must wait until the Day of Judgement.

Huzooraa clarified that judgement begins immediately. A person who does good deeds enters a state of Paradise upon death, though not the ultimate station, while those who do evil enter a state of punishment.

Huzooraa explained that on the Day of Judgement, Allah will call the souls again for the final decision. Those who were already rewarded will be granted a higher status. For those who have received their punishment, Allah may choose to forgive some and admit them into Paradise, while others may require further punishment in another stage of Hell. Huzooraa referred the khadim to The Philosophy of the Teachings of Islam by the Promised Messiahas for a detailed understanding, noting that he had also answered this question in detail in a previous issue of Al Hakam.

The joy of children’s letters

A khadim asked what aspect of the letters Huzooraa receives from children brings him the greatest joy.

Huzooraa smiled and remarked that sometimes he does not even fully understand what the very young children are trying to say, as they have only scribbled some lines on the paper, but he appreciates them by praying for them. He expressed happiness that so many children write to him to share their sentiments. Even when a child writes just a few lines and the parents provide an interpretation – whether accurate or their own – Huzooraa feels joy that the children are attached to the Jamaat, have respect for it, ask for prayers and believe in Allah. He reiterated his advice to parents to maintain a close, interactive relationship with their children, especially as they reach the age of 15 or 16, to ensure they remain connected to the Jamaat.

Parenting through difficult ages

Huzooraa was asked which age of his own children he found most difficult to handle as a parent.

Huzooraa replied that he did not find any situation particularly difficult. He explained that if parents have a good relationship with their children, the children will follow their guidance. Children should have the confidence that their parents are their friends who will listen to them and help overcome their challenges. If this confidence is established, training them is not difficult at any age. However, Huzooraa noted that after the age of 15, the environment can cause children to deviate from basic Islamic morality. At this stage, parents should keep a closer watch while maintaining a friendly relationship.

Staying away from evil as a teenager

A young teenager asked how he could avoid the evils that are easy to fall into and remain steadfast in faith.

Huzooraa stated that since the khadim already knows the difference between good and bad, he can try to avoid the bad. He advised him to read the Holy Quran, study Jamaat literature and listen to the Friday sermons to reinforce this knowledge.

Huzooraa emphasised that offering the five daily prayers sincerely is the key protection, as Allah promises that prayer saves one from indecency. Satan has vowed to mislead people, but by praying, “O Allah, keep me on the right path,” Allah will protect them. This is why we recite “اِہۡدِنَا الصِّرَاطَ الۡمُسۡتَقِیۡمَ” repeatedly in Surah al-Fatihah. Huzooraa also advised using one’s intellect, avoiding bad company – especially friends involved in addictions – and not wasting time on screens.

Career guidance for waqifeen-e-nau

A waqif-e-nau khadim asked what career path he should pursue if not becoming a murabbi and which career allows one to serve the Jamaat the most.

Huzooraa reiterated that waqifeen-e-nau can enter any field – medicine, teaching, engineering, law – that they find appropriate. When the khadim asked which career best serves the Jamaat, Huzooraa explained that one can serve the Jamaat in any capacity and field, provided one has the determination to do so. One should not later use their career as an excuse to say they are too busy for Jamaat work. Upon learning that the khadim was better at computer science than science subjects, Huzooraa advised him to pursue computer science.

Conclusion

At the conclusion of the mulaqat, the amir-e-qafilah expressed gratitude to Huzooraa for his kindness and hospitality towards the khuddam from the US. He then requested, beloved Huzooraa, to also visit America so that they may have the honour of hosting him. Huzooraa responded with a smile.

The group then had the honour of a photograph with Huzooraa, after which Huzooraa took his leave.

(Summary prepared by Al Hakam)

‘The Citadel of Security’: The purpose of the advent of the Promised Messiah

Meekail Ahmed, Student, Jamia Ahmadiyya Canada
Masjid-Aqsa-Qadian-sketch. Promised Messiah-
Image: Library

In 1905, Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmadas, the Promised Messiah and Mahdi, wrote:

ہیں درندے ہر طرف میں عافیت کا ہوں حصار

“Wild beasts abound in every direction – I am the Citadel of Security.” (Barahin-e-Ahmadiyya Part V [English], p. 203)

In a world often characterised by anguish, chaos and disorder, the pursuit of inner peace becomes an invaluable endeavour. The metaphorical “beasts” that surround us represent the various external factors, ranging from societal pressures to global crises, that threaten our tranquillity.

The concept of a “Citadel of Security” stands as an ideal, an aspiration and a beacon of hope. The term evokes the image of a sanctuary, a place where harmony, cooperation, and understanding reign supreme. The Promised Messiahas and his teachings are a citadel of peace in this day and age needed to combat religious crises, to find a solution for global crises and for self-realisation and identity.

Throughout human history, doctrines and ideologies have played a pivotal role in shaping societies. However, one undeniable truth is that teachings change over time. Teachings are often subject to interpretation and communities seek to apply them to new contexts and situations. As the human mind keeps evolving, the real essence of the teachings might get lost. People always start to divide based on their interpretations while rejecting others.

The same can be seen in the history of Islam, as the Holy Prophetsa said, “And my Ummah will split into 73 sects. All of them are in the Fire except one sect.” (Jami‘ at-Tirmidhi, Hadith 2641)

Each different sect interprets Islam and its teachings in its own way and has developed enmity for each other. Though they say there are more than one billion Muslims in the world, they call each other infidels and disagree with one another in ideology. Mullahs have directed people to extremism and they have diverted some people away from the true religion. They use this as a tool for their own purposes and to keep people with them. The best way to sell your product is under the umbrella of religion. The Promised Messiahas states:

“It should be remembered that today’s Islamic scholars (who are called maulavis) completely misunderstand jihad and misrepresent it to the general public. The public’s violent instincts are inflamed as a result and they are stripped of all noble human virtues. This is in fact what has happened. […] May God bring these ignorant maulavis back to the right path. They have misled the populace into believing that the keys to Paradise lie in beliefs that are oppressive, cruel and completely immoral.” (The British Government and Jihad, pp. 8 and 13)

So-called Islamic ideologies, which are led by clerics, have gone towards a very extreme side, which is not the true image of Islam. Due to these statements, Islam is being attacked from every side. In this very age, God made sure to protect Islam by sending the Messiah to strengthen the walls of Islam. As the Promised Messiahas writes:

“Reason requires that in this time of peril when forces of opposition have erupted in the world and the internal condition of Muslims has seriously deteriorated, some reformer should appear to repel the mischief of the cross and to purify the internal condition of Muslims.” (Tohfah Golarhviah, Ruhani Khazain, Vol. 17, p. 129; Essence of Islam, Vol. 4, p. 190)

Even though Islam had been perfected, the real teachings were lost and a reformer was needed to bring the truth to light. The evolution of teachings through reform is an integral part of human intellectual and spiritual development. Reformers, driven by deep understanding and moral courage, reshape teachings to address contemporary needs and challenges.

Self-realisation and identity are fundamental aspects of human existence, shaping our understanding of who we are, what we value and how we navigate the world. The journey towards self-realisation involves discovering our authentic selves, understanding our values and beliefs, and aligning our actions with our inner truths. Especially during this day and age, when people are going away from God and trying to find pleasure in worldly pursuits, people are forgetting their true purpose in life.

Thus, a lot of people question if God is real and if one can reach Him. The Promised Messiahas beautifully explained how the Holy Prophetsa brought a change in his society through the true teachings of Islam. He states:

“None but the Holy Prophetsa could have brought about this great reformation. He taught human values to people who were savages and brutes. In other words, he transformed brutes into men, men into civilised men, and civilised men into godly men. He infused spiritual qualities into them and established their communion with the True God.” (Lecture Sialkot, p. 6)

How did this great phenomenon occur? Firstly, it was due to his fervent prayers. Secondly, people saw a great example of a godly person in the character of the Holy Prophetsa. As the Promised Messiahas brought a true spiritual reformation for mankind, his writings have helped people to be fortified from the evils of this world. When a person truly becomes aware of their Creator and truly finds peace in this citadel, they can connect with their Creator and find their true identity.

The world today faces an array of interconnected global crises. The enormity of these challenges often leaves individuals feeling powerless, as if they alone cannot make a significant impact. However, history has shown that the power of individuals and their communities, when driven by passion, determination and a vision for change, can indeed be a catalyst for addressing and even stopping global crises.

Most global crises arise due to the immoral values or actions of a group or society or due to a certain mindset of people. When the Holy Prophetsa first migrated to Medina, his first action was to create a charter of Medina to ensure that everyone lived in peace. Huzooraa stated:

“The Holy Prophetsa immediately stated that it was essential that they all lived together in peace and harmony, and so he proposed a covenant of peace between them. According to the terms of this treaty, each group and each tribe were given their due rights. The lives and wealth of all parties were guaranteed, and any preexisting inter-tribal customs were also respected.” (Keynote Address at the 11th National Peace Symposium, 8 November 2014)

When people truly understand the rights they owe to their fellow human beings, societies can truly prosper. As Huzooraa states:

“The founder of the Ahmadiyya Muslim community has also taught us that the majority of Muslims and non-Muslims have forgotten their fundamental teachings and have gone far away from God. This growing distance from God and religion is increasing the restlessness in the hearts of people.

“And he said that he had come, therefore, to remove such distance so that the rights of God may be discharged and the rights of God’s creation may also be discharged with feelings of love and sympathy. When these teachings are acted upon, then we will observe real peace; otherwise, agitation will once again bring about utter destruction in the world.” (Keynote Address at the 7th National Peace Symposium, 20 March 2010)

When people stray away from the true purpose of their creation, great problems arise. A true reformer is needed to fortify societies and their real teachings. The Promised Messiahas, driven by moral conviction and resilience, inspired the communities to address pressing global issues. Communities, in turn, provide support, shared goals and collective action to amplify the impact of individuals.

God Almighty has sent a reformer who truly was a “Citadel of Security” in time of peril. Through his teachings, the Promised Messiahas abolished extremism and brought out the true face of Islam, displayed various solutions for global crises and helped people find the true purpose of our creation and identity.

Since the time of the Promised Messiahas, society has gone through many problems and situations, from economic crises to one’s endeavour for truth. People need a philosophy, teaching or an ideology that can save them from this land of “beasts” and bring them into a citadel of peace. Every answer can be found in the teachings of Islam as explained by the Promised Messiahas, and coming to him, people can find true protection.